We had a good play Eagle.
There goes 9000HKD for me down the toilet in less than 1 minute
HKD :mj07: I don't even know what that looks like.
Have a good day at work eagle
NBA MON 033009 early thoughts - value hunting (NO PICKS INSIDE)
- Thread starter axp59
- Start date
We had a good play Eagle.
There goes 9000HKD for me down the toilet in less than 1 minute
HKD :mj07: I don't even know what that looks like.
Have a good day at work eagle
Cause I thought your under hits also. Can't believe that GS fouled all the time
I wanted that my over and your under hitsI'll be damned, Crockie...can you believe it ? I watched the whole thing live on Comcast Sports Bay Area out here in Cali, and I tore up my ticket at about 6
Yes I know what you mean. I can't watch such a game where I bet lots of money and damn this was so close. I remember my Toronto -2 yesterday. I only watched the scoreboard and this game was :scared
- Mar 22, 2009
- 121
- 1
- 0
what kind of BS was that ????? are u kidding me ????
oh man......u just have to laugh that one off
i need a beer after that one :mj06:
oh well .... back at it tomorrow
oh man......u just have to laugh that one off
i need a beer after that one :mj06:
oh well .... back at it tomorrow
Never bet under on 2 such defenseless teams. Especially when the teams are Phoenix & Golden State in the matchup.
Ultimately, if some of those late 3-point shots from GS don't fall, and GS would have fell back more than 3 possessions, the under would've hit. Just a lucky (or unlucky if you had the under) turn of events. I think we all had the game capped correctly, no matter what side you had - just some things happened at the end that normally don't.
Ax, we don't disagree very often - I hated that we were on different sides today - can't wait for tomorrow, so we can get back on the same side - like that much better. Hope we're cool, pal.
- Mar 18, 2009
- 295
- 0
- 0
burnetto57
burnetto57
FWIW Ax,
I've been following JCtS for a couple weeks @ covers and thought u may find his comments earlier this evening on page 3 - he continues to try to explain his 2H capping ( I still find it hard to understand - I'm just 'not getting it'):00x3 : - but that's for another day.
My point is she talks often/a lot abt totals and gives a link to a forum that looks very much like this one - same - web design but called, <capping the game dot com> . Thought u may find it interesting.:mj11: :mj10:
burnetto57
FWIW Ax,
I've been following JCtS for a couple weeks @ covers and thought u may find his comments earlier this evening on page 3 - he continues to try to explain his 2H capping ( I still find it hard to understand - I'm just 'not getting it'):00x3 : - but that's for another day.
My point is she talks often/a lot abt totals and gives a link to a forum that looks very much like this one - same - web design but called, <capping the game dot com> . Thought u may find it interesting.:mj11: :mj10:
- Mar 18, 2009
- 158
- 0
- 0
The thing that is driving me crazy is GS fouled intentionally with 49 seconds to go down only 4 points????
If Nelson was in front of me right now I would punch him straight in his vagina!!!
Get an f'in DEFENSive stop, and THEN try your 3-point hail marry plays..........sheesh.
And they pay these guys money?????
Maybe they get all those HKD we lost tonight!!!!
If Nelson was in front of me right now I would punch him straight in his vagina!!!
Get an f'in DEFENSive stop, and THEN try your 3-point hail marry plays..........sheesh.
And they pay these guys money?????
Maybe they get all those HKD we lost tonight!!!!
- Mar 18, 2009
- 295
- 0
- 0
Catching up after having been out for the evening.
my $0.02: I'll take under 60% wins for a max bet.
Heh - I like the unicorn line.
I agree that "sharps" are mostly a myth when it comes to numbers which have been released to the public.
There are bettors who have arrangements with some books and actually wager before the line is released to the public. The common term for them is outlaw bettors. I would consider those people to be the real "sharps" or so-called "market-forces". I laugh when people talk about the sharps moving a line when the sharps moved the line before the public ever got to see the line for the first time.
Well I know those people aren't real because a "sharp" person I know told me so.
In case people don't know about this site:
http://www.channelsurfing.net/
Actually there isn't a bill for a Hong Kong dollar - the lowest bill is 10 HKD.
Here's the coin:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/08/HKG009.JPG
and here's the note you really want to have:
http://www.pomexport.com/O%20-%20HK%20handover%201%20Million/POC%20-%20HK%20handover%201%20Million_2x.jpg
my $0.02: I'll take under 60% wins for a max bet.
Heh - I like the unicorn line.
I agree that "sharps" are mostly a myth when it comes to numbers which have been released to the public.
There are bettors who have arrangements with some books and actually wager before the line is released to the public. The common term for them is outlaw bettors. I would consider those people to be the real "sharps" or so-called "market-forces". I laugh when people talk about the sharps moving a line when the sharps moved the line before the public ever got to see the line for the first time.
Well I know those people aren't real because a "sharp" person I know told me so.
In case people don't know about this site:
http://www.channelsurfing.net/
Actually there isn't a bill for a Hong Kong dollar - the lowest bill is 10 HKD.
Here's the coin:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/08/HKG009.JPG
and here's the note you really want to have:
http://www.pomexport.com/O%20-%20HK%20handover%201%20Million/POC%20-%20HK%20handover%201%20Million_2x.jpg
Last edited:
boss, we're always cool. It's already TUE on the east coast. Monday is a distant memory and so is my damn money LOL. See you tomorrow pal. Nice hit tonight!
