'NBA 3rd in 4 Profile' for NOV 12 to 18

Meestermike

Sports Investor
Forum Member
Apr 26, 2002
1,435
0
36
72
Proud to be Canadian
'NBA 3rd IN 4'
1. A team you are looking at wagering against is playing its 3rd game in 4 nights.
2. The team you are looking at wagering against is playing this 3rd game as a 'back to back' and must have played the immediate day or night before the game in question.
3. The team you are looking at wagering against is on the road for the game in question.

November 2002...
12th Tue... Portland 83 @ Houston 86... SU Win ATS LOSS
14 Thu... San Antonio 94 @ Philadelphia 99 ~ HM SU & ATS WIN
15th Fri Utah @ Detroit 8:00 PM ..TONIGHT
15th Fri L.A. Clippers @ Portland 10:00 PM ..TONIGHT

17 Sun Washington @ Philadelphia 7:00 PM
17 Sun Orlando @ Sacramento 9:00 PM
18 Mon Toronto @ Atlanta 7:30 PM
18 Mon L.A. Clippers @ Golden State 10:30 PM
....................................................

'3rd in 4 Profile Plays'
2002/03 YTD Results... +18.91 units
Sides ~ 18-8 ATS +9.24 units
ML's ~ 19-7 +9.67 units


'NBA '3rd in 4' {Inner Angle} ~ "HOME UNDER-DOGS"...2002/03 = {9-5 +7.49 Units}
ML's 4-3 +4.65 ~ ATS 5-2 +2.84.
Where you are wagering against a 'Road Favourite' and on the home team SU & ATS as a 'home underdog'.

.....................................................

I play this profile because of one major factor. Scheduling!!! The NBA create schedules where all of their teams play back to back games, 3 games in 3 nights, 3 games in 4 nights, 3 games in 5 nights, 4 games in 6 nights, 4 games in 7 nights, and so on. The depth of this league and the chemistry of teams and coaches of those teams are very complex. Any edge which can provide us with a way to maximize profit from wagering in this sport is a plus for us.It is done by the league. There are a couple of teams in just the 1st half of the 2002/03 schedule, who play in this situation only 2 times. There are also a couple of teams who must play 7 or more games. The league average is 5 in this situation in the 1st half this year.

The '3rd in 4' play is to normally wager against the team in this situation. However, there are some teams in the NBA, who play very well in this scenario. As you will see, on many occasions, there will be teams that should be wagered on instead of against, and I will do my utmost to provide these plays on a regular basis in my threads and as my time permits me. I may fade the home team opponent because of these teams' past success but it is a game by game analysis. Some days, I will only play a game SU while others, I will play both SU & ATS. This to me, is a very strong indication that even over time (7 years), and even while teams personnel change, the bottom line playing the moneyline is a profit. I must say, I really look harder at the last 2 years and if warranted, then I make a play.

Information for people who tail; the profile has a winning SU record over a 7 year period:
Overall Profile Record - 7 YR Total 1995/96 to 2001/02.
League Total: SU : 1126/663 = .630 Win %
League Total: ATS: 819/821/24 = .500 Win % {125 games had no ATS line}
 
Last edited:

Home Wrecker

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 26, 2002
1,014
8
38
Denver
So a wager on Houston both SU and ATS would be your suggestion according to this posting, right? I am making sure that I understand the theory. I could not agree with you more on the scheduling. I have been working my butt off to try to find a trend that shows value with the NBA's scheduling, especially with teams traveling. This sounds great, I just hope I am understanding it correctly.....

YAZ :)
 

STEEL CITY SELECTIONS

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 2, 2001
9,044
905
113
pittsburgh,pa.
meestermike...i have done alot of nba research last 10-yrs...and i may not understand exactly what your trend is....but i do know from my own research that there is no value in betting against every team in a 3rd in 4 situation...there may be some angles such as betting against a road fav. in this spot, such as u pointed out.
....can you break down more, clearly other scenarios that show an advantage for playing against teams in this spot.

i just think that from what ive read....you maybe unintentionally misleading some cappers...i know that blindly betting against all teams in a 3 in 4 spot will need be profitable.


thanks, interesting thread.

gluck, burgh...
 

Meestermike

Sports Investor
Forum Member
Apr 26, 2002
1,435
0
36
72
Proud to be Canadian
SCS...

DOES $67,452.00 "BANKED AND IN MY POCKET" ON THIS ONE SYSTEM OVER 5 YEARS HAVE ANY VALUE ???

I THINK SO. JUST LAST YEAR ALONE ON THIS PART OF IT...
'NBA 3rd in 4 Angle' "HOME UNDER-DOGS"...2001/02: 64 games = +82.75 units.
SU = +71.05 units \ ATS 39-26 = +12.7 units. Where you are wagering on the home team SU & ATS as a 'home underdog' & against a 'Road Favourite'.
NOT MISLEADING ANYONE. IF PEOPLE FOLLOW THE PROFILE SO BE IT. ALL THE GAMES I PLAY I POST IN MANY PLACES...

ALSO PLAY THE SAME PROFILE IN THE NHL. VERY PROFITABLE

WELL...ONE GAME TONITE...

14 Thu ... San Antonio @ Philadelphia 7:30 PM
 

Hooks

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 14, 2000
3,058
13
0
VEGAS
With the Houston non cover it should increase the odds of Philly covering tonight.
:)
Good luck Mike !
 

STEEL CITY SELECTIONS

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 2, 2001
9,044
905
113
pittsburgh,pa.
mr. mike....

im not bashing you or your trend....im just trying to understand.
ive read thru your post a few times now. i didnt say you were mis-leading people....i said you maybe un-intentionally mis-leading.
at first glance your numbers look impressive, but as you look at them more closely there is only 1-angle that is profitable.... that is the angle you mention......bet against road favs. bot su and ats....last yr. this trend went 39-26 and plus 82.75 on money-line...now those are some strong numbers....but im not so sure of the 82.75 units on moneyline....if that were the case the the 39 su winners wouldve had to be atleast plus 300 or better to net anything close to 82.75 units.

as i stated in my first reply.....from my own research.....if you were to bet against all teams in a 3 in 4 spot, you would lose money against the spread.....and your results confirm that statement....you have results at 819-826 last 7-yrs.
the money line results [1126-663] are impressive , but more than likely a losing angle as well...if you take away all the juice spent betting the favs. in all these games im sure you would lose money.

i give you credit for posting this info....and i will be looking at playing against road=favs in this spot and i think that all of us should....but the main point i am trying to get across is that cappers who read your post.....read thru it carefully and understand that not many 3 in 4 spots are profitable other than the road-fav. angle.



gluck to you, burgh.
 

crib_19

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 16, 2001
136
0
0
Lima, Ohio, USA
Mike...great info...really appreciate your input here...thank you...i'm interested in your Hockey theory...do you post(in hockey) here at madjacks as well??
 

kreationz

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2002
55
0
0
San Diego, CA
nice system meester... your 8 outta 9 SU.. and 7 outta 9 ATS for this system !!!

let us know when the next 3rd in 4;s are playing !!!
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top