Limbaugh
- Thread starter hedgehog
- Start date
rush Limbaugh, that junkie slob is about as relevant as Willard Scott. Hellooooo opium!:142smilie
I"ll play the liberals advocate here and give them some supporti via recent interview with their liberal icon of 57 years on reporting on white house.
A lesson to all we conservatives on objectivity and fair and balanced reporting.
You GOT to see this one.
http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=263153
A lesson to all we conservatives on objectivity and fair and balanced reporting.
You GOT to see this one.
http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=263153
I"ll play the liberals advocate here and give them some supporti via recent interview with their liberal icon of 57 years on reporting on white house.
A lesson to all we conservatives on objectivity and fair and balanced reporting.
You GOT to see this one.
http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=263153
That woman is a POS. JMHO.
Gotta love Helen Thomas
say it like it is woman !
Bush came in with the whole idea of war
this is most unkind:mj07:
nothing but the truth from that lady
say it like it is woman !
Bush came in with the whole idea of war
this is most unkind:mj07:
nothing but the truth from that lady
Limbaugh is a racist, drug user, so anyone that actually follows this guy has to have their sanity questioned. The vile hate spewed from his three chins each day is alone enough for any so called christian to turn off the dial if they believe in the good book.
Yep interviewer should have asked her and you why he waited till 911--but that would be objected wouldn't it. OOps almost forgot--GW planned 911 -- so he could go to war.
Has Acorn cut back since election Scott--or are you still employed?
Yep interviewer should have asked her and you why he waited till 911--but that would be objected wouldn't it. OOps almost forgot--GW planned 911 -- so he could go to war.
Has Acorn cut back since election Scott--or are you still employed?
why did he wait ? good question... if you remember, when he was running for president, he said no nation building.... was that a slip, what nation was he talking about ??????
Last edited:
Yep interviewer should have asked her and you why he waited till 911--but that would be objected wouldn't it. OOps almost forgot--GW planned 911 -- so he could go to war.
Has Acorn cut back since election Scott--or are you still employed?
..................................................
I still believe that the reason that George W went to war with Iraq is because Saddam tried to kill his daddy in Kuwait with a car bomb.
payback was on his mind as soon as he got in
I still have the same job and made more money that I did the previous year.
how about you
:mj07: I think Rush hung the moon, a day does not go by without me listening to him on the radio, Rush is always right
Did you thank GW
--on myself--ask me about March 15th when I get my taxes done--have no idea now--1099's just starting to come in
--however can assure you taxable income will be much less starting 2010.
I see Bobby--
You supported Edwards who skirted $590,000 of SSN/Medicare taxes on loopholes--but anyone else is a tax fraud?
--and I was dissing Helen Thomas on objectivity
"yes we can" :SIB
i think what we`re experiencing here is the first shot across the bow in the dems` efforts to bring back the "fairness doctrine"....
that amazes me....you have fox news and talk radio that tilt conservative...and every other media outlet tilting liberal...
but that doesn`t seem to be good enough....they want to force free talk radio into carrying liberal talk radio,which is a proven failure(see air america)......
dem congress-critrters understand this....so they figure that if they can basically quash conservative speech by forcing talk radio to "carry"(like an albatross)liberal talk radio,station mangers will eventually lose money(`cause that`s what liberal talk radio does) and to stay afloat they`ll abandon the talk radio format altogether to stay in business....
pretty shrewd...
th democrat idea of "freedom"(crush every opposing voice) is a strange concept indeed....
socialism AND marxism...
that amazes me....you have fox news and talk radio that tilt conservative...and every other media outlet tilting liberal...
but that doesn`t seem to be good enough....they want to force free talk radio into carrying liberal talk radio,which is a proven failure(see air america)......
dem congress-critrters understand this....so they figure that if they can basically quash conservative speech by forcing talk radio to "carry"(like an albatross)liberal talk radio,station mangers will eventually lose money(`cause that`s what liberal talk radio does) and to stay afloat they`ll abandon the talk radio format altogether to stay in business....
pretty shrewd...
th democrat idea of "freedom"(crush every opposing voice) is a strange concept indeed....
socialism AND marxism...
Last edited:
Of course, the ratings have nothing to do with who owns the station, what programming they choose to put on the station, how many stations a business can own in a single market, what major conglomerate owns how many stations - in how many markets - with the same shows put on in those markets, which of course produces the numbers, etc., etc., etc.
It has nothing to do with groups like the FCC who have for a few years now been lead by known conservative entities and people who have opened the door for this kind of ownership and radio control of markets and major stations, etc.
Radio is a bit of a different egg when it comes to media assessment. It can easily be controlled and dominated by a message and theme, and it's now easier than ever thanks to conservative efforts of the past few years. Considering that the radio airwaves are supposedly public interest and free to listen to, some guidance and oversight should be in place, IMO, to prevent one theme dominating another. It's not like newspapers, who are completely at the mercy of subscribers, which are the only real measure of success.
It has nothing to do with groups like the FCC who have for a few years now been lead by known conservative entities and people who have opened the door for this kind of ownership and radio control of markets and major stations, etc.
Radio is a bit of a different egg when it comes to media assessment. It can easily be controlled and dominated by a message and theme, and it's now easier than ever thanks to conservative efforts of the past few years. Considering that the radio airwaves are supposedly public interest and free to listen to, some guidance and oversight should be in place, IMO, to prevent one theme dominating another. It's not like newspapers, who are completely at the mercy of subscribers, which are the only real measure of success.
Jack Cafferty says Barack Obama learned a few things during his first days in office.
NEW YORK (CNN) -- I wonder if President Obama is having second thoughts.
Picking a fight with that corpulent Oxycontin aficionado of right wing talk radio, Rush Limbaugh, will mobilize a bunch more on the conservative right and begin to bring those approval ratings down from 83 percent, where they were before you actually started working as the president, to a more mortal 68 percent in the Gallup Poll taken on those first three days in office.
Sour grapes Limbaugh seems to be having trouble coming to terms with the fact that all the stuff he embraced so fervently during the eight years of the Bush nightmare got swept out the door in November. Limbaugh disagrees with Obama's policies and fears he could take the country in the direction of socialism.:mj07:
Fair enough -- but to come right out and say "I want him to fail," exposes Limbaugh for the petulant, shallow gasbag that he is.:142smilie
In December, Colin Powell, who was himself a member of the Bush administration who switched parties and supported Obama, suggested that people need to stop listening to Rush Limbaugh. Does he really add anything to the national dialogue by wishing failure on our newly inaugurated president?
Let me help you there, the answer is no. And in case Limbaugh hasn't noticed, our country is failing thanks to the misguided policies of the right-wing nuts that have called the shots for the last eight years.:sadwave:
Still, it's probably not a good idea for the president to respond to Limbaugh by name and inflate the talk show host's air of self-importance.
Remember how much fun it was when you won the Iowa caucus?
.................................................................
NEW YORK (CNN) -- I wonder if President Obama is having second thoughts.
Picking a fight with that corpulent Oxycontin aficionado of right wing talk radio, Rush Limbaugh, will mobilize a bunch more on the conservative right and begin to bring those approval ratings down from 83 percent, where they were before you actually started working as the president, to a more mortal 68 percent in the Gallup Poll taken on those first three days in office.
Sour grapes Limbaugh seems to be having trouble coming to terms with the fact that all the stuff he embraced so fervently during the eight years of the Bush nightmare got swept out the door in November. Limbaugh disagrees with Obama's policies and fears he could take the country in the direction of socialism.:mj07:
Fair enough -- but to come right out and say "I want him to fail," exposes Limbaugh for the petulant, shallow gasbag that he is.:142smilie
In December, Colin Powell, who was himself a member of the Bush administration who switched parties and supported Obama, suggested that people need to stop listening to Rush Limbaugh. Does he really add anything to the national dialogue by wishing failure on our newly inaugurated president?
Let me help you there, the answer is no. And in case Limbaugh hasn't noticed, our country is failing thanks to the misguided policies of the right-wing nuts that have called the shots for the last eight years.:sadwave:
Still, it's probably not a good idea for the president to respond to Limbaugh by name and inflate the talk show host's air of self-importance.
Remember how much fun it was when you won the Iowa caucus?
.................................................................
