israel should wipe out the palestinians

[TheCooler]

what in the world is wrong with these people :

Palestinian youths wear head bands from the militant group Hamas during a rally in the village of Salem, just outside the northern West Bank town of Nablus, Friday, Jan. 14, 2005. The arabic text on the head band reads 'There is no God but Allah and Mohammed is his prophet'.

 

[TheCooler]

Palestinian masked militants from Hamas burn a mock Israeli bus during a rally in the village of Salem, just outside the northern West Bank town of Nablus, Friday, Jan. 14, 2005

 

[Master Capper]

Israel would mark their end of existence if they wiped out anyone in the Middle East!

 

[danmurphy jr]

In a NY minute and drag their benefactors(US) with them

 

[RAYMOND]

its going to happen sooner or later ! get them first why wait!

nuke them all and get it over! crazy statement but true

 

[RAYMOND]

what in the world is wrong with these people :

Palestinian youths wear head bands from the militant group Hamas during a rally in the village of Salem, just outside the northern West Bank town of Nablus, Friday, Jan. 14, 2005. The arabic text on the head band reads 'There is no God but Allah and Mohammed is his prophet'.

this picture tell it all
:sadwave:

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

"Israel would mark their end of existence if they wiped out anyone in the Middle East!"

"In a NY minute and drag their benefactors(US) with them"

Really would you share with us just who in middle east could accomplish this feat?

 

[danmurphy jr]

Iran - China - Russia - Syria - North Korea and any Islamic entity.
Good thread though, the attitude gives credibility to the Bible prediction of a World War in July 05. The United States is bankrupt and can not defeat a partisan army. George Washington predicted this in the late 18th century.

 

[gardenweasel]

unfortunately,the real ending to this tragedy will be when some terrorist group feels that their hateful vendetta towards israel is more important than the lives of their fellow muslims.......

and acquire some sort of dirty bomb or biological weapon......unleash it on isreal and kill a good many palestinians in the process....

"The United States is bankrupt and can not defeat a partisan army"....

dan....where can i get what you`re smoking?

israel has the military wherewithal to basically smash any particular arab country if they so chose to..."the war" proved that....

if the reverse were true.....if there were an arab power with that kind of military superiority.....and the u.s. stepped away,how long do you think israel would exist?

not very long,i`d say.....

i think israel shows incredible restraint considering they exist surrounded by their enemies....enemies that if they had the ability,would exterminate them in a heartbeat.....

that is part of the reason why the proliferation of nuclear weapons in the middle east is such an important issue.....and part of the reason why we erred on the verification of wmd`s when iraq refused full compliance with the u.n. monitors.......

 

[danmurphy jr]

I would hope that's a stretch but it's a shuddering thought.My layman's take is that this beef is between the 2 factions and like Northern Ireland, something could be hacked out.

 

[RAYMOND]

we have 7000 nukes in stock

 

[RAYMOND]

muslims country don't care palestinians or there own people anyway

 

[RAYMOND]

is the world comning to a end i think so look at whether look at the world in a whole , GOD IS PISS OFF AT MAN KIND

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

"Iran - China - Russia - Syria - North Korea and any Islamic entity"

Iran and Syria could not remotely faze them if they joined forces.
China and Russia would join us if they HAD to make a choiceas the have no love for Islamic extremist themselves.

Isreal? NK would be total mismatch. The only ally we have that NK is any threat to is SK and Japan. NK bark is MUCH worse than abiliity to bite--greatest threat they are is selling weapons.

on the matter of the subject I think Isreal is doing exactly what they need to do and not retaliate till new Palestine leader is sworn in. Give him chance for peace. If he turns out to be another Arafat, build the wall completely including existing entrances and seperate these killers with only opp to fight among them selves.

 

[MrChristo]

I would hope that's a stretch but it's a shuddering thought.My layman's take is that this beef is between the 2 factions and like Northern Ireland, something could be hacked out.

The new Palistinian leader (Arafat's successor) favours diplomacy over violence.
He has actually denounced violence in the region....and he was voted in in free, democratic elections.


is the world comning to a end i think so look at whether look at the world in a whole , GOD IS PISS OFF AT MAN KIND

Oh dear....And it's the same people who laugh and take the piss out of Muslim's and Buhdist's for saying the earthquake/tsunami was 'Gods' fault!

 

[Master Capper]

Israel in no way could withstand attacks by the vast majority of the middle east if they were to aggresively take out a large portion of one of the other countries.You have to understand that Israel is a tiny little country and except for the east coast is surrounded thus the borders would have to be sealed which is virtually impossible. As we have seen by our own error of going into Iraq for false reasons these people are no longer incapable of of waging a guerilla warfare and while Israel is no doubt one of the worlds greatest battlers when it comes to fighting terror, the amount of terror that would unflod would be nearly 1000 times greater than what they have faced in the past. A sleeping giant in this whole affair is Egypt they have been playing the role of a peaceful nation but it has been projected that they are very close to having nuk capabilities, moreso than any of the other countries in that arena of the world. While there is no doubt that we would come to Israel's aid and we should, but one has to wonder just how effective our forces would be spread out throughout the middle east. Initially Israel and the US would put down any aggresive attakers but this would be a prolonged battle that would be full of losses for the Americans and Israel and would also make us defenseless in other parts of the world. I agree with Raymond, it's only a matter of time before Iran and Egypt have nuk capabilities with Syria having a outside chance. The problem with nuking them now is that we would also be causing our allies in that region hardship and deaths with the fallout such as Turkey, Qatar, Yemen etc...and also how much damage would this do to the oil supply that are whole economy is based on?

 

[TheCooler]

mark my words. israel will eliminate the nuclear site iran is building sometime this year.

 

[danmurphy jr]

July 2005

 

[gardenweasel]

mc...you make the argument yourself for taking extraordinary measures to keep wmd`s out of the hands of radical or unstable middle eastern governments.... of which egypt is not one...

and of course,your argument is flawed in it`s initial premise....

israel has no intention of "attacking the middle east" unless they are threatened...and the only way they are threatened is if unstable,violent,radical islamist leaders are able to acquire.....or are in the process of acquiring nuclear weapons....certainly iran doesn`t need nuclear power....while a major portion of the world`s energy supply flows underneath their sandals....

israel has nuclear weapons....they have not used them....even when saddam launched scuds into their country during his removal from kuwait by the u.n....

they sat on their hands...

they do not want more war...if the balance of power in the middle east shifts....i.e. the iraq``s,iran`s,syria`s acquire the ultimate weapon,just how much more unstable do you think this volatile region will become? .....

exponentially more unstable...

and not just to israel..and not just to our economy......but the world`s economy....if our economy collapses,does anyone think the rest of the world won`t be affected?.....

china`s(now a huge middle eastern oil customer )budding economy and industrial revolution would die....

it`s in everybody`s best interests to keep the status quo in the middle east.....

that`s why the u.n....whose leaders appear more interested in lining their pockets than securing the world`s economy and keeping the middle east dormant,are a very scary bunch.....

they seem to be extremely shortsighted...

which is why i can`t for the life of me understand why the u.n. isn`t more interested in nipping the iranian situation in the bud....

unless,of course,the payoffs are in progress as they were in iraq....

if there is some sort of major conflict in the middle east....and iran had wmd`s,there will be no more israel....make no mistake.....

and my guess is a major portion of iran will be uninhabitable for around 100 years....maybe a good portion of the middle east...

how can any clear thinking entity not see that this scenario can never be allowed to happen?....

how we could afford to ignore the iraq situation...not knowing whether they actually had wmd`s(and nobody knew for sure....saddam blocked the inspectors time and again).....knowing the potential holocaust that could result...

the war is a mess...but you just can`t ignore the fact that there was some rationale for removing saddam....

was it a mistake?...we may never know.....

and it`s not the same situation as n.korea....the ramifications for nuclear war in the middle east are 10 fold more catastrophic than a conflagration in the pacific....there are no indications that the n.koreans can reach the west coast with any sort of nuclear weapon...and that WOULD indeed be suicide for them...

japan could disappear....s.korea .too...but i don`t think china will allow n. korea to shit in their backyard...not while n.korea basically exists on aid from china...

and i don`t mean to dismiss the peril to japan and s.korea...it just doesn`t present the same ramifications as a full blown middle eastern conflict...

 

[SixFive]

dan, I'd like to know where in the Bible war is predicted in July '05. Please post that for me. Thanks.