Lowest Total On the board

[c20916]

I had a feeling once I placed the bet at 182 and you had it at 184, I said watch this total land on 183, it was 184 at least you got the push.

I was pissed Det came down with a minute left and the prick put up a quick shot with like 20 left on the shot clock, just a scrub trying to get in the box score.

 

[Agent 0659]

No offense, but this might be one of the worst "systems" I have ever seen. Just cap the fkin games you guys. Or, maybe fade this thing! But seriously, just cap the games. :shrug: This obviously doesn't work.

 

[cisco]

0-4 -6.82
No play today.

Last year the system went the first 12 games with 2 double ups but not suffering a loss so you never know what's in store.

 

[BUCSnotYUCKS]

I had a feeling once I placed the bet at 182 and you had it at 184, I said watch this total land on 183, it was 184 at least you got the push.

I was pissed Det came down with a minute left and the prick put up a quick shot with like 20 left on the shot clock, just a scrub trying to get in the box score.

Why does it seem like I'm typically, if not always on the side where the guy just runs the clock out? LOL Yeah, and I usually need that garbage chuck to cover.

 

[IntenseOperator]

You guys should think about passing on a system play like the Detroit game yesterday, when there is a trade involved. Possibly even play the next lowest total (a winner) or passing all together.

Personally, I would give you a mulligan on that.

 

[BUCSnotYUCKS]

You guys should think about passing on a system play like the Detroit game yesterday, when there is a trade involved. Possibly even play the next lowest total (a winner) or passing all together.

Personally, I would give you a mulligan on that.

I thought the same thing. I don't see how a "system" play can be counted when trades are in effect. These guys from Vegas are great at what they do with setting lines, but with trades, that's a whole new ball game.

 

[c20916]

Det game was the lowest, but now off the board due to the trade, so we'll go with the next lowest,

SA/Minn under 181.5.

Why is it the lowest totals always involve SA and Det of the 5 games this year, including this pick, 3 have been on a Det game and this is the 2nd SA game.

 

[cisco]

Det/Tor un 180.5 +100 @ pinnacle

edit: un 181 +102

 

[cisco]

Sa/Min un 180.5 -106

Looks like I'll be playing both tonight.

 

[BUCSnotYUCKS]

I really like the SA/MIN under180.5, but I like the OVER in the 1H of Detroit game.

 

[cisco]

Det/Tor un 181.5 +102 @ pinnacle- Final

 

[cisco]

Bos/Okc also ended up at 180.5. I didn't see that before.

 

[cisco]

That's enough for me for a while. :shrug:

 

[cisco]

Update:

Lowest total: 4-6 -3.92
Highest total: 6-5 -.82

 

[cisco]

Update 11/18

Lowest total: 8-6 +.08
Highest total: 9-6 +1.18

The under is on a 5-0 winning streak.
The over is on a 6-1 run.



.

 

[Keyser Soze]

I've been super busy.........sure appreciate the update Cisco.

 

[cisco]

using the 1st Quarter only;

under 10-4 +7.69
over 12-3 +12.0

This is looking very promising.

 

[cisco]

Update

Lowest total 11-8 +2.18
Highest total 12-7 +4.18

1st Quarter
Lowest 12-6 +2.18
Highest 16-3 +16.0

 

[BUCSnotYUCKS]

cisco, you get my email?

 

[cisco]

Bucs-You have mail