Jord last week

rocky mountain

Registered User
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
Sep 24, 2005
8,571
2,473
113
Jags -115 1H pk 5x
Then Josh 2nd half. Don't blame you, GL! Below doesn't take into account playoff all out stype and Josh rushing. But starts slow.

In the 2025 NFL season, Allen's situational stats highlight this discrepancy:
Metric 1st Half2nd Half
Passer Rating90.8117.5
Completion %65.2%73.2%
Passing Yards1,5092,172
Passing TDs1024
Interceptions65
 

rocketrubly

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,372
420
83
Sacramento, CA
Trevor hit the logo in the middle of the field on 3rd and 6. closest Jax player.

Apparently not. Maybe give credit for following analytics so if you make the same decision a million times you will come out ahead.
But I don't agree. So many times if you take the points at the end of the game it would win the game or put you in a much better situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redsfann

jdg226

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 21, 2017
780
75
28
3rd and 2 over 47.6
47.6% off what? Getting the first down? Getting a TD from that location? Even if they get the first down no guarantee of TD. I understand the analytics perspective and certainly respect you and those who follow. However, it's not blackjack where you can have many opportunities to follow the numbers. Seen way too many scenarios like we just saw.
 

boomer1

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 27, 2008
3,933
1,483
113
Birmingham Al
47.6% off what? Getting the first down? Getting a TD from that location? Even if they get the first down no guarantee of TD. I understand the analytics perspective and certainly respect you and those who follow. However, it's not blackjack where you can have many opportunities to follow the numbers. Seen way too many scenarios like we just saw.
My guess is he play over 46.5 when it was 3rd and 2 but I may be wrong. Bc he was looking for an over opp
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jord20 and ripken8

BMONEY83

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 25, 2009
2,410
327
83
Not really. I like when they do well when i don’t have 5 figs against. So i have no joy for this one tbh
47.6% off what? Getting the first down? Getting a TD from that location? Even if they get the first down no guarantee of TD. I understand the analytics perspective and certainly respect you and those who follow. However, it's not blackjack where you can have many opportunities to follow the numbers. Seen way too many scenarios like we just saw.
 

rocketrubly

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,372
420
83
Sacramento, CA
The FG luck almost becoming funny
So, we don't take the 3 points for the tie
we have the left tackle false start to cost 10 seconds
we get a lucky break by putting 1 second back on clock and give the kicker that has the 2 longest FG in NFL history miss a 54 yard FG.

Just to add to the packers.
 

Jord20

Sharp
Forum Member
Jun 27, 2002
46,287
7,960
113
Chicago, IL
47.6% off what? Getting the first down? Getting a TD from that location? Even if they get the first down no guarantee of TD. I understand the analytics perspective and certainly respect you and those who follow. However, it's not blackjack where you can have many opportunities to follow the numbers. Seen way too many scenarios like we just saw.
Hear you but i don’t agree with your blackjack point really
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top