Live on Fox...Minnesota's complete destruction.

PocketAces

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 30, 2003
6,054
114
63
50
WI
:00hour:00hour:00hour:00hour:00hour

I don't want to hear ANY injury talk. All teams have injuries. Decent rosters can handle injuries.


psssst. Trade Peterson while he's worth something....
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,599
245
63
"the bunker"
that offense is a disaster(and the d just allowed a 98 yard td drive)........rethinking my opinion on bridgewater(31st ranked pass offenxe?)....he`s not cuttin` it...
 

poolplayer8888

Registered
Forum Member
Jan 15, 2006
1,207
20
0
:00hour:00hour:00hour:00hour:00hour

I don't want to hear ANY injury talk. All teams have injuries. Decent rosters can handle injuries.


psssst. Trade Peterson while he's worth something....

How can this be true? BP thinks Purple is better than GB at every position but QB.....Could he be full of it? :mj07:
 
Last edited:

PocketAces

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 30, 2003
6,054
114
63
50
WI
How can this be true? BP thinks Purple is better than GB at every position but QB.....Could he be full of it? :mj07:

The way our Packers are playing, they'd be down by 21 to a Seattle as well.

Wow this division is shit.
 

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,437
254
83
52
Where it is real F ing COLD
Vikings can't throw the ball 15 yards, but it was to Seattle, they haven't lost to Detroit or Chicago, Vikes definitely not an 8-4 team, bet Arizona with confidence Thursday night bet straight and tease them with all your teams cause they aren't losing, Vikes can't throw more than 15 yards they are incapable and I'm telling ya it's not teddys fault, when you watch it at the game He's running for his life and receivers are running long routes, Norv Turner is an idiot. Vikes were bad today but packer fans talking shit the way they have played ugh
 

Mags

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2000
2,813
27
48
but it was to Seattle

Yea, Seahawks are tough... Packers could only beat them by 10 points.

As I said a couple of weeks ago, Bridgewater is not an NFL QB. The Vikes are set up for success - they have one of the best RB in football and IMHO, the Vikings receivers are better than GB's are currently. Rudolph is a very good TE (one that gets underutilized by Minn), and I'd rather have Diggs/Wallace/Johnson that Cobb/J. Jones/Adams.

So, why can't the Vikings offense move the ball? Sure the offensive scheme can play a role in this, but in my mind, it is all on the QB. Not many QB's in today's NFL get to stand back in the pocket and make plays - they all pretty much have to move around and make plays with their legs (to keep plays alive).

The Vikings have won games this year due to their defense and Peterson, and in spite of their QB. But as I said before, it is hard to find a decent QB these days, so I do understand that the Vikes have to play what they have. Hopefully they will continue to search for a long term solution at the position.
 

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,437
254
83
52
Where it is real F ing COLD
Yea, Seahawks are tough... Packers could only beat them by 10 points. As I said a couple of weeks ago, Bridgewater is not an NFL QB. The Vikes are set up for success - they have one of the best RB in football and IMHO, the Vikings receivers are better than GB's are currently. Rudolph is a very good TE (one that gets underutilized by Minn), and I'd rather have Diggs/Wallace/Johnson that Cobb/J. Jones/Adams. So, why can't the Vikings offense move the ball? Sure the offensive scheme can play a role in this, but in my mind, it is all on the QB. Not many QB's in today's NFL get to stand back in the pocket and make plays - they all pretty much have to move around and make plays with their legs (to keep plays alive). The Vikings have won games this year due to their defense and Peterson, and in spite of their QB. But as I said before, it is hard to find a decent QB these days, so I do understand that the Vikes have to play what they have. Hopefully they will continue to search for a long term solution at the position.

Go to a game and watch the Viking receivers, good luck
 

Mags

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2000
2,813
27
48
Go to a game and watch the Viking receivers, good luck

I respectfully disagree. Rudolph is very talented at TE. Diggs is an exciting young player. Charles Johnson was a stud last year (not sure what happened this year?). Wallace is an OK WR. All are young with some experience, with the exception of Wallace.

Don't you think the Packers would trade Cobb/J. Jones/Adams/R. Rogers even up for your receivers? I would in a heartbeat, and I think the Packers would too.

Packers couldn't beat Seattle today? Maybe/maybe not. Sure, they are playing better but, we played them already and beat them. We also played Minnesota and beat them.

All in not right in Packerland, for sure. But since we have a NFL QB (who hasn't been as good as he had in the past, but still is pretty good), we have a chance in most games.

My point is, having TB - there will be many games that Minn won't have a chance, because it is impossible to put up points without an NFL caliber QB. Having the 24th rated QB in the league just doesn't get it done.

But you do have all good weapons around him,including Peterson. You just need a guy at QB - if you get one, the Vikings could rule the divison for years, as their defense is also pretty good.

I hope you guys don't find a QB, and keep TB there for years.
 

kneifl

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 12, 2001
9,138
95
48
51
Virginia
www.tradewithjon.com
Arizona Cardinals

Arizona Cardinals

Saw that BP said to bet on the Cardinals on Thursday. Probably the best team in the NFL with a few losses right now. Most complete and well rounded team. They have been decimated at RB, but look at David Johnson stepping up and doing so well for the,. They have a flurry of WR with Brown, Fits, JJ, and Floyd. Gresham at TE and a really good defensive and offensive line. Arians is the finishing touch on this team. In my opinion they go deep in the playoffs.

kneifl
 

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,437
254
83
52
Where it is real F ing COLD
I respectfully disagree. Rudolph is very talented at TE. Diggs is an exciting young player. Charles Johnson was a stud last year (not sure what happened this year?). Wallace is an OK WR. All are young with some experience, with the exception of Wallace. Don't you think the Packers would trade Cobb/J. Jones/Adams/R. Rogers even up for your receivers? I would in a heartbeat, and I think the Packers would too. Packers couldn't beat Seattle today? Maybe/maybe not. Sure, they are playing better but, we played them already and beat them. We also played Minnesota and beat them. All in not right in Packerland, for sure. But since we have a NFL QB (who hasn't been as good as he had in the past, but still is pretty good), we have a chance in most games. My point is, having TB - there will be many games that Minn won't have a chance, because it is impossible to put up points without an NFL caliber QB. Having the 24th rated QB in the league just doesn't get it done. But you do have all good weapons around him,including Peterson. You just need a guy at QB - if you get one, the Vikings could rule the divison for years, as their defense is also pretty good. I hope you guys don't find a QB, and keep TB there for years.

Charles Johnson has been hurt
Rudolph is slow but he is good but they use him to pass block a ton.
Diggs is a rookie
Wallace is never open. There is a reason miami and Pitt got rid of him.
I don't know if the Packers would be willing to part with Cobb or not but I would say neither team has good receivers. Diggs will be really good,
Norv Turner I think needs to go. I'm not closing the book on Teddy, I'd give him another year, maybe the line will be back, they lost their center and right tackle in preseason. He may by be the guy but I think they give him another chance cause another QB isn't coming around.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top