Just because it's TRUE.

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
Newt crys in a interview when he talks about his mother.

Newt is shrewd. Room full of mothers with babies crying in the background just set Newt off to tears.

And now Newt says he is considering Sarah Palin for his Vice President. :scared

What happened to Rubio ?

Romney is taking Cristy thats pretty obvious.

Obama trades in Biden for Hillary and that evens out.

:0corn
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
Breaking News


This just in ..........

Newt Gingrich tells a tele-townhall that Sarah Palin is someone to be considered for the Vice Presidency or Energy Secretary.

Caller: If you?re fortunate enough to be nominated, would you consider having Sarah Palin as your running mate?

Gingrich: She is certainly one of the people you would look at. I am a great admirer of hers and she was a remarkable reform governor of Alaska, she?s somebody who I think brings a great deal to the possibility of helping in government and that would be one of the possibilities. There are also some very important Cabinet positions that she could fill very, very well. I can?t imagine anybody who would do a better job of driving us to an energy solution than Gov. Palin, for example. Tell her that she would certainly be on the list of one of the people we would consider.
.............................................................


Oops did I say Vice President.

Newt says she is one of the people you would look at. Not I would look at. :142smilie

He calls her Gov Palin. No remember she quit as Governor. She couldnt take not getting paid the millions. Had to go reality rogue with Gosselin camp outs for that to happen.

Did they renew her Palin in Alaska ..... :facepalm:


I meant to say Secretary of Engery.:142smilie



Put her in a place where no one would listen to her.

Consider her for VP :142smilie

Newt's last ditch efforts at Iowa votoers.

Crying and Sarah Palin

Pity really
 
Last edited:

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
December 22, 2011 4:00 A.M.
Newt Sets Up a Surprise
His emergence is a sign of Mitt?s weakness.

It seems to me that I have a duty to write about Newt Gingrich, as I am one who did not think his rise in the polls as a Republican presidential contender would be as durable as it already has been. As interesting as Newt himself is the dumbfounded reaction to his return to the grand tier of political life after a sleep almost as long as Rip Van Winkle?s, and after he had flat-lined for months as a candidate, and had been abandoned by his entire staff. In a year that should be a big Republican sweep, all the more probable and popular Republicans ? and the hopeful sprouts of enthusiasm for a sequence of non?Mitt Romneys (Bachmann, Perry, Christie, and Cain) ? fizzled, were snuffed out in a pandemic of foot-in-mouth disease, or were pulverized by the wall of fire from the liberal assassination squads. Then Newt levitated like a Frankenstein monster, with Maureen Dowd and Gail Collins shrieking in horror and in excitement: ?It?s alive!?

I do not believe that the proverbial Republican base is so perverse or shell-shocked that Newt really is, in these terms, alive. And I write as someone who actually knows Newt Gingrich and his good qualities a little, and, to the extent my acquaintance enables me to comment, likes him; respects his eclectic but effervescent intelligence; and renders him great credit for inaugurating an era of Republican preeminence in Congress.

There is nothing left to be said about the vagaries of his public personality. Old stand-bys like ?stormy petrel,? ?loose cannon,? and ?unguided missile? are not nearly adequate. The delightful Peggy Noonan comes closest, with ?He?s a human hand grenade who walks around with his hand on the pin, saying ?Watch this!??:scared

Where speaking about himself, philosophizing, or discussing almost anything except the performance of the incumbent administration, he is likely to say anything. Dipping lightly into the Newt sampler ? from complaining about his seat on Air Force One, to praising Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, to pronouncing himself the ?definer of civilization? ? we see that anything can happen. He is an interesting character with a hyperactive personality who made a difference. He proved not to be a good parliamentarian, and he conforms to Richard Nixon?s summary, on returning from abroad in 1964, of sophisticated European thinking about Barry Goldwater: ?A nut, a kook, a jerk.?

Since Newt Gingrich is a completely unfeasible president, the question pops up, like a cobra?s head, of why he is now the leading contender for the Republican nomination. In the desperation created by this glazed pall of implausibility that has anesthetized the Republicans, I offer an alternative explanation. We are witnessing the Hegelian dialectic in action, a rare and unfashionable occurrence, yet appropriate to such an epochal farce as this. (If Newt can be Lazarus for a month, the roots of Marxism can be briefly verdant again.) Fighting an administration whose three cardinal projects were Obamacare, an $800 billion economic-stimulus plan, and cap-and-trade ? i.e. two disasters and a scheme so harebrained not even a Pelosified Congress could take it ? the Republicans are swimming downstream on pelagic trillions of budgetary deficits, and still haven?t been able to get their best candidates to take the plunge. The office is not seeking, and the nation is not turning its lonely eyes toward, Willard M. Romney, widely perceived as a plastic policy weather vane and incorrect health-care champion who was mean to the family dog.

After the rise and decapitation of each non-Mitt, the frustrations of the average reasonable Republican or independent who loves America and is horrified by the most incompetent administration since that of James Buchanan (who at least had the decency not to seek reelection) seem to have become explosive and irrational. But this is misleading. Inconceivable though Newt is as president, he is an articulate and forceful critic of the administration and not just an O?Reilly-Hannity impersonator. Newt sees it plain, calls it straight, and gets the sleep-deprived Republicans halfway home by tearing the incumbents limb from limb. But there?s more: He is such a cyclonic change of pace, he is a non-Mitt who can actually stay the course and stop Mittification from happening. Never mind that he won?t fly himself, he can keep the nomination open for someone who can, who couldn?t face having to campaign for a year and spend $100 million to be nominated.

The Obama administration doesn?t know whether to scream for joy at the thought of facing the human grenade, or to cling to its assurance that Romney is the candidate. The character-assassination squads, though their ranks are now so deep they are the largest such work party since the scores of people who crowded into the firing squad to execute the Ceausescus, couldn?t believe their good fortune. But despite a replication of the 25-battleship sustained bombardment of Okinawa, they haven?t brought Newt down. There is a sci-fi quality to him and there always was, and it is little wonder that thoughts of Frankenstein come to mind.

Newt could not have arisen earlier, because the Republicans were not desperate enough, and has :142smilie endured despite the $1.6 million for history lessons from Freddie Mac, his incoherent fumbling on health care, and a retrospective national soap opera on his marital infidelities. The Republicans are clinging to the last device of deliverance from a Mitt-Obama vortex, and such a prayerful hope will not be vaporized by the mere crackle of sniper fire or choreographed triumphs over amnesia by aggrieved women that sent Herman Cain to the showers or the innovative blundering that will dispatch Rick Perry back to the Texas morning-jog/coyote shootouts. With a pistol in each hand. :facepalm:

If Mitt couldn?t set anything on fire to this point, the tinder isn?t there, and efforts, even by first-class commentators such as Holman Jenkins, to perceive Newt?s destiny as warming Mitt up for the main event don?t make it. At this point ? 235 years on from the Declaration of Independence, with much of the U.S. economy, public education, health care, and justice system in shambles ? history will not be mocked by a Mitt-Newt death struggle for the honor of helping to affront nature and reason by reelecting a failed administration. Hegel has come to the rescue of James Madison. Newt is not the nominee; he?s the negation of Mitt, and the nomination will be deferred to the timely decision of the none-of-the-above majority.

Either Newt, too weighed down by darts, buckshot, and self-detonated combustion, will start to fade before the caucuses and primaries are too advanced, and one more declared non-Mitt, possibly Jon Huntsman, will arise; or the absence of a contender with a commanding lead will prevail until it is so close to the convention, or even at the convention, that there will be a draft of one of the non-runners, probably Jeb Bush. There will not be endless balloting until the deadlock is broken by selection of a dark horse, as with Warren Harding in 1920, or John W. Davis by the Democrats in 1924. But the process that has produced a nominee easily for both parties at every convention since 1952 now looks likely not to work this year; there is no bandwagon, and there could be the first real draft since the Democrats chose Adlai Stevenson in 1952, and, on the Republican side, since Wendell Willkie in 1940.

The genius of the American system produces a serious leader when the country has to have one, and substitutes an improvised selection process when the normal procedures don?t work. If the country were happy with the administration, the Republicans could nominate an ill-favored candidate like Davis or Goldwater, or Alfred Landon (1936), George McGovern (1972), or Walter Mondale (1984). A large enough number of Americans is uneasy with four more years of Obama that the system has magically, intuitively, dragooned the amiably preposterous ex-speaker to produce a deadlock. Out of this astonishing showdown of able non-presidents, either a mid-primary inspiration or a convention-eve groundswell will identify the right candidate. The office is seeking the man, or woman, but so far without success; so the search will continue.

..........................................................s


what a mess

pity really ..............
 
Last edited:

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
Everyone keeps getting out of control when the Obama?s wear a fancy dress or suit, go to a fancy dinner, or do anything other than sit in the white house. They happen to have alot of money. Over $10 Million. We dont buy them clothes with tax money, however we do pay for their travel and security. (remember, they also get paid for this job)

President Bush took 149 Trips to Camp David for a total of 487 days. He also took 77 trips to his ranch for a total of 490 days. He was president for 2920 days and away from the white house for 977 days. Thats roughly 1/3 of the time. Imagine how much it costs to transport and secure him on the 226 trips he took during those 8 years.:scared

As of september of 2011 (i dont know the time figures for his recent trip to hawaii) Obama had taken 61 vacation days through about 930 days of his presidency. Thats about 6.5% as compared to Bush?s 33%. That also means that he takes about 1 day off for every 15 he works. How many days to you get off a week?

To bring vacation time into persepective you got to compare it to Buuuussssh.

What a tremendous vacation team the Bushs were.

Yeh but they were having cabinet meetings in Texas:142smilie

Yeh but Bush was chopping wood in Texas :SIB

Yeh but Bush was working in Texas :142smilie

Yeh but Bush was always on call 24/7 in Texas:142smilie


Fawking politics anyways.

nothing but a bunch of look out for themselves
rat bastid pussychops.
 

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
Oops did I say Vice President.

Newt says she is one of the people you would look at. Not I would look at. :142smilie

He calls her Gov Palin. No remember she quit as Governor. She couldnt take not getting paid the millions. Had to go reality rogue with Gosselin camp outs for that to happen.

Did they renew her Palin in Alaska ..... :facepalm:


I meant to say Secretary of Engery.:142smilie



Put her in a place where no one would listen to her.

Consider her for VP :142smilie

Newt's last ditch efforts at Iowa votoers.

Crying and Sarah Palin

Pity really
I can see the end of Sarah Palin's political career from my house... :142smilie
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
The front seat: It's a testament to Herman Cain's utterly catastrophic collapse that Gingrich has emerged as a palatable alternative for family-values conservatives. But it won't last. Gingrich had a six-year affair with his third wife while he was still married to his second. He had an affair with his second wife while he was still married to his first wife. And as we previously reported, during his 1974 campaign, a former aide described "approaching a car with Gingrich's daughters in hand, only to find the candidate with a woman, her head buried in his lap." Another former aide alleged that Gingrich had attempted to seduce her, Chaz Reinhold-style, after the death of a relative.

Newt's complaint about sitting in the back seat of Air Force One did not sit well with the New York tabloids. Yes, that's a milk bottle.: Courtesy of the New York Daily NewsThe back seat: On the flight back from Yitzhak Rabin's funeral in Israel in November 1995, Gingrich was asked to sit in the back of Air Force One, rather than up front with President Clinton. As a result, Gingrich upped his demands in the budget fight, leading to a historic government shutdown. "It's petty, but I think it's human,? Gingrich explained at the time. The New York Daily News put Gingrich on its cover dressed in a diaper, holding a bottle and crying.

The couch: Have you seen the advertisement in which Newt sits in a love seat with Nancy Pelosi, on behalf of Al Gore's nonprofit, to call for Congress to take action on climate change? Well, you will?Rep. Ron Paul has already featured the clip in an online ad. Although he maintained at the time that "our country must take action to prevent climate change," Gingrich now says he doesn't think the science is settled and it's not the government's role to involve itself with climate change.



He calls the ad his single biggest regret in life. Which brings us to?

The hospital bed: In some ways, the fact, first reported in MoJo, that Gingrich hammered out the details of his first divorce while his wife was in the hospital recovering from cancer isn't even the most damaging revelation from that story. But it's certainly damaging. One longtime Gingrich aide recalled: "Newt came up there with his yellow legal pad, and he had a list of things on how the divorce was going to be handled. He wanted her to sign it. She was still recovering from surgery, still sort of out of it, and he comes in with a yellow sheet of paper, handwritten, and wants her to sign it." It's a damaging enough story that he felt compelled to mention it in his new fight-the-smears, site, "Answering the Attacks."

During his 1974 campaign, a former aide described "approaching a car with Gingrich's daughters in hand, only to find the candidate with a woman, her head buried in his lap."

The smoke-filled room: Since leaving Congress in 1998, Gingrich has reinvented himself as the epitome of everyone's worst stereotypes of a Washington insider. His consulting firm has brought in more than $100 million in contracts since 2000, including $1.6 million from government-backed housing giant Freddie Mac?a payment Gingrich said initially was for his analysis as "a historian." Although never a registered a lobbyist, he certainly fit the definition.

The inglorious exit: It almost seems like an afterthought given everything he's done before and since, but Gingrich left Capitol Hill in disgrace, resigning from the House of Representatives after being slapped with a $300,000 fine for ethics violations. The only reason this hasn't appeared in a Mitt Romney campaign ad yet is that, up until recently, it didn't seem necessary.

The border: On immigration, Gingrich boldly went where Rick Perry had gone before, telling GOP voters that they should think twice before indiscriminately deporting all undocumented residents. To put it mildly, that's heresy among social conservative voters in Iowa, where Gingrich hopes to win big. It's a big reason why Perry is currently polling in single digits.

The doghouse: Gingrich rose to the top of his party in the '90s by eating his own. He publicly rebuked the leader of his own party, then-president George H.W. Bush, on taxes. He aggravated senior members of his party like Bob Dole, who famously chewed him out for trying to have it both ways on spending, calling Gingrich and his cohorts "young hypocrites." Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) was just as dismissive: "He also has this incredible sense of exaggeration. Like, I don't know how many times he'll say, 'This is the most corrupt act in the history of Western Civilization,' or 'the most despicable.' You can only say that so many times." Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), a former congressman, told Fox News Sunday that "I'm not inclined to be a supporter of Newt Gingrich's having served under him for four years and experienced personally his leadership." After Gingrich criticized Rep. Paul Ryan's budget plan in June, the Wisconsin congressman said, "With friends like that, who needs enemies." Newt's got plenty of enemies.

Planet Earth: Gingrich was a dues-paying member of the Sierra Club, as Mike Mechanic noted, from 1984 to 1990. During that period, he publicly opposed drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, calling it a "180-day quick fix." In the name of preventing global warming, he also supported the 1989 Global Warming Prevention Act, which called for global population control?hugely problematic for social conservatives, who conflate family-planning programs with contraception and abortion. In 2009, he called for "mandatory carbon caps," a position he now derides as an "anti-energy, big bureaucracy agenda." It goes much, much deeper than a one-time-off appearance on a couch with Pelosi. Speaking of large, gaseous spheres...

Gingrich was a dues-paying member of the Sierra Club from 1984 to 1990.

Planet Newt: When he tried out for his high school football team in the 1960s, the equipment manager had to order a custom-made helmet to accommodate his head. This, it turned out, was a metaphor: Newt Gingrich is arrogant. It's not a cheap shot to say that. He said it himself, many times over. To read through Gingrich's log of quotes is to hear a politician perpetually talking about himself. "If you're not in the Washington Post everyday, you might as well not exist," he said in 1989. "I'm unavoidable," he said in 1985. "I represent real power." In 1989, he explained why he fought with his second wife: "It's not even that it matters to me. It's just the habit of dominance, the habit of being the center of my staff and the center of the news media." It's not just off-putting; it's often disastrous. As conservative columnist George Will argued on Sunday, Gingrich "embodies the vanity and rapacity that make modern Washington repulsive...His temperament?intellectual hubris distilled?makes him blown about by gusts of enthusiasm for intellectual fads?"

Mandate, mandate, mandate: Have you heard of this thing called Obamacare? It's a pretty big deal on the political right, mostly because it contains an individual mandate requiring people to buy health insurance if they can afford it. Gingrich has been characteristically outspoken in his opposition to the mandate recently. But there's one little problem: Before he decided it was an unconstitutional, tyrannical abuse of power, he was all for the individual mandate. In a 2007 column, he called on Congress to "require anyone who earns more than $50,000 a year to purchase health insurance or post a bond." He made the same pitch in 2005. Hey, there's even a video of it?and, what do you know, he's sitting just across from conservative favorite Hillary Clinton:

The exodus: Gingrich's political aggression and impulsiveness sometimes pays off. It also frequently ends in disaster?as it did last June, when his entire Iowa campaign staff quit en masse over complaints that (among other things) he lacked discipline and frugality. To the extent that many of those staffers then went on to work for Perry, you could say that Gingrich had the last laugh. But the consequence of that is that Gingrich didn't even have an Iowa campaign office until late last week. Organization is everything in the caucuses, and with just a few weeks to go, Newt doesn't really have one.

..................................................................

maybe Newt can overcome in South Carolina

but not Virginia :SIB
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top