why not take Byrd at +220, and continue to go anti-A's until they lose? You will get + money on every game, so the doubling up won't get exponentially out of hand, and the A's certainly will not win ten more in a row(??).
so, if you put a measly 20 (or any amount) on KC to win 44, the next game you can stay pat at 20 (or add 10) and then start adding money to make a little/break even based on your total investment so far.
I never do this for any streak, but am seriously toying with the idea because they've already reached 20....you'd be busted if you went anti-A's at 10, but 20? C'mon....I think this might be the time.
On the other hand, it ain't really worth the chance to win a little to possibly lose a lot either....
mack
so, if you put a measly 20 (or any amount) on KC to win 44, the next game you can stay pat at 20 (or add 10) and then start adding money to make a little/break even based on your total investment so far.
I never do this for any streak, but am seriously toying with the idea because they've already reached 20....you'd be busted if you went anti-A's at 10, but 20? C'mon....I think this might be the time.
On the other hand, it ain't really worth the chance to win a little to possibly lose a lot either....
mack
