The problem I have with college is the complete lack of fundamental basketball intelligence which leads to the poor quality of play.
First of all, there is just as much banging underneath in college as there is in the pros. Anyone who says otherwise is watching through rose colored glasses.
I love the reasoning that college is more "entertaining" than the pros. WTF does that mean? Where is this entertainment coming from? Poor shooting skills? No ability to play man defense? Complete lack of dribbling, screening and finishing fundamentals? Missed free throws at the end that make games artificially competitive?
College basketball has one huge advantage and that is the arena atmosphere. Same goes for football. The sad fact is that the NFL and NBA (and NHL, for that matter) have priced themselves out of the true fans' tax bracket. The result is that those who can afford to go have to have high salaries, and it only stands to reason that the time and effort needed at work to make a higher salary results in less time devoted to following sports, and therefore less passionate a fan at the games.
If your entertainment watching a game is derived from a loud crowd, then fine, college sports are more entertaining. If entertainment comes from anything having to do with the play on the court, then the NBA wins every time.
And please, no more responses about this team or that putting out a subpar effort. Give me a f'n break. Like college players put out a 100% defensive effort every time out. I am sure those of you who play in rec leagues can remember your team putting on a subpar effort sometimes. It is human nature. No matter how much you're paid or if you're paid at all, there will be nights when things just don't click.