mutual funds

selkirk

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 16, 1999
2,147
13
0
Canada
Got this list from a friend in an email, an interesting list about why not to buy mutual funds. I am just passing this list along some interesting points in it that I agree and disagree with, my comments are in (brackets at the end of the point).
some good reading,
thanks
selkirk


Why I refuse to be sold mutual funds:

1. I choose not to deal with an outfit which deducts an annual fee but does not have the gumption to show subtraction of the fee on statements. Seven out of ten people who own funds do not even realize they are paying hundreds of dollars a year in recurring annual MER fees. (more people are learing what MER fees are and why high MER funds ussually underperform the market.)

2. With so many funds, it's easier to pick a good stock than a mutual fund. (disagree there are many sites in which you can look at past performance and management style and top holdings).

3. Managers of funds do not really care about taxes because the burden to pay falls on unitholders, not upon them. Mutual fund managers buy and sell. In contrast, holding good stocks with increasing dividends defers income taxes on the gains. (agree, most managers do not care or consider the taxes the unitholders will pay)

4. If you do find a fund that has beaten the averages for a few years, this does not guarantee that the fund will outperform again. (that is true but I will take a well run fund that beats the averages over the years over a dog fund that always produces bad results)

5. By their very nature, funds can't profit from stock selectivity: they overdiversify often by owning hundreds of different companies. (true many funds grow to such a size that they become closet index funds, except for a higher MER)

6. The short-term focus of money managers and pressure from unit holders for immediate performance are obstacles to long term growth. (yes but when I invest I would like my stock to do good in the next 1-2 years, some managers try to get the best pop every quarter, can get killed this way)

7. "Most mutual fund managers are so young they have no historical reference on which to base their asset allocation decisions." Geraldine Weiss, I Q Trends First-September, 1997

8. Most funds lack the cash reserves to pay off the massive redemptions which will follow a market panic. ( I find most mutual fund investors do not panic during a downturn, I find that the professional pundits panic before the "average investor" in most cases)

9. When the shakeout comes and fund owners clamour for redemption, mutual fund shares will go down faster and farther than stocks which are supported by their dividends. (most stocks have low yields and will not be supported by their divs, also the shares would go down, the managers have to sell shares for the redemptions, everyone gets killed. most equity funds hold less than 10% in cash, so they would have to sell stocks to fund massive distributions)

10. I have no control over when capital gains are realized. (true)

11. Most mutual funds have a high turnover rate: this means higher taxes for investors.
(agree)

12. Funds results are sometimes overstated because market lagging mutual funds are shut down. (Forbes, Feb 23, 1998)

13. Mutual funds can result in you paying income taxes on other peoples' capital gains. (agree)

14. Eventually the performance of all funds will regress to the mean. (have to look into this statement)

15. The mutual fund ratings are mostly backward-looking.

16. Fund marketing is often misleading. Sometimes, for instance, they imply that no-load means no fees. ( if you ask a company No-Load about fees they will tell you about MERs and how much they are when asked. this is up to the investor)

17. A mutual fund could be liquidated, without notice, when the unit value is low.

18. Money in funds is not covered by Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation. (yes, but you are also not covered when you own, trade shares, options, futures. Most Money market, Tbill account funds have double AA or triple AAA holdings so though the fund is not guaranteed everything it holds is, same thing really.)

19. Fund managers can change without notice.
(true, but you should follow your fund closely enough to know who is actually running it, and watch more closely the performance when there is a change)

20. I do not wish to make a financial planner rich. ( if the financial planner is good and makes you money (better than the market average then who cares) the dumb financial planners making money off of your underperforming assets, that is painful)

21. Loads reduce the return on funds. (true, do not pay them, just buy a fund without a load, also many brokers will sell you load funds with no load.

22.Mutual funds are not noted for generating income.

23.The long term effect of mutual fund fees is devastating. According to William M. Merser Ltd. $1,000 invested in a fund earning 8% annually over 25 years would give you$6,850 before the annual fee. With a MER of 2% a year, you end up with only $4,290. You lose $2,560 or 37% of your end capital. They abscond with one third of your money...2% a year adds up.
(Globe and Mail - Report on Business - May 8, 1999)

24. Mutual fund transaction costs are a dead weight that inevitably will lead funds to trail the market. Actively managed funds can turn over 150% of their portfolio each year. (Barron's May 10, 1999)

25. "The art of persuasion has crowded out the art of performance." Common Sense on Mutual Funds by John Bogle, founder of the Vanguard Group, (Wiley, $38.95)

26. It's more profitable to own shares of fund managers like Mackenzie, Trimark or Investors Syndicate than to hold the funds they manage, (agree, a well run mutual fund company will ussually beat out what you could have made by investing in their funds, note: I own some mutual fund companies for this reason)

27. Control of funds is effectively in the hands of the management company because fund investor are so numerous and spread out. There is a profound conflict of interest between fund managers and investors. (disagree; if the fund does bad investors will pull their money out and the fund will get less money in MERs and the fund company and managers will get less $$$$$. the better they do the more the fund grows and the more money is generated $$$$.

28. Mutual funds are just an entry-level, mass-marketed way to invest. (true, so you have to start somewhere, a good base to begin investing)

29. Unit holders have to pay the management fees even if the managers underperform.

30. Deferred sales charge (DSC) penalties effectively mean you have made a six year commitment. (again do not buy load funds with a load, bad idea)

31. "Many fund companies are reluctant-or flatly refuse-to publish the names of their investment personnel." Financial Post June 19, 1999 pE1

32. "...many fund managers would be more accurately described as traders rather than investors." Financial Post Aug28, 1999 p.C4

33. Fund managers almost invariably buy at market tops. They never have money to buy when stock prices are really down. Timing the Stock Market by Colin Alexander (McGraw Hill, 1999)

34. I can't get a tax receipt for the fees charged against my account.

35. Fund managers come and go with alarming frequency and the funds try to hide this fact.

36. I'd much rather select my own dividend-paying stocks then get a grab-bag with risker stocks I might not want to own. Some funds, for instance, held Bre-X. (most Canadian Equity funds had Bre-X, however many funds made money on it, that stock fooled a lot of fund families. just scary,)

37. When a fund is forced to sell stock to meet redemption demands, trading costs are borne not by the departing unitholders but by the unsuspecting souls who remain in the fund.

38. "The supply of stars [to run funds] has all but dried up" Gordon Powers Oct 30, 1999 Report on Business

39. "Desperate to do well in quarterly and monthly rankings, [mutual fund] managers take risks."
Kelly Rodgers, CFA, MoneySense Nov. 99 p.23

40. "Mutual fund managers have no apparent superiority in skill or performance over other institutional money managers." Kelly Rodgers, CFA, MoneySense Nov. 99 p.23

41. Toward year end, many fund managers window dress: they buy winning stocks at too high a price so their portfolios will look good in the annual printed report and sell losing stocks at low prices for the same reason. Do you really want these managers working for you?

42. Most funds are condemned to ho-hum performance because they are constrained by industry representation guidelines. "Some portfolio managers whose portfolios are underweighted in a hot sector chase high prices, just to secure sufficient representation. As I see it, these money managers bought stock they should have been selling." John Neff on Investing p102

43. Most fund managers receive greater inflows of money in a rising market and are pressured to buy stocks rather quickly...at high prices...lest they underperform their competition and lose their jobs..

44. Some funds have had their prospectuses altered so they can use the futures market to create synthetic cash. Barron's Jan 24th 2000

45. Regulators block funds from having more than a certain percent of the fund in any one company. Report on Business Feb 7, 2000

46."risk control has come to mean not controlling the client's principal risk, but controlling the managers' career risk." John Bogle - Risk in an Era of Confidence - April 2000

47. I'm concerned about "style drift". For instance, growth managers not being able to buy value stocks.

48. Most funds are no longer balanced: many don't hold bonds, for instance. (who cares, I do not want my equity fund to hold bonds, I can do that, just buy equities. up to the investor to have balance in the portfolio.)

49. "In the last year alone, all-industry costs absorbed an estimated $120 billion of the returns earned by mutual fund shareholders-an astonishing figure." John Bogle, April 6, 2000

50. "With its 90% portfolio turnover, the fund industry has chosen short [term speculation]." rather than long term investing. John Bogle - Risk in an Era of Confidence - April 6, 2000

51. "studies of mutual fund performance have found that although there is some tendency for mutual funds that have done well to continue to do so, the tendency is weak and short-lived."
Robert J. Shiller, Irrational Exuberance p.198

52. "You might wonder if those lofty management fees suggest a better-managed fund that will ultimately earn you more. It really seems to be unrelated." Fortune May 15, 2000 Fund Fees p.462

53. Like John Bogle, I'm skeptical: I just don't believe "any [bond] fund manager could consistently forecast interest rates with accuracy, and thus significantly outpace the famously efficient bond market over the long run." bogle_site/ march092000 (I do not care for bond funds many have to high of an MER, if you want bonds buy them yourself)

54. Funds have failed to share the economies of scale with the investors they are responsible for serving. (the MERs should go down on bigger funds, ussually does not work that way, though)

55. "mutual funds, ever searching for the market's sweet spots, turnover their portfolios at an astonishing rate of 90% per year-clearly short-term speculation, not long-term investing. The cost of executing these transactions came to an estimated 0.7% per year. (Funds don't disclose this hidden cost.)" John Bogle Jan 5, 2000 vanguard.com/bogle_site/

56. "...very few equity funds have provided their shareholders with anything like the generous returns offered by the market." John Bogle Jan 5, 2000 vanguard.com/bogle_site

57. I like to invest for the long term. "This year, for the first time in memory, more funds are being liquidated or merged out of existence than created. That trend is likely to accelerate."
The Economist May 20, 2000 p.95

58. Return figures are only independently audited once a year.

59. Few funds have incentives for exceptional performance by managers nor penalties governing dismal returns.

60. I don't want to get caught by this bear market: "...we'll see absolute slaughter in that dinosaur industry, mutual funds." Richard Russell Barron's June 12, 2000 (I disaggree with the whole statement, I have yet to see a massive panic in fund redemptions, most investors actually think about buying more when the market falls and they also hate to take a loss.)

61. "High closing" may be a common industry practice to gee up returns. "Many [funds] routinely post strong gains on the final day of the year" Report on Business July 5, 2000

62. Fund performance is susceptible to the movement of hot money - investment dollars that move from place to place seeking short term gains.

63. "The most compelling reason not to buy a fund is when its investment policies and objective are incompatible with or not suited to your own." Investment Guide, August 31, 2000 (yes)

64. Some managers have too much leeway in controlling fund assets. They can suddenly change gears and you might not know about it.
(that is an idea of a fund, you give money to a fund manager to manage it, there are ussual rough guidelines, ie:smallcap, large cap. etc.)

65. When you invest in mutual funds, you surrender control. By control, we mean the ability to plan with certainty when you'll get your money back" Peter Brewster, Investor's Digest March 17, 2000 (track the fund if it underperforms then sell it.)

66. Some funds have misleading names - names which suggest they hold certain types of investments when, in fact, a large percent of assets are in other types of securities.
(true in some cases)

67. "...spin and hype mask the true performance of a mutual fund" Arthur Levitt, chairman, SEC

68. "the mutual fund industry is an expensive home for the long term investor" Bogle's example: the final value of $1,000 invested in S&P in 1950 should be $514,00 but is only $193,000 after fees. John Bogle, Toronto, December 2000

69. "Advertising expenses (usually pumping high-and unsustainable-returns) are paid by fund shareholders. John Bogle, Toronto December 4, 2000

70 "there's simply no evidence that funds have been successful at market timing" John Bogle (agree)

71."Style drift" leaves many funds larded with stocks I'd rather not own.

72.The fund I own could be shut down and the liquidation could cost a bundle. In 1998, 222 funds went out of business in the States.

73.The mutual fund industry argues that, " by pooling money, funds offer investors an efficient way to venture into the markets." However, many* "funds have committed the cardinal sin of padding their profits by raising their fees at a time when their asset base is growing." Barron's Feb 26, 2001 *According to Morningstar, 260 funds in the past three years.
 

Baker

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 7, 2001
70
0
0
Southern N.M., USA
Interesting post.

First I do not buy individual stocks because not only do you have to decide when to buy and sell but what individual stock to buy. If you have time to keep up with individual companies then that is fine. But with mutuals I leave what to buy to the manager. Plus one of the generally accepted principles of investing is to keep properly diversified. This can obviously be more easily done with mutuals.

With regard to mutual's performance it is pretty clear that what works one year doesn't necessary work the following. You've got to be prepared to move in and out of funds when your performance starts to decline. This is generally true with individual stocks too, e.g. I don't know of any tech stock that's done well the past nine months.

There's different turnover of course but if it's your retirement fund it won't make a difference and if it's nonretirement then you can always pick a fund with a lower turnover ratio, eg an index fund.

I never buy load funds. Too many no-load funds out there that I just think that's throwing money away. On annual expenses, there's no real excuse for not knowing more or less what you're paying because it's in your prospectus and you can just call or get the info off the internet or from Morningstar, Money magazine, Consumer Reports or whereever. I agree that paying a higher fee far from guarantees a better profit. It's perhaps analogous to paying a tout. Does paying a tout who charges a lot more guarantee a better return than one who charges very little or nothing at all? Of course not. Index funds have incredibly low annual fees so if you've got a "closet index fund" you may as well save a few bucks and buy an index fund like Vanguard.

John Bogle as was pointed out is the founder of Vanguard so his comments are geared toward convincing people that there is no advantage of a managed fund over an index as this is what Vanguard specializes in. By the way, he has the second largest mutual fund second to Fidelity's Magellan so he's obviously not against buying mutual funds.

I'm pretty sure that it is unusual to find annual expenses over 2%. I think there's well over 6,000 different funds and I believe the vast majority have fees between 0.5 and 1.5%. Even if I am mistaken with so many funds there's no excuse for paying a high annual expense unless you believe their performance justifies this.

I just very recently read some easy principles of buying mutuals.
1. Find the fund you're interested in buying.
2. Make sure its past 12 month performance exceeds the S&P.
3. Make sure the past one month performance exceeds the S&P.
4. If so, then buy the fund.
5. Anytime the one month performance goes negative, sell the fund and repeat steps 1-4.

I just found this so I haven't tried it but it's worth looking in to. Of course, you can also take into account the annual expenses, load expenses, and turnover ratio if you want.

Thanks for posting this as it brings up a lot of points to buying mutuals that are often ignored.
 

selkirk

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 16, 1999
2,147
13
0
Canada
hello Baker

you make many good points, up here in Canada MERs are in general higher for mutual funds. For instance the average MER for Cdn. Equity fund = 2.48%, US Equity fund 2.46%, it is also not uncommon to have a funds MER around or over 3%. However just like in the US there are good mutual fund families that charge a lower MER, they do not advertise as much (so fund families do no advertising just word of mouth).

I have some mutual funds not as many as I once did, mostly stocks and options trading. Buying or having index funds or stocks that track the index is probably a good starting point for a portfolio.

There are more alternatives to mutual funds, DRIP/SPP Dividend Re-investment plans, and Share Purchase Plans, are often free and allow you to buy into companies without paying commission. My shareclub before each meeting exchanges shares (if someone want to go into a plan they just buy one registered share off of a fellow member) and then they can invest. these plans for the most part contain blue chip companies and one can get started for as little as $100 cdn. so it is not hard to set up a diversified portfolio.

also with discount brokerage the costs are becoming lower to accumulate a variety of shares.

there are also services in the US and hopefully soon in Canada where you can for a low fee invest in thousands of stocks and the divs are reinvested for free. The cost is $2.99 per transaction or $8.95 for a whole month. You get an average price over a 3 day time period so this is not for people who want to trade in and out but provides a cheap way to buy into thousand of stocks, easy way to diversify.

I own 5 mutual funds, when I started I had up to 13 funds, this was way to many. One time I recieved a phone call from lady asking me some general questions, she had over 38 mutual funds. Everytime a GIC(CD) came due (or had extra money to invest) she bought another fund, recently heard of someone with 72 mutual funds, some people collect them. to me 5 seems plenty.

I have heard about mutual fund buy and sell strategies like the 17.5%, will try to post some info on these in the future.

good luck with the mutual funds and your investment Baker and thanks for the reply.
selkirk
 

dawgball

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 12, 2000
10,652
39
48
50
I personally own one mutual fund. I think this is plenty for this type of investing. I put a % of my total investments towards this style and use the rest with individual stocks.

Baker made two comments that I thought were misleading. One he states that you need to be properly diversified. Owning mutual funds does not raise your likelihood of doing so. Properly diversified differs with each individual. Factors such as age, income, investing styles, etc. all factor in when diversification is the topic. IMO, being over-diversified (for a younger person) is much more dangerous to overall return than finding high-quality stocks and investing in a couple. Mutual funds are only allowed to invest a certain % of their funds in a particular stock. This sounds good on paper to protect the investors from an over-zealous manager, but it also limits the amounts of profits that a good manager can obtain from properly-studied investment ideas.

This is generally true with individual stocks too, e.g. I don't know of any tech stock that's done well the past nine months.
Have you ever heard of Microsoft? Oct 2000 @ ~55.00 presently @ ~71.00. Nice return on your money for a nine month investment in my opinion. This was a very bad generalization. People were warned many times about the over-valued fakers in the stock market a few years back, but noone wanted to listen. Now, everyone acts like there are not good tech stocks out there. That's okay with me because I am loving the low prices.

When comparing the amount of time it takes to investigate mutual funds compared to individual stocks, I would suggest you do the same amount of research on either before you buy. Whether you are going to invest $50,000 in a fund or individual, it is still $50,000. To me, that is worth some investigation. The difference in time-consumption would be the updates that you have to give yourself. If you do not want to do the investigations yourself, then taht is why you should pay a highly-skilled stock broker. People have forgotten the value of brokers these days. I personally do my investing on-line simply because I enjoy doing the research. If you do not want to research, that is why you pay a broker commissions. Find a good one, and he/she will work very hard for your dollar. Especially now because their livelihood has been threatened by the internet trading boom, and the makret downslide.

A good broker will update you with the good, the bad, and the ugly. Will a stock broker make you money eveyr time? Hell no, but neither will a fund.

To make a clearly defined statement, I think mutual funds are for the birds. Unless your company is offering a match on your investment, go talk to a broker to find some good values for your lifestyle, age, and situations.

Just my opinion and happy investing.

------------------
Sic 'em
dawgball

[This message has been edited by dawgball (edited 06-28-2001).]
 

kneifl

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 12, 2001
9,138
95
48
51
Virginia
www.tradewithjon.com
I have a ten page paper on this subject that I did for an investments course. I got a 100% on it - highest grade in the class. If anyone cares to read it let me know. I would also give a copy to a student who needed one for a paper - they'd get a good grade. Its too long to post.

kneifl
wink.gif
 

selkirk

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 16, 1999
2,147
13
0
Canada
mutual fund returns
the following data refers to mutual funds in Canada, however I saw some data on the US funds and they were similar. information is from morningstar (May 31, 2001)
1 year% 5 yr.% 10yr%
average all funds -2.4% 6.5% 8.6%
average balanced -1.4% 8.1 8.4
average Cdn Equity -1.3 9.8 10.5
average Gold/precious 13.3 -18.3 4.5
average cdn. bond .4 6.3 7.8
average small cap value 10.5 .1 8.7
average cdn. div. 2.4 12.6 11.2


interesting to see how the funds did over time in certain sectors.

thanks
selkirk


[This message has been edited by selkirk (edited 07-07-2001).]
 

kneifl

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 12, 2001
9,138
95
48
51
Virginia
www.tradewithjon.com
Well, I will post it anyway
wink.gif


Mutual Funds
Author: J P Kneifl

What is a Mutual Fund? In this paper we will attempt to answer this question in detail. Different types of funds will be examined as well as the essentials of buying and selling mutual funds. Also, investment strategy will be closely examined as well as some of my own ideas on Mutual Fund Investments.

A Mutual Fund is an investment company that pools the money of many individual investors. When the fund takes in money from investors, it issues shares. The price of a mutual fund share is the total net assets (the funds assets less liabilities) divided by shares outstanding. This is also referred to as the firms Net Asset Value (NAV). Unlike stocks, whose prices are subject to change at each trade, mutual fund NAV?s are calculated at the end of each day.

A mutual fund is also an ?open-end? vehicle. That means the fund doesn?t have a fixed number of shares, but issues new shares as it takes in money and redeems them as investors withdraw. This type of mutual fund offers liquidity for investors.

A smaller number of funds are ?closed-end? funds. They raise their capital during offering periods, and once the pool is closed, investors can only get into the fund or out of it by buying or selling the shares on a stock exchange or in the over-the-counter market.

There are many different types of mutual funds that the intelligent investor would want to look at before making an investment. One type of fund might suit one type of investor better than another type of investor. The four different types that we will look at in detail are Equity Funds, Bond Funds, Money-Market Funds, and Closed-End Funds. There are many types and categories of funds within each of these four different types of funds and I will list each type (subcategory). However, I will not go into detail on the subcategories because this would be too lengthy of a process.

Equity funds are those funds that invest in equities, or in common stocks. Many of the companies most widely held by equity funds are household names ? IBM, AT&T, Philip Morris, General Electric, etc.

There are many types and categories of Equity Funds. A few examples of the categories Equity Funds fall into are Maximum Growth Funds, Small Company Funds, Growth Funds, Growth and Income Funds Equity Income Funds, Balanced Funds, Asset Allocation and Multiasset Global Funds, International Funds, Precious Metals Funds, Specialty Funds, and Index and Social Investing Funds.

Bond Funds may be the most difficult or easiest to understand depending on the way you want to look at it. Bond funds are composed of a number of different types of bonds and measured by interest rates and derivatives. When interest rates decrease (increase) bond prices increase (decrease). If you understand this you have an idea of how bond, or fixed income, mutual funds operate.

There are many types and categories of Bond Funds. A few examples of the categories Bond Funds fall into are Corporate - High Yield Funds, Corporate ? High Quality Funds, Corporate ? General Funds, Multisector Bond Funds, International ? World Bond and Short-Term World Income Funds, Government ? Treasury Funds, Government - General Funds, Government ? Mortgage Funds, Government ? Adjustable Rate Mortgage Funds, Municipal ? National Funds, Single State Funds, Convertible Funds.

Money-market funds are much different from stock and bond funds. Their principal difference is that they keep their share prices at a constant $1 per share. They?re able to do this because they invest in very short-term debt instruments. Usually those investments are so small that funds can maintain their constant dollar price. As such, a money-market mutual fund account will look much like a bank account.

There are many types and categories of Money Market Funds. A few examples of the categories Money Market Funds fall into are U.S. Treasury Bills, Bank Certificates of Deposit, Bankers acceptances, Commercial Paper, and Tax Exempt Funds.

Closed End-Funds are similar to regular mutual funds in that they are professionally managed portfolios of securities and are regulated by the same laws. Many mutual fund management companies run closed-end funds, and for many of those funds the portfolios look a lot like their regular mutual fund counterparts. The returns from the best closed-end funds are much like the returns from regular mutual funds.

Closed End-Funds developed before mutual funds, and they have characteristics that are similar to the stocks and bonds traded in the security markets. A closed end investment company has a set capital structure that may be composed of all stock or a combination of stock and debt. The number of shares and the dollar amount of debts that the company may issue are specified. The shares in a closed end investment company are bought and sold in the open market, just as the stock of IBM is traded. Shares of these companies are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (i.e., Adams Express), on the American Stock Exchange (i.e., First Australia Fund) and in over-the-counter markets (i.e., Z Seven Fund).

Buying and Selling Mutual Funds should be very important to the Intelligent Investor as well. When you go out and decide to buy a mutual fund you most likely will buy the fund through a salesperson (i.e. stockbroker, financial planner, or sometimes a dually-licensed life insurance agent) or buy the fund directly from the mutual fund company. If you buy the fund through a salesperson you pay a sales charge or ?load?. A ?load? is a fee that compensates the salesperson for selling you the fund. If you bought the fund directly from the mutual company there was no salesperson, so the fund was purchased ?no load,? without the fee.

?Load? funds sold by brokerage firms were most prevalent until the1970?s. Up until then, the usual ?load? charge (or commission to broker) was 8.5%. In the early 1970?s, the stock market plummeted and so did mutual fund sales. In order to raise capital, some companies started to sell their funds direct to investors without a sales charge ? ?no load.? Until the mid 1980?s the mutual fund universe was split between the ?loads,? which stuck with their 8.5% sales charges, and the no-loads. Then the load funds feeling investor resistance to the stiff fees, started lowering their sales charges. Most of the load funds have now dropped their fees to the 4-6% range. Increasingly they have also offered funds with different methods to pay the sales charge, the ?back-end load? and the ?level load.?

Back-end loads can be summed up by their name. They call it a back end load, ?redemption fee,? ?exit fee,? or technically, the ?contingent deferred sales charge.? The fee starts at 4 or 5 percent of the value of the funds you?re selling, depending on the fund. If you sell your shares in the first year, you pay the full charge. In the second year, your exit fee drops by 1 percentage point, and so on. By the fifth or sixth year redemption fees are usually gone, so if you?re a long-term investor, you may never pay that fee.

?Hidden loads? are yet another way to buy mutual funds. This load carries what brokers call the ?12(b)-1 fee.? The 12(b)-1 charge, named for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rule which enabled funds to levy it, is, like loads, meant to help defray marketing and distributing costs. Sales force fund companies can use the 12(b)-1 revenues to compensate brokers for their selling efforts. Direct marketing companies, on the other use the money to pay for advertising. At least half of all funds levy some sort of 12(b)-1 fee. This 12(b)-1 charge is collected from it?s shareholders in a unique way. Instead of paying the charge once when the investors buy the fund (front-end load) or when they sell it (back-end load), investors pay this fee from the funds assets. Therefore, the 12(b)-1 charges are treated just like the fees shareholders pay for portfolio management, administration, auditing, printing, postage, and other expenses.

Investment Strategy is very important when deciding to invest in Mutual Funds. Rather than discussing top performing Mutual Funds (which after extensive research, I found out was much too broad to go into), I thought discussing Investment Strategy would be a much better topic. Individuals will have different investment strategies for different reasons when selecting a mutual fund. One of the most important things to keep in mind is that you are investing your own money so the decisions that you make or your broker makes you will have to live with. After reading several articles on Mutual Fund Investment Strategy in Forbes, U.S. News, and Fortune Magazine I have put together some of the best ideas (in my opinion) that these reports had to offer. In order to be successful in investing in Mutual Funds one must concentrate and look at the markets. This past few years we have encountered what most would consider a ?bull? market period followed by a rather sluggish ?bear? market period that has been dominant the last 6-8 months. This is what good timing is all about, one must understand the markets moods in order to be successful at making money within it. Learning to live with risk is something the Intelligent Investor may want to consider. Playing it safe in today?s volatile stock market isn?t necessarily less risky, sometimes taking a chance is wiser.

The first thing I would recommend in investment strategy is to closely examine the prospectus of the mutual fund you are looking at. It may be boring, but it is for your own good. The language within a prospectus is mostly in legal and financial terms that may sound awfully technical. The language is precise for a reason. The SEC has strict guidelines about what the fund can say about itself and how it must present information on past performance, expenses, and fees. Remember, the SEC?s approval of a prospectus is only that. It is not an endorsement of any particular investment. However, after you read the prospectus on a certain fund it should give you an idea of whether or not that fund is for you or if it meets your investment criteria.

Some of us may ask ourselves the question ?should I buy mutual funds on margin?? I will be the first to say buying on margin does work. I will try to illustrate a favorable example of buying on margin. Suppose a fund investor thinks stocks are about to stage a big rally and thinks highly of the Janus Mercury Fund. She decides to invest $10,000 in that fund. If the fund goes up 25 percent in the next six months, the investment is worth $12,500, and the investor can cash out at a profit of $2500. But if the investor buys on margin she could invest $20,000 in the fund: $10,000 is her money and $10,000 is a loan from the brokerage firm. The interest rate on the loan is usually the brokers loan rate (a figure similar to the banker?s prime rate) plus anywhere from 0.5 to 1.5 percent, depending on the size of the loan. If the fund goes up 25%, the leveraged investor?s holding climbs to $25,000, and if she sells it, there?s a 50% return on the original $10,000 investment ? a $5,000 profit less the interest expense. Let?s say the loan of $10,000 was for 6 months at 10% interest. That comes out to $500. The investor nets (before commissions) $4500 on her original $10,000. In a cash account that does not use margin, the net profit would be $2500. However, do not ?spend? on margin. This can work in the opposite direction as well and the example above is not always what happens. There is nothing like a margin call to ruin your day, or quite possibly your month.

Thinking small may not be a bad idea right now. Small Company stocks have been a dilemma for most investors the past few years. They looked like bargains, and the pundits predicted they would go up. But investors have proved willing to pay dearly for blue chips. Now, small stocks, as measured by the Russell 2000 index are so cheap that their price to earnings ratio is hovering at a 20 year low relative to blue chips, trading at less than 80 percent of the price to earnings ratio on the S&P 500 index. Because earnings at small companies typically grow so much faster than at larger, established businesses, small stock P/E?s usually trade at 1 ? times that of the S&P P/E. Mutual funds composed of relatively small company stocks may not be a bad investment for the future.

Mutual Funds with Value Stocks are another type of stock that I find promising today and maybe in the future. Value stocks by definition are out-of-favor stocks with prices that, for any number of reasons, are lower than their long-term business prospects warrant. That goes double for the group these days. Investors, focused only on the earnings momentum of growth stocks (and sometimes just the promise of future earnings momentum), couldn?t be less interested in comeback stories. Looking at the annual charts, some of these Value Stocks have shown some rather healthy returns the last few years and should not be ignored.

Junk Bonds sometimes aren?t ?junk.? In the third quarter of 1998, the differences between Treasury bonds and high yield ?junk? bonds became clear. Bonds overall returned 4.2 percent while investors were uneasy about falling stocks; junk bonds, meanwhile, fell 4.6 percent. Before you avoid junk bonds consider their worst year ? 1990 when they lost 9.6 percent ? was followed by a 46 percent return in 1991. No one is expecting a comparable rebound, but today?s prices, pushing yields over 10 percent, may reflect an outlook that?s a bit pessimistic. Such high yields are a sign that investors think default rates will rise in an economic slowdown. However, junk bonds could return 8 to 12 percent this year ? anything is possible. Sometimes looking at high risk Mutual Funds (i.e. high income funds) with a little bit of ?junk? in them may not be a bad thing.

I hope that I have given you a better understanding of mutual funds within this paper so that you might be more familiar with them. I have tried to illustrate the different types of Mutual Funds, the buying and selling of Mutual Funds, and Investment Strategy. Also, I have tried to mix in my own investment philosophy as well. I have found that Mutual Funds can be a solid investment for those who are willing to give them a try. In Conclusion, I hope that you have learned more about Mutual Funds after reading this paper.
 

selkirk

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 16, 1999
2,147
13
0
Canada
Kneifl good article, and good introdution to mutual funds. I invest in small companies however when looking for a small company equity fund would see the style of the manager. some are value, or growth, or prefer a certain sector, as you state the style of the fund (manager) is important.

MERs are fairly important in Canada MERs on many funds are over 2.50%. Also an MER of around 1-1.25% can be rich for bond funds when the bonds they hold only pay 5-7%.

thanks for the article
selkirk

[This message has been edited by selkirk (edited 07-09-2001).]
 

kneifl

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 12, 2001
9,138
95
48
51
Virginia
www.tradewithjon.com
Thanks Selkirk,

I know my paper is aimed at the beginner to try to help out in the "understanding" of mutual funds.

You bring up some very valuable information about MER's and no-load, load fees, and what you should look for in pros and cons in investing. Are you a broker?? I was for Ameritrade (a discount brokerage) for a short time, but have since moved on to a different career in project management.

I found a lot of your thoughts and ideas to be very well informed and intuitive. From some of your thoughts posted (and sources) I get the impression that you read a lot of financial magazines. That is a good thing, I have found some great articles as well in some of the publications that you mentioned. I subscribe to Forbes and think it is by far the best - JMHO, I know there are lots of good ones out there.

Good Luck with your future endeavors
smile.gif


kneifl
 

selkirk

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 16, 1999
2,147
13
0
Canada
Kneifl was a broker, now just trade for myself and a few friends and family. have been trading for more than 12 years and in mutual funds longer than that, started fairly young.
I still have plenty to learn and find every year I make 2-3 (in a good year) mistakes that I should not have.

by the way First Australia fund I believe is the same fund that also trades on the TSE. I own a little over 150 shares in a DRIP/SPP, they used to own high grade Australia bonds, now however they have changed their name and will hold more Asian bonds.

thanks
selkirk
 

Baker

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 7, 2001
70
0
0
Southern N.M., USA
Thought I'd mention a couple of other points. I have different time frames for different funds. For example, last week I bought two different sector funds. I'll hold these maybe 3 wks, maybe a couple of months, but very unlikely any longer. Looking for a intermediate term gain and back into cash. Mostly look for oversold sectors. I have another that I trade in and out of frequently but rarely for more than 5 days at a time, and sometimes in and out the same day (a leveraged Nasdaq long/short fund). Not long ago I had a buy and hold fund that I never dreamed I'd sell, but about 6 months ago I sold it. Just have a small amount in a couple of retirement funds right now. When I believe that we've put in a bottom (of course maybe we already have, right) then I'll go back into my old favorites. I'll rarely have more than 5-6 buy and hold funds even when 100% invested. More than that's too hard to keep up with. And it doesn't make much sense to me to have several funds in the same category, e.g. four different growth funds.

Selkirk, I didn't know that the MERs in Canada was so high. What does MER stand for, mutual expense ratio? And the lady with all those funds is kind of weird. Kneifl, great paper. Very informative.



[This message has been edited by Baker (edited 07-15-2001).]
 

selkirk

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 16, 1999
2,147
13
0
Canada
Baker MER stands for Management Expense ratio.

Some times up here and in the US they charge you a MER plus a performance bonus.
one fund I owned charged me, 2.30%. then they wanted to increase it to 2.50%. six months later wanted to approve a performance bonus, if the fund beats a certain index (TSE 300) it would then get 10% of the outperformance. talk about fees on top of fees. sold the fund.

the lady with over 30 funds is some what unussual but I can find many people with over 15 funds and sometimes 20.

just this week someone was talking to me about mutual funds, the person in question could not name the funds, or tell me what they were (income, growth). this is not that uncommon I believe many people do little research on what funds they may want or how to construct a mutual fund portfolio. Something that I do not believe is all that difficult. often they buy a fund based on past performance and advertising.

interesting strategy with sectors, most sector funds at a certain percentage should be traded.


there is hope up here I notice that fees for index funds have come down over the years, this has to do with competition.

thanks
selkirk

[This message has been edited by selkirk (edited 07-16-2001).]
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top