Monday September 10th 2007
yesterday: 9-4 +7.63
September: 67-62 +11.96
ml 27-20 +9.25
rl 1-4 -7.67
totals 27-14 +9.7
parlays & IFs 12-24 +0.68
system picks 2-1 yesterday; 17-15 in September (value indicator any+10, +7at60+, +5at65+)
system totals 4-1 yesterday; 21-10 in September (67.7%)
system sides
team win% (line)value indicator
mil 60% (-125)+4
wash 59 (+103)+9
col 52 (+120)+6
Mets 60 (-101)+9
Sf 60 (-135)+2
Bost 54 (-165)-9 tb 46 (+157)+7
tor 61 (-103)+10
Kc 63 (+103)+13
clev 54 (-165)-9 Cws 46 (+157)+7
oak 58 (+107)+9
Cubs 59 (-135)+1
system totals
atl@Mets un8.5 72% (+106)+23
ariz@Sf un8.5 67 (+101)+17
tb@Bost un9.5 65 (-116)+11
I told you. No problem. Went 4-2 on the moneyline and 4-1 on totals. Sure could have used a Padres win but at least got something out with the Rockies under 5, which didn't look to good after they scored 3 in the first. D'Backs come from behind win?a play I added late?kind of makes up for my 3 burns yesterday; the Gods owed me and I guess that was the payback. Not only ended the losing streak at one day but I've turned a plus now for 5 of the past 6 days. The icing on the cake is my great week (so far) in the NFL; hit my top 2 plays in the Steelers and the Seahawks; gauranteed a plus on the week but a Cowboys win or the Ravens not losing by double-digits will only grant me a larger smile in the future; I'm very excited about this year's NFL season after this weekend as I imagine that my accuracy will only improve with more information (only real boo-boo this week was expecting the Jags to handle the Titans?I'm sure I wasn't alone on that).
As for Monday's baseball, system picks are the Mets, the Blue Jays and the Royals (incredible that I am doing so well with system picks really not impressing so far this month?totals are rocking?helps large). Hudson is kind of cold and the Mets are smoking, and last start by Perez was a total umpire-fvck?if you read my post(s) you would have caught my word about the over-ump going and my concern about Oliver and the BB's, which is what really hurt him last start?bottom line is that he can compete with Tim and the Mets bats are much hotter than the Bravesticks right now. Jays is a Halladay start and facing a lefty?the Jays best hope; I still think that the Jays might be good fade material from here on out (I freakin knew they would lose Sunday but had to give them 1 more shot to give me playoff hope?besides, I had the Jays on a series play (they DID take the first 1.8 games), but they have a good shot on Monday. Royals Buckner is a bit of a gamble but the Royals are the hotter hitting team and they've seen Bonser FIVE TIMES already this season (Boof is 0-2 with a 4.91 era); I think that a call of 60% or higher is very warranted for this contest so the Royals are totally a system pick.
Other sides with value appear to be the Brewers, Nationals, Rockies, D'Rays, Chisox and A's. Devil Rays and Pale Hose I like the least, as they both have calls under 50%, but the others all look promising. Nats are good against lefties and have hit Olsen before (5.14 era in 4 vs Nats '07) while Hill is an undervalued pitcher. Brewers bats really on fire lately and face, in my opinion, a very soft pitcher in Armas?Villanueva looked pretty good last start so I'll give the seemingly hot Brew-Crew a shot. Rockies Jimenez has great stuff but is getting burned by one poor inning or a lack of run support; might be tough facing the Phillies at their home but I like the pitching matchup, favoring Colorado, and I think that the Rockies should get 4-6 off of Lohse and Co (a "Co" which still really sucks) which might be enough if Jimenez can have a solid start (this will be his first vs, and he should perform better than the past couple of Marlins starters have). A's appear worth a shot due to the SP matchup; M's big game yesterday may have them fooled into thinking that they're still in the playoff race so they likely keep this one competitive.
All 3 posted totals look worthwhile to me. System totals are kicking ass in September so who am I to question authority?
Will post all plays. I love todays.
GL
yesterday: 9-4 +7.63
September: 67-62 +11.96
ml 27-20 +9.25
rl 1-4 -7.67
totals 27-14 +9.7
parlays & IFs 12-24 +0.68
system picks 2-1 yesterday; 17-15 in September (value indicator any+10, +7at60+, +5at65+)
system totals 4-1 yesterday; 21-10 in September (67.7%)
system sides
team win% (line)value indicator
mil 60% (-125)+4
wash 59 (+103)+9
col 52 (+120)+6
Mets 60 (-101)+9
Sf 60 (-135)+2
Bost 54 (-165)-9 tb 46 (+157)+7
tor 61 (-103)+10
Kc 63 (+103)+13
clev 54 (-165)-9 Cws 46 (+157)+7
oak 58 (+107)+9
Cubs 59 (-135)+1
system totals
atl@Mets un8.5 72% (+106)+23
ariz@Sf un8.5 67 (+101)+17
tb@Bost un9.5 65 (-116)+11
I told you. No problem. Went 4-2 on the moneyline and 4-1 on totals. Sure could have used a Padres win but at least got something out with the Rockies under 5, which didn't look to good after they scored 3 in the first. D'Backs come from behind win?a play I added late?kind of makes up for my 3 burns yesterday; the Gods owed me and I guess that was the payback. Not only ended the losing streak at one day but I've turned a plus now for 5 of the past 6 days. The icing on the cake is my great week (so far) in the NFL; hit my top 2 plays in the Steelers and the Seahawks; gauranteed a plus on the week but a Cowboys win or the Ravens not losing by double-digits will only grant me a larger smile in the future; I'm very excited about this year's NFL season after this weekend as I imagine that my accuracy will only improve with more information (only real boo-boo this week was expecting the Jags to handle the Titans?I'm sure I wasn't alone on that).
As for Monday's baseball, system picks are the Mets, the Blue Jays and the Royals (incredible that I am doing so well with system picks really not impressing so far this month?totals are rocking?helps large). Hudson is kind of cold and the Mets are smoking, and last start by Perez was a total umpire-fvck?if you read my post(s) you would have caught my word about the over-ump going and my concern about Oliver and the BB's, which is what really hurt him last start?bottom line is that he can compete with Tim and the Mets bats are much hotter than the Bravesticks right now. Jays is a Halladay start and facing a lefty?the Jays best hope; I still think that the Jays might be good fade material from here on out (I freakin knew they would lose Sunday but had to give them 1 more shot to give me playoff hope?besides, I had the Jays on a series play (they DID take the first 1.8 games), but they have a good shot on Monday. Royals Buckner is a bit of a gamble but the Royals are the hotter hitting team and they've seen Bonser FIVE TIMES already this season (Boof is 0-2 with a 4.91 era); I think that a call of 60% or higher is very warranted for this contest so the Royals are totally a system pick.
Other sides with value appear to be the Brewers, Nationals, Rockies, D'Rays, Chisox and A's. Devil Rays and Pale Hose I like the least, as they both have calls under 50%, but the others all look promising. Nats are good against lefties and have hit Olsen before (5.14 era in 4 vs Nats '07) while Hill is an undervalued pitcher. Brewers bats really on fire lately and face, in my opinion, a very soft pitcher in Armas?Villanueva looked pretty good last start so I'll give the seemingly hot Brew-Crew a shot. Rockies Jimenez has great stuff but is getting burned by one poor inning or a lack of run support; might be tough facing the Phillies at their home but I like the pitching matchup, favoring Colorado, and I think that the Rockies should get 4-6 off of Lohse and Co (a "Co" which still really sucks) which might be enough if Jimenez can have a solid start (this will be his first vs, and he should perform better than the past couple of Marlins starters have). A's appear worth a shot due to the SP matchup; M's big game yesterday may have them fooled into thinking that they're still in the playoff race so they likely keep this one competitive.
All 3 posted totals look worthwhile to me. System totals are kicking ass in September so who am I to question authority?
Will post all plays. I love todays.
GL
Last edited:

