MONDAY NIGHT

[LDB]

turned off the game after the muffed punt... check my book and the niners covered... :toast:

I feel bad for SF, they should of won that game.. big mistakes cost them.. They had 4 turnovers and only lost by 3.. wow

2-0 on the night...

 

[The Situation]

Nice night for you, sir ... SF could have won this going away w/o the crucial TOs.

:toast:

 

[pfj]

nicely done ldb. yeah brandon lang is a handicapper that charges all this money for his picks and they are usually losers, but the thing is his money management is horrible so if you fade his picks usually end up in profit at the end of the season. I look for his picks and try to stay away from them as much as possible there are systems out there that solely fade his picks and do very well. Great job last night ldb! keep those profits rolling

 

[LDB]

nicely done ldb. yeah brandon lang is a handicapper that charges all this money for his picks and they are usually losers, but the thing is his money management is horrible so if you fade his picks usually end up in profit at the end of the season. I look for his picks and try to stay away from them as much as possible there are systems out there that solely fade his picks and do very well. Great job last night ldb! keep those profits rolling

interesting, so he is tout and everyone fades him? how the hell does he make money if he picks losers?

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

interesting, so he is tout and everyone fades him? how the hell does he make money if he picks losers?

He had a REALLY bad last year, so that's when a lot of the 'fade Lang' threads started popping up on forums. He's not very good, but last year he was a lot worse than usual.

The reason people follow him is because he's an obnoxious loudmouth who brags about great he is, which is what most people who buy picks want to hear.

Also, he claimed to win like 18 Super Bowls in a row (which was never documented). And then when they made a movie about the dude, that just made people want to throw their money at the guy...

 

[LDB]

He had a REALLY bad last year, so that's when a lot of the 'fade Lang' threads started popping up on forums. He's not very good, but last year he was a lot worse than usual.

The reason people follow him is because he's an obnoxious loudmouth who brags about great he is, which is what most people who buy picks want to hear.

Also, he claimed to win like 18 Super Bowls in a row (which was never documented). And then when they made a movie about the dude, that just made people want to throw their money at the guy...

what is the movie called?

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

what is the movie called?

Two For The Money. Warning though, it's an AWFUL movie. It's got Pacino in it, which is good, but it's also got Matthew McConaughey playing Lang's part. No wonder it sucked. :mj07:

 

[LDB]

Two For The Money. Warning though, it's an AWFUL movie. It's got Pacino in it, which is good, but it's also got Matthew McConaughey playing Lang's part. No wonder it sucked. :mj07:

will have to look at it.. thanks glenn :toast:

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

will have to look at it.. thanks glenn :toast:

No problem. If you go into it with low expectations, you might not be too disappointed. I guess there are some entertaining parts. Just don't expect Citizen Kane. :142smilie

 

[LDB]

No problem. If you go into it with low expectations, you might not be too disappointed. I guess there are some entertaining parts. Just don't expect Citizen Kane. :142smilie

I went on youtube to see parts of it, doesn't look too bad of a film.. :shrug:

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

I went on youtube to see parts of it, doesn't look too bad of a film.. :shrug:

Give it a whirl. I'm just not a big fan of over-the-top, sensationalized movies, and a lot of it didn't seem very accurate to me. I'll be the first to admit I have a tendency to pick movies apart, though, so don't take my word for it. Everyone has different taste in movies, and I often forget that.

 

[LDB]

Give it a whirl. I'm just not a big fan of over-the-top, sensationalized movies, and a lot of it didn't seem very accurate to me. I'll be the first to admit I have a tendency to pick movies apart, though, so don't take my word for it. Everyone has different taste in movies, and I often forget that.

since there is no football tonight, will watch it with my wife.. thanks glenn..

will let you know tomorrow what I thought of it... :0074

 

[The Situation]

Two for the Money ...

Two for the Money ...

Shawshank Redemption it is not ... But I was entertained. Give it a whirl.

 

[LDB]

just watched the movie with my wife.. I thought it was good, the ending was a little lame, but overall good movie.. Thanks for recommending it glenn...

:0008

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

just watched the movie with my wife.. I thought it was good, the ending was a little lame, but overall good movie.. Thanks for recommending it glenn...

:0008

Glad you liked it. Although I can't say I 'recommended' it, considering I said it was awful. :mj07:

Seriously though, I was probably exaggerating a bit. Maybe 'awful' was too harsh. I do remember Pacino being good in it and that it is somewhat entertaining. I think the cheesiness just kind of got to me. Then again, Brandon Lang is incredibly cheesy, so maybe it was dead on. :toast: