mccain/obama

Mjolnir

Registered User
Forum Member
May 15, 2003
3,747
11
0
S. CAL.
any thought's?




MCCAIN RELEASES LETTER TO OBAMA
For Immediate Release
Monday, Feb 06, 2006

Washington D.C. *? Today, Senator McCain sent the following letter to Senator Obama regarding ongoing Congressional efforts towards bipartisan lobbying reform. The following is the text from that letter:

February 6, 2006

The Honorable Barack Obama

United States Senate

SH-713

Washington, DC 20510


Dear Senator Obama:

I would like to apologize to you for assuming that your private assurances to me regarding your desire to cooperate in our efforts to negotiate bipartisan lobbying reform legislation were sincere. When you approached me and insisted that despite your leadership?s preference to use the issue to gain a political advantage in the 2006 elections, you were personally committed to achieving a result that would reflect credit on the entire Senate and offer the country a better example of political leadership, I concluded your professed concern for the institution and the public interest was genuine and admirable. Thank you for disabusing me of such notions with your letter to me dated February 2, 2006, which explained your decision to withdraw from our bipartisan discussions. I?m embarrassed to admit that after all these years in politics I failed to interpret your previous assurances as typical rhetorical gloss routinely used in politics to make self-interested partisan posturing appear more noble. Again, sorry for the confusion, but please be assured I won?t make the same mistake again.

As you know, the Majority Leader has asked Chairman Collins to hold hearings and mark up a bill for floor consideration in early March. I fully support such timely action and I am confident that, together with Senator Lieberman, the Committee on Governmental Affairs will report out a meaningful, bipartisan bill.

You commented in your letter about my ?interest in creating a task force to further study? this issue, as if to suggest I support delaying the consideration of much-needed reforms rather than allowing the committees of jurisdiction to hold hearings on the matter. Nothing could be further from the truth. The timely findings of a bipartisan working group could be very helpful to the committee in formulating legislation that will be reported to the full Senate. Since you are new to the Senate, you may not be aware of the fact that I have always supported fully the regular committee and legislative process in the Senate, and routinely urge Committee Chairmen to hold hearings on important issues. In fact, I urged Senator Collins to schedule a hearing upon the Senate?s return in January.

Furthermore, I have consistently maintained that any lobbying reform proposal be bipartisan. The bill Senators Joe Lieberman and Bill Nelson and I have introduced is evidence of that commitment as is my insistence that members of both parties be included in meetings to develop the legislation that will ultimately be considered on the Senate floor. As I explained in a recent letter to Senator Reid, and have publicly said many times, the American people do not see this as just a Republican problem or just a Democratic problem. They see it as yet another run-of-the-mill Washington scandal, and they expect it will generate just another round of partisan gamesmanship and posturing. Senator Lieberman and I, and many other members of this body, hope to exceed the public?s low expectations. We view this as an opportunity to bring transparency and accountability to the Congress, and, most importantly, to show the public that both parties will work together to address our failings.

As I noted, I initially believed you shared that goal. But I understand how important the opportunity to lead your party?s effort to exploit this issue must seem to a freshman Senator, and I hold no hard feelings over your earlier disingenuousness. Again, I have been around long enough to appreciate that in politics the public interest isn?t always a priority for every one of us. Good luck to you, Senator.



Sincerely,





John McCain

United States Senate
 

bjfinste

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2001
5,462
18
0
AZ
I read about that a few days ago, and also Obama's response. Seemed like standard politics on both ends when I read through it. (Not sure where the find the Obama letter, I just read a bunch of excerpts in a news story a few days ago).
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
I had seen snippets of this McCain letter, but didn't know of the response. Might be a good project for you today, BJ, to find the response. Or maybe Saul can do it. Everyone knows he has nothing better to do.
 

smurphy

cartographer
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,914
140
63
17
L.A.
Sounds like McCain took something that was privately between the 2 of them and made it public when Osama ...errr Obama backstabbed him or something.

Does this mean they are no longer BFF's?
 

bjfinste

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2001
5,462
18
0
AZ
I guess they kissed and made up....

Obama, McCain make up

WASHINGTON -- Dueling Senators Barack Obama and John McCain called themselves "pen pals" Wednesday as they worked together again on ethics and lobbying reform legislation.

"The witnesses will behave themselves and restrain themselves," joked Senate Rules and Administration Committee Chairman Trent Lott (R-Miss.) as he gaveled to order a hearing where Obama and McCain both testified.

Their cease-fire came as neither man took back the letters that prompted the biggest political story of the week and raised questions about whether Democrats and Republicans could work together on lobbying and ethics reform.

McCain, the Arizona Republican, entered the packed hearing room first. When Obama, the Chicago Democrat, arrived, he walked over, shook hands and semi-draped his arm around McCain's shoulder.

Both agree it's time to move on

At the top of McCain's testimony, he said, "Sen. Obama and I are moving on" and "I value his input."

When it was Obama's turn, he said he was "pleased to be sharing this panel with my pen pal, John McCain."

McCain later picked up on the phrase, calling Obama -- whom he blasted in a Monday letter -- "my pen pal."

The public truce -- Obama and McCain said in individual interviews it was time to move on -- came at a hearing on proposals to overhaul ethics rules and tighten regulations that govern lobbying.

McCain's focus is to clean up a much-criticized way of appropriating money for projects, called earmarking.

The use of earmarks has grown through the years because these special items are secretly inserted into legislation -- often at the behest of lobbyists -- at the last minute, and few lawmakers know what they are voting for.

"That is out-of-control spending, Mr. Chairman, and that has got to stop," McCain said. McCain unveils his earmark proposals today.

The House and Senate are working on a variety of measures to rid Congress of the influence of lobbyists, who exert power over lawmakers because of their ability to help them directly and indirectly raise campaign money.

With Obama and McCain back on track, the Senate seems on course to consider some measures in the next few weeks.

At issue is whether there is a comprehensive package of changes -- which Obama and Democrats advocate -- or a piecemeal approach.

Meanwhile, in the House, the initial push by Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) for speedy change has been slowed with the election of Majority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio), who is not in a rush -- so far -- to put anything to a vote.

The fundamental role of lobbyists -- and whether Congress needs to crack down on itself when it comes to lawmakers accepting gifts and free trips and subsidized rides on private planes -- is only on the agenda because GOP lobbyist Jack Abramoff pleaded guilty to a variety of crimes in a still-unfolding scandal.

Invited to join 'working group'

"Just take out your credit card and pay your own way," advised Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.), who backs a total ban on gifts.

Democrats have seized on the so-called GOP "culture of corruption" as an issue that could tip the November congressional elections in their favor. The popular Obama, who had carved out apolitical territory in his first year, was named the Democratic lead on the ethics crackdown.

McCain has spent years working on ridding the system of special-interest cash. McCain invited Obama to be part of his bipartisan "working group."

Last week, after the first meeting of the group, Obama sent McCain a letter -- released to reporters -- that implied McCain was trying to slow down the legislative process.

Obama's letter incorrectly said that McCain was "interested" in creating a task force to deal with ethics and lobbying reform rather than going through the regular committee structure.

McCain responded with a mocking letter to Obama that accused him of "self-interested partisan posturing."
 

bjfinste

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2001
5,462
18
0
AZ
Here are a few snippets from a yahoo news article:

Obama responded in a letter later Monday that he had "no idea what ... prompted" McCain to strike out like that.

"The fact that you have now questioned my sincerity ... is regrettable but does not in any way diminish my deep respect for you nor my willingness to find a bipartisan solution to this problem," Obama wrote.

.............. "During my short time in the U.S. Senate," Obama responded Monday, "one of the aspects about this institution that I have come to value most is the collegiality and the willingness to put aside partisan differences to work on issues that help the American people. It was in this spirit that I approached you to work on ethics reform, and it was in this spirit that I agreed to attend your bipartisan meeting last week."
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Love Love Love is all we have. Over reaction!
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top