Kazza, Lite etc..BEWARE

Senor Capper

is feeling it
Channel Member
Nov 14, 2000
24,639
104
63
Vegas
www.SenorCapper.com
Music labels to sue hundreds of music sharers


WASHINGTON (AP) ? The music industry disclosed aggressive plans Wednesday for an unprecedented escalation in its fight against Internet piracy, threatening to sue hundreds of individual computer users who illegally share music files online.
The Recording Industry Association of America, citing substantial sales declines, said it will begin Thursday to search Internet file-sharing networks to identify users who offer "substantial" collections of MP3-format music files for downloading. It expects to file at least several hundred lawsuits seeking financial damages within eight to 10 weeks.

Executives for the RIAA, the Washington-based lobbying group that represents major labels, would not say how many songs on a user's computer will qualify for a lawsuit. The new campaign comes just weeks after U.S. appeals court rulings requiring Internet providers to identify subscribers suspected of illegally sharing music and movie files.

The RIAA's president, Carey Sherman, said tens of millions of Internet users of popular file-sharing software after Thursday will expose themselves to "the real risk of having to face the music."

"It's stealing. It's both wrong and illegal," Sherman said. Alluding to the court decisions, Sherman said Internet users who believe they can hide behind an alias online were mistaken. "You are not anonymous," Sherman said. "We're going to begin taking names."

Critics accused the RIAA of resorting to heavy-handed tactics likely to alienate millions of Internet file-sharers.

"This latest effort really indicates the recording industry has lost touch with reality completely," said Fred von Lohmann, a lawyer for the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "Does anyone think more lawsuits are going to be the answer? Today they have declared war on the American consumer."

Sherman disputed that consumers, who are gradually turning to legitimate Web sites to buy music legally, will object to the industry's latest efforts against pirates.

"You have to look at exactly who are your customers," he said. "You could say the same thing about shoplifters ? are you worried about alienating them? All sorts of industries and retailers have come to the conclusion that they need to be able to protect their rights. We have come to the same conclusion."

Mike Godwin of Public Knowledge, a consumer group that has challenged broad crackdowns on file-sharing networks, said Wednesday's announcement was appropriate because it targeted users illegally sharing copyrighted files.

"I'm sure it's going to freak them out," Godwin said. "The free ride is over." He added: "I wouldn't be surprised if at least some people engaged in file-trading decide to resist and try to find ways to thwart the litigation strategy."

The RIAA said its lawyers will file lawsuits initially against people with the largest collections of music files they can find online. U.S. copyright laws allow for damages of $750 to $150,000 for each song offered illegally on a person's computer, but Sherman said the RIAA will be open to settlement proposals from defendants.

"We have no hard and fast rule on how many files you have to be distributing ... to come within our radar screen," Sherman said. "We will go after the worst offenders first."

The RIAA said it expected to file "at least several hundred lawsuits" within eight to 10 weeks but will continue to file lawsuits afterward on a regular basis.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright 2003 The Associated Press.

ya better download all you can today (Wednesday) ;)
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
Maybe if those thiefs signed musicians with talent instead of trying to create them from untalented thugs to lisping boybands they could sell a few cd's.
 

BigMonkey

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 17, 2001
68
0
0
59
las vegas
Senor, I think that

Senor, I think that

you are overreacting "better download all you can", 3.8 million use Kazza and Kazza isnt going anywhere. The amount of people who stop sharing b/c of fear of litigation will be at most 10%. So we still have 3 million people x how manys files. This is a desperate attempt by a corrupt industry to scare people. I hope you arent scarred by this, I'm not. Thanks for the info though and I suggest that anyone interested in the latest news on p2p check out zeropaid. The RIAA has to find a way to get the ISP's to block the use of p2p somehow, otherwise the cat is out of the bag forever. Considering Kazza has already won a ruling in Federal Court that they can operate, I am not sure how the RIAA will be able to attack the Isp's. Sueing a few p2p users wont curve the movement much. Something else will have to happen for that.
 

GENO

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 5, 2002
5,114
17
0
71
Plain City OH
GO AHEAD MAKE MY DAY,.......... SUE ME !


(Rudy theme playing in the background as I type !)


:moon: :thefinger :cool:
 

Senor Capper

is feeling it
Channel Member
Nov 14, 2000
24,639
104
63
Vegas
www.SenorCapper.com
overreacting ???

overreacting ???

Maybe.

But I've got enough crap to worry about without having to take my chances that I may be one of the unfortunates.

:(
 
Last edited:

BigMonkey

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 17, 2001
68
0
0
59
las vegas
Kazza lite has no spyware

Kazza lite has no spyware

and all you need to do is download ad aware to remove any on your computer. Senor you see they are going to sue a few hundred out 3.8 million, please dont lose sleep or downloads over this hype.................................
 

BigMonkey

Registered
Forum Member
Mar 17, 2001
68
0
0
59
las vegas
who still uses kazza....

who still uses kazza....

please use kazza lite, no recrimnations here, just sharing thoughts....thanks to all posters
 

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
StevieD said:
Maybe if those thiefs signed musicians with talent instead of trying to create them from untalented thugs to lisping boybands they could sell a few cd's.

Steve i agree with you bud....write it down as a historic occasion :cool: :cool: :cool:
 

EXTRAPOLATER

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 22, 2001
7,327
78
48
Toronto
This 'solution' is a joke. There are tons of file-sharers from all over the planet, a few hundred out of -- what was that? -- 3.8 million U.S. sharers? (high % there:rolleyes: ) is nothing. The threat, alone, may deter more people (500?:rolleyes: ) from file-sharing than those "busted."

But, that aside, the article suggests that they will CATCH PEOPLE BY SCANNING THEIR SHARED FILES LIST, obviously only relevant IF they are at a file-sharing site when the scan is performed.
The site I use allows you to restrict the files that you share. Restrict your available files list (even to 500+ ... is that "substantial"?) and there should be no problem.

They can't just be scanning people's hard drives whenever, as any information so gathered would be useless - my hard drive is loaded with tunes simply because it doubles wonderfully as a jukebox.

They can't bust anyone for DOWNLOADING if the guilty action is having many files AVAILABLE. Am I reading this right? Can they prove that, just because I have files available (which I can claim I don't know how to control or restrict) when I visit a file-sharing site, I am sending these files out to other users and thus conspiring with another in HIS/HER crime (all the files on my shared list MIGHT be all burned from discs I purchased).

Only in the U.S., aye?
Pity
:)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
America, where are you now
Don't you care about your sons and daughters
Don't you know, we need you now
We can't fight alone against the monster
(Steppenwolf-Monster-Monster/Suicide/America)

(not meant to stir no pot)
"baseball has been very-very good to me"
:canada1 :Yep: :weed:
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top