New BCS Bowl

Kdogg21

who?
Forum Member
Dec 8, 2001
5,364
0
0
48
Chicago,IL
MIAMI BEACH, Fla. -- TCU and LSU in the Sugar Bowl? Boise State and Texas in the Fiesta Bowl? Marshall and Miami in the Orange Bowl?


As strange as they may seem, those matchups are now more likely to happen.


The Bowl Championship Series agreed to add a fifth game Sunday, increasing access for schools not part of college football's most lucrative postseason system.


It means a better chance at big bucks for teams in the Mid-American Conference, the Mountain West Conference, the Western Athletic Conference and Conference USA. But the changes do not guarantee that a team outside the six BCS conferences -- the Big East, ACC, SEC, Big 12, Big Ten and Pac-10 -- will play in one of the elite bowls.


"This is still a merit-based system," said Oregon president Dave Frohnmayer, a member of the BCS Presidential Oversight Committee. "We have done our level best not to dilute the quality of play in BCS games."



The fifth bowl is still subject to final approval based on market viability, but all indications point to it being in place when the new BCS contract takes effect before the 2006 season.



"This agreement is a significant victory for college sports and higher education," NCAA president Myles Brand said.


Smaller schools have long complained that the current BCS system makes it impossible for them to win the national championship and puts them at a financial and recruiting disadvantage.


The BCS Presidential Oversight Committee and the Coalition for Athletics Reform agreed to tweak the system after a six-hour meeting Sunday that capped nine months of discussions and may have ended threats of congressional intervention.


"It's a significant improvement from where we are right now," said Tulane president Scott Cowen, the leader of the Coalition for Athletics Reform that fought to change the current system.


The champions of the six BCS conferences will maintain automatic berths in one of the five games. The remaining four spots will be at-large berths to be decided by a complex formula based largely on national rankings.


Frohnmayer said the Big East will retain its spot in the BCS despite losing football powerhouse Miami as well as Virginia Tech and Boston College.


The committee and the BCS agreed on access rules for non-BCS schools, but refused to give details until after the changes are presented to the conferences.


Cowen said that using the new system, a non-BCS school would have played in a BCS bowl in four of the last six seasons. He declined to say which teams or which seasons.


The current BCS bowls are the Rose, Sugar, Fiesta and Orange. One of those bowls pits the top two teams in the BCS standings in a championship game, which will be the Orange Bowl next season. The Rose, Fiesta and Sugar host the other games.


Frohnmayer said the fifth bowl would join in the title game rotation. He also said the Rose Bowl would retain its long-standing ties to the Big Ten and Pac-10 champions during years in which it does not host the title game. The other bowls also would have the chance to protect conference ties.


Frohnmayer said existing bowls probably will get the first shot at becoming the fifth BCS bowl. Cities expected to show immediate interest include Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, Jacksonville, Orlando and San Diego.


"We are envisioning a bowl of equal stature in terms of its command of television audiences and its desirability from a standpoint of teams," Frohnmayer said. "Whether that would come from the volunteering of an existing bowl system and its own structure or the creation of a new bowl, that's something we simply can't determine at this point."


The BCS bowls generate more than $110 million a year for the big conferences. The BCS gives about $6 million a year to smaller conferences. Frohnmayer said those figures should increase under the new format.
Since ABC owns the current television rights to BCS games, Frohnmayer said the network would get a chance to negotiate a new contract under the five-bowl format.

"It's our hope that the interest in the series will be heightened by the availability of one more game," he said. "It's our hope that this whole new system will generate more revenue."

Negotiations with the bowls and TV networks begin soon, starting almost immediately with next year's Rose Bowl, putting some sense of urgency to the talks.

"Today is a very good day for college athletics," Cowen said. "This has been a difficult and contentious issue to deal with for the last nine months."


------so basically whats this means is they just want more money, and they are just going to still invite more schools from the Big 6 conferences....
 

bjfinste

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2001
5,462
18
0
AZ
One of the only threads that has real info in here these days, and no responses. Just sad. I hope Jack cleans all this USC shit up once the season starts to roll around.

As for this post, I like the idea, but only if there is a real effort made to get the non-BCS teams into the mix. Don't give me any shit about SoS. The winner of the MAC already is as worthy of a berth as the winner of the no-Miami, no-Va.Tech Big East.

Curious as to which bowl will actually get the nod. Gotta think it's either the Citrus (Capital One) or the Cotton. Personally, I think the Citrus deserves it more, but then again, Florida already has one BCS bowl and Texas doesn't have any, so who knows?
 

Blackman

Winghead
Forum Member
Aug 31, 2003
7,867
42
48
New Jersey
Cotton came to my mind too, I think that is the natural selection in my opinion. The fact that Texas doesn't have a BCS Bowl is a good point too.
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
bjfinste

I have to disagree with you, I think SOS is very important and "should" be brought up. I also have to disagree with you again for thinking that MAC is equal to the Big East next year. I think the Big East still would be better than the MAC from top to bottom.

TOP 4 TEAMS

Pittsburgh, Boston College, West Virginia, and Syracuse
vs
Miami Ohio, Bowling Green, N. Illinois. and Marshall

You don't even want to try and compare the teams at the bottom of the conferences. MAC is HORRIBLE at the bottom half of the conference. So the top team in the MAC can go into cruise control through their conference.

For fun, lets see where the bottom 5 teams in each conference are ranked "pre-season." www.collegefootballnews.com

The average ranking of the bottom 5 teams in the conference are:

Mac= ranked 108 :nooo:
Big East= ranked 70

Ok, now I know someone will try and use the argument of the Big East only having 7 teams in the conference and the MAC having 14 teams. So lets compare the the pre-season ranking of the MAC for teams ranked 3-7 vs teams 3-7 of the Big East. Sorta level the playing field.

MAC= ranked 70
Big East= ranked 70

Now the difference is you do not play all the teams in the MAC, and therfore the #1 team in the MAC will def. be facing the teams ranked at the bottom of the conference which is why the Big East is a better conference.

I think many would argue this last season was one of the best years for the MAC. I congratulate them. If you think this last season was one of the best years, then explain this......

Bowling Green was the 2nd best team in the Mac and they struggled to barely beat the #8 ranked team in the Big 10. And you would like to see a MAC team in a BCS Bowl Game? Remember, in a BCS bowl game, NO MAC TEAM WILL BE PLAYING A TEAM WHO FINISHED 8th IN THEIR CONFERENCE!!!!!!!!!

Personally, I would not want to see a MAC team in a BCS bowl game unless they went undefeated in the year and played a top 40 SOS. Miami Ohio last season played a SOS ranked #72 in the country. :lol:
 

bjfinste

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2001
5,462
18
0
AZ
How the bottom teams in the league do doesn't mean a lot to me. BG may have struggled with Northwestern in the bowl game, but they also only lost by a TD on the road (and had a chance to win at the end) against Ohio State, which won a BCS bowl.

It's all subjective, but to me, Bowling Green and Miami were better teams last year than Pitt or BC were. Just my opinion though.
 

hellah10

WOOFJUICE
Forum Member
Oct 24, 2001
7,958
0
0
45
Toledo
Theyve talked about how the Motor City Bowl is gonna be the next BCS bowl game. The big auto companies said they would dish out the big bucks for it too....so dont be surprised if you hear the MCB get thrown into that mix
 

Sun Tzu

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 10, 2003
6,197
9
0
Houston, Texas
Lots of talk in Houston too, especially after the way teh Super Bowl came off. The Cotton Bowl has no chance - the place is a dump and they may not even keep Texas_Ou unless something is done soon.
 

Stuman

Banned
Forum Member
Nov 5, 2002
800
0
0
Memphrica, Tennessee
I agree, the Cotton is a freaking DUMP. I attended the Cotton bowl this year, and that stadium is in definite need of a major facelift. I'm not so sure about hosting a major bowl in Detroit and the reason is simple. Bad Weather that time of year. Even if the game is in a dome, driving would be horrible. Arren't all the BCS bowls at good weather sites?

Stuart
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top