MON 5.16 - ALL IN on TB

tball

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 5, 2001
2,565
11
0
boston, ma
LAST
6-4 (+260)


YTD
39-32-2 (+509)


this is play ON smyly, as well as VS happ

Tampa Bay Rays +114 vs Toronto Blue Jays (D Smyly - L must Start J Happ - L must Start)

Tampa Bay Rays 1st 5 Innings +108 vs Toronto Blue Jays (D Smyly - L must Start J Happ - L must Start)


GLA
 

Crookity

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 11, 2014
2,834
227
63
Toronto
LAST
6-4 (+260)


YTD
39-32-2 (+509)


this is play ON smyly, as well as VS happ

Tampa Bay Rays +114 vs Toronto Blue Jays (D Smyly - L must Start J Happ - L must Start)

Tampa Bay Rays 1st 5 Innings +108 vs Toronto Blue Jays (D Smyly - L must Start J Happ - L must Start)


GLA


Happ is Hot and Smyly is not??:shrug::shrug:
 

tball

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 5, 2001
2,565
11
0
boston, ma
Happ is Hot and Smyly is not??:shrug::shrug:


smyly has made a huge leap -so far anyways- this year.

in couple games ive seen him pitch, both on and against, has been nothing short of solid, as well as somewhat unlucky (run support)

right now his record stands at 1-4, but by my judgement, should be -at worst- .500

but sometimes you dont get run support, or just plain unlucky, i get it

this yr, been L, L, ND (when he went 8, and 0 ER), W, L, ND, L

2 no decisions his team has won. he's pitched, near upper tier level this year and only 1 W to show for it

happ

he is hot, yes. 5-0 this yr

has not been saddled with a L going all the way back to last year

all his starts with TOR this year has been ND, W, W, W, ND, W, W (and 3 prev starts last yr, with PIT, W, ND, W) --so clearly he's pitched well enough to keep his team in it.

based off stats alone -he too- has pitched masterfully, only having allowed no more than 3 ER in any of these outings. hes gotten win in all 3 games played at home, allowing 1, 3, and 1 ER (6 inn, 7 inn, 7 inn of work)

for me, those are stats/trends that are hard to keep going

--that said, i believe i read some pretty sharp advice <below> about ever betting against a streak ((which essentially is what i'm kind of doing)) in banking that the law of avgs should catch up for both pitchers - and their respective records.

The lesson I learned from that situation is to ALWAYS bet "with" the streak. You can only lose once betting with it, yet an indeterminable number going against it.



only things that give me pause

TOR: josh donaldson, who is usually a tough out, in midst of 0-14 (mini) slump L3 games, which statistically he should 'awaken' from -soon-


TB: logan forsythe, who seems to have found home in TB, and solid hitter, has been sidelined with hairline fracture in arm (to DL)</below>
 
Last edited:

tball

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 5, 2001
2,565
11
0
boston, ma
fwiw

fwiw

for whatever its worth, and really doesn't help, within framework of my thinking, but the 2 ND's for happ, happened to come at TB --in which both times, TOR lost

^^so then is TOR due for a win vs TB when happ on the bump?^^<so then,="" is="" tor="" due="" for="" win="" vs="" tb="" when="" happ="" on="" the="" bump?="">

</so>
 

tball

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 5, 2001
2,565
11
0
boston, ma
total trend

total trend

<so then,="" is="" tor="" due="" for="" win="" vs="" tb="" when="" happ="" on="" the="" bump?="">
a side stat note

games played between these teams this year have gone OVER once, pushed once and remained UNDER the other 5 contests for a 1-5-1 line on totals, including UNDER the last 5 ((to which i suspect an OVER outcome either tonight or tomorrow, or -more likely- both)

total for tonight's tilt, is at 8


GL


</so>
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top