<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_MGT_cSi7Rs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Khaddafy dead, Obama will watch his
- Thread starter Skulnik
- Start date
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_MGT_cSi7Rs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/N5p-qIq32m8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
:tongue
GMROZ, send all of your BUSH TAX CUTS back to the Treasury. ASAP
TIA
Did you change your Id for a reason, like your HISTORY?
Gee, where have I heard that ridiculous accusation before?GMROZ,
Did you change your Id for a reason, like your HISTORY?
Gee, where have I heard that ridiculous accusation before?
I borrowed it without permission.
:142smilie
Osama and Ghadaffi both dead within Obama's first 3 years. Bush didnt do this. If he did, right wing mainstream media would adore him to no ends. Obama has done this and all he gets is grief. In fact, almost everything he's done is exactly what right wing should love. ...So why the fuck don't you love him?
PLEASE, someone from the right wing answer this question.....
PLEASE, someone from the right wing answer this question.....
..................................................................
no right winger will answer.
Khadaffi kills 300 Americans on the Lockerbee plane. Thats enough for out total involvement until he is dead.
Obama does it again
he seems to be better at these war games than Bush and Cheney ever were :shrug:
Actually Gary
I have been an adamant supporter of O/this admin on drones and continued use of prior admin tools/tactics - he/they onced were wailing about back in the land of Oz.
I certainly welcome the 360 flop from the rhetoric/campaighn promises prior to being elected-
--and media and liberals dropping their previous agenda's over same stuff is HUGE plus.
-How about you?
opcorn2 --or do you want to nominated him for another Nobel Peace Prize :lol:
Last edited:
GMROZ, send all of your BUSH TAX CUTS back to the Treasury. ASAP
TIA
Did you change your Id for a reason, like your HISTORY?
Too late. I gave all the tax cuts to my pastor.
I prayed about my monicker for weeks, then I got some divine inspiration. The rest is history.
Actual Gary I have been an adamant supporter of O/this admin on drones and continued use of prior admin tools/tactics - he/they onced were wailing about back in the land of Oz.
I certainly welcome the 360 flop from the rhetoric/campaighn promises prior to being elected-
-How about you?
--or do you want to nominated him for another Nobel Peace Prize :lol:
Wayne: I think he's nothing but GWB 2.0. I will not vote for him and DID NOT vote for him the last time around. I have supported his Health Care initiative but for the most part, I think he's just another talking head. I give him all the credit in the world for being in charge when these assholes finally got dismissed from life. Beyond that, I don't know what he's really doing to turn things around. In his defense, I don't know what he could do to turn things around when all of his plans are shot down in Congress.
Good for you, IT WAS YOUR MONEY, I, don't belong to a church, I guess i'm a sinner.
JMO
It's not the ones that didn't pass Gary--it's the ones that went through when Dems had carte blanc control on everything they wanted that have us where we are--
See any trends here--
eg rhetoric vs reality/estimates vs actual etc
Out of curiousity and with due respect--which would you have liked to seen pass that didn't specifically.
Last edited:
I think we all agree regardless of sides that we need to stop having multi-layered bills that link internet gambling with port security or as we see below linking Innovation Research with pornography.
http://leadenergy.org/2010/05/breaking-house-rejects-america-competes-act/
Congress Blocks Major Competitiveness and Innovation Legislation
On 05.14.10, In News, By Teryn Norris
The America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 ? a flagship proposal for U.S. innovation and competitiveness containing critical funding authorization for ARPA-E, Energy Innovation Hubs, clean energy STEM education, science R&D budgets, and more ? was blocked on the House floor yesterday due to political point-scoring over a small and unrelated pornography issue.
?Six newly proposed programs encouraging science research and technological innovation are casualties of Thursday?s House fight over porn,? reports The Hill. According to Science Insider, ?members voted 292 to 126 to block passage of a 5-year authorization bill that would have provided healthy increases in the research and education budgets of the NSF and research programs at the Department of Energy and the Department of Commerce. Instead, a bipartisan majority voted for a 3-year freeze on the budgets for those agencies; it also cut all funding for DOE?s new Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy.?
Congressman Bart Gordon, Chairman of the House Science & Technology Committee and COMPETES champion, stated in his press release, ?I?m disappointed that politics trumped good policy. The Minority was willing to trade American jobs and our nation?s economic competitiveness for the chance to run a good political ad.? The COMPETES Act was originally passed with strong bipartisan support in 2007 to implement several of the recommendations from the definitive national competitiveness report, ?Rising Above the Gathering Storm.?
Congress is playing petty politics with our economic security, and it couldn?t come at a worse time. The blockage of America COMPETES comes when our international competitors ? especially countries like China ? are making rapid advances and investing massively in science, technology, and innovation, especially in the clean energy industry. If Congress had behaved this way in reaction to Sputnik, we not only would have lost the space race, we would have lost in industries that helped power our growth for half a century.
?I believe in American leadership,? Gordon declared, ?and I think COMPETES is too important to let die. I would like to see it brought up again, but timing is unclear. Advocates for science, technology, manufacturing, and education ? including the 750 organizations that endorsed COMPETES and their memberships ? need to make their case to Members of the House and Senate why this bill needs to be signed into law.?
Stay tuned for more commentary next week, and see more coverage at Chronicle of Higher Education and Nature blog
http://leadenergy.org/2010/05/breaking-house-rejects-america-competes-act/
Congress Blocks Major Competitiveness and Innovation Legislation
On 05.14.10, In News, By Teryn Norris
The America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 ? a flagship proposal for U.S. innovation and competitiveness containing critical funding authorization for ARPA-E, Energy Innovation Hubs, clean energy STEM education, science R&D budgets, and more ? was blocked on the House floor yesterday due to political point-scoring over a small and unrelated pornography issue.
?Six newly proposed programs encouraging science research and technological innovation are casualties of Thursday?s House fight over porn,? reports The Hill. According to Science Insider, ?members voted 292 to 126 to block passage of a 5-year authorization bill that would have provided healthy increases in the research and education budgets of the NSF and research programs at the Department of Energy and the Department of Commerce. Instead, a bipartisan majority voted for a 3-year freeze on the budgets for those agencies; it also cut all funding for DOE?s new Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy.?
Congressman Bart Gordon, Chairman of the House Science & Technology Committee and COMPETES champion, stated in his press release, ?I?m disappointed that politics trumped good policy. The Minority was willing to trade American jobs and our nation?s economic competitiveness for the chance to run a good political ad.? The COMPETES Act was originally passed with strong bipartisan support in 2007 to implement several of the recommendations from the definitive national competitiveness report, ?Rising Above the Gathering Storm.?
Congress is playing petty politics with our economic security, and it couldn?t come at a worse time. The blockage of America COMPETES comes when our international competitors ? especially countries like China ? are making rapid advances and investing massively in science, technology, and innovation, especially in the clean energy industry. If Congress had behaved this way in reaction to Sputnik, we not only would have lost the space race, we would have lost in industries that helped power our growth for half a century.
?I believe in American leadership,? Gordon declared, ?and I think COMPETES is too important to let die. I would like to see it brought up again, but timing is unclear. Advocates for science, technology, manufacturing, and education ? including the 750 organizations that endorsed COMPETES and their memberships ? need to make their case to Members of the House and Senate why this bill needs to be signed into law.?
Stay tuned for more commentary next week, and see more coverage at Chronicle of Higher Education and Nature blog
