Is Fla move off 3- significant?

[ces]

Read somewhere that if a line moves from 7- to 8, it usually means no love for the dog(and no cover). And it seems the moves in the bowl games have generally been correct (Miss., ND, Tulsa come to mind).

Was wondering if anyone considered move off 3- something more than public pounding?

 

[Woodson]

It's at 5 now.... :scared

 

[Theboundbook]

Read somewhere that if a line moves from 7- to 8, it usually means no love for the dog(and no cover). And it seems the moves in the bowl games have generally been correct (Miss., ND, Tulsa come to mind).

Was wondering if anyone considered move off 3- something more than public pounding?

from 2.5 in many places is what it started at. I think the line goes to 6 by tomorrow!

 

[Theboundbook]

from 2.5 in many places is what it started at. I think the line goes to 6 by tomorrow!

Yep at 6 and 69 already!!!!

 

[ces]

My initial point about move seems moot now. Next question is 4- pt. swing from initial opening too much or maybe not enuf to keep people off Fla. Okla and Stoops aren't getting much respect.

FWIW, I'm on Fla at even $ through various ML parlays. Wasn't going to hedge but also never thought I"d get Okla on ML at 190 or better.

Bound, or anyone, have you seen %'s. Got to be more than 80% on Fla.

 

[CWood97]

Was wondering if anyone considered move off 3- something more than public pounding?

I think it is due to a public pounding but the move to 6 clearly indicates that the books are not at all comfortable with exposure they have out there right now. If this thing sat at 3, I'd be a lot more comfortable playing OU.

IMO the books are ripe for a giant bath in this one.

 

[ces]

I think it is due to a public pounding but the move to 6 clearly indicates that the books are not at all comfortable with exposure they have out there right now. If this thing sat at 3, I'd be a lot more comfortable playing OU.

IMO the books are ripe for a giant bath in this one.

Good point. I keep thinking about Tulsa and BSU.