Loophole
- Thread starter Eddie Haskell
- Start date
Why the hell is everyone begging this liberal lowlife to stay, thank goodness he is going. Don't let the door hit in the ass on your way out.......
CELEBRATE EVERYONE, the name calling lowlife bottom dwelling shyster is leaving :clap: :spotting: dance2 :Yep:
HAPPY DAYS ARE HERE AGAIN :toast: :spotting: :spotting: :142smilie :142smilie
GOOD RIDDANCE
CELEBRATE EVERYONE, the name calling lowlife bottom dwelling shyster is leaving :clap: :spotting: dance2 :Yep:
HAPPY DAYS ARE HERE AGAIN :toast: :spotting: :spotting: :142smilie :142smilie
GOOD RIDDANCE
Edward You are correct that I did state I thought it took courage and was admirable that you took efforts to admit your fault and try and help others--and I stand by that 100%--ONLY when continuied dissing everyone as inept boneheads with no logic or objectivity compared to your holiness did I make reference that is was pretty strong statement from someone who couldn't objectively break even on a coin toss,if you'll remember.
and yes I am conservative and yes I do not like a lot of liberal stances on issues but why do you keep saying I am against Lawyers in general. Did you once again not read my post to you on that issue last week. Here is for the last time for your review----
For the record I will also miss you as while we agree on little I do find you quite witty and amusing. Whatever you decide on---I sincerely wish you the best in your endeavors.Stay safe--stay alert and stay with Fox
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
from link
http://www.madjacksports.com/forum/showthread.php?t=153385
Edward ror the 100th time I DO NOT CONDEM ALL LAWYERS.
!st I respect all attorneys for the time and education they put in to better their lives.
Where the respect ends is with( most not all) Personal injury attorneys--class action lawsuits ect.
I have many friends and clients that are attorneys.
I have used immigration and corporate attorneys myself in past year and confer with estate attorney's many times during year.
Have the utmost respect for public defenders as many truely believe in cause vs pocket book.
Have utmost respect for criminal defence attorneys with a few exceptions like Gerigos and few other high profile ones.
So you "opinion" of me dissing all attorneys simply won't float.
It has never been your being a PI attourney that that I have probs with cause you may be the good guy--I hope so anyway--it is your opinions and justifications I have probs with.
and yes I am conservative and yes I do not like a lot of liberal stances on issues but why do you keep saying I am against Lawyers in general. Did you once again not read my post to you on that issue last week. Here is for the last time for your review----
For the record I will also miss you as while we agree on little I do find you quite witty and amusing. Whatever you decide on---I sincerely wish you the best in your endeavors.Stay safe--stay alert and stay with Fox
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
from link
http://www.madjacksports.com/forum/showthread.php?t=153385
Edward ror the 100th time I DO NOT CONDEM ALL LAWYERS.
!st I respect all attorneys for the time and education they put in to better their lives.
Where the respect ends is with( most not all) Personal injury attorneys--class action lawsuits ect.
I have many friends and clients that are attorneys.
I have used immigration and corporate attorneys myself in past year and confer with estate attorney's many times during year.
Have the utmost respect for public defenders as many truely believe in cause vs pocket book.
Have utmost respect for criminal defence attorneys with a few exceptions like Gerigos and few other high profile ones.
So you "opinion" of me dissing all attorneys simply won't float.
It has never been your being a PI attourney that that I have probs with cause you may be the good guy--I hope so anyway--it is your opinions and justifications I have probs with.
wow eddie, it blows me away that we obviously have so many things in common yet see things so differenty. in reading your post, i find i disagee with just about everything you had to say. moreso, i disagree with your manner and motive in saying it. i've had to go back and reread your post in order retain everything to which i would like to respond.
did i single you out in asking you to apologize for namecalling? of course i did. this forum is obviously overrun with hordes of individuals who love to bash lawyers and the court system but who are so ignorant of the subject matter as to be unable to find their ass with an indian guide and three pack mules. i occasionally like to correct a factual misrepresentation; you like to "call them out" in a manner calculated by design to provoke an angry reaction. is this your idea of advocacy? if so, i find it ineffective, as my experience has been that you can never win someone's heart and mind by making them feel foolish. that is the approach of one who possesses intellect but lacks wisdom.
i singled you out for the namecalling because i know that you are educated, articulate, and just ought to know better. you know, you ought to go back and read some of your early posts here at madjacks. they were much more engaging, witty and less provocational. but i have watched your presentation slowly erode from satirical to condescending to denigrating to downright insulting. it's as if some manner of bitterness has crept into your soul. i know you often suffer the slings and arrows of those in the forum that are incapable of a reasoned, articulate response, but, as you stated above, more often than not that is the kind of response that you intend to provoke. i sense that other influences outside of the forum may be at the core of your change in demeanor.
i completely take exception to your "calling me out" for mentioning the military backround of my family, insinuating that i did so as an emotional appeal for sympathy and support. if you go back and read the context in which i made mention of the fact, you will see that that i brought up my family backround and geographic location to put into context the perspective of my assertion that kerry is not popular among military types. as a writer, i think you would agree that it is a good practice for an author to set out the context of their remarks on a subject. it aids the reader in understanding bias and agenda. i think a similiar approach would serve you well when editorializing.
i'm sorry but i did not see your post concerning a gambling problem, only a passing reference that you did not gamble. in retrospect, i guess i should have put two and two together. i also did not see any post by dtb demeaning you on this issue. if he did so, then he owes you an apology also. knowing wayne as i do, i wuold consider such a remark out of character, then again, when the purpose of your writing is to "get a rise" out of people, you shouldn't find it too surprising if, on occasion, their response is over the top.
i am unsettled by your comment that attempts to justify some of your hyperbolic content by stating that it is made in the context of an internet chat forum where one is cloaked with the mantle of anominity. redneck that i am, i consider that excuse unmanly, as i am committed to a personal code that does not permit me to say anything to someone or about someone that i would not say to their face. i've been participating in this forum for quite some time, and many of these people are not anonymous to me. the are real, breathing human beings with faces and names, and i consider many of them personal friends, even the ones whose politics differ from mine.
if you chose not to post in the future, that is your perogative, but i'm stunned that you would use that as an excuse to cancel out of the atlantic city gathering. you should reconsider on that subject. i think you would benefit from meeting some of the people i understand will be there, and i think they would benefit from meeting you. hell, there's a good chance i'll be there, and if you change your mind and atttend i'll even buy you a beer.
did i single you out in asking you to apologize for namecalling? of course i did. this forum is obviously overrun with hordes of individuals who love to bash lawyers and the court system but who are so ignorant of the subject matter as to be unable to find their ass with an indian guide and three pack mules. i occasionally like to correct a factual misrepresentation; you like to "call them out" in a manner calculated by design to provoke an angry reaction. is this your idea of advocacy? if so, i find it ineffective, as my experience has been that you can never win someone's heart and mind by making them feel foolish. that is the approach of one who possesses intellect but lacks wisdom.
i singled you out for the namecalling because i know that you are educated, articulate, and just ought to know better. you know, you ought to go back and read some of your early posts here at madjacks. they were much more engaging, witty and less provocational. but i have watched your presentation slowly erode from satirical to condescending to denigrating to downright insulting. it's as if some manner of bitterness has crept into your soul. i know you often suffer the slings and arrows of those in the forum that are incapable of a reasoned, articulate response, but, as you stated above, more often than not that is the kind of response that you intend to provoke. i sense that other influences outside of the forum may be at the core of your change in demeanor.
i completely take exception to your "calling me out" for mentioning the military backround of my family, insinuating that i did so as an emotional appeal for sympathy and support. if you go back and read the context in which i made mention of the fact, you will see that that i brought up my family backround and geographic location to put into context the perspective of my assertion that kerry is not popular among military types. as a writer, i think you would agree that it is a good practice for an author to set out the context of their remarks on a subject. it aids the reader in understanding bias and agenda. i think a similiar approach would serve you well when editorializing.
i'm sorry but i did not see your post concerning a gambling problem, only a passing reference that you did not gamble. in retrospect, i guess i should have put two and two together. i also did not see any post by dtb demeaning you on this issue. if he did so, then he owes you an apology also. knowing wayne as i do, i wuold consider such a remark out of character, then again, when the purpose of your writing is to "get a rise" out of people, you shouldn't find it too surprising if, on occasion, their response is over the top.
i am unsettled by your comment that attempts to justify some of your hyperbolic content by stating that it is made in the context of an internet chat forum where one is cloaked with the mantle of anominity. redneck that i am, i consider that excuse unmanly, as i am committed to a personal code that does not permit me to say anything to someone or about someone that i would not say to their face. i've been participating in this forum for quite some time, and many of these people are not anonymous to me. the are real, breathing human beings with faces and names, and i consider many of them personal friends, even the ones whose politics differ from mine.
if you chose not to post in the future, that is your perogative, but i'm stunned that you would use that as an excuse to cancel out of the atlantic city gathering. you should reconsider on that subject. i think you would benefit from meeting some of the people i understand will be there, and i think they would benefit from meeting you. hell, there's a good chance i'll be there, and if you change your mind and atttend i'll even buy you a beer.
loophole said, "i am unsettled by your comment that attempts to justify some of your hyperbolic content by stating that it is made in the context of an internet chat forum where one is cloaked with the mantle of anominity. redneck that i am, i consider that excuse unmanly, as i am committed to a personal code that does not permit me to say anything to someone or about someone that i would not say to their face."
Loophole, we need more rednecks on this forum. Cheers to that, and I totally agree with this statement.
Loophole, we need more rednecks on this forum. Cheers to that, and I totally agree with this statement.
Im not reading all that shit..
your leaving thats all i need know..
makes no diff. to me either way, football will be starting soon, which means most will no longer need to frequent the General Forum everyday. And since you contribute little anywhere else, i suspect you will be nothing less but a distant memory by mid September.
your leaving thats all i need know..
makes no diff. to me either way, football will be starting soon, which means most will no longer need to frequent the General Forum everyday. And since you contribute little anywhere else, i suspect you will be nothing less but a distant memory by mid September.
Eddie :.......................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
................................................
Last edited:
Don't be getting to UP or down on this one.
Eddie's beating his meat with all the attention :yup This is better than imagining of what the mailman's wife's trim looks like an inch from his face.
My capping skills threw up a red flag :bsflag
The problem of telling all his "friends" ad MJ's that he would be seeing them at Atlantic City got him into a bind. You see this would "interfere" with his ability to post as he does. Becoming too close to the subject matter dulls one's edge. So he just ducks out on his own terms, supposedly. :sadwave:
He'll be back............probably TS style :soapbox:
Eddie's beating his meat with all the attention :yup This is better than imagining of what the mailman's wife's trim looks like an inch from his face.
My capping skills threw up a red flag :bsflag
The problem of telling all his "friends" ad MJ's that he would be seeing them at Atlantic City got him into a bind. You see this would "interfere" with his ability to post as he does. Becoming too close to the subject matter dulls one's edge. So he just ducks out on his own terms, supposedly. :sadwave:
He'll be back............probably TS style :soapbox:
attention whore.
if you were going to leave just leave.
obviously you need to have your fans gush all over you staying.
if you were going to leave just leave.
obviously you need to have your fans gush all over you staying.
Eddie Haskell said:
I think he may have me confused with someone else, I don't recall posting that. I remember once he realy pissed me off by saying I had less than honorable motives for something I posted, but that doesn't sound like something I would post...
no stay here so you spend less time robbing people of their livelihoods; and keep taking doctors and nurses out of the hospitals...patients dont really need help
WTF!....
Who pissed off my biatch (cupcake) and caused her to leave?...
What throbbing Dic Head hurt my baby's feelings...
Yes, her sarcasm and attempts at humor offended some, but for the love of distilled liquor, she is a character in a forum with something to say... Some of you take this chit way to seriously.....
Say what you will about the pompous little litigator, but she verbally dismantled the majority that went up against her... I for one will miss little cox-sucker...
:sadwave:
:bs: :142smilie
Who pissed off my biatch (cupcake) and caused her to leave?...
What throbbing Dic Head hurt my baby's feelings...
Yes, her sarcasm and attempts at humor offended some, but for the love of distilled liquor, she is a character in a forum with something to say... Some of you take this chit way to seriously.....
Say what you will about the pompous little litigator, but she verbally dismantled the majority that went up against her... I for one will miss little cox-sucker...
:sadwave:
:bs: :142smilie
geez guys, how about you all giving it a rest? some of you eddie haters bear a marked resemblance to turkey buzzards circlng road kill.
jack or ie, maybe it's time to consider locking this and related threads. it appears there's nothing else constuctive or reflective that's going to come out of them. at least, move them to the trash bin.
in earlier days, this was a much more appealing forum to hang out in. now it's a snake pit. maybe it's just the election year - i surely hope so.
jack or ie, maybe it's time to consider locking this and related threads. it appears there's nothing else constuctive or reflective that's going to come out of them. at least, move them to the trash bin.
in earlier days, this was a much more appealing forum to hang out in. now it's a snake pit. maybe it's just the election year - i surely hope so.
