NFC North Week 4
- Thread starter bleedingpurple
- Start date
You think if we talk about Packer fan's great taste in women, BP will remind us how fat and ugly female Packer fans are?
Well there is no comparison when it comes to trim outside the stadiums. There is a reason there are a lot of pastures on the way to Green Bay. :tongue
Now Miller Park is a different story
I'm not trying to stick up for b.p here, but we have a lot
Of thick women in wi.
There is always good scenery at miller though.
Of thick women in wi.
There is always good scenery at miller though.
Really???? don't take this wrong way but that's just stupid....I can always buy u a green and golf jersey and u can convert to the greatest franchise of all time....Your call
exactly, why do you think they need bleachers instead of individual seats?
Also never get up at a packer game, you will come back and you spot has disappeared into humanity
Really???? don't take this wrong way but that's just stupid....I can always buy u a green and golf jersey and u can convert to the greatest franchise of all time....Your call
I would rather the Bears win by 7 but I will take a bury.
Nah I'll pass most of the Nostalgia was before my time
Back to the Plays for this week, I'll pick the Lions to win but I think I am just going to lay off and back to the Viking game. It doesn't add up.
Vikes are without GreenWay (He SUCKS) Fusco (He SUCKS) and Cassle (SUCKS), and Rudolph (Good) and starting Bridgewater and the line stays at 3. I call my buddy in Atlanta to find out what he thinks. He says don't be fooled by Atlanta last week, their defense is absolutely brutal and Vikes will be able to move the ball on them at will. I would love to think that but I can't trust them at all until I see better O line play.
I can't say to back Atlanta either. I am not much of trends guy, unless it benefits my side :mj07: Vikes are 9- 0 ATS as a home dog vs. team off a win. I guess that's how desperate I am,
I may teaser the Vikes up. Not sure. I found a site where a guy runs a computer system and he is in the Hilton. He runs two entries and combined he is 25 - 5 with a couple games over lapping. I may check out what he has tomorrow.
Vikes are without GreenWay (He SUCKS) Fusco (He SUCKS) and Cassle (SUCKS), and Rudolph (Good) and starting Bridgewater and the line stays at 3. I call my buddy in Atlanta to find out what he thinks. He says don't be fooled by Atlanta last week, their defense is absolutely brutal and Vikes will be able to move the ball on them at will. I would love to think that but I can't trust them at all until I see better O line play.
I can't say to back Atlanta either. I am not much of trends guy, unless it benefits my side :mj07: Vikes are 9- 0 ATS as a home dog vs. team off a win. I guess that's how desperate I am,
I may teaser the Vikes up. Not sure. I found a site where a guy runs a computer system and he is in the Hilton. He runs two entries and combined he is 25 - 5 with a couple games over lapping. I may check out what he has tomorrow.
LOL..so your taking the packers in a single play and da bears in a teaser??? last week i asked why u took detroit -1 but wouldnt take them as your 3rd game in a teaser. You said dont wanna put all eggs in one basket..thats exactly what you are doing here.
bleedingpurple said:
I think it's as clear as mud! He's picking Packers to win straight up but not betting on it, and hoping the Bears will win. He's taking the Packers +8 in a 10 point teaser, and the Bears +12 because he believes the game will be decided by a field goal either way. He'll let us know how he did after the game.
I took the bears because they are getting 2 scores
But I do pedict the packers to win, but if they would have been getting the 1.5 I would have played them getting the two scores.
