KCWolf ...

Status
Not open for further replies.

JEFF

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 30, 2001
2,165
0
0
Curious what you think about the bowls Thursday. Looking hard at Oregon State as I have them having the advantage in many ways, but curious what you got cookin:D
 

kcwolf

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 1, 2000
7,224
21
0
Iowa City
Jeff

My numbers came up OSU winning by 2-3 points. IF you can tell me PIT might quit turning the ball over, I'd adjust a point or a little more in PIT's favor.

Tough game to get a handle on, so if I get the time, going to watch some line movement in the last hour or so before kickoff.

I would suggest a pass on the side and total for this game.

I made a small play on the under 45.5 about an hour ago. Would not necessarily recommend it.

Going to try and take a break until tomorrow. Have already spent alot of energy on NFL for this weekend, over the past three days, and the bowl games.

Probably won't be back the rest of day.

gl!
 

JEFF

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 30, 2001
2,165
0
0
My numbers came up OSU winning by 2-3 points.

Well duhh, the spread is 2.5 so you're gonna have to be more specific.:D
Have a good break ...
 

Topdog

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2001
443
0
0
Houston, Texas
Well DUHHHH!!

Well DUHHHH!!

Hey Jeff, Maybe I can help since Wolf is trying to be nice. I think that cappers look for a certain degree of value in a game. For some it will be a 7 point advantage for a 1* and additional *'s are added as the advantage increases. They do not bet every game!!

Secondly, Wolf has a pay service, and it would not be fair to his customers for him to give his best plays away for free. I am intrested in getting on his service if I can find out how to contact KCWolf.

It seems that Wolf is NOT reccomendind a play either way on this game, but he did tell you what he did as a sweat bet.
 

kcwolf

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 1, 2000
7,224
21
0
Iowa City
Sorry Jeff, just the way my numbers came up, I don't care about the spread when I make my numbers. I sense you didn't get the answer you wanted, so I'm sorry. I'm not much for write-ups, so I guess it was to shallow.

If you want to look at the last five games, I favor Oregon St by up to 8 points. But that is why I mentioned Pittsburgh's turnovers, and why my numbers might be flawed.

Both teams have great ground attacks, but give a slight edge to PIT in the passing game. If you look at raw numbers, you will think I'm crazy. As with the Panthers being prone to turnovers, I see another liability for Oregon St in QB Derek Anderson. His interceptions scare me, especially concerning TD/INT ratio.

Then I have to come back to the PAC 10. So much talent in this league and part of reason I took UCLA yesterday. The Big East isn't to shabby either.

So, I felt the number was to close to take a side. But I see two very good defenses and two teams that now how to run the ball. I also felt the Panthers secondary might tame Anderson.

Why I humbly played the under 45.5.

Hope this helps some Jeff. gl! tonight!

kcwolf
 

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,771
338
83
53
Belly of the Beast
Dig deeper, KC. We want a side !!!

Jeff was being facetious and maybe it didn't read that way to others, but that's what I got out of his remark. Hope you had a wonderful holiday, Wayne, and were able to spoil the grandkids.

KCWolf's website advertises prominently over at bestbettor.com. If you're looking for his service, the banners are all over the place there.
 

Topdog

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 7, 2001
443
0
0
Houston, Texas
Bobby Blue Chip

Bobby Blue Chip

Thanks for the help, I wasn't sure if it was ok to ask in the forum, so I tried to be as discrete as possible.

Jeff, If you are going to bet both these games today, as I am, I'm happy to offer my opinion.
I like Toledo +4.5 in a close game and Under 59
Oregon St -2.5 and Under 45.5

Great Luck, and Thanks, Topdog
 

kbyoda

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 31, 2001
292
0
0
52
Bethesda, MD
Jeff.............

YOU ARE AN IDIOT!!

Last 2 days I saw you post negatives about Ray & KC.

Yes, your posts were negative.........

A-HOLE!!!!!
 

G Money

Registered
Forum Member
Aug 23, 2001
1,023
1
0
WV
Kbyoda, Jeff was joking with KC. Why do you have to start name calling. In my opinion you insulted KC by comparing him to Raymond. KC is a solid capper who doesnt have 5 GOYs every week. Maybe you can be the head of Raymonds fan club since you love him so much.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,535
289
83
Victory Lane
G Money said:
Kbyoda, Jeff was joking with KC. Why do you have to start name calling. In my opinion you insulted KC by comparing him to Raymond. KC is a solid capper who doesnt have 5 GOYs every week. Maybe you can be the head of Raymonds fan club since you love him so much.

G Honey

you are the real A-hole in the bunch.

You were wrong in RAYMONDS thread yesterday and you started the whole thing. and you are wrong in this thread as Jeff was not joking. :thefinger


Scott King of the Underdogs
 

G Money

Registered
Forum Member
Aug 23, 2001
1,023
1
0
WV
Scott, I didnt start anything yesterday. I'm really upset that you think I'm an asshole since your opinion is so highly respected around here. You are the jackass of the board so why don't you go find you another game to throw it the F down on and lose the rets of your money.
 

JEFF

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 30, 2001
2,165
0
0
I'm glad at least a few of you have a sense of humor. To the rest of you, maybe you can buy one at the five and dime (this is not directed at you KC).

I was joking. Some of you are clueless. If you are clueless, it's generally a good idea to keep your mouth shut so you have at least a chance of hiding that from others. Jeezus f ucking Christ! I certainly will never start a thread like this one again.

I guess all this GOY year stuf has everyone's thongs up in a bunch. KByoda, thank you for your comments. When you're done monitoring my posts and determining what my intentions are, feel free to kiss my hairy white ass.


FWIW KC I played OSU as I think Pitts depth at RB and WR will hurt them and Rutherford is not consistent enough to get the W against this team. Hardly a huge play though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Bet on MyBookie
Top