capped this total to end up at 47 to 53 ;) :eek: taking under 42 x2
K kcwolf Registered User Forum Member Aug 1, 2000 7,224 21 0 Iowa City Nov 4, 2002 #1 capped this total to end up at 47 to 53 taking under 42 x2
T theGibber1 Registered User Forum Member Aug 27, 2001 8,615 64 0 Dallas TX Nov 4, 2002 #2 good luck wolf
Crazy Fingers Registered User Forum Member Dec 15, 2000 3,642 58 48 Gulf Breeze, Florida Nov 4, 2002 #3 Solid weekend for you KC! GL tonight on this play.
F freelancc Registered User Forum Member Aug 18, 2002 12,270 263 83 Nevada Nov 4, 2002 #5 gotta believe the 30 degree temperature slows everyone down a bit and Brett will not be as mobile.... Good luck KC...~~
gotta believe the 30 degree temperature slows everyone down a bit and Brett will not be as mobile.... Good luck KC...~~
T Trentwalker Registered User Forum Member Dec 12, 2000 354 5 0 Boston, MA Nov 4, 2002 #6 Ok, dumb question... If you have the total at 47 to 53, then why the under? Are you fading yourself KC? I Must be missing something GL
Ok, dumb question... If you have the total at 47 to 53, then why the under? Are you fading yourself KC? I Must be missing something GL
T Topdog Registered User Forum Member Jan 7, 2001 443 0 0 Houston, Texas Nov 4, 2002 #7 Totals Totals At what capping number would you bet the Over?? Congrats on your 6-0 sunday!! Thanks, Topdog
Totals Totals At what capping number would you bet the Over?? Congrats on your 6-0 sunday!! Thanks, Topdog
N nighthorse Registered User Forum Member Nov 26, 2001 1,783 0 0 57 wichita, ks 67209 Nov 4, 2002 #8 I'm glad I'm not the only one who couldn't figure that out.
M Mizzou Registered User Forum Member Dec 18, 2001 1,945 1 0 Nov 4, 2002 #9 What am I missing here? What am I missing here? capped this total to end up at 47 to 53 taking under 42 x2 Should end up 47 - 53. Under 42? Am I missing something or just plain simple?
What am I missing here? What am I missing here? capped this total to end up at 47 to 53 taking under 42 x2 Should end up 47 - 53. Under 42? Am I missing something or just plain simple?
T theGibber1 Registered User Forum Member Aug 27, 2001 8,615 64 0 Dallas TX Nov 4, 2002 #10 If you have the total at 47 to 53, then why the under? Click to expand... not the guy you wanted to hear from but heres my 2cents.. with a healthy set of QBs i can see the over.. easy... but w/ favre not 100% and fiedler out.. both teams will try and establish the run.. played the under 1st half myself.. good luck
If you have the total at 47 to 53, then why the under? Click to expand... not the guy you wanted to hear from but heres my 2cents.. with a healthy set of QBs i can see the over.. easy... but w/ favre not 100% and fiedler out.. both teams will try and establish the run.. played the under 1st half myself.. good luck
D djv Registered User Forum Member Nov 4, 2000 13,817 17 0 Nov 4, 2002 #12 Look at the face's guys next to his numbers. He's telling you why. Sorry if im wrong but yes he is fading him self.
Look at the face's guys next to his numbers. He's telling you why. Sorry if im wrong but yes he is fading him self.
P P-38 Registered User Forum Member Aug 4, 2002 93 0 0 Nov 4, 2002 #13 he must be fading himself? :shrug:
T Trentwalker Registered User Forum Member Dec 12, 2000 354 5 0 Boston, MA Nov 4, 2002 #15 I hear ya gib, makes sense, but... I was wondering if KC's total was w/2 healthy qbs. Is that what one caps first: two completely healthy teams and then subtracts from there based on injuries?? Just curious. Thanks. 2 years and I finally have an avatar GL
I hear ya gib, makes sense, but... I was wondering if KC's total was w/2 healthy qbs. Is that what one caps first: two completely healthy teams and then subtracts from there based on injuries?? Just curious. Thanks. 2 years and I finally have an avatar GL
THE KOD Registered Forum Member Nov 16, 2001 42,564 315 83 Victory Lane Nov 4, 2002 #16 djv KC is fading himself. cool .. Scott-Atlanta
K kcwolf Registered User Forum Member Aug 1, 2000 7,224 21 0 Iowa City Nov 4, 2002 #17 Trentwalker Just trying to point out numbers/stats. Game looked like an obvious over on stats alone. Remember to take in all the intangibles. A lot more goes into capping games than numbers. May work tonight, maybe not. gl!
Trentwalker Just trying to point out numbers/stats. Game looked like an obvious over on stats alone. Remember to take in all the intangibles. A lot more goes into capping games than numbers. May work tonight, maybe not. gl!
T Trentwalker Registered User Forum Member Dec 12, 2000 354 5 0 Boston, MA Nov 4, 2002 #18 Thanks KC Good Answer and GL
T Topdog Registered User Forum Member Jan 7, 2001 443 0 0 Houston, Texas Nov 5, 2002 #19 Another Winner!!! Another Winner!!! KC Wolf, Thanks for another winner. I offset it with a pick of my own on Miami. Thanks, Topdog
Another Winner!!! Another Winner!!! KC Wolf, Thanks for another winner. I offset it with a pick of my own on Miami. Thanks, Topdog
J Jhpga Registered User Forum Member Jan 23, 2001 350 0 0 Brentwood,Tn Nov 5, 2002 #20 Great weekend Wolf!!!!!