Pats have won but not covered how many games in a row now?
Giants have won covered how many consecutive road games now?
eli played three wasit?... mistake free games now, in a row. NO INTS?! really?
as impressed with the 1-2 punch of bradshaw and jacobs ...and even toomer steppin out, think that pick free streak ends for eli; which in turn helps NE in turnover battle--and we usually know who wins regarding that stat...usually
((though the GIANTS as a team--played their turnover game LW vs pack--though instead of losing the fumbles--lucky enough to not lose/have pack recover +cb and punt returner+))
brady got HIS bad game outta the way LW vs bolts, now eli is due?
--not as applicable--though of note? pats last two SB appearances, have not covered vs. carolina and vs phi. mind you, in same line of thjought: nyg didnt even show up for their last meeting (thrashed at hands of ravens) and are 0-1 vs spread...but to point - do pats cwin no cover three straight SBs? seeing that giants are absolutely game enough to win vs ne--i dont see ne losing here.
despite brady's record setting percentage performance against jags(mostly underneath, dropoffs--which is fine--as got W, took what thay gave him)... he seems to have regressed a little--so that means...he played on avg with league?. dont see that trend continuing---THOUGH...
i have a bad habit of trying my luck at timing when to go AGAINST a trend--which is a definite no-no considering the forum i'm in:banghead:
i think most of these "trends" will balance correct. all at once? we'll see.
this might jus be a case of selective reasoning--though believe NE is play here. opinions always welcome.
play is NE -14 and anything under is gravy
GL fellas
Giants have won covered how many consecutive road games now?
eli played three wasit?... mistake free games now, in a row. NO INTS?! really?
as impressed with the 1-2 punch of bradshaw and jacobs ...and even toomer steppin out, think that pick free streak ends for eli; which in turn helps NE in turnover battle--and we usually know who wins regarding that stat...usually
((though the GIANTS as a team--played their turnover game LW vs pack--though instead of losing the fumbles--lucky enough to not lose/have pack recover +cb and punt returner+))
brady got HIS bad game outta the way LW vs bolts, now eli is due?
--not as applicable--though of note? pats last two SB appearances, have not covered vs. carolina and vs phi. mind you, in same line of thjought: nyg didnt even show up for their last meeting (thrashed at hands of ravens) and are 0-1 vs spread...but to point - do pats cwin no cover three straight SBs? seeing that giants are absolutely game enough to win vs ne--i dont see ne losing here.
despite brady's record setting percentage performance against jags(mostly underneath, dropoffs--which is fine--as got W, took what thay gave him)... he seems to have regressed a little--so that means...he played on avg with league?. dont see that trend continuing---THOUGH...
i have a bad habit of trying my luck at timing when to go AGAINST a trend--which is a definite no-no considering the forum i'm in:banghead:
i think most of these "trends" will balance correct. all at once? we'll see.
this might jus be a case of selective reasoning--though believe NE is play here. opinions always welcome.
play is NE -14 and anything under is gravy
GL fellas
