NFC North Week 9 Vikes in Trouble

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,388
227
63
51
Where it is real F ing COLD
BTW didnt Rodgers win 3 straight games on the road to SB few years ago against winning teams? oh yeah i believe so. Beat Chicago on road to win division when they were above .500....find some new stats please.

Yeah that's been mentioned, look at those
3 teams he beat to get to super bowl, not
All that special but yeah he did it.

2015
Rodgers @ Denver horrible
2014
Rodgers @ Seattle NFC champ game horrible
Rodgers @ Buffalo horrible
Rodgers @ Detroit horrible
Rodgers @ Seattle Horrible
2013
Rodgers hurt most of season

Like I said he's great but he doesn't hold the best's of all time's jock and he's not very good on the road unless he plays s patsy
 

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,388
227
63
51
Where it is real F ing COLD
Denver has a real good defense yes BUT i also watch mighty Cleveland take that denver D to overtime...Cleveland was a few yards away from a game winning FG then got sacked...Denver was at home and nobody would have beat them that night but on neutral field they are very beatable....Hell KC had them by the balls and fucked up at the end....GB had a bad game and im ok with that..not like 16-0 was happening. im also ok with 6 straight playoffs and 1 SB title....sorry not gonna win it every year...or ANY year like the purple turds u love. Gb wins the division AGAIN this year. Marino was top 5 all time IMO and never won any...Rodgers has one and hoping for more..if not thats ok..every year they have a solid team and fun to watch...unlike purple turds who suck most years

BTW - I said Denver's Defense is light years ahead of Green Bay and your reply to me was that it wasn't true it was just hate. Also I said Green Bay has better play makers at WR and you laughed at that. I think I was dead on for that game and you can see no hatred was involved. You never acknowledge when I peg it right. This Packer team will win the division and they may make it far again, NFC really sucks, but this team will not win it all.
 

poolplayer8888

Registered
Forum Member
Jan 15, 2006
1,207
20
0
Yeah that's been mentioned, look at those
3 teams he beat to get to super bowl, not
All that special but yeah he did it.

2015
Rodgers @ Denver horrible
2014
Rodgers @ Seattle NFC champ game horrible
Rodgers @ Buffalo horrible
Rodgers @ Detroit horrible
Rodgers @ Seattle Horrible
2013
Rodgers hurt most of season

Like I said he's great but he doesn't hold the best's of all time's jock and he's not very good on the road unless he plays s patsy[/QUOTE

LMFAO@ YOU so GB and Rodgers beat a 3, 2 and 1 seed on road in 3 straight weeks and you say they didnt beat very good teams???? Makes you look real sad there. That's what many do tho..They refuse to say AWESOME wins on the road as 6 seed but instead say the other teams weren't that good....Seen this story any times..you refuse to give credit...Oh yeah they also whooped a heck of a PITT team that year in SB away from Lambeau. Maybe someday ur purple turds will actually win a meaningful game and ur GB hatred will be less......i love it Gb has an awesome QB since 1992 and make playoffs damn near every year and two a SB with Favre and Rodgers......I also love it ur team has sucked for a long time and still wont even win a division this year.
 

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,388
227
63
51
Where it is real F ing COLD

Vikes improving, I like your goal is winning the division. The packers are win the super bowl or bust and that's not happening this year but hey you can brag about being better than Vikes, lions, and bears
 

poolplayer8888

Registered
Forum Member
Jan 15, 2006
1,207
20
0
They were the best teams that season but those teams couldn't hold weight to most playoff teams

Once again giving no credit...IF that was Minny that won it over them teams that year you would be all over that SB title and gloating up a storm.....No brainer to see that would be true.
 

poolplayer8888

Registered
Forum Member
Jan 15, 2006
1,207
20
0
Vikes improving, I like your goal is winning the division. The packers are win the super bowl or bust and that's not happening this year but hey you can brag about being better than Vikes, lions, and bears

I have ZERO goals for GB..Not y job to make goals..My job is to be a huge fan and enjoy each game hoping for a W and try and get in playoffs and see what happens.....Very realistic IMO. I will assume u understand how hard it is to win a title...That's why most teams(including yours) never win one.....a handfull have won 4-6 including Gb and that's it...If it was easy a teams would win 5-6 then but it's NOT
 

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,388
227
63
51
Where it is real F ing COLD
I have ZERO goals for GB..Not y job to make goals..My job is to be a huge fan and enjoy each game hoping for a W and try and get in playoffs and see what happens.....Very realistic IMO. I will assume u understand how hard it is to win a title...That's why most teams(including yours) never win one.....a handfull have won 4-6 including Gb and that's it...If it was easy a teams would win 5-6 then but it's NOT

Oh no doubt
 

Shleprock

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2007
1,594
29
0
You presented the stat as Rodgers record against teams with a winning record. 8-7 is a winning record, and that was the Bears record at kickoff. Otherwise, this stat cannot be applied until a team has 9 wins. Starting this week Carolina could lose 8 of the next 9 and finish 8-8 and then it wouldn't be applicable. Is that going to happen? Highly doubtful, but not in possible.

Anyway, did you read my next post? I acknowledged this. That's why it's a terrible stat. So if he loses that game, the Bears are 9-7 and now Rodgers is 0-10. But instead he wins it, so it doesn't count?

You're also ignoring the fact that the 0-18 Stafford stat is from his entire career while you are only using the last 9 results from Rodgers that paint him in the worst light possible.
I stand by the stat it's the teams season record. His record against teams with a winning record on the road was 0-9 his last 9 going into this game.
 

Shleprock

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 21, 2007
1,594
29
0
I wish this stat was true, but it's not. I was at the game in Chicago on 12/29/13 where (after waste-of-space Chris Conte fell down in the end zone) Rodgers threw the game-winning TD to Cobb with 38 seconds to go to send the Packers to the playoffs and my Bears into the offseason. The Bears were 8-7 going into the game; 8-8 afterwards. Is this stat excluding cases where a team was over .500 going into the game but only at .500 afterwards? If so, that's a pretty biased stat. Rodgers essentially gets no credit for winning those games, and gets penalized for losing.

Last year the bears were 2-1 before playing gbay at home. Packers won. Again Rodgers has lost 9 straight on the road to teams with a winning record on the road not at the time they played a team.
 

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,388
227
63
51
Where it is real F ing COLD
I thought Denver D was light years ahead of GB?? They are getting lit up against awful Indy.....You should know it's the NFL and week to week diff teams show up for all teams. U made it sound like they are the 85 Bears,

Yes they are light years ahead of the pack, they give up stuff but they still much better than green bays are you to say they are close? Hahahahaha. You Just got lit up and start spouting about the broncos defense who just rang you UP..Sad
 

ticket casher

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 15, 2012
754
9
0
east troy, wisconsin
Bp. Just think, in 2 weeks gb is going to pat your queens on there Little heads and put them back in the corner like the little brother they are. Gb is 6-2 with an easy ass schedule left, they could - should go 13-3 or 12-4 worst case.
 

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,388
227
63
51
Where it is real F ing COLD
Bp. Just think, in 2 weeks gb is going to pat your queens on there Little heads and put them back in the corner like the little brother they are. Gb is 6-2 with an easy ass schedule left, they could - should go 13-3 or 12-4 worst case.
You are in denial too. I think the Vikings will win but maybe not, fact is the packers are not going to win the super bowl, they are lucky they don't play many good teams on the road, packers offense sucks and defense sucks. Vikings win in two weeks. The realm is changing cause this is the packers last year to win it otherwise they will have to rebuild with Ridgers. They have many free agents and some key.. The guard is now slipping away.
 

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,388
227
63
51
Where it is real F ing COLD
Bp. Just think, in 2 weeks gb is going to pat your queens on there Little heads and put them back in the corner like the little brother they are. Gb is 6-2 with an easy ass schedule left, they could - should go 13-3 or 12-4 worst case.

Rodgers will be in 0-11 in last 11 games against teams who finish above .500. Rodgers will never make it to another super bowl, all because of McCarthy and gm who can't draft defensive players worth shit. Thompson and McCarthy bailed out by 12,
 

ticket casher

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 15, 2012
754
9
0
east troy, wisconsin
You are in denial too. I think the Vikings will win but maybe not, fact is the packers are not going to win the super bowl, they are lucky they don't play many good teams on the road, packers offense sucks and defense sucks. Vikings win in two weeks. The realm is changing cause this is the packers last year to win it otherwise they will have to rebuild with Ridgers. They have many free agents and some key.. The guard is now slipping away.

Lol. You still have a sense of humor I see.
Green Bay can still win the superbowl.
They lost too 2 undefeated teams in there house.
Minny ' s offense sucks. Teddy is a dink and dounk qb.
Green Bay beats minny by 2 td's. Book it.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top