It's a shame...
- Thread starter Jord20
- Start date
The 5 yard penalty on running into the kicker was a huge miscall...that was absolutely a personal foul and would have given Wisky first and ten in great field position...surprised more was not made of the non call...unless of course Herby and Mushberger had $$$ on Stanford 
Wisconsin is not a top 50 team I don't think. Stanford STINKS!
I'm not even that bitter about the loss either. I didn't even have a big play on it.
I'm not even that bitter about the loss either. I didn't even have a big play on it.
It's pretty subjective for sure. Just my opinion. I was looking to fade Stanford huge. Wisconsin was just not the team to do it with
Didn't help spotting them 14 to start the game, they played them pretty tough, I still lost, but the way the game started I was surprised we had a chance.
- Sep 7, 2006
- 5,066
- 760
- 113
I needed stanford -6.5 for 1500 and I'm not upset either..Just thought they would be up for the game more..They are MUCH better than what they showed..If you don't see that then I'm sorry bro..
I wanted a wisky win not only for the money but curt phillips is from my hometown watched him play high school ball and he is a class act for a young man and played his ass off i think he cooda done more if they wood had let him but still proud of him !
Seem pretty bitter to me.. To say Stanford stinks is just being plain bitter or uneducated. Better luck in the future.
Are you drunk?
I would love to see your list of the 50+ teams that are better than Wisconsin. :mj07:
SoCalYo said:
Lol. Uneducated I guess. Not bitter at all. I appreciate the good luck wishes. I need it. Lol.
Anyway, like I said, I don't know why I even make posts like this because it is so subjective. My point was only that I thought Stanford was a mediocre football team and wanted to fade them badly until I realized they would be playing an Alvarez led Badger team in the Rose. After watching the game, I felt I had the right read on this team. Just not very good. My only ounce of bitterness is that Stanford didn't have a tougher matchup - for money purposes only.
It's a good program and their success this year, despite my opinion of them is quite impressive
Hashish said:
Sober as can be.
Not bored enough to try and compile a list. I'm not sure if that was hyperbole or not. Def not top 30. Definitely not
I don't think you can say definitely. Maybe they aren't. No way are they outside the top 50 though. There would be some real laughs when it came time to read your 30-50 section of the liist.
I don't think this is that crazy of a statement...wisky was not in the top 25 in the ap poll or the bcs coming in
thomas_howard said:
Of course it's not. I can get to 30 no problem. That's why I said definitely not in top 30. This is an average, average football team.
ejthree said:
I think they didn't play well because they are easy to defend.
I love Oregon. Very bad matchup for KState, in my humble opinion. Stanford, on the other hand, was a tough matchup for Oregon. I was on Stanford large in that game
- Sep 7, 2006
- 5,066
- 760
- 113
