ncaa football: week 1 play .......

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
kent at michigan state

Kent State comes into this season with a lot of momentum after finishing their 2004 campaign with 4 straight wins while outscoring those opponents by a combined 185-64. The Flashes return a large majority of their defense which was ranked #1 in the MAC in 2004. But the enthusiasm at Kent needs to be tempered because this program still has a ways to go before they begin to make a climb toward becoming a MAC contender. The Flashes no longer have do-everything quarterback Josh Cribbs behind center, as he has graduated and moved on to the NFL. Cribbs was #4 in the nation last year in total offense, accounting for 310.8 yards per game
every weekend. There were countless times when his incredible athletic ability allowed him to improvise within the offense and turn "nothing" into "something" and essentially bail out the Flashes and move the chains. That luxury is gone and will be sorely missed.

Cribbs wasn't the only significant loss on the offensive side of the ball for Kent. The Flashes lost their leading rusher (David Alston) and their leading receiver (Darrell Dowery) to graduation. Looking for an eye-popping stat? The Flashes rushed for 1695 yards as a team last year. Josh Cribbs and David Alston accounted for 1565 of them.

Kent is turning to JUCO-transfer Michael Machen at quarterback, but the running back position is a serious question mark. There's simply nobody there that is going to step in and stabilize the rushing attack. Kent will have a solid defense this year, but right now, they just don't have any reliable offense to complement their defensive unit. And that spells trouble for their season opener against a Michigan State team that has a lot of offensive firepower and is going to force Kent to score consistently if they want to keep up
and stay in the game.

Whereas Kent has all kinds of question marks at quarterback and running back, those are positions of strength in East Lansing, with Drew Stanton back for his junior year at QB and Kevin Teague moving into the starting role at running back after splitting time with DeAndra Cobb last year. The Spartans were vulnerable on defense last year, but this pedestrian Kent State offense is not going to cause MSU defensive coordinator Chris Smeland any sleepless nights heading into Saturday's game. With Cribbs, maybe. But not this
inexperienced group Kent has right now.

Eventually, the Kent offense will catch up to their defense and the Flashes will be a solid team later this season, but expecting that to happen any time before mid-October is wishful thinking. Michigan State should lay a sound beating on Kent to open the season on Saturday. Kent is getting too much credit for their strong finish to the 2004 season. Not only were those 4 wins against 4 lower-tier MAC teams, but the guys who contributed to those offensive fireworks aren't wearing Kent uniforms any longer.

Recommended play: Michigan State (-18.5)

==========

repost of mac futures:

ball state under 2.5 wins (-145)

all i can say is dont be afraid of the juice. this team could very well go winless in 2005. their schedule is a bitch, and any talent they had, they lost either to the nfl or to suspensions.

schedule:
at iowa
bowling green
at auburn
at boston college
at western michigan
toledo
at ohio
at northern illinois
akron
at eastern michigan
central michigan

their first four games are automatic double-digit losses. their week 5 game against western michigan should at least be competitive, but they'd have to win it on the road. even if they were to steal that one, they would then have to go 2-1 in games against ohio on the road, akron at home, and central michigan at home. bottom line is this is by far the mac's worst team. buffalo has improved, central florida left for conference usa, and western michigan has enough weapons on offense to improve from their dismal 2004 season.

ball state had one game-breaker last year (dante ridgeway, who had 105 catches in 2004 alone) and because he's playing on sundays now.... he cant help ball state on saturdays. their leading rusher (adell givens) was supposed to be back, but he decided to be a knucklehead and get booted from the team for academic reasons.

youd like to think that their brutal non-conference schedule would prepare them for the mac portion of the season, but i think those (what likely will be) blowout losses will hurt their psyche more than they'll help.

if this team finds a way to win more than 1 game, it will be a minor miracle. they were bad last year and they had some talent on offense. it will be a long season for the cards.

central michigan over 3.5 wins (+110)

seymour or no seymour, this team should have a chance at a 5-6 or 6-5 season.

schedule:

indiana
at miami, ohio
at penn state
eastern michigan
at akron
at army
ohio
toledo
northern illinois
at western michigan
at ball state

if you check out the cmu preview i posted, you'll see that they let a handful of winnable games get away from them last year. last year was a "learning year" for cmu as they made the transition to kelly's spread offense. smith showed a lot of promise in the final weeks of the season and theres no reason he shouldnt have an excellent year. im banking on their defense to improve, and if it does, then 4 wins should be almost automatic, with a good chance at 5 and an outside chance at 6. they have a chance for an upset right away against indiana. but even if they head into the mac at 0-3, they have 4 winnable games in a row --- home to eastern michigan (big revenger for them, considering how crushing that loss was last year) ... at akron, who is rebuilding... at army, who is, well, army ..... and home to ohio.

even their games with the two elite teams in the mac west (toledo and niu) are at home this season. and they close the season with a less-than-daunting road trip at western michigan and ball state.

i said it last year and im sticking to it -- this will be one of the better teams in the mac in a few years. kelly went 118-35 (41-2 from 2001-2003) and won two division II national titles at grand valley before taking this job at central michigan -- the guy is a winner and wont stand for mediocrity.
his stance on the seymour situation only proves he's a no-BS coach that will has the confidence to win even without a key guy who could help.

==

other mac futures that looked tempting:

bowling green to win the mac (+300)
their schedule is backloaded and they get rival toledo at home in the final week. their offense is gonna be sick. theyre the most complete out of the mac contenders

buffalo over 2 wins at (-115)
no stability at qb means no bet for me. but their defense has a ton of experience and should be solid enough to give them a shot to steal a few games. but their offense will be hard-pressed to crack the top 100 in the country. and thats what ultimately keeps me away from layin money on this over 2 wins. should be a handful of nice spots with buffalo "plus the points" this year though, even if they dont win more than 1 or 2 games. just close your eyes when watching their offense.

kent state under 4.5 wins (+140)
they only won 5 games last year, and that was WITH one of the most dynamic players in school history (cribbs). they've got a juco QB (albeit a talented one in machen) and lack a game-breaker at running back. their defense should be really good but to me, theyre just a rich man's buffalo ---solid defense with a lot of experience, but just dont have an offense that can score enough to win against the upper echelon mac teams. and their 4 game winning streak to close 2005 was against ohio, buffalo, eastern michigan, and central florida. the only semi-solid win in that group was against eastern michigan. to play near-.500 ball without josh cribbs is gonna be tall task, and over 4.5 wins at -160 juice is crazy.

the over/unders for the contenders (bowling green, miami, toledo) are very sharp. every way you look at their schedules, you come up with either 1/2 win more or less than their "projected total" thats open for betting. so a definite pass on all the big boys.

but those ball state and central michigan futures are big ones for me.
 

ysg3

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 18, 2005
317
0
0
gman what do u think About E. Mich @UC.. Im looking at grabbing the points with EMU. They are +10 @cincy. I dont expect much out of cincy this year as they have 6 returning starters, none in their linebacking corps. Also they are replacing Gadugli. It appears as if neither team has anything that even resembles a defense. However, EMU seems to be returning a lot fo quality on the offensive side of the ball and they seem like they can certainly put some points on the board. EMU looks like a team heading in the right direction whereas cincy is going backwareds trying to replace their whole team. Wanted to see if you had some info for me on EMU for me to help me make a more informed decision. Really am liking EMU in this spot.
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
all comes down to defense for eastern michigan. their offense is loaded. and theyre confident too. its crazy, emu hasnt had a successful football program in years but genyk has these guys believing they can compete with anyone in the conference. listening to the offensive guys for emu talk, theyre really confident. but everything comes down to defense. they gave up 58 and 69 points late in the season last year in b2b weeks. thats emu in nutshell. tons of offense. little defense. cincy has some strong and powerful backs so thats a bit scary. but emu has a huge edge at quarterback. bohnet is one of the best qb's youve never heard of, whereas cincy is starting from scratch. its a dog or nothing spot.
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
liking this play even more.

kent was already young and inexperienced in the backfield. now luke tillman, who was supposed to be their starting running back to open the season, is out for the season opener due to a strained MCL. theyre now going running back-by-committee with a redshirt freshman getting the start.
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
just a heads up on an unrelated mac game -- be careful with the western michigan/virginia game. lots of injuries and suspensions to some very key guys. dont want to see anyone go overboard on a game that is very tricky due to the indefinite status of some skill position players.

btw- the kid starting at running back for kent state now that tillman is out is converted wide receiver tony smith, a redshirt freshman and former walk-on. four freshmen receivers also are expected to see some time on offense. so a real new-look group on saturday for sure.
 

gridman

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 22, 2000
477
2
18
honolulu, Hi, USA
GM - you have my sincerest respect when it comes to the MAC as you have been a steady influence on me throughout the years. Would appreciate you take on the Ohio State/M.Ohio game. I am all over OHS even w/out Smith as Tressel is a great great preparer whenever given adequate time. Despite Texas on the horizon, I still see OHS easily winning by 2-3 tds. I just feel OHS is loaded and being at home only solidifies my decision. Your opinion please?????
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
gridman:

i wouldnt get too crazy with either side in this game, because you can make a case for both teams. having said that, i get the feeling ohio state is going to cover this game. i just dont trust josh betts going against the buckeyes aggressive defense. the redhawks have played season-opening games against iowa and michigan the last two years and are minus-8 in the turnover department in those two games. theyll get blown out if they make more than 2 on saturday. im not thrilled about laying 2+TDs with justin zwick, as the offense just runs more smoothly with smith in there, but i think osu is the way to go here. tressel has fared well in season openers the last 3 years and i dont think osu will take miami lightly.

btw- any word on who will see more time between graunke and brennan out on the island?
 

gridman

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 22, 2000
477
2
18
honolulu, Hi, USA
Thanx for the info; I think I'll still play OHS but cut back on my bet amt. As for Hawaii's QB situation, Jones has stated that both will see action. I believe Graunke will start with Brennan coming in later. Personally, I feel that Jones prefers Brennan but will give Graunke all the opportunity to start since he is a redshirt Freshman and has one year of practice under his belt. Whereas Brennan is a JC transfer and is supposedly coming in "new" to the program. But, my spies tell me that Brennan has looked the more impressive at practices. We'll see. BTW, Brennan backed up Leinart in high school and they are good friends. Going to cheer on the home team and will probably end up putting a small amount with the +37pts. Needless to say Hawaii does not stand a chance. But, who knows . . . on a given day, anyone can get beaten and that's why they play the game. Go Hawaii! :)
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
gridman:

thanks for the info back. everything ive heard about brennan has been positive. im surprised that akina got jumped in the depth chart so easily by those young kids. he showed some potential at eastern michigan but then again, hawaii runs such a sophisticared pass offense that not every quarterback is cut out for it. again thanks for the info

=======

just a mac heads up elsewhere -- wmu quarterback ryan cubit is a game time decision today and that is big time trouble for wmu if he doesnt play. was battling shin splints for a week or so, then came back to practice this week but missed the final two days and his status is really uncertain. injuries and suspensions are really killing this team in the first few wks.
 

cooz3

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 2, 2002
6,026
2
0
boston
bets of luck this season bro...

gave you a brief response on that BC game..hope it helps a little...

best of luck

cooz
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
thanks fellas. kent couldnt stop the msu offense, and the flashes' running game was non-existent. machen threw 52 times in his first collegiate start on the 1-A level. have to say that machen looked very good at times, but kent was totally one-dimensional and got dominated.

2nd half:

northern illinois under 26

have seen many michigan games become real grinders in the 2h. wolverines scored a real cheap one right before half. think were gonna see a lot of hart and grady in the 2h.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top