MLK Day Ht Plays

Ike Bomb

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 3, 2002
240
0
0
I like the over so much because the game is close. I can't really argue with Memphis +10, but why do you like the under so much?
 

JEFF

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 30, 2001
2,165
0
0
I like the under as well as I believe it's gonna slow down and Sac should clamp down on D. Took over 215 so looking for a nice middle between 205 and 216.

As for the side, I don't know if I'd touch either side. Sac could easily blow them outta the water after a tight first half, but I've seen a lot of secind half faves fall a point or two short on some last minute garbage.
 

Dragon

Firebreather
Forum Member
Dec 6, 2001
1,998
0
0
49
NJ
Ike-

I have to agree with TJ on the under. Memphis is shooting a lights out 64% from the field....without Battier and Williams. Sacramento is shooting a more realistic 54% which is still very high. I could see Sacramento keeping up that pace but no way Memphis is going to shoot 60% for the game. I'd be suprised if they stay over 50% for the game. Sacramento should clamp down and blow these guys out. I like both Sac -10 and the under 102, although I don't know if I can pull the trigger and play either one of them. Just my thoughts...nothing more. Good luck with whatever you play!
 

Ike Bomb

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 3, 2002
240
0
0
If you ever see Sac "clamp down on D" let me know, I want to record it. ;)

GL to all!
 

JEFF

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 30, 2001
2,165
0
0
Dragon-
IMO those are the best ways to go.No way would I take the +10 on a Grizz team playing on borrowed time
 

Dragon

Firebreather
Forum Member
Dec 6, 2001
1,998
0
0
49
NJ
I talked myself into a small parlay Sac-10/U102. Hoping we "lay up" with a nice 52-40 type half here.
 

JEFF

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 30, 2001
2,165
0
0
Ike Bomb-
Grizz starters were a combined 22-of-33 in first half. That stat amlone is due to comeplummeting back to earth, and I'd venture to say the SAC coaches mentioned the ridiculous shooting % at halftime. Minus two of their best offensive weapons, this Grizz team is hardly an offensvive juggernaut incapable of being "clamped down on."
 

Ike Bomb

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 3, 2002
240
0
0
Denver +2.5 / 94

Denver +2.5 / 94

I haven't been following this game, so I'm open to suggestions.
 

JEFF

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 30, 2001
2,165
0
0
I haven't been following this one either,although I've got the Nuggs + 7.5 for the game and was hoping for a middle. Smallline on the favemakes me lean Denver, but take it for what its worth. I'llprobably lay off.

Any suggestions?
 

Dragon

Firebreather
Forum Member
Dec 6, 2001
1,998
0
0
49
NJ
Re: Denver +2.5 / 94

Re: Denver +2.5 / 94

I haven't been watching the Denver game either. Quickly glanced at the stats. Not a lot of free throws, not a lot of 3 pointers. Denver is shooting just under 48% and the Clips a little over 53%. Was it a running 1st half? Don't know...maybe someone can confirm. They did manage to pump up 111 points in the first half however. I tend to think it slows down some. I'll throw a little on the under 94 here. That puts the under at 205 for the game. GLTA
 

Dragon

Firebreather
Forum Member
Dec 6, 2001
1,998
0
0
49
NJ
Damn...missed the parlay by a stick...i'll settle for a push on the side and straight up win on the under. Congrats to everyone on Sac under and whomever had sac -9.5!
 

Ike Bomb

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 3, 2002
240
0
0
You guys were right

You guys were right

About the Sac under.

:mad: :mad: :mad:

I had a nice day going and gave back most of my winnings by betting too much on this one bet.

:mad: :mad: :mad:

Stupid, stupid, stupid.............

:nono: to me.

:thefinger to me.
 

JEFF

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 30, 2001
2,165
0
0
Ike Bomb

Ike Bomb

I feel you buddy.I've done that too many times myself. Trying to push a winnin streak is always a risky proposition. We'll get it back tomorrow though.

;)

With a nice middle on the SAC over/under and tight wins with Memphis and Cleveland, I'm looking for 5-0 if the Nuggs can just pull this out. Lets go nuggs.
 

Felonious Monk

Site Owner
Forum Member
Oct 26, 2001
3,579
1
0
52
Austin, TX
Dragon, appreciate the great capping on the Sac 2H play...I put it in at -9.5 just in time. After I refreshed the page it went back up to -10 which of course would have pushed.

Night guys!
 

Dragon

Firebreather
Forum Member
Dec 6, 2001
1,998
0
0
49
NJ
FM...nice hit on Sac! WTG man. I look forward to working with the half time team more often. Let's keep it going today. :D
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top