Looks like OU vs. Oregon is on for Sept. 18th....

[Scott4USC]

Big props to the Ducks!!

Very impressive that the fighting highlighters aren't afraid to play serious teams. I will definitely be a Duck fan for that game. Definitely a chance for the pac-10 to gain some respectability in the national picture. (since most of you do not respect the Pac 10)

Oregon has a lot of talent and pretty good coaching on offense. The question will be, how does Oregon slow down OU. However, you have to play the best to be the best.

This is a chance for Oregon to make a big statement, much like last year against Michigan. It does you no good (other than padding the win/loss record)to play stiffs. (like the other conferences do, for example, SEC)

Why doesn't OU travel to Oregon like Michigan did? (maybe they do not want the same result) OU did not sign a return visit to Oregon. Why? Thought they were tough? Oh i get it, they schedule crappy OOC opponents, and if they do schedule a tough OOC opponent, they better play at NORMAN with no return visit.

You may ask, what is the purpose of Oregon traveling all the way to Norman? For what purpose? Money? Crap, Oregon has one of the richest men in the world giving money to the program. They do not need an additional $300K for chance to get whooped on national TV. Ducks could have gone 10-1 without this game. I RESPECT OREGON AND THE PAC 10 FOR ALWAYS ACCEPTING CHALLENGES!!!!!!

OU vs UO
Do you know which is which? I look forward to this matchup. Too bad its not being played @Oregon, because I would lay a bundle on Oregon. I def. will be tuning in for this one.

 

[bbk]

Hey Moran
Get your facts straight before you post something. OU did sign a home and home. They come to Eugene in 2008. So you can look forward to losing your money in 2008. Its so funny how you talk about how USC plays a tough schedule and tough OOC and never talk about other teams. OU plays 9 bowl teams next year; do you think they should schedule some more powerhouse teams in their OOC schedule. They dont get to play Arizona, Notre Dame, ASU and all the other creampuff PAC 10 schools. So keep talking about how tough USC schedules people and USC will consistently be left out due to their weak ass conference. Again get your facts straight and go back to cut and pasting your knowledge is alot better when you get it from someone else.

 

[Scott4USC]

bbk

Thanks for calling me a moron when it is not warranted. However, thanks for pointing out that OU indeed signed a return visit in 2008. I did not know that because I did not see UO playing OU in the next few seasons. I just hope OU does not try and buy out Oregon in 2008 like they tried to get out of playing UCLA prior to last season. They said it would be too tough for OU.

OU plays 9 bowl teams next year

Last season 3 of USC 4 OOC opponents were bowl teams. I was not impressed with the bowl teams from the BIg 12. Were you?

Let see the results from those bowl teams from the mighty Big 12. The Big 12 went 2-6 in bowl season. 25% winning %. The average bowl loss was by 11pts.

do you think they should schedule some more powerhouse teams in their OOC schedule.

No not really, but maybe one road game would be nice. So if OU does go 3-0 in beginning of the season, are you gonna proclaim them the best team ever? :lol:

So keep talking about how tough USC schedules people and USC will consistently be left out due to their weak ass conference.

TOOO FUNNY!!! Last season USC was left out of the BCS Championship game because they were only .15 bcs pts behind LSU. If the Pac 10 had down year and USC OOC opponents tanked and USC was only .15 bcs pts behind, then i am not worried at all about USC SOS. TOO FUNNY! I guess you think .15 bcs pts was a wide margin. :lol: Oh by the way, USC had the #1 SOS 2 years ago. Not worried at all about USC SOS or the BCS formula for USC.

 

[bbk]

will you please stop telling me about usc sos 2 years ago
i dont give a flying f*** and noone else does. i cannot wait until usc loses at least 2 games which they will next year so you will go hide under the hole you came from. and another thing
i was laughing my ass off on your tier systems; ranking cal and wsu and wash a tier one and nebra a tier 2; that just shows how freakin bias you are; everything you write is a complete joke
and that is a fact; please go away and get a life and why dont you graduate arent you still in college at 23

 

[Scott4USC]

bbk

will you please stop telling me about usc sos 2 years ago

You said this stupid remark.........

USC will consistently be left out due to their weak ass conference.

How can USC be left out if just 2 years ago USC had the #1 SOS??? I think bringing up USC SOS just 2years ago to tear apart your comment was justified. We all know why you do not want to hear about it. :nono:

why dont you graduate arent you still in college at 23

After this semester, I will have a B.S. in Finance and Economics from a top 10 Undergraduate Business School in the country. Only 9 other business schools degrees in the United States carry more weight than mine.

everything you write is a complete joke

Then why do you read my posts? Do yourself a favor and do not read my posts and do not waste YOUR time replying to my posts. I think your the silly one.

I will repeat myself, do yourself, not me, but yourself the favor and not read and reply to my threads or my posts. PLEASE PUT ME ON YOUR IGNORE LIST!!!!! PLEASE BBK!!!!!! I have yet to read an intelligent post written by you. I have read plenty of posts from you obessing about me. I do not need someone obsessing over me, so please, please ignore me.

HERE IS PROOF OF YOUR SICK OBSESSION OVER ME. LOOK AT HOW MANY TIMES YOU HAVE WASTED YOUR TIME WRITING TO ME AND CALLING ME NAMES. YOU ARE PATHETIC!!!!!!!!!!! I DO NOT NEED SOMEONE OBESSING OVER ME LIKE THIS!! GET A LIFE AND STOP REPLYING TO MY POSTS!!!!! HOW PATHETIC ARE YOU???? There must be over 20 replies from you with negative comments. DO YOURSELF THE FAVOR AND DO NOT OPEN OR READ MY THREADS AND REPLIES!!!!! PLEASE!!!!!! THIS IS A SCARY OBSESSION!!!!

you are such a dipS#%t; why dont you respond to me and give me one impressive win that usc has

you are starting to sound like that fag homer scott

god almighty lets start a thread scott the biggest homer on the face of the year;

scott you are such a fagot homer please madjack get him off this site he brings no incite at all to anything about anything other than he is balls out homer;

that statement is completely acinine you dont freaking know that so shut up; god you are in idiot for saying stupid crap...

scott knows jack crap about anything he probably does just read the USC daily or something like that i respect hellah 10 thousand more than scott who i dont respect at all because all he writes is homer crap. Why would buckeye fans be scared if a recruit comes their way they must not have a life if they are scared as hell and I guarantee you this; scott has no inside info other than the info that he is the biggest homer loser and clutters this site with nothing but crap and what 3 wrs is he talking about; didnt doucet go to lsu; isnt he the top wr; like i have always maintained recruiting helps but does not translate into champioships; see texas as your prime example. Get a life scott and please stop posting things especially against hellah who smokes your a## when it comes to handicapping and knowledge.

***If I remember correctly, Scott4USC was correct and Hellah was wrong. Hellah was man enough to admit it. You continue to attack Scott4USC. I think he is right and you are jealous and threatened from him. Why else would you go to all the trouble to say all this stuff about him. This is sick BBK.

Like I have said Scott brings nothing but biased homer crap please get this pathetic loser off this site

Can I get anyone that wants Scott4USC banned please post here
Hopefully Madjack can do something about this.

Stop posting Scott and trust me you will never hear from me. The only thing that is old is your obsession with USC and that is not a RUMOR its a FACT

Nice spin again Scott; Just keeping posting your crap and I will call you on it.

Scott is such a joke on this board;

another homer spin; beautiful; what a joke

you are hopefull scott hopeless; i actually voted in the poll you were gay and not a loser and i am going to have to switch that to a hopeless homer loser.

That is funny crap; I agree Scott is a Lucas impersonator; a wannabe

This just shows how completely pathetic Scott is. This just goes to show you how NOTHING Scott says is worth even looking at.

Lucas has absolutely no life. I figure if we dont respond to him on his threads he may just go away. And I know what everyone will say this moron will still respond in our threads.

get a life

I would guess Scott is going to say USC and because OU did not win their last 2 games that OU is the 5th best team over the last 4 years.

And now Scott has even sunk the lowest of all lows. I agree what a complete jerk.

Its a dead heat; i like scotts parents in a landslide

Just some spin keep it going lucas. You are so homerized its impossible to have a real conversation with you.

wish this joker would just get thrown off this site;

you are such a freakin moran you are making yourself look even worse; get a freakin life'

 

[Avalanche]

Scott, you might want to take it easy on BBK. After all, you're sitting there accusing him of doing nothing but slam you without any sort of probable cause, yet he just blew away your entire argument with factual data. Oklahoma did sign with Oregon for a home and home. At least you admitted it, though. Be careful with the word 'obsession' because you're the one clearly obsessed.

But lets rewind.... to your first post in the thread. All you do is praise Oregon for scheduling Oklahoma. What about Oklahoma scheduling Oregon? All praise for the PAC 10 and nothing for the other schools. Notice the pattern? DO YOU NOTICE THE PATTERN? PAC 10 PAC 10 PAC 10 PAC 10 PAC 10 PAC 10 PAC 10.

That, frankly, is why we all love to reduce you to ribbons every time you make your outlandish statements.

Originally posted by SCOTT4USC
This is a chance for Oregon to make a big statement, much like last year against Michigan. It does you no good (other than padding the win/loss record)to play stiffs. (like the other conferences do, for example, SEC)

You are a certifiable idiot, SCOTT4USC. Actually is does a lot of good to schedule weak OOC teams. Looks like it didnt hurt LSU and OU b/c they made it to the national championship game. LSU received no points for beating Georgia a second time. That's the only reason why USC had a chance. And, oh yeah, the only reason why you guys were given half of the national title is because OU lost in the title game of the Big 12. So, in essense, by virtue of the Big 12 and SEC both having to play conference title games -- this was the only reason why USC was given half of the national title. If OU didn't have to play a title game, they'd have been there automatically (and they still went, oh by the way) and in the SEC if LSU had played anyone other than Georgia (provided they hadnt played in the regular season already), they would have widened their lead of USC for the right to go to the Sugar Bowl.

Congrats on receiving your degree soon. Are you that kid I read about that was accepted into college at age 12?

 

[Scott4USC]

Avalanche

Scott, you might want to take it easy on BBK.

:lol2

I guess you did not read my post. :nono: This is a college football forum and BBK has written over 20 different posts slamming me with personal attacks. NOTHING TO DO WITH COLLEGE FOOTBALL! But I guess you enjoy reading pathetic posts from a poster who is obsessed with me. So the answer is, NO I am not going to take it easy with BBK who is clearly obsessed with me. This is a college football forum where college football should be discussed. Not over 20 posts personally attacking somebody. How pathetic is that.

All you do is praise Oregon for scheduling Oklahoma. What about Oklahoma scheduling Oregon? All praise for the PAC 10 and nothing for the other schools.

I do not have a real problem with OU OOC schedule (I did say that). I just do not respect OU playing all their OOC games at home. So if they do go 3-0, or 6-0, I am not going to respect them as much as a team who plays/wins on the road. OU is playing by the rules, but I just wish BCS would calculate home and away victories/losses. Then the Ohio St.'s of the world would be royally screwed. Your kidding yourself if you think there is no difference winning at home vs away. Therefore, why give respect to a program who plays majority of there games at home? I DON'T!!!!! Playing by the rules, which is fine by me, but I will not be fooled by their W's.

And, oh yeah, the only reason why you guys were given half of the national title is because OU lost in the title game of the Big 12.

Pretty bold statement. AP is seperate from the BCS and the AP had USC ranked ahead of LSU. So if the AP had USC ranked ahead of LSU going into the Bowl season with OU ahead of USC, but LSU beating OU, can you guarantee me the AP would have put LSU ahead of USC? There is no way you can guarantee that, as the AP thought that USC clearly was better than LSU. Pretty bold statement for just a subjective opinion. LSU may have leaped USC in the AP if they beat an undefeated OU, but nobody would know for sure. I am not so sure, because USC dominated Michigan who was considered one of the hottest teams in the country and the AP clearly had USC ahead of LSU. AP has nothing to do with the BCS, so the AP could care less who plays in the BCS NC. The coaches poll has to vote the winner of the BCS game, NOT THE AP!!!!! AP votes on who they think is the #1 team in the country. You can't possibly give me a scenario and tell me how the AP would have voted. You do not know. :nono:

and in the SEC if LSU had played anyone other than Georgia (provided they hadnt played in the regular season already), they would have widened their lead of USC for the right to go to the Sugar Bowl.

Good point and you are right. That was about the only thing that went against LSU in the BCS. There were at least 7-10 things that went against USC in calculating the BCS pts. HUGE DIFFERENCE. Most hurtful example was WSU starting QB (Kegal) getting hurt against inferior Washington opponent, yet WSU lead the whole game playing the backup QB, but WASHINGTON won on a last min. game winning drive. If WSU won, no way LSU would have passed USC. NO WAY! USC SOS goes up, and USC gets QW pts which is .5 BCS pts. NO WAY LSU PASSES USC! That is just 1 of 7 examples that went against USC. Nothing you can do about it and hopefully that bad luck never happens to USC again, or better yet, USC does not lose and let bad luck have a chance to keep them out of BCS Title game. But I am not worried at all that the BCS would affect USC again. In a down year for the Pac 10, OOC opponents tanking, and bad luck going against USC, USC still was ONLY .15 BCS pts from going. SO USC fans should never be worried about getting shut out of the title game again because of the BCS. At the worse possible scenarios, USC was only .15 bcs pts short.

You are a certifiable idiot, SCOTT4USC.

You make yourself look like an idiot for wrongly calling me one. :nono:

 

[bbk]

Scott
can you please give me some more crappy college basketball picks. I like wheny you try to act like a handicapper and end up looking like the fool you are. Who do you like in the final four so i can bet opposite. :moon:
By the way really impressive graduated at age 23. You really showed me up. Have fun starting out making 60k in a year. :moon:

 

[Avalanche]

SCOTT,

For as many countless times you talk about how unlucky USC was, you are yet to state the obvious, which is how LUCKY USC was to get handed the national title in the first place in the AP
without even qualifying for the national championship game.

BTW, for you to claim that Michigan was one of the "hottest" teams in the country is suspect at best. They beat a mediocre Ohio St team at home and that's about it.

As much as I slam the Pac 10 for how weak it is, the Big 10 wasn't too much better than the Pac 10 last year. But that's only one year... but for you to claim that Michigan was that "hot" is a little strange. Especially if they were bad enough to lose at Oregon.

Aren't you the same guy that was making fun of the AP a few months ago??? Now you're acting like it is more important than the BCS. Did USC suceed from the union and just decide to play for the AP championship?

 

[mansa_musa]

how LUCKY USC was to get handed the national title in the first place in the AP.... without even qualifying for the national championship game.

USC was #1 in both the AP & coaches polls at the end of regular season. How much more qualified can a team be?

BCS is not the be all & end all of college football. BCS has modified itself on an annual basis since it began. Most people believe it should be scrapped, added to or incorporated into a playoff system. The coaches poll has a contractual obligation to vote the BCS title winner #1 in its poll. By my logic, then, the title was "handed" to LSU, since they didnt have to face the coaches or media's #1 team. & after playing the 2nd best team from the weakest BCS conf, the coaches were paid to vote LSU #1. To show the folly of the BCS, some coaches revolted against it & voted their conscience despite their contractual obligation not to.

Also, that "mediocre" Ohio St team took your conf champ, K State, behind the woodshed!

 

[Avalanche]

Go ahead and talk about the two polls that don't really matter - the AP and coaches. What about the BCS poll? USC was 3rd. That, unfortunately, was the poll that mattered most.

To square off against a feisty Michigan team ranked #4 in the Rose Bowl? Do you think that was that tough? Do you think a trip to New Orleans against OU or LSU would have been tougher??? PLEASE PLEASE tell me that a trip to the Rose Bowl against Michigan was a tougher road for USC... PLEASE!

How would USC have liked to have gone to New Orleans??? (actually, I am sure they would have liked it because this would have meant they would have qualified for the national title game) but they would have had to have played the #1, #2, or #3 team (depending on the poll) rather than #4 and much further away from the friendly confines of Southern California.

Don't tell me that USC was happy to be in the Rose Bowl (not that you're saying it) but in advance, don't tell me that USC was happy to be in the Rose Bowl rather than New Orleans.

Incidentally, I don't view K State as our Big 12 conference champ anyway. IMO it just shows how unfair a conference title game is. A 10-3 K State team with 2 losses in the conference can now claim they're the conference champ by winning albeit a very important conference championship game (but its one game for "all the marbles") despite Oklahoma going into the game a perfect 12-0 and 8-0 in the Big 12. How would the Pac 10 like a situation like that? Lets say USC went undefeated and had to play Cal in the Pac 10 conference title game and lost it? Despite USC having a better record in the conference even after the loss in the title game, does that seem fair? Nope.

And by the way, for you to say LSU played the 2nd best team from the BCS' "weakest conference' (assuming you mean Oklahoma in the Big 12) that shows how distorted and biased your opinions are (although much better articulated than SCOTT4USC). The Big 12 is certainly NOT the weakest conference in the BCS... not even close. How do you think Oklahoma got to the title game in the first place if it was in the weakest conference? Is it a Pac 10 conspiracy or could it be that the Pac 10 is one of the weakest BCS conferences? I look forward to your response and please tell me how the Big 12 is considered the BCS' "weakest" conference - please dont dodge that. I want to hear what spin you're going to come up with for that.

 

[Scott4USC]

The Big 12 was 2-6 in bowl games and the losing teams lost by an average of 10pts!!!

According to Jeff Sagarin NCAA football ratings for conferences:

1 ATLANTIC COAST
2 SOUTHEASTERN
3 BIG TEN
4 PAC-10
5 BIG 12
6 BIG EAST

Where is your analysis supporting your claim? Yep, you have none. :nooo:

Here is something interesting.

Decade Conference Ranking

Incidentally, I don't view K State as our Big 12 conference champ anyway.

That is hilarious. KSU beats OU 35-7 and you still want to proclaim OU conference champion of the Big 12. HILARIOUS!!!! :lol2 Why have a conference championship? :lol2

 

[Avalanche]

SCOTT4USC,

You are indeed a terminal fool.

NOTICE SCOTT4USC YOU DONT MENTION ANYTHING ABOUT WHICH WAS A TOUGHER ROAD === THE ROSE BOWL OR NEW ORLEANS? DID YOU JUST HAPPEN TO MISS THAT???????????

Your alias mansa musa is claiming that the Big 12 is the "weakest" conference in the BCS. I am stating that is not the case. By even your numbers the Big 12 is 4th in total points and oh by the way #1 when calculated by national championship points.

Ironically, those same numbers indicate the Big 12 is 5th. Not the weakest like you indicate.

Face it Pac 10 supporters, your conference is weak.

How did USC do in the conference championship game??? Oh that's right, they don't have one... all they have to do is beat Arizona, Arizona State, Stanford, Oregon State and Cal (oh yeah they lost to them).

WHO HAD THE TOUGHER ROAD???? THE PAC 10 or the BIG 12 or SEC?????

WHO HAD THE TOUGHER ROAD?????? ANSWER THE QUESTION AND QUIT PLAYING DODGE BALL!!!!!!

If you would simply answer the question, you would not be able to defend the PAC 10 like you do. You are simply playing dodge ball at every turn.

 

[Scott4USC]

Avalanche

First of all, I NEVER SAID THE BIG 12 was the 6th best BCS conference. I NEVER SAID THAT!!!!!!!! 2nd, the data i provided was just to show YOU and anybody else where the conferences statistically ranked last year. BIg 12 was bad last year and their bowl record was horrible.

Face it Pac 10 supporters, your conference is weak.

A down year in the Pac 10 was still better than the Big 12 (who also had down year). And no, on average the Pac 10 conference is "not" weak IMO and neither is the Big 12.

I am trying to understand what you mean who had the tougher road. It would be nice if you would tell me your opinion on who had the tougher road and why.

Based on conference ratings last year and my own personal opinion, the SEC was a tougher road than the Pac 10, and the Pac 10 was a tougher road than the Big 12. But that is all based on calculating all the teams in the conference and we know all the teams in each conference do not play each other.

I also find it funny how KSU tore apart OU in the conference title game beating OU 35-7. So KSU is the Big 12 champion and OU is the 2nd best team. Yet, Ohio St. dominated KSU and OU lost 2nd game in a row to LSU. Not very impressive from the Big 12. The 2 top teams from the PAC 10 won both of their games (WSU beating Texas, a Big 12 team) and USC dominated the Big 10 champ who was considered by MANY to be one of the hottest teams in the country. BTW, the Big 12 conference was 2-6 in bowl games. Not something to be proud about. :nooo:

You are indeed a terminal fool.

Nope, you are, for calling me one. :nono:

 

[bjfinste]

This is a college football forum

This is a college football HANDICAPPING forum, not a fvcking fan site.

 

[Scott4USC]

bjfinste

Not what Madjack said. :nono:

 

[mansa_musa]

Avalanche

My opinion that the Big 12 is the weakest conf is just an opinion. Same as your opinion about the Pac 10. But let me tell you why I think the Big 12 was the weakest BCS conf. I did the research at the end of the regular season & I'm sure you can look this up for yourself. But, 6 teams in the Big 12 gave up over 30 ppg v BCS competition -- 3 of those gave up 40+ ppg -- & Texas gave up about 28 ppg.

Tx Tech
Iowa St
Baylor
Colorado
Tx A&M
Ok St

I believe Oklahoma played all 6 of those 30+ clubs (& Texas), so whatever #s used to define the Sooners greatness are skewed by the conf weakness on the defensive side of the ball.

That's why they got blown out in the bowl season. 2-6! --w the only wins over Navy & Michigan St. Off the top of my head, I cant think of any BCS conf that did worse than the Big 12 in the bowls.
So to answer your question about the tougher road. I'd have to say no one had an easier road than Oklahoma.

What about the BCS poll?

I thought I had covered that, but, the BCS is not a poll -- it is a computer ranking system. With several flaws! Funny that you would recognize a championship based on a flawed computer ranking system. But, you disregard the head to head playoff between the division champs in your own conf. You then called my ideas biased & distorted! :shrug:

How do you think Oklahoma got to the title game in the first place if it was in the weakest conference?

The same way that Miami & Florida St play in the BCS game every other yr. By being the best team in the weakest BCS conf. The ACC & the Big East of yrs past have a whole lot in common w the Big 12 of last yr -- one so-called dominant team & one so-called challenger -- & a host of other teams that cant compete for anything.

 

[Avalanche]

I will give you Pac 10 spin doctors some credit - at least you all are persistent and consistent --- and somehow you seem to actually believe what you're saying.

Go ahead and call the BCS flawed and not a "poll" and go ahead and call it a computerized ranking system instead. What do you think the Saragin ratings are??? Get real people! Somehow I would wager that if USC had mustered up enough points to actually qualify for the national title game, you guys wouldn't be slamming the BCS so much now would you? Just like you guys suddenly love the Associated Press all in a sudden, eh?

For you Pac 10 supporters to slam Oklahoma's opponents is just like you guys slamming USC's opponents - sure.. blame it all on Hawaii and Notre Dame, USC. Come on! USC didn't qualify for the national title game PERIOD. End of story. Be happy that enough people in the country felt sorry for USC that the AP gave them half of the national title without even qualifying for the national title game.

In the history of the BCS, how many Pac 10 teams have made it to the national championship game? ZERO.

 

[Scott4USC]

Avalanche

Once again you cannot bring up any material backing up your opinion. Once again you just make attacks against the Pac 10. DO YOU HAVE ANY MATERIAL SUPPORTING YOUR OPINION?

Go ahead and call the BCS flawed and not a "poll" and go ahead and call it a computerized ranking system instead.

That is exactly what the BCS is. :lol:

Just like you guys suddenly love the Associated Press all in a sudden, eh?

The AP has been around a lot longer than the BCS.

USC didn't qualify for the national title game PERIOD. End of story.

Why do you take offense to looking at "why" a team did not qualify for the BCS National Title game?

Be happy that enough people in the country felt sorry for USC that the AP gave them half of the national title without even qualifying for the national title game.

USC had more than enough people thinking they were the #1 team in the country. It was LSU, NOT USC, who was fortunate. NO ONE of significance is calling LSU the champ. LSU is ONLY co-champs because the coaches HAD to vote for LSU. Now, it's just not one poll calling USC champs over LSU. In the numerous non-coerced polls, USC was a unanimous NUMBER ONE!

All have USC #1

Associated Press "National Championship Trophy"
Football Writers Association of America "Grantland Rice Trophy"
College Football News "National Championship Poll"
Sports Illustrated "College Football Power Poll"
Sporting News "National Championship Poll"

National Media:

Jim Rome - "USC the better team"
Kirk Herbstreet - "USC the better team"
Lee Corso - "USC the better team"
Ivan Maisel - "USC the better team"
USA Today - "USC the better team"
Fox Sports - "USC the better team"
CBS Sportsline - "USC the better team"
Sports Illustrated - "USC the better team"
Sporting News - "USC the better team"
CFN - "USC the better team"
FWAA - "USC the better team"
Etc., etc., etc., etc.

Find one MAJOR media outlet that says LSU is better.

In the history of the BCS, how many Pac 10 teams have made it to the national championship game? ZERO.

Your question should have asked BCS NC game, and the answer is ZERO. Oregon, Washington, and USC all easily or should have made it to the BCS NC game. Remember the year people said Miami got screwed out of going to the BCS NC game, Washington was the team that gave them the loss and why were they not chosen? Oregon without question should have been chosen. Maybe the only reason they were not selected is because USC is the only real respected team the media (east coast bias) respects on the west coast. Which is wrong. I am not sure why you asked this question? It does not prove or support anything.

 

[bbk]

Isnt the FACT the PAC 10 has not won a NC in the BCS since it has been around supporting material and I dont know but how many NC has the PAC 10 won in the last 20 years. ???? I dont know can someone tell me please. Everyone keeps talking about USC not getting there because of their OOC schedule; the reason why is because the PAC 10 is pitiful. BIG XII teams have to play these 2nd tier teams like NEB that was in the NC game a few years ago and won 9 games last year versus the Top Tier Teams USC faces like Cal which beat USC and lost 5 games and was even worse the year before and didnt they lose 10 games the year before that. Hey Scott are those not FACTS or are they made up numbers also. Vtech is a good start but they still have to play those pitiful PAC 10 teams. :nono: :moon: