Krauthammer-healthcare

[DOGS THAT BARK]

....................................................................

I coined that phrase and I use it all the time.

Look in Gen Forum in Jacks thread about a woman chasing him. You dipstick

It shows you really don't know anything about me as long as I have been saying that here.

I have a BBA and own my own business for the past 15 years. I deal with people every day that could buy and sell you . I probably could myself.

I can speak the Kings english and write alot better than you. I just get lazy and if people get the gist I dont even bother with commas and spelling errors. Idiot


so your right . just shut the fawk up you piece of rat shit.

Nothing more comical than someone whining about not being able to afford health ins/how they are for increased taxes to fund more social welfare--and then come up with gem above

Now to the FACT of the matter--

If you've been self employed for 15 years and if your 56 now--that would make you 41 at time you became self employed--

Had you been responsible it would have taken just a fraction of that mass amount of wealth you've accumulated per above to protect yourself and family--and guaranteed your assurabilty now.

Cost for standard rates (middle of the road) for male age 41.

[FONT=Arial,Verdana,Tahoma]Prepared on: 12/12/2009 Effective Date: 12/12/2009 [/FONT]​

<TABLE border=4 width="80%" align=center><TBODY><TR align=middle><TD colSpan=8>Kentucky Individual Quote</TD></TR><TR><TH colSpan=7>Monthly Payment Option</TH></TR><TR align=middle><TH colSpan=7>Warren County</TH></TR><TR bgColor=#cccccc><TH bgColor=#cccccc vAlign=center align=middle>Medical Product</TH><TD vAlign=center align=middle>Blue Access--Plan 2 </TD><TD vAlign=center align=middle>Blue Access--Plan 2 </TD><TD vAlign=center align=middle>Blue Access--Plan 2 </TD><TD vAlign=center align=middle>Blue Access--Plan 2 </TD></TR><TR bgColor=#cccccc><TH bgColor=#cccccc vAlign=center align=middle>Medical Deductible</TH><TD vAlign=center align=middle>$250 </TD><TD vAlign=center align=middle>$500 </TD><TD vAlign=center align=middle>$1,000 </TD><TD vAlign=center align=middle>$2,500 </TD></TR><TR bgColor=#cccccc><TH bgColor=#cccccc vAlign=center align=middle>Rx</TH><TD vAlign=center align=middle>included subject to Copays or Coin</TD><TD vAlign=center align=middle>included subject to Copays or Coin</TD><TD vAlign=center align=middle>included subject to Copays or Coin</TD><TD vAlign=center align=middle>included subject to Copays or Coin</TD></TR><TR bgColor=#cccccc><TH bgColor=#cccccc vAlign=center align=middle>Maternity</TH><TD vAlign=center align=middle>No </TD><TD vAlign=center align=middle>No </TD><TD vAlign=center align=middle>No </TD><TD vAlign=center align=middle>No </TD></TR><TR bgColor=#cccccc><TH bgColor=#cccccc vAlign=center align=middle>Mental Health</TH><TD vAlign=center align=middle>No </TD><TD vAlign=center align=middle>No </TD><TD vAlign=center align=middle>No </TD><TD vAlign=center align=middle>No </TD></TR><TR><TH bgColor=#cccccc vAlign=center align=middle>Medical Rate</TH><TD vAlign=center align=middle>$252.83</TD><TD vAlign=center align=middle>$229.70</TD><TD vAlign=center align=middle>$196.51</TD><TD vAlign=center align=middle>$143.42</TD></TR><TR><TH bgColor=#cccccc vAlign=center align=middle>Calculated Risk Factor</TH><TD vAlign=center align=middle>0.688 </TD><TD vAlign=center align=middle>0.688 </TD><TD vAlign=center align=middle>0.688 </TD><TD vAlign=center align=middle>0.688 </TD></TR><TR align=middle><TD colSpan=7>(Calculated Risk Factor may vary by deductible options) </TD></TR>



</TBODY></TABLE><TABLE border=4 width="90%" align=center><TBODY><TR><TH></TH><TH>Name


</TH><TH>Rating Tier


</TH><TH>Factor


</TH><TH>Gender


</TH><TH>Age


</TH><TH>Dental


</TH><TH>Life


</TH></TR><TR><TH>Applicant


</TH><TD>Scotty Tissue</TD><TD align=middle>Standard One</TD><TD align=middle>0.688</TD><TD align=middle>M</TD><TD align=middle>41</TD><TD align=middle>No</TD><TD align=middle>No</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>


--oh and one other piece of advice--if you do in fact deal with people per above--I would certainly avoid discussing politics with them -at all costs. They are more than likely on the other end of the redistributing agenda than yourself

 

[Mags]

first time I ever saw you get mad, scotty.

kurby kurby kurby

Yea, dumb folk that are looking for a government handout scare me.......

Such a bitter old man.

And he pulls out the "I could buy you"?? :mj07:

That's the funny part about internet persona's..... he can act like he's rich, and I'm poor.... but he has no idea.....

And I don't see the value of arguing "my account is bigger than yours" - even if poor Government Bailout Scottie does.....

Scottie probably sent an email to Obama saying "please, please take care of me and my wife. I'm not man enough to take care of my family, so I need the government to do it".....

It's people like Scottie that make it clear that this forum should be shut down for good. It goes from intelligent discussion and facts to personal insults from Scottie.

Wish more posters were like Chadman - who likes to discuss the issues - not just throw out insults when they don't get their way - like Scottie does.

Very much what an 8 year old does - but folks that want the government to take care of them are basically 8 year olds anyway I guess....

Good luck with that healthcare Scott - you only have 10 years to go until Medicare! Hope you make it! Don't you wish you would have bought it when you were 41 and you could! But that would have been the RESPONSIBLE thing to do - what a man would have done - taking care of his family.

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

I always use to wonder who these 1% were until I frequent the political forum

Poll with almost 100,000 participating on the 3 amigos O-Pelosi-Reid raising debt ceiling 1.8 Trillion

Do You Support Raising the Federal Debt Ceiling?




<LABEL class=pds-feedback-label for=PDI_feedback1>Yes. I?m all for spending whatever is needed to turn our economy around. 1% (1,019 votes) </LABEL>


<LABEL class=pds-feedback-label for=PDI_feedback2>No. This out-of-control spending is outrageous and irresponsible. 99% (97,834 votes) </LABEL>


<LABEL class=pds-feedback-label for=PDI_feedback3>Undecided. <1% (153 votes) </LABEL>


Total Votes: 99,006
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2009/12/11/support-raising-federal-debt-ceiling/

 

[Chadman]

Thanks for the Fox News poll that showed the vast majority of Fox News watchers are against whatever democrats are for.
:00x15

 

[Trampled Underfoot]

Thanks for the Fox News poll that showed the vast majority of Fox News watchers are against whatever democrats are for.
:00x15

I thought that was insanely funny too. I get tired of replying to DTB. The time he spends on trying to prove his point is just insane. Sums up the state of the party.

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

Well I trapped 2 of the 1%'s

actually Chad if you will notice fox opinion poll on O is higher than national ave

So you might reconsider that your agreeing with 1% might be "a tad" out of the mainstream. :SIB

President Obama Job Approval

Polling Data

<TABLE class=data><TBODY><TR><TH class=noCenter>Poll</TH><TH class=date>Date</TH><TH>Sample</TH><TH>Approve </TH><TH>Disapprove </TH><TH class=spread>Spread</TH></TR><TR class=rcpAvg><TD class=noCenter>RCP Average</TD><TD>12/1 - 12/11</TD><TD>--</TD><TD>48.8</TD><TD>45.3</TD><TD class=spread>+3.5</TD></TR><TR class=alt><TD class=noCenter>Rasmussen Reports</TD><TD>12/9 - 12/11</TD><TD>1500 LV</TD><TD>46</TD><TD>53</TD><TD class=spread>-7</TD></TR><TR><TD class=noCenter>Gallup</TD><TD>12/7 - 12/11</TD><TD>1547 A</TD><TD>50</TD><TD>44</TD><TD class=spread>+6</TD></TR><TR class=alt><TD class=noCenter>FOX News</TD><TD>12/8 - 12/9</TD><TD>900 RV</TD><TD>50</TD><TD>44</TD><TD class=spread>+6</TD></TR><TR><TD class=noCenter>CBS News/NY Times</TD><TD>12/4 - 12/8</TD><TD>1031 A</TD><TD>50</TD><TD>39</TD><TD class=spread>+11</TD></TR><TR class=alt><TD class=noCenter>Bloomberg</TD><TD>12/3 - 12/7</TD><TD>1000 A</TD><TD>54</TD><TD>41</TD><TD class=spread>+13</TD></TR><TR><TD class=noCenter>Marist</TD><TD>12/2 - 12/7</TD><TD>858 RV</TD><TD>46</TD><TD>44</TD><TD class=spread>+2</TD></TR><TR class=alt><TD class=noCenter>Ipsos/McClatchy</TD><TD>12/3 - 12/6</TD><TD>1120 A</TD><TD>49</TD><TD>49</TD><TD class=spread>Tie</TD></TR><TR><TD class=noCenter>Quinnipiac</TD><TD>12/1 - 12/6</TD><TD>2313 RV</TD><TD>46</TD><TD>44</TD><TD class=spread>+2</TD></TR><TR class=alt><TD class=noCenter>CNN/Opinion Research</TD><TD>12/2 - 12/3</TD><TD>1041 A</TD><TD>48</TD><TD>50</TD><TD class=spread>-2</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>See All President Obama Job Approval Polling Data

--and TU You pretty well sum up the 1%

 

[Trampled Underfoot]

--and TU You pretty well sum up the 1%

Do you think this is really a good use of your time? I try to use my free time to further improve my life. Thats okay though, you keep digging up charts and graphs that no one else gives a shit about.

 

[Chadman]

Quite the contrary, Wayne. I don't agree with the 1% in the Fox poll. I don't think we should spend whatever it takes. I think fiscal responsibility has to enter into this at some point. My problem is not knowing for sure when and where. I listened to plenty of conservative pundits and economic experts that told me that we needed these stimulus packages, and even more than we have enacted. Some still maintain we need more. Plenty of conservatives said our financial system would go under without those stimulus packages. Plenty. And we really don't know for sure that we wouldn't have, truth be told.

So, you're initial premise about me personally is wrong. Seems to be a consistent place for you here over the past day or so...

Not that it matters, but we all know each poll is different, different people responding, and we all know it all depends on how questions are asked, and who is asked, and when. I know many times you have dismissed polls without a blink when you didn't agree with their findings - and rightfully so in some cases. So, if you need this to keep yourself going, so be it. It's an easier argument than some you've posted here in the past couple of days, and I can see why you'd want to spend time on this subject, and not the other one you started.

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

Quite the contrary, Wayne. I don't agree with the 1% in the Fox poll. I don't think we should spend whatever it takes. I think fiscal responsibility has to enter into this at some point. My problem is not knowing for sure when and where. I listened to plenty of conservative pundits and economic experts that told me that we needed these stimulus packages, and even more than we have enacted. Some still maintain we need more. Plenty of conservatives said our financial system would go under without those stimulus packages. Plenty. And we really don't know for sure that we wouldn't have, truth be told.

So, you're initial premise about me personally is wrong. Seems to be a consistent place for you here over the past day or so...

Not that it matters, but we all know each poll is different, different people responding, and we all know it all depends on how questions are asked, and who is asked, and when. I know many times you have dismissed polls without a blink when you didn't agree with their findings - and rightfully so in some cases. So, if you need this to keep yourself going, so be it. It's an easier argument than some you've posted here in the past couple of days, and I can see why you'd want to spend time on this subject, and not the other one you started.

I knew you were not with 1% Chad--You just couldn't pass putting in dig on fox--so thought I'd trow in my own dig--however we have several here that would be.

Reason I used fox opinion is not many others that have 100,000 viewers let alone participants in polls

I think their polls are tainted a tad because its viewers and not random population--this is evident as otherwise we'd have at least 12% in favor.

This might suprise a lot of foks also

December 11th, 2009
Can't Hide the Decline: Obama Hits New Polling Lows
Posted by Tom Bevan | Email This | Permalink | Email Author
Excluding the Rasmussen and Gallup overnight tracking polls, there have been seven major national surveys released this week. President Obama has recorded an all-time low job approval rating in six of the seven:
Quinnipiac 46%
Marist 46%
CNN/Opinion Research 48%
Ipsos/McClatchy 49%
CBS News/NY Times 50%
Bloomberg* 54%
Only one poll - FOX News/Opinion Dynamics - showed in increase in President Obama's job approval rating over the last month. In the current survey, FOX has Obama at 50% approval, up from his all-time low of 46% recorded in last month's poll.
The net result, of course, is that Obama has also reached an all-time low approval rating in the RCP National Average at 48.9%. Obama initially dropped under the 50% for the first time over Thanksgiving - he spent three days at 49.9% between November 25 and November 28. After ticking up back over 50% right after the holiday break, Obama went under 50% again on December 4th and has remained there for seven straight days: