MondayNightFoosball

PJ12

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 6, 2000
6,147
50
48
PA
No messin around, over thinkin, changin my mind. I could look at stats, trends, forums and find a case for either side. Bottom line is I LIKE the BOLTS so I put this in NOW!!!!


SD-3 -125 hate layin the juice but I would flip if I lost by 3.5:shrug:

Lean Over 44 too but havent played total yet.

Feels good to jus sit back and wait for the game :142smilie
GL 2 nite

:toast:
 

PJ12

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 6, 2000
6,147
50
48
PA
Something to think about

Something to think about

Found a very good post that :scared me since I just bet SD.....the post he was refering to was the following.....

"I just feel denver is the wrong side.. Feel San Diego just blows them out like 31-17.... I doubt Denver will score many points... I think Denver pulled out some wins.... I doubt Kyle Orton will move the ball"


Let me get this straight....You think SD can score about a TD over their average against Denver's D?

To put that in perspective:
NE's avg. is 29 PPG when not playing Denver
They scored 17 on Denver

Dallas' avg. is 28 PPG when not playing Denver
They scored 10 on Denver

Oak's avg. is 12 PPG WNPD
They scored 3 on Denver

CLE's avg. is 13 PPG WNPD
They scored 6

CIN's avg. is 22 PPG WNPD
They scored 7

So collectively.....Denver's opponents are averaging roughly 21 PPG when not playing Denver but only 9 when playing Denver.

Really considering buyin this one back :shrug:
 

ldabdou

Chillaxin
Forum Member
Dec 28, 2004
9,299
55
48
Nor Cal
Found a very good post that :scared me since I just bet SD.....the post he was refering to was the following.....

"I just feel denver is the wrong side.. Feel San Diego just blows them out like 31-17.... I doubt Denver will score many points... I think Denver pulled out some wins.... I doubt Kyle Orton will move the ball"


Let me get this straight....You think SD can score about a TD over their average against Denver's D?

To put that in perspective:
NE's avg. is 29 PPG when not playing Denver
They scored 17 on Denver

Dallas' avg. is 28 PPG when not playing Denver
They scored 10 on Denver

Oak's avg. is 12 PPG WNPD
They scored 3 on Denver

CLE's avg. is 13 PPG WNPD
They scored 6

CIN's avg. is 22 PPG WNPD
They scored 7

So collectively.....Denver's opponents are averaging roughly 21 PPG when not playing Denver but only 9 when playing Denver.

Really considering buyin this one back :shrug:

Sounds like under written all over it...
 

PJ12

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 6, 2000
6,147
50
48
PA
yea you would think huh. Especially at 44 :scared

Five of the last six meetings between these two teams have flown OVER the posted total including the past two straight, however, Denver?s hiring of Mike Nolan as their defensive coordinator has turned things around for the Bronco defense which has allowed an NFL low 43 points over their first five games which is an average of 8.6 points per game and has resulted in five straight UNDERS season to date. A check into the ole history book reveals that San Diego has gone UNDER the posted total 20 of the past 26 times when listed as a home favorite of 3 or less points and inside that number San Diego is a perfect 4-0 to the UNDER in home games with a posted total of between 42.5 and 45.0.

All this shit gives me a headache :shrug:
 
Last edited:

LDB

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 18, 2007
18,725
60
48
39
Bay Area, CA
Found a very good post that :scared me since I just bet SD.....the post he was refering to was the following.....

"I just feel denver is the wrong side.. Feel San Diego just blows them out like 31-17.... I doubt Denver will score many points... I think Denver pulled out some wins.... I doubt Kyle Orton will move the ball"


Let me get this straight....You think SD can score about a TD over their average against Denver's D?

To put that in perspective:
NE's avg. is 29 PPG when not playing Denver
They scored 17 on Denver

Dallas' avg. is 28 PPG when not playing Denver
They scored 10 on Denver

Oak's avg. is 12 PPG WNPD
They scored 3 on Denver

CLE's avg. is 13 PPG WNPD
They scored 6

CIN's avg. is 22 PPG WNPD
They scored 7

So collectively.....Denver's opponents are averaging roughly 21 PPG when not playing Denver but only 9 when playing Denver.

Really considering buyin this one back :shrug:

this is why im considering the under... but what scares me is that this is denvers first real test on the road... they have only played the raiders and cinci on the road thus far this year :scared
 

bej0101

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2001
11,407
2
38
Uranus
denver gets their asses kicked tonite..keep your bet and enjoy the game..over under is a lean to under but only playing chargers-3 and ml..:toast: :toast:
 

PJ12

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 6, 2000
6,147
50
48
PA
yea good point, cinncy really isnt a bad offense but Raiders have been putrid till the Iggles made em look like SB Champs. Liked it a lot better when I used to just look and pick. All this thinkin is givin me dain bramage:mj07:
 

ldabdou

Chillaxin
Forum Member
Dec 28, 2004
9,299
55
48
Nor Cal
yea you would think huh. Especially at 44 :scared

Five of the last six meetings between these two teams have flown OVER the posted total including the past two straight, however, Denver?s hiring of Mike Nolan as their defensive coordinator has turned things around for the Bronco defense which has allowed an NFL low 43 points over their first five games which is an average of 8.6 points per game and has resulted in five straight UNDERS season to date. A check into the ole history book reveals that San Diego has gone UNDER the posted total 20 of the past 26 times when listed as a home favorite of 3 or less points and inside that number San Diego is a perfect 4-0 to the UNDER in home games with a posted total of between 42.5 and 45.0.

All this shit gives me a headache :shrug:

Sounds like your talking urself out of the obvious...I will be on it BIG.. GL whatever you do...
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top