Life In Solitary

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
Voices from Solitary: A Sentence Worse Than Death

March 11, 2013 By Voices from Solitary 172 Comments


The following essay is by William Blake, who has been held in solitary confinement for nearly 26 years. Currently he is in administrative segregation at Elmira Correctional Facility, a maximum security facility located in south central New York State. In 1987, Blake, then 23 and in county court on a drug charge, murdered one deputy and wounded another in a failed escape attempt. Sentenced to 77 years to life, Blake has no chance of ever leaving prison alive, and almost no chance of ever leaving solitary?-a fate he considers ?a sentence worse than death.?

This powerful essay earned Blake an Honorable Mention in the Yale Law Journal?s Prison Law Writing Contest, chosen from more than 1,500 entries. He describes here in painstaking detail his excruciating experiences over the last quarter-century. ?I?ve read of the studies done regarding the effects of long-term isolation in solitary confinement on inmates, seen how researchers say it can ruin a man?s mind, and I?ve watched with my own eyes the slow descent of sane men into madness?sometimes not so slow,? Blake writes. ?What I?ve never seen the experts write about, though, is what year after year of abject isolation can do to that immaterial part in our middle where hopes survive or die and the spirit resides.? That is what Blake himself seeks to convey in his essay. ?Lisa Dawson

................................................................... . . . . . . . . . . . .

?You deserve an eternity in hell,? Onondaga County Supreme Court judge Kevin Mulroy told me from his bench as I stood before him for sentencing on July 10, 1987. Apparently he had the idea that God was not the only one justified to make such judgment calls.

Judge Mulroy wanted to ?pump six buck?s worth of electricity into [my] body,? he also said, though I suggest that it wouldn?t have taken six cent?s worth to get me good and dead. He must have wanted to reduce me and The Chair to a pile of ashes. My ?friend? Governor Mario Cuomo wouldn?t allow him to do that, though, the judge went on, bemoaning New York State?s lack of a death statute due to the then-Governor?s repeated vetoes of death penalty bills that had been approved by the state legislature. Governor Cuomo?s publicly expressed dudgeon over being called a friend of mine by Judge Mulroy was understandable, given the crimes that I had just been convicted of committing. I didn?t care much for him either, truth be told. He built too many new prisons in my opinion, and cut academic and vocational programs in the prisons already standing.

I know that Judge Mulroy was not nearly alone in wanting to see me executed for the crime I committed when I shot two Onondaga County sheriff?s deputies inside the Town of Dewitt courtroom during a failed escape attempt, killing one and critically wounding the other. There were many people in the Syracuse area who shared his sentiments, to be sure. I read the hateful letters to the editor printed in the local newspapers; I could even feel the anger of the people when I?d go to court, so palpable was it. Even by the standards of my own belief system, such as it was back then, I deserved to die for what I had done. I took the life of a man without just cause, committing an act so monumentally wrong that I could not have argued that it was unfair had I been required to pay with my own life.

What nobody knew or suspected back then, not even I, on that very day I would begin suffering a punishment that I am convinced beyond all doubt is far worse than any death sentence could possibly have been. On July 10, 2012, I finished my 25th consecutive year in solitary confinement, where at the time of this writing I remain. Though it is true that I?ve never died and so don?t know exactly what the experience would entail, for the life of me I cannot fathom how dying any death could be harder or more terrible than living through all that I have been forced to endure for the last quarter-century.

Prisoners call it The Box. Prison authorities have euphemistically dubbed it the Special Housing Unit, or SHU (pronounced ?shoe?) for short. In society it is known as solitary confinement. It is 23-hour a day lockdown in a cell smaller than some closets I?ve seen, with one hour allotted to ?recreation? consisting of placement in a concrete enclosed yard by oneself or, in some prisons, a cage made of steel bars. There is nothing in a SHU yard but air: no TV, no balls to bounce, no games to play, no other inmates, nothing. There is very little allowed in a SHU cell, also. Three sets of plain white underwear, one pair of green pants, one green short-sleeved button-up shirt, one green sweatshirt, ten books or magazines total, twenty pictures of the people you love, writing supplies, a bar of soap, toothbrush and toothpaste, one deodorant stick but no shampoo, and that?s about it. No clothes of your own, only prison-made. No food from commissary or packages, only three unappetizing meals a day handed to you through a narrow slot in your cell door. No phone calls, no TV, no luxury items at all. You get a set of cheap headphones to use, and you can pick between the two or three (depending on which prison you?re in) jacks in the cell wall to plug into. You can listen to a TV station in one jack, and use your imagination while trying to figure out what is going on when the music indicates drama but the dialogue doesn?t suffice to tell you anything. Or you can listen to some music, but you?re out of luck if you?re a rock-n-roll fan and find only rap is playing.

Your options in what to do to occupy your time in SHU are scant, but there will be boredom aplenty. You probably think that you understand boredom, know its feel, but really you don?t. What you call boredom would seem a whirlwind of activity to me, choices so many that I?d likely be befuddled in trying to pick one over all the others. You could turn on a TV and watch a movie or some other show; I haven?t seen a TV since the 1980s. You could go for a walk in the neighborhood; I can?t walk more than a few feet in any direction before I run into a concrete wall or steel bars. You could pick up your phone and call a friend; I don?t know if I?d be able to remember how to make a collect call or even if the process is still the same, so many years it?s been since I?ve used a telephone. Play with your dog or cat and experience their love, or watch your fish in their aquarium; the only creatures I see daily are the mice and cockroaches that infect the unit, and they?re not very lovable and nothing much to look at. There is a pretty good list of options available to you, if you think about it, many things that you could do even when you believe you are so bored. You take them for granted because they are there all the time, but if it were all taken away you?d find yourself missing even the things that right now seem so small and insignificant. Even the smallest stuff can become as large as life when you have had nearly nothing for far too long.

I haven?t been outside in one of the SHU yards in this prison for about four years now. I haven?t seen a tree or blade of grass in all that time, and wouldn?t see these things were I to go back to the yard. In Elmira Correctional Facility, where I am presently imprisoned, the SHU yards are about three or four times as big as my cell. There are twelve SHU yards total, each surrounded by concrete walls, one or two of the walls lined with windows. If you look in the windows you?ll see the same SHU company that you live on, and maybe you?ll get a look at a guy who was locked next to you for months that you?ve talked to every day but had never before gotten a look at. If you look up you?ll find bars and a screen covering the yard, and if you?re lucky maybe you can see a bit of blue sky through the mesh, otherwise it?ll be hard to believe that you?re even outside. If it?s a good day you can walk around the SHU yard in small circles staring ahead with your mind on nothingness, like the nothing you?ve got in that lacuna with you. If it?s a bad day, though, maybe your mind will be filled with remembrances of all you used to have that you haven?t seen now for many years, and you?ll be missing it, feeling the loss, feeling it bad.

Life in the box is about an austere sameness that makes it difficult to tell one day from a thousand others. Nothing much and nothing new ever happen to tell you if it? a Monday or a Friday, March or September, 1987 or 2012. The world turns, technology advances, and things in the streets change and keep changing all the time. Not so in a solitary confinement unit, however. I?ve never seen a cell phone except in pictures in magazines. I?ve never touched a computer in my life, never been on the Internet and wouldn?t know how to get there if you sat me in front of a computer, turned it on for me, and gave me directions. SHU is a timeless place, and I can honestly say that there is not a single thing I?d see looking around right now that is different from what I saw in Shawangunk Correctional Facility?s box when I first arrived there from Syracuse?s county jail in 1987. Indeed, there is probably nothing different in SHU now than in SHU a hundred years ago, save the headphones. Then and now there were a few books, a few prison-made clothing articles, walls and bars and human beings locked in cages? and misery.

There is always the misery. If you manage to escape it yourself for a time, there will ever be plenty around in others for you to sense; and though you?ll be unable to look into their eyes and see it, you might hear it in the nighttime when tough guys cry not-so-tough tears that are forced out of them by the unrelenting stress and strain that life in SHU is an exercise in.

I?ve read of the studies done regarding the effects of long-term isolation in solitary confinement on inmates, seen how researchers say it can ruin a man?s mind, and I?ve watched with my own eyes the slow descent of sane men into madness?sometimes not so slow. What I?ve never seen the experts write about, though, is what year after year of abject isolation can do to that immaterial part in our middle where hopes survive or die and the spirit resides. So please allow me to speak to you of what I?ve seen and felt during some of the harder times of my twenty-five-year SHU odyssey.

I?ve experienced times so difficult and felt broken and loneliness to such a degree that it seemed to be a physical thing inside so thick it felt like it was choking me, trying to squeeze the sanity from my mind, the spirit from my soul, and the life from my body. I?ve seen and felt hope becoming like a foggy ephemeral thing, hard to get ahold of, even harder to keep ahold of as the years and then decades disappeared while I stayed trapped in the emptiness of the SHU world. I?ve seen minds slipping down the slope of sanity, descending into insanity, and I?ve been terrified that I would end up like the guys around me that have cracked and become nuts. It?s a sad thing to watch a human being go insane before your eyes because he can?t handle the pressure that the box exerts on the mind, but it is sadder still to see the spirit shaken from a soul. And it is more disastrous. Sometimes the prison guards find them hanging and blue; sometimes their necks get broken when they jump from their bed, the sheet tied around the neck that?s also wrapped around the grate covering the light in the ceiling snapping taut with a pop. I?ve seen the spirit leaving men in SHU and have witnessed the results.

The box is a place like no other place on planet Earth. It?s a place where men full of rage can stand at their cell gates fulminating on their neighbor or neighbors, yelling and screaming and speaking some of the filthiest words that could ever come from a human mouth, do it for hours on end, and despite it all never suffer the loss of a single tooth, never get his head knocked clean off his shoulders. You will never hear words more despicable or see mouth wars more insane than what occurs all the time in SHU, not anywhere else in the world, because there would be serious violence before any person could peak so much foulness for so long. In the box the heavy steel bars allow mouths to run with impunity when they could not otherwise do so, while the ambient is one that is sorely conducive to an exceedingly hot sort of anger that seems to press the lips on to ridiculous extremes. Day and night I have been awakened to the sound of the rage being loosed loudly on SHU gates, and I?d be a liar if I said I haven?t at times been one of the madmen doing the yelling.

I have lived for months where the first thing I became aware of upon waking in the morning is the malodorous funk of human feces, tinged with the acrid stench of days-old urine, where I eat my breakfast, lunch, and dinner with that same stink assaulting my senses, and where the last thought I had before falling into unconscious sleep was: ?Damn, it smells like shit in here.? I have felt like I was on an island surrounded by vicious sharks, flanked on both sides by mentally ill inmates who would splash their excrement all over their cells, all over the company outside their cells, and even all over themselves. I have went days into weeks that seemed like they?d never end without being able to sleep more than short snatches before I was shocked out of my dreams, and thrown back into a living nightmare, by the screams of sick men who have lost all ability to control themselves, or by the banging of cell bars and walls of these same madmen. I have been so tired when sleep inside was impossible that I went outside into a snowstorm to get some sleep.

The wind blew hard and snowflakes swirled around and around in the small SHU yard at Shawangunk, and I had but one cheap prison-produced coat on and a single set of state clothes beneath. To escape the biting cold I dug into the seven- or eight-foot high mountain of snow that was piled in the center of the yard, the accumulation from inmates shoveling a narrow path to walk along the perimeter. With bare hands gone numb, I dug out a small room in that pile of snow, making myself a sort of igloo. When it was done I crawled inside, rolled onto my back on the snow-covered concrete ground, and almost instantly fell asleep, my bare head pillowed in the snow. I didn?t even have a hat to wear.

An hour or so later I was awakened by the guards come to take me back to the stink and insanity inside: ?Blake, rec?s over?? I had gotten an hour?s straight sleep, minus the few minutes it had taken me to dig my igloo. That was more than I had gotten in weeks without being shocked awake by the CA-RACK! of a sneaker being slapped into a plexiglass shield covering the cell of an inmate who had thrown things nasty; or the THUD-THUD-THUD! of an inmate pounding his cell wall, or bars being banged, gates being kicked and rattled, or men screaming like they?re dying and maybe wishing that they were; or to the tirade of an inmate letting loose his pent-up rage on a guard or fellow inmate, sounding every bit the lunatic that too long a time in the mind-breaking confines of the box had caused him to be.

I have been so exhausted physically, mental strength being tested to limits that can cause strong folks to snap, that I have begged God, tough guy I fancy myself, ?Please, Lord, make them stop. Please let me get some peace.? As the prayers went ungranted and the insanity around me persisted, I felt my own rage rising above the exhaustion and misery, no longer in a begging mood: ?Lord, kill those motherfuckers, why don?t you!? I yelled at the Almighty, my own sanity so close to being gone that it seemed as if I were walking along a precipice and could see down to where I?d be falling, seeing myself shot, sanity a dead thing killed by the fall. I?d be afraid later on, terrified, when I reflected back on how close I had seemed to come to losing my mind, but at that moment all I could do was feel anger of a fiery kind: anger at the maniacs creating the noise and the stink and the madness; anger at my keepers and the real creators of this hell; anger at society for turning a blind eye to the torment and torture going on here that its tax dollars are financing; and perhaps most of all, anger at myself for doing all that I did that never should have been done that put me into the clutches of this beastly prison system to begin with. I would be angry at the world; enraged, actually, so burning hot was what I would be feeling.

I had wet toilet paper stuffed hard into both ears, sock folded up and pressed into my ears, a pillow wrapped around the sides and back of my head covering my ears, and a blanket tied around all that to hold everything in place, lying in bed praying for sleep. But still the noise was incredible, a thunderous cacophony of insanity, sleep impossible. Inmates lost in the throes of lavalike rage firing philippics at one another for even reasons they didn?t know, threatening to kill one another?s mommas, daddies, even the children, too. Nothing is sacred in SHU. It is an environment that is so grossly abnormal, so antithetical to normal human interactions, that it twists the innerds of men all around who for too long dwell there. Their minds, their morals, and their mannerisms get bent badly, ending far off-center. Right becomes whatever and wrong no longer exists. Restraint becomes a burden and is unnecessary with concrete and steel separating everyone, so inmates let it go. Day after day, perhaps year after year, the anger grows, fueled by the pain caused by the conditions till rage is born and burning so hot that it too hurts.

Trying to put into words what is so unlike anything else I know or have ever experienced seems an impossible endeavor, because there is nothing even remotely like it any place else to compare it to, and nothing that will do to you on the inside what so many years in SHU has done to me. All that I am able to articulate about the world of Special Housing Unit and what it is and what it does may seem terrible to you indeed, but the reality of living in this place for a full quarter of a century is yet even more terrible, still. You would have to live it, experience it in all its aspects and the fullness of its days and struggles added up, to really appreciate and understand just how truly terrible this plight of mine has been, and how truly ugly life in the box can be at times, even for just a single day. I spent nine years in Shawangunk?s box, six years in Great Meadow?s, and I?ve been here in Elmira?s SHU for four years now, and through all of this time I have never spent a single day in a Mental Health Unit cell because I attempted or threatened suicide, or for any other reason. I have thought about suicide in times past when the days had become exceedingly difficult to handle, but I?m still here. I?ve had some of my SHU neighbors succumb to the suicidal thoughts, though, choosing death over another day of life in the box. I have never bugged out myself, but I?ve known times that I had come too close. I?ve had neighbors who came to SHU normal men, and I?ve seen them leave broken and not anything resembling normal anymore. I?ve seen guys give up on their dreams and lose all hope in the box, but my own hopes and dreams are still alive and well inside me. The insidious workings of the SHU program have yet to get me stuck on that meandering path to internal destruction that I have seen so many of my neighbors end up on, and perhaps this is a miracle; I?d rather be dead than to lose control of my mind.

Had I known in 1987 that I would spend the next quarter-century in solitary confinement, I would have certainly killed myself. If I took a month to die and spent every minute of it in severe pain, it seems to me that on a balance that fate would still be far easier to endure than the last twenty-five years have been. If I try to imagine what kind of death, even a slow one, would be worse than twenty-five years in the box?and I have tried to imagine it?I can come up with nothing. Set me afire, pummel and bludgeon me, cut me to bits, stab me, shoot me, do what you will in the worst of ways, but none of it could come close to making me feel things as cumulatively horrifying as what I?ve experienced through my years in solitary. Dying couldn?t take but a short time if you or the State were to kill me; in SHU I have died a thousand internal deaths. The sum of my quarter-century?s worth of suffering has been that bad.

To some judges sitting on high who?ve never done a day in the box, maybe twenty-five years of this isn?t cruel and unusual. To folks who have an insatiable appetite for vengeance against prisoners who have committed terrible crimes, perhaps it doesn?t even matter how cruel or unusual my plight is or isn?t. For people who cannot let go of hate and know not how to forgive, no amount of remorse would matter, no level of contrition would be quite enough, only endless retribution would be right in their eyes. Like Judge Milroy, only an eternity in hell would satisfy them. Given even that in retribution, though, the unforgiving haters wouldn?t be satisfied that hell was hot enough; they?d want the heat turned up. Thankfully these folks are the few, that in the minds of the many, at a point, enough is enough.

No matter what the world would think about things that they cannot imagine in even their worst nightmares, I know that twenty-five years in solitary confinement is utterly and certainly cruel, moreso than death in or by an electric chair, gas chamber, lethal injection, bullet in the head, or even immolation could possibly be. The sum of the suffering caused by any of these quick deaths would be a small thing next to the sum of the suffering that this quarter-century in SHU has brought to bear on me. Solitary confinement for the length of time that I have endured it, even apart from the inhuman conditions that I have too often been made to endure it in, is torture of a terrible kind; and anyone who doesn?t think so surely knows not what to think.

I have served a sentence worse than death.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
Palin: "If you don't have a lobbyist in DC, you are not at the table, you are on the menu."

images


the old hag look just aint doing it for Sarah
 
Last edited:

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/GFmvMHPQ1k8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
The war remains one of America's most controversial, not to say catastrophic, military endeavors. As we now know, though the U.S. would not invade Iraq until 2003, President Bush (or rather Vice President Dick Cheney, the real "decider") had already determined that the second step in the "war on terror" would be to obliterate Saddam's regime.

A decade later we know the result. Joshua Hersh, The Huffington Post's foreign affairs correspondent, summarizes it brilliantly:

When President George W. Bush announced the invasion into Iraq in March 2003, the goal was to remove a dangerous dictator and his supposed stocks of weapons of mass destruction. It was also to create a functioning democracy and thereby inspire what Bush called a "global democracy revolution."
The effort was supposed to be cheap -- to require few troops and even less time. Instead, it cost the United States $800 billion at least, thousands of lives and nearly nine grueling years ... [T]oday in Fallujah, the site of two of the war's largest and most devastating military campaigns, the very best that can be said is that two years late to the party -- not 10 years early -- the Arab Spring has arrived. But the government the people are rising up against is the very one the U.S. installed.


Ten years ago Saturday, the first U.S. troops started to stealthily enter Iraq in advance of the massive "shock and awe" bombing that began on March 20, 2003.
......................................................................


I questioned Iraq well before the war happened. In fact, I told my Republican friends if I'm wrong, I'll worship GW, but if I'm right, he needs to admit he was wrong and accept responsibility like the republicans claim everyone else should. The funny thing is that my hair cutter, who was a vet, said he saw trains moving tons of military equipment well before the American people had any idea we were considering war. He said the war was going to happen no matter what. It was set. Sad... And the GOP complains about the costs of welfare, where 80% of those on welfare are actually working. Yet, they have no problem with trillions on war... What a waste. Fiscally conservative, pfft.

blog post.........


Bush wasn't wrong. He was doing this for the oil industry and at Cheney's insistence and Cheney was doing it for Halliburton and hundreds of millions of dollars. Follow the money trail. Bush's phoney pretext for war was wrong, but Bush did everything he intended to for the $$$$-purpose he intended. The only amazing thing is that so many people willingly pretended that Bush's obviously bogus pretext for the war was accurate -too many influential people interested in making money off war and in neo-conservative politics.
..............................................................


pity really
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
1. Pakistan
> Pct. disapprove of U.S. leadership: 79%
> GDP per capita: $2,786
> Life expectancy: 65.2 years

Pakistan?s disapproval of U.S. leadership rose to 79% of all Gallup respondents in 2012, a 30 percentage point increase from the year before. According to the polling agency, this was due to a combination of American drone strikes and the online release of an anti-Islam film made in the United States. Diplomatic relations were tested in 2011 when the U.S. raided a house near Pakistan?s top military academy to find and kill Osama bin Laden. Pakistan had long claimed bin Laden was not in the country. In 2010, Pakistan was one of five nations with the worst rating on the political terror scale, which measures both political violence and terror within the country. The nation also was among the lowest ranked on Gallup?s social well-being index for 2011.

.......................................................................

too bad we couldnt drop a surgical nuke on these people instead of sending them millions a year so they can survive.

oh wait we did ...........

Obama double tapped Bin Laden:0074
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
For more than a century, the White House Easter Egg Roll has been insulated from the sort of partisan sniping that now dominates Washington politics.

That tradition ended Monday, when Republicans started complaining about a notice that the event could be canceled due to a potential government shutdown. The Obama administration has already come under GOP criticism for canceling White House tours due to the mandatory, across-the-board cuts known as sequestration.:scared :SIB

The memo ? which doesn?t actually say the White House is nixing the bunny fest, but just that it might do so at some point during the next couple of weeks ? warns ticket-holders that the nation?s financial woes may affect the 135th Easter Egg role slated for April 1. (Note: this is not an April?s Fools Day joke.)

?Finally, by using these tickets, guests are acknowledging that this event is subject to cancellation due to funding uncertainty surrounding the Executive Office of the President and other federal agencies,? it reads. ?If cancelled, the event will not be re-scheduled. We will notify you if there are any modifications to this event.?

House and Senate members received the memo last week, along with the notice that each congressional family would receive a total of five tickets; Politico first reported news of it Monday.

Former House speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) was quick to attack the Obama administration over the issue, tweeting: ?Shameless! How else can you describe the threat to cancel white house Easter egg hunt? Maybe pathetic, demagogic? You try to find right words.?:142smilie

A White House official, who was not authorized to discuss the planning of the event on the record, confirmed the warning went out to all ticket-holders who received confirmation they secured tickets, including those who obtained passes through a lottery.

Congress has yet to finalize a continuing resolution, which could pass within a matter of days.

?Because we distribute tickets to the Easter Egg Roll far in advance, we alerted all ticket holders that this event is subject to cancellation due to funding uncertainty, including the possibility of a government shutdown,? the official wrote in an e-mail. ?However, we are currently proceeding as planned with the Easter Egg Roll.?

In fact, first lady Michelle Obama has invited guests of her own to the event, including the family of Hadiya Pendleton, the 15-year-old who was slain in Chicago just a week after performing at President Obama?s second inauguration. CBS Chicago reported Monday that Hadiya?s mother, Cleopatra Cowley-Pendleton, and her 10-year-old son Nathanial have accepted the invitation; the White House official said they had been invited but did not confirm their attendance.
................................................................

why are the Republicans crying about austerity.

They dont cry about making every attempt to cute SS or even medicare

but shit dont stop the white house tours and the easter egg hunt

how pathetic is this..

Maybe Trump will kick in for paying the tours and the Easter hunt.

It has to start somewhere.

cut this shit out. It probably costs hundreds of thousands to put on the easter egg thing.

Let them go local for their eggs.

pity really
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
barack-obama-limo.jpg



The Dow Jones Industrial Average rallied 55.91 points, or 0.39 percent, to close at 14,511.73, led by American Express and Coca-Cola, after earlier hitting a fresh intraday high for the eighth time this month at 14,546.82. The blue-chip index is up nearly 11 percent so far this year
,.......................................................................\


:0074 :0074
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
Former vice presidential candidate and current House Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis., gave a little more oxygen to the idea that he?ll run for president in 2016.

?I?m going to make my mind up later,? Ryan said on CNN today, as NBC?s Kasie Hunt noted. ?I will give it serious consideration.? That remark goes beyond his comments earlier this month on Fox News.

?We look back at it as a very positive experience,? Ryan told Fox News? Chris Wallace. ?We actually enjoyed it. We got to meet hundreds of thousands of people who care so much about their country. We learned a lot, just about the greatness of this country. How hard-working people want to get ahead and make a difference. So I actually found it a very pleasant exercise to be candid with you.?

On the other hand, Politico?s Mike Allen Jim Vandehei cited Ryan associates who say he doesn?t like campaigning. ?Ryan seems increasingly intrigued with the prospect of amassing more power within Congress, using his juice in the House leadership to promote his trademark Medicare plan and engineer spending cuts,? they suggested. ?The friends say this path could ultimately lead him to an eventual run for House GOP leader, or even speaker, an option they surmise he has warmed to since the election.?
.........................................................


:142smilie :142smilie :142smilie

Run him against Hillory

he wil be trounced

next !
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,010
250
83
Jefferson City, Missouri
Former vice presidential candidate and current House Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis., gave a little more oxygen to the idea that he?ll run for president in 2016.

?I?m going to make my mind up later,? Ryan said on CNN today, as NBC?s Kasie Hunt noted. ?I will give it serious consideration.? That remark goes beyond his comments earlier this month on Fox News.

?We look back at it as a very positive experience,? Ryan told Fox News? Chris Wallace. ?We actually enjoyed it. We got to meet hundreds of thousands of people who care so much about their country. We learned a lot, just about the greatness of this country. How hard-working people want to get ahead and make a difference. So I actually found it a very pleasant exercise to be candid with you.?

On the other hand, Politico?s Mike Allen Jim Vandehei cited Ryan associates who say he doesn?t like campaigning. ?Ryan seems increasingly intrigued with the prospect of amassing more power within Congress, using his juice in the House leadership to promote his trademark Medicare plan and engineer spending cuts,? they suggested. ?The friends say this path could ultimately lead him to an eventual run for House GOP leader, or even speaker, an option they surmise he has warmed to since the election.?
.........................................................


:142smilie :142smilie :142smilie

Run him against Hillory

he wil be trounced

next !

Hillary is taking responsibility for Benghazi.

:mj07:
 

theGibber1

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 27, 2001
8,615
64
0
Dallas TX
barack-obama-limo.jpg



The Dow Jones Industrial Average rallied 55.91 points, or 0.39 percent, to close at 14,511.73, led by American Express and Coca-Cola, after earlier hitting a fresh intraday high for the eighth time this month at 14,546.82. The blue-chip index is up nearly 11 percent so far this year
,.......................................................................\


:0074 :0074

Now hang on a second Scott.. I thought this was a President who was for the down trodden? Someone who was going to fix Wall Street and take care of the common man??

Seems to me the rich white men on Wall Street are making more than ever while African American unemployment still hovers at over 14% and the number of people on food stamps goes up every month.

If Romney were in office you would cut and paste these same stats but with a different connotation.
"Oh look, Romney making money for his rich white Wall Street buddies while the poor are forgotten."

Rose colored glasses..
:sadwave:
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
Now hang on a second Scott.. I thought this was a President who was for the down trodden? Someone who was going to fix Wall Street and take care of the common man??

Seems to me the rich white men on Wall Street are making more than ever while African American unemployment still hovers at over 14% and the number of people on food stamps goes up every month.

If Romney were in office you would cut and paste these same stats but with a different connotation.
"Oh look, Romney making money for his rich white Wall Street buddies while the poor are forgotten."

Rose colored glasses..
:sadwave:
.....................................................................

unemployment just dropped again in Georgia and I think you know that it is not rich white men getting the jobs.

My company is so busy we have been turning jobs down and just taking the best profitable ones.

so go figure

all I can say is I am thankful that Willard did not make it. Much to the chagrin of ppl like you and Rove and his bunch.:0008
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
WASHINGTON -- The Senate has soundly rejected a balanced budget plan authored by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan.

Five Republicans joined every Democrat present to kill the measure, which failed on a 40-59 vote.

The GOP's most ardent tea partyers ? Rand Paul of Kentucky, Ted Cruz of Texas and Mike Lee of Utah ? opposed the measure, which projects a balanced budget in a decade but relies on $600 billion-plus in tax revenues on the wealthy enacted in January to do it.

Susan Collins of Maine and Dean Heller of Nevada also opposed the Ryan plan, which cuts sharply from safety net programs for the poor and contains a plan to turn the Medicare program for the elderly into a voucher-like system for future beneficiaries born in 1959 or later.
................................................................

what a dork

2016 :142smilie
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) was dismissive on Thursday of conservative critics such as Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh, saying their arguments against immigration reform were misguided.

"I've got a news flash for those who want to call people names on amnesty: what we have now is de facto amnesty," he said in an appearance on Fox News. "We have 11 million people here. They've been here, some of them, for a decade or more. No one is telling them to go home, no one's sending them home."

Paul delivered a speech on Tuesday in support of immigration reform to legalize undocumented immigrants already in the United States and later allow them to become citizens. He disputed reports that it was an endorsement of a pathway to citizenship, but also said he would not support a policy that banned naturalization for undocumented immigrants.

For one, he argued, it would be good politically. Republicans have increasingly struggled with Latino voters, who support a path to citizenship by large margins. A majority of Americans -- 63 percent -- as a whole also support a pathway, according to a poll released on Thursday by the Public Religion Research Institute.

Paul said other Republicans are wrong when they say pushing for reform will hurt the GOP.

"Here's another news flash," he said. "We haven't been too competitive in the last two national elections."

The Republican National Committee announced its support on Monday for immigration reform -- although without going into specifics -- based in part on what it considered an electoral need.

According to Coulter and Limbaugh, though, such a move would doom the party. :142smilie

Fox played a clip of Coulter saying Saturday at the Conservative Political Action Conference that a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants would create more Democratic voters.

"If amnesty goes through, America becomes California and no Republican will ever win another national election," Coulter insisted at the conference.

Fox News also referenced Limbaugh, a conservative radio host who has likewise argued that Latinos will never vote Republican in large numbers, regardless of immigration support.

That's not backed up in polling: A survey released Monday by Latino Decisions found that 32 percent of Latino voters said they would be more likely to vote Republican if the GOP helped to pass immigration reform.

Anyway, it would be worth a shot, Paul said in a Fox News appearance on Wednesday.

"The ideas I'm talking about could help Republicans grow in areas like California, New England, Illinois -- states who have given up on Republicans," he said. "So we do have to think about new ideas if we're going to be competitive as a national party."

.....................................................................

love it when someone like Rand Paul calls Coulter and Fat Rush dumb asses.

:0074
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
!!@@

!!@@

(CNN) -- Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu apologized Friday to Turkey for a 2009 raid on a Gaza-bound flotilla, both nations said, signaling a potential major thaw after three years of chilly relations between the two key Middle East nations.

The Israeli leader phoned his Turkish counterpart, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, while sitting with U.S. President Barack Obama in a trailer on a Tel Aviv airport tarmac. In the call -- which Turkey's foreign minister said lasted for nearly 30 minutes -- Netanyahu acknowledged "operational mistakes" during the raid, which ended with eight Turks and an American of Turkish origin dead.

"(Netanyahu) made it clear that the tragic results regarding the Mavi Marmara were unintentional and that Israel expresses regret over injuries and loss of life," the Israeli government said.

Erdogan accepted the apology, which came shortly after he talked with the leaders of Egypt and Qatar. Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said later on state TV, according to the semiofficial Anadolu news agency, that all Turkey's demands had been met.

At the least, the movement toward mending a rift between two of Washington's top allies appeared to be a boon for Obama, who said he's been appealing to Netanyahu and Erdogan "for the last two years" for them to fix "this rupture."

"There are obviously going to still be some significant disagreements ... but they also have a wide range of shared interests, and they both happen to be extraordinarily strong partners and friends of ours," Obama said at a press conference with Jordan's King Abdullah II. "So it's in the interest of the United States that they begin this process of getting their relationship back in order."

'An important step'

While there was little public indication ahead of a time that there would be a breakthrough Thursday, Davutoglu said it actually came after three years of tough negotiations.

The talks picked up steam in the past week, spurred by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and other officials, the Turkish foreign minister added.

On Thursday, Obama said he talked with Netanyahu about his reaching out to Erdogan, "and both of us agreed that the moment was right." The U.S. president at one point got on the call between the two Middle East leaders, said two senior administration officials who labeled the call "an important step" in normalizing Turkish-Israeli ties.

"During my visit, it appeared that the timing was good for that conversation to take place," Obama said, without elaborating.

Turkey and Israel have been two pro-Western political, economic, and military linchpins in the Middle East, and their falling out has hurt initiatives to tackle problems in the region, such as the Syrian civil war and tensions relating to Iran's nuclear aspirations.

A Muslim member of NATO, Turkey long had been Israel's most significant Muslim friend, and the deterioration of relations between the two nations intensified the Jewish state's isolation in the region, more unstable in light of the Arab Spring and other ferment in the Middle East. Erdogan's critical rhetoric toward Israeli policies in Gaza have been hailed by many in the Arab world.

It's not clear when and if such steps as fully normalizing relations and returning ambassadors to their posts will be taken. Earlier Israel had sent out a statement saying those steps had been agreed upon, but it later amended its statement by removing those points.

There also was no word on whether the once-close nations would resume the joint military exercises that were suspended after the Mavi Marmara incident.

Turkey had been prosecuting four Israeli soldiers in absentia, and Israel initially said the two leaders agreed to the cancellation of legal steps against the troops. Later, however, its amended statement omitted that action as well.

Agreeing to work together

In Thursday's conversation, Erdogan told Netanyahu that he thought the deterioration of ties between the countries was regrettable, especially given "the shared history and centuries old ties of strong friendship and cooperation between the Jewish and Turkish peoples."

According to a statement released by the Turkish government, Erdogan discussed with his Israeli counterpart the "importance of a just, lasting and comprehensive resolution of the Israel-Palestine conflict on the basis of the two-state vision."

The two leaders "agreed to work together to improve the humanitarian situation in the Palestinian territories," the Turkish statement said.

The Israeli government said in a statement the two sides would "work to improve the humanitarian situation in the Palestinian territories," with Netanyahu noting Israel has "substantially lifted the restrictions" on entry of civilian goods into Gaza. Helping the Palestinian people had long been a concern for Turkey, and was the reason ostensibly that the flotilla set sail for Gaza in the first place.

Israel long has voiced concerns about arms smuggling to Gaza militants intent on attacking the Jewish state. Gaza is controlled by Hamas, an anti-Israel group regarded as a terrorist organization by the United States and Israel.

But activists say Israel's embargo of goods into Gaza from land and sea punishes civilians in the tiny and densely populated strip of land along the Mediterranean coast.

Israel has said any organization or state that wants to give humanitarian aid to Gaza can do so in coordination with Israeli authorities via existing land crossings into the Palestinian territory.

All that said, the highlight of the conversation dealt with the 2009 raid. Israel has long stood by the operation, though its tune publicly changed Friday.

"In light of Israel's investigation into the incident, which pointed out several operational mistakes, Prime Minister Netanyahu expressed Israel's apology to the Turkish people for any mistakes that might have led to loss of life or injury and agreed to conclude an agreement on compensation/nonliability," the Israeli government said.

Asked to confirm whether Netanyahu called and apologized and offered compensation, as Ankara had long demanded, a senior Turkish official told CNN: "Yes." Erdogan only said they "agreed to conclude an agreement on compensation/nonliability."

One Palestinian-Israeli lawmaker doesn't like it

Hanin Zoabi, a Palestinian activist who was on the Mavi Marmara and also is a Palestinian member of Israel's parliament, said she does not accept Netanyahu's apology. She wants an international court to try the people "involved in the political decision that gave a green light to kill the political activists on the Marmara."

She said Netanyahu's push to improve Israeli-Turkish ties is undermining the Palestinians' demands -- such as ending Israeli occupation of the West Bank and the Israeli military and economic strictures on Gaza. She said Netanyahu is trying to evade that and other issues.

"The issue is not only Marmara, Marmara was the small crime. The big crime was the siege on Gaza," she told CNN.

Gulden Sonme -- a spokeswoman for IHH, the Muslim aid agency that operated the Mavi Marmara == called the apology "a positive political development."

"But in terms of the need for the blockade on Gaza to end and in terms of the ongoing case to punish those who are responsible for the crimes committed during the raid, the legal process will continue," she said, referring to the case against the soldiers.

Suat Kiniklioglu, a Turkish political analyst and former parliamentarian from Erdogan's party, said the apology is important because it shows "to the world that there is a political price to kill Turkish citizens in international waters."

"Probably in the Middle East, as well, it will be seen as political victory for the Erdogan government. But what matters more is the normalization itself, the obvious benefits to Turkey and Israel as well as the Palestinians."

The prospect of an Israeli-Turkish reconciliation is bad news, Kiniklioglu said, for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and Iran.

"As Syria is entering into its third year of uprising, Ankara and Tel-Aviv will have to coordinate policy and may need to work together to contain potential risks to both countries," he said.
.......................................................................

When was the last time a American President made Israel apologize to any other nation..... ever... ?
Never is the answer.


GO OBAMA !
 
Last edited:

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
Count Republican strategist Karl Rove among the folks who see a possible GOP evolution on gay marriage.

In an appearance on Sunday's edition of ABC's "This Week," Rove was asked by host George Stephanopoulos whether he could "imagine" the next GOP presidential candidate saying they are flat out for gay marriage.

"I could," Rove said.
.....................................................................

:142smilie :142smilie

how quickly they can change from conservative for the good of the party.

They might have a candidate that says they are for gay marriage but it will be a lie and the American ppl will know its a lie.

conservative :mj07:
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
130309110515-04-north-korea-0309-horizontal-gallery.jpg


if you want to know who is really running N Korea'
its the guy on the left.

He is pulling all the strings of what to do and say


you see him in every picture
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
Obamacare?s effect on premiums debated
comment(138)

With full rollout of President Barack Obama?s health care law just months away, attention is shifting from political battles to how it will affect health insurance premiums for millions of Americans.

Some experts and studies predict sticker shock for people with individual coverage, who include about 5 percent of Georgians, though others say the fears are overblown. Workers with employer-based insurance, as well as those on Medicare and Medicaid, are expected to feel less financial fallout.

?We?re talking about a small sliver of the population that?s going to be affected,? said Larry Levitt, senior vice president with the non-profit Kaiser Family Foundation.

A report from three congressional committees, citing a study by consulting firm Oliver Wyman, forecast an average premium increase of 40 percent for people buying insurance outside an employer plan.

The report said individual premiums for young adults in Atlanta would rise 179 percent, to $1,716 a year from $612, as a result of the health law.

Some analysts and advocates don?t buy it.

?There are a lot of scare tactics out there,? said Kathleen Stoll, director of health policy for Families USA, a non-profit advocate for affordable health care. ?I don?t believe the myth of rate shock.?

Even young people ? the group generally considered most likely to experience higher rates ? won?t be badly hurt, Stoll argued. Many are allowed under changes by the health law to stay on their parents? insurance plans until age 26.

Others will benefit from federal tax credits if they buy coverage through the new online health insurance exchanges that are supposed to be up and running by January.

One group will almost certainly benefit: People with pre-existing conditions who have to shop in the individual market. They now pay high rates and in some cases cannot get insurance.

Nearly 900,000 Georgians are expected to shop on the federally-run exchange websites created by the health law. Tax credits based on income will partly offset premium costs.

Industry experts say, however, some individuals still face potentially large hikes.

That?s in part because insurers will be required by the Affordable Care Act to provide 10 ?essential? benefits such as mental health, emergency and maternity services which may be offered now but are not mandated.

A report released this week by eHealth Inc., a private online health insurance marketplace, shows individuals whose policies include those types of benefits pay 47 percent more than individuals whose policies don?t.

Bill Custer, a Georgia State University professor and health care policy analyst, downplayed both that study and the one from Congress.

?There is little chance that average premiums paid will rise by 40 percent, and it is very unlikely that any individual will see premiums rise by 179 percent solely due to the implementation of the Affordable Care Act,? Custer said.

How much premiums change, Custer said, will be mostly determined by how many healthy people, particularly the young, buy coverage when the act goes into full effect.

Getting healthy, younger consumers in the insurance pool is critical to balancing the costs of covering older people and those with often multiple, chronic diseases.

?There?s a concern all things being equal (that people) are more likely to sign up if they know they?re pregnant or have cancer or HIV,? said Karen Pollitz, a private insurance expert for the Kaiser Family Foundation.

While having insurance will be mandatory, some may opt instead to pay the relatively small initial penalty for not buying it. That would leave insurers no way to offset the cost of covering the chronically ill.

The penalty will start next year at $95 for an adult or 1 percent of family income, rising to $695 for an adult or 2.5 percent of family income in 2016 and beyond.

Critics of the law also argue premiums will rise, in part, because insurers won?t be able to charge people with serious medical conditions more even though they are more costly to care for. Older people also can only be charged three times as much for coverage as young people, less than on an open market.

Another element of the Affordable Care Act is a new tax on health insurance providers that industry leaders say will mean higher premiums for some consumers. America?s Health Insurance Plans, a trade association, estimates that next year individuals buying coverage on their own will pay an extra $110 in premiums as a result of the new tax, which will be passed on to them.

?This will add directly to the cost of individuals and small businesses,? said Robert Zirkelbach, the group?s spokesman.

One difficulty in assessing Obamacare?s effect is that insurance costs have been steadily rising for years anyway. Employers decide how, or whether, to pass on those costs, which means some people who get insurance through their jobs see increases while others don?t. Obamacare won?t change that.

Some industry analysts say pieces of the health care law already in play, such as allowing young adults to stay on their parents? coverage until 26 and eliminating lifetime caps, are already driving up costs for companies and workers.

Health officials in Georgia say 2 percent in premium increases this year for more than 650,000 employees on the state?s health benefit plan is a direct result of the Affordable Care Act.

National surveys show companies have already seen health care costs rise by 1 to 4 percent because of the law.

The issue also is clouded by the deep political divide over Obamacare.

Earlier this month, the Republican-dominated Georgia Senate passed a bill requiring insurers to include on premium statements the amount of rate increases ? if any ? resulting from the health law.

Opponents of Senate Bill 236 argued the legislation is biased because it assumes the law would raise costs for consumers.

?This is nothing more than a political attack on the President?s bill,? Sen. Steve Thompson, D-Marietta, said during the floor debate.
......................................................................

Go Obama !
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top