League official admits: a bad call was made

Blitz

Hopeful
Forum Member
Jan 6, 2002
7,541
46
48
58
North of Titletown AKA Boston
1/26/07

League official admits: a bad call was made
Kyle Psaty

Rewind to the third quarter of last Sunday?s AFC Championship game, when Patriots cornerback Ellis Hobbs was flagged for pass interference.

It?s a second-and-seven play on the Patriots 19-yard line. Peyton Manning sets up behind center, checks the coverage and calls for the snap. He takes a three step drop and fires the football into the end zone, aimed for wideout Reggie Wayne, who?s given Ellis Hobbs the slip and is streaking down the sideline for a touchdown catch.

But Hobbs stays with the Colts No. 2 receiver. He closes on Wayne, chopping his feet to avoid bumping into the wideout, a sure penalty since his back is to the passer. Wayne?s eyes widen, indicating the ball is on its way. Free from contact, Hobbs jumps up but doesn?t turn to look for the football, which strikes Hobbs? left biceps from behind and falls to the turf dead.

Penalty flags fly, and referee Bill Carollo turns on his mic to let everyone know that the penalty?s on the ?Defense. Automatic first down. The ball will be placed at the 1-yard line.? Manning hits former Patriot Dan Klecko for a 1-yard touchdown pass. A two-point conversion follows, tying it 21-21.

?Face-guarding,? said CBS analyst and former Giants quarterback Phil Simms during the replay. ?Ellis Hobbs jumps up, just tries to get in the way of Reggie Wayne. Does not see the football. Does not play it. Easy call.?

Not so, according to replay official Dean Blandino, who joined Bob Boylston in the booth that day.

In a recent posting by Vic Ketchman, Jaguars.com senior editor, Ketchman responded to a fan?s posting about the play, writing, ?You are absolutely correct. Face-guarding was discontinued several years ago and I completely missed it.?

Apparently, Ketchman had already responded to questions about the play, attributing the call to face-guarding just like Simms and countless fans across the nation who tuned in to watch the most viewed AFC Championship game in over 20 years.
There is no NFL rule against face-guarding.

?I talked to Dean Blandino in the league office and he confirmed what you?re saying,? wrote Ketchman. ?Ellis Hobbs should not have been flagged for pass-interference. He didn?t make contact with the receiver and in no way did Hobbs impede Reggie Wayne?s ability to catch the pass. Blandino confirmed that the incorrect call was made. ? Referee Bill Carollo made no reference to face-guarding in his explanation, but CBS analyst Phil Simms did. Apparently, he, too, doesn?t know the rule no longer exists. The next time you hear a TV analyst say, ?he wasn?t playing the ball,? think of the Hobbs play, then turn down the sound.?
 

Emersonboozer

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 3, 2006
822
2
0
1/26/07

League official admits: a bad call was made
Kyle Psaty

Rewind to the third quarter of last Sunday?s AFC Championship game, when Patriots cornerback Ellis Hobbs was flagged for pass interference.

It?s a second-and-seven play on the Patriots 19-yard line. Peyton Manning sets up behind center, checks the coverage and calls for the snap. He takes a three step drop and fires the football into the end zone, aimed for wideout Reggie Wayne, who?s given Ellis Hobbs the slip and is streaking down the sideline for a touchdown catch.

But Hobbs stays with the Colts No. 2 receiver. He closes on Wayne, chopping his feet to avoid bumping into the wideout, a sure penalty since his back is to the passer. Wayne?s eyes widen, indicating the ball is on its way. Free from contact, Hobbs jumps up but doesn?t turn to look for the football, which strikes Hobbs? left biceps from behind and falls to the turf dead.

Penalty flags fly, and referee Bill Carollo turns on his mic to let everyone know that the penalty?s on the ?Defense. Automatic first down. The ball will be placed at the 1-yard line.? Manning hits former Patriot Dan Klecko for a 1-yard touchdown pass. A two-point conversion follows, tying it 21-21.

?Face-guarding,? said CBS analyst and former Giants quarterback Phil Simms during the replay. ?Ellis Hobbs jumps up, just tries to get in the way of Reggie Wayne. Does not see the football. Does not play it. Easy call.?

Not so, according to replay official Dean Blandino, who joined Bob Boylston in the booth that day.

In a recent posting by Vic Ketchman, Jaguars.com senior editor, Ketchman responded to a fan?s posting about the play, writing, ?You are absolutely correct. Face-guarding was discontinued several years ago and I completely missed it.?

Apparently, Ketchman had already responded to questions about the play, attributing the call to face-guarding just like Simms and countless fans across the nation who tuned in to watch the most viewed AFC Championship game in over 20 years.
There is no NFL rule against face-guarding.

?I talked to Dean Blandino in the league office and he confirmed what you?re saying,? wrote Ketchman. ?Ellis Hobbs should not have been flagged for pass-interference. He didn?t make contact with the receiver and in no way did Hobbs impede Reggie Wayne?s ability to catch the pass. Blandino confirmed that the incorrect call was made. ? Referee Bill Carollo made no reference to face-guarding in his explanation, but CBS analyst Phil Simms did. Apparently, he, too, doesn?t know the rule no longer exists. The next time you hear a TV analyst say, ?he wasn?t playing the ball,? think of the Hobbs play, then turn down the sound.?

Geez not a bad call in Mannings favor? You are kidding me? Right? LOL Why do they make rules to totally handcuff the defense? Why does the Dback have to be looking for the ball? As long as he doesnt make contact with the reciever it should not be a penalty. Period Just another game changing bad call late in the playoffs but we should be used to that by now. Right?
 

Statman02

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 29, 2000
1,063
8
38
yep.....another game changing mistake by the officials puts the Colts in the super bowl.......if there is any justice in this world....if there is a football God in heaven........the Colts wont win this next game......may I join our president in using one of his favorite words and call for JUSTICE for Osama Bin Laden and JUSTICE for the Indianapolis Colts
 

edludes

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 25, 2001
3,592
38
0
alaska
Hardly a "game changing" call given the field position and the fact it was only 2nd down,early in the third qtr.3rd and 7 from the 19 going in is hardly unmakeable,especially considering how tired the NE defense was and how well Indy O was playing.Do you think NE is going to win every game were it not for a "bad call" here and there?You already got that bogus "Tuck" rule call against the Raiders,negating an obvious Brady fumble for entry into your first Super Bowl.NO,it wasn't going to be NEs game,it isn't NEs year.Did you watch the rest of the second half?Indy would have just found another way to have won.3rd and 7 from the NE 19,going in,and your sure you would have had a stop....just remember how wide open Wayne was in the first place.
 

TouchdownJesus

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 13, 2004
6,140
75
48
North Carolina
I was unaware that "face-guarding" was now legal. When did this happen?

If guys can face-guard, then its easy as hell to play defense, especially against anything close to a long pass. Just stay within a step or so of the guy and when his eyes get big, simply cover his eyes with your hands without touching him. Either that, or wave your hands in his face.

I could have been an NFL player.
 

TouchdownJesus

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 13, 2004
6,140
75
48
North Carolina
The main drawback is being susceptible to the run. But, thats why LB's and safeties yell "PASS" or "RUN" as soon as they see it.

At this point, I'd like to be an NFL coach.
 

smurphy

cartographer
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,911
135
63
16
L.A.
so that makes 1 bad call going against the pats versus the 12 or so big ones that have helped them the last 5 years.

i seem to remember most people around here predicting favorable calls for the colts ahead of this game. if anything, this just re-affirms the good handicapping.
 

WayneWonder

Registered User
Forum Member
May 17, 2005
1,380
2
0
Wilmington, DE
The comeback started at this point. In the third quarter came the play that Colts players, coaches and front office people, especially Bill Polian, have been waiting for since the 2004 AFC Championship. In that game, New England was never called for defensive pass interference, despite numerous obvious muggings of Colts' receivers. Bill Belichick, knowing officials tend to call defensive pass interference and offensive holding (the two most damaging penalties) less as the postseason progresses, had instructed his defensive backs to interfere with Colts receivers mercilessly until such time as a flag was thrown -- and a flag was never thrown. Polian complained bitterly after that game, and should have; the league changed its officiating procedures, instructing zebras to end the traditional practice of switching to "let the boys play" in the postseason. Then in 2005, New England beat Indianapolis again in the playoffs, and again was never flagged for defensive pass interference. Now it's the third quarter of the 2007 AFC Championship, and once again New England has not been flagged for defensive interference. Eleven consecutive postseason quarters between the Pats and Colts and we're supposed to believe New England has never once interfered with an Indianapolis receiver? Finally the yellow flies -- Ellis Hobbs called for pass interference in the end zone. Polian must have yelled, "Finally, FINALLY!"

And now they are saying it was a mistake!!! Boy those New England boys must be really well coached.
 

Emersonboozer

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 3, 2006
822
2
0
I was unaware that "face-guarding" was now legal. When did this happen?

If guys can face-guard, then its easy as hell to play defense, especially against anything close to a long pass. Just stay within a step or so of the guy and when his eyes get big, simply cover his eyes with your hands without touching him. Either that, or wave your hands in his face.

I could have been an NFL player.

I disagree whole heartedly. If you can run step for step with a reciever why wouldnt you already be an NFL Dback? If the dback is close enough to put his hands up and deflect the ball then hes already made a good play or the QB has underthrown the ball. How many times do you see a dback run into the reciever because the ball was underthrown and the reciever slows down and the contact is called against the Dback? Too many times in my opinion. The main point of this thread isnt if it is interference or not but just when they choose to call it and when they dont. Get it? It seems they leave alot of grey areas in certain situations so they can be called either way and justified. THERE IS THE POINT.
 

Pujo21

Registered
Forum Member
May 14, 2002
2,772
2
0
Phils simms is less than knowlegable. They don't make announcers like Ray Scott , Charlie Jones, Gowdy anymore. Why are these stations forcing Simms and Brent Douchbagger etc down our throats.



The refs screwed The Patriots but it was payback for all the years The Pats were getting away with their Def Backs mugging everyone for years.

peyback is a bitch.
 

Dizzayton

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 8, 2001
1,747
6
0
Simms is the worst announcer in NFL. I will take Michaels and Madden anyday over that guy. Complete joke. So is Joe Theisman.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top