NBA MON 032309 early thoughts - value hunting (NO PICKS INSIDE)

axp59

axp59

Jarhead
Forum Member
Oct 8, 2008
3,012
0
0
Taxachusetts
Think of today as the books giving something back to the community.

How nice of them.

Personally, I've a choice for my potential UOD.

Love MIN/ATL - locked and loaded full 1U @196.5
Like CHI/WAS - locked and loaded 1/2U and waiting for just a little more info before going full 1U.

That's it for me...2 potential 1U plays is plenty.

:firing: :firing:

love these emoticons!
 
axp59

axp59

Jarhead
Forum Member
Oct 8, 2008
3,012
0
0
Taxachusetts
You guys look like you're hard at work!!

I need to sneak out for a bit and take care of some business. Catch up with you all shortly!
 
C

cricket2009

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2009
22
0
0
i like the atkanta game but it went down to 195....so u have a good deal there......at 196.5
 
LookKaPyPy

LookKaPyPy

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 21, 2009
105
0
0
Butler might actually be a good thing for under, he hasn't played in 10 days. What are we looking at here, 30mins and 3/10 shooting possibly
 
JBrilman

JBrilman

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 18, 2009
648
0
0
Las Vegas
easterntimezone said:
The Blazers will be playing their 6th game in 9 nights (and not on a back-to-back); 76ers 5 in 7 (back-to-back)

:00x32
Click to expand...

just got on the thread and without reading anything the FIRST thing that popped out at me was ATL -195.5 (i wasnt up last night to get the better #). This number is off and after watching Minn/Okc game yesterday I dont see how this isnt the POD...

Minn only showed up in the 4th quarter and against a STINGY ATL defense at home and Minn on a b2b i see this being around 180 TOPS!!!

As for the qoute above that almost makes me want to take the UNDER in that game without even thinking about it anymore, and then add in the Mr Roy pace of play in Portland and :toast:

Anyone else like this Por/Phi under?

I am locking in 1 unit on ATL U195.5
 
M

milton

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2009
6
0
0
All,

I have been running some numbers this morning on the Chicago vs Washington game and everything that I have ran so far and every scenario points to over the posted total of 210 in this game. I am still running some more numbers and trying to find something to point direct me to the under but cant find anything as of yet. Here are the numbers that my software program has crunched...FYI. I think that I will lay off this game unless I can find something else...

Chicago 107
Washington 114

Chicago 122
Washington 116

Chicago 134
Washington 135

Chicago 114
Washington 111

Chicago 107
Washington 114

~Milton
 
C

Crockie

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 22, 2009
137
0
0
Ax why do you like the Chicago/Washington under? I can't agree with that. I am sure both teams will score more than 100 points and get over 210 points.
 
S

Slicer

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 18, 2009
498
0
0
North Carolina
jlippens said:
Does a guy who hasn't played in a week and a half automatically get inserted, play regular minutes and score 19 points?

Computers are untrustworthy!
Click to expand...


Ya know, this is the 2nd time you have pointed this out, I've supplied the information, nothing more, now it's beginning to feel like a personal attack.

If you want dig into his stats vs Chi and vs East conference opponents, unless you are his doctor and know the effects of his sore hamstring and maybe it's back to 100% or maybe it's only 90%.

You dont see me coming back and attacking you based on your analysis of games or your stats.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Bet on MyBookie
Top