My final four is starting with these 2...
NOT Michigan State and
NOT Kansas
My final four is
NOT Michigan State and
NOT Kansas
Jord, the vast majority of the time the read you have on a team is spot on. Every once in a while though, I think you get really stubborn about a team and refuse to change your mind despite a mountain of evidence to the contrary. I think you're doing that with Michigan St.
Except for the 2 blowout losses against Iowa (which I honestly have absolutely no explanation for, other than Valentine being out for the first one and just barely back for the 2nd) this is a team who has lost 3 other games the entire year - all of which were by a single point. Basically, somehow Iowa has their number and they had one bad week in January. This is a team that is really good on both sides of the ball, and you can't deny that Valentine is a true gamer. Then there's Izzo, who is one of the greatest tourney coaches of all time. Are they a lock for the Final Four? Not at all. But I do think they're a lock for the Elite 8 and, as such, am just very surprised to see you immediately eliminate them from consideration.
BTW, not an MSU fan in any way shape or form.
Also not a fan of Kansas. Yes, I'm still bitter about Bill Self kicking my Illini to the curb. I'll get over it when the Illini finally win a championship (so never). But I likewise am somewhat mystified to see you dismiss them immediately. They have easily been the most consistent team this season. Ranked #1 on KenPom in mid-January and number 1 today. They've beaten very good teams on the road and bludgeoned very good teams at home. They've also got the easiest path to the Final 4 IMO.
Teams which I think are far easier to dismiss:
Oklahoma - How can you not love Hield? The problem is they are just way too dependent on the 3. Eventually their will come a game in the tourney where the 3 doesn't fall and I don't think they will find another way to win.
Villanova - Jay Wright finally got them to the Final Four a few years back, but a 14-10 overall tournament record does not scream "Final Four" to me. They've yet to win more than 1 game in a tournament over the last 5 years since that Final Four run.
Xavier - Most of the time, they look like a great team. But like clockwork, every 4-5 games they lay an egg. I don't know when the next one is coming, but I'm convinced it will be before the Final 4.
Virginia - Is this the year they finally get over the hump? Quite possibly but, fair or not, you get no cred until you prove you can get through Mich St.
So, I guess by process of elimination that leaves:
Kansas
Oregon
North Carolina
Michigan St
Think I like North Carolina the best of that group, but they're also in the bracket of death. Heading into this weekend, I was thinking I'd be picking UNC, Indiana, and Kentucky all to make fairly deep runs. Now at least 2 of those will be gone by the elite 8 and 1 for sure by the sweet 16. Still think UNC goes to the Final Four but either Indiana or Kentucky could beat them and it wasn't that much of an upset. Hell, Providence should give them a hell of a game.
Other one I think is precarious is Oregon. Having just moved out West, I've watched a lot more Pac-12 basketball this year than ever before. My impression is that the conference is full of good teams but no great ones. Oregon is clearly the class of the league but they can be had.
I don't think I'm being stubborn with this team at all. I've watched a bunch of their games. They aren't that good. Look at their recent win streak - 3 of those wins were against Ohio St!! They should have lost both the Maryland and Purdue games - they got lucky as the other teams both had cold open shooting, and made some bonehead plays down the stretch. Look, Valentine is an absolute man among boys - but outside of him, you sort of cringe when anyone else has the ball. Again, when I am "against" teams, it's not because I don't think they are good. Everything is relative. I know by watching that this team is overrated. Those last 2 games against good teams proved that to me. Again, they have Valentine, and Izzo always has them prepared - but I won't back off my stance that they aren't that good - and that people overrate the crap out of them because Izzo and their jerseys.
Oregon is a joke of a 1 seed. I don't care that they got it, they just aren't elite.
I cannot take a Kansas team like this seriously. Self and Kansas are both notorious for choking in the tourney. They have some nice experience, and some nice size, but I don't trust their shooting to hold up, and I don't trust Self as a game coach with pressure.
May I ask why not these 2?
I'm a West Coast/Pac12 guy (not that it makes my opinion worth anything). I didn't watch a ton of College BB this year, but saw Oregon play in person (L at stanford) and a couple other times. They strike me as a VERY athletic team, but not very skilled.
8th in the conference in 3PT-FG%
7th in Assists/GM
9th in REB/GM (a little odd)
2nd in Steals/GM
2nd in Blocks/GM
Tough team for me to back based purely on their athleticism to make a deep run.
see my last response.
MSU has a very easy road, but still think they will fumble. Valentine can carry them, but I don't see it. I like both Maryland and Cal over Kansas - and then Zona/Miami/Nova too.
So? With all that said, who do you like?
I just don't see Arizona beating Kansas. I can see them losing in the first round.
UNC has Roy Williams at the helm... That is their biggest obstacle!
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
One more reminder before the Tourney starts...
DON'T SLEEP ON PURDUE!!
Oklahoma over Maryland
Carolina over Purdue
Carolina for all the marbles
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.