NFL Week 1 (Selections and Comments)

Nolan Dalla

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2000
1,201
2
0
Washington, DC/Las Vegas, NV
*********************************
2004 NFL SEASON TO DATE

WINS 5
LOSSES 4
PUSH 1

SIDES: 4--3--1
TOTALS: 1--1
HALFTIMES: 0--0
**********************************

NOTE: For halftime plays, see "Halftime Angles" post, here at the site. When angle applies, it will be counted in the overall record.

THIS WEEK'S GAMES:

JACKSONVILLE +3
Comments: This appears to be a very even matchup, although the Jags defensive line is probably the best unit on the field. I think that's the difference here, as the Bills OL is young and in transition -- giving JAX the edge. Bills OL gave up 49 sacks last year and comes into this season with just an many questions. QB Bledsoe remains the NFL's least mobile QB, which means Bills will probably have to win through the air, assuming Bledsoe gets pass protection. Jags come into the game with more confidence than last season, are the better coached team, have the stronger defense, and are getting a FG. In a game expected to be close, I think that's enough to justify a wager on the underdog -- plus the points. The game is also expected to be low scoring (TOTAL -- 35), meaning the +3 is far more valuable in a game like this, than an offensive shootout. JAX +3

BALTIMORE -3
Comments: Ravens dominated this series last year, outscoring Browns 68-13 in two games. RB Lewis also ran wild against Cleveland's injury-riddled defense. Ravens offense should be even stronger this season, especially with healthy QB Boller now in his second season. I'm a big fan of gutsy QB Garcia, but in his first real game with his new team, with a unit that hasn't played much together, they will have a tough task against one of the NFL's best defenses. SInce Browns could have trouble scoring points, laying -3 on the road with a team that has proven it can run the ball appears to be a viable option. BALT -3

TENNESSEE/MIAMI OVER 38
Comments: Miami's aging and over-rated defense should have problems stopping Titan's air attack, and WRs Mason, Bennett, and Calico should get plenty of catches. With both teams losing their star RBs -- passing should be a big part of both offenses. Titan's also have some injury concerns with two CBs -- Dyson and (Mr. Holdoout) Rolle. Meanwhile, Miami upgraded its pass attack with addition of Booker, who should compliment Chambers and McMichael. There's no question Titans are capable of putting up points. More questions on Miami's side of the ball, but assuming Titans score 20+, I believe Miami has enough talent to keep pace and this total should soar into the 40s. This total is too low -- based on some outdated perceptions about the Miami defense which are no longer accurate. UNDER 38

TEASE NEW ORLEANS +8.5 with SAN FRANCISCO +10
Comments: I'd prefer to get +3 with the Saints as a side, but since the line is holding firm at 2.5, I'm teasing the Saints up as the home dog over a TD. Seattle is everyone's sexy pick, but until this team wins some road games, I'm not on the Seattle bandwagon. Seahwaks went just 2-6 SU on the road last year, and New Orleans is always a dangerous team at home. New Orleans can both run and pass the ball, and faces a medicore Seahwaks defense. For that reason, I think New Orleans should keep this very close. Saints suffered a miserable season in 2003, and are a better team than their record showed. I'll take a solid home dog early in the season against an overhyped team that could be very good, but has no business laying over a TD on the road (with the teaser)
Regarding the 49ers, I'm not high on this team, but the Falcons laying -4 is a joke. So, I'm taking SAN FRAN +4 and teasing them up to +10. I fail to understand how a team that won just 5 games last season can be more than a FG road favorite. The public is overreacting to QB Vick, who looked awful in preseason. Vick is certainly an exciting player and runner, but his 52 percent completion percentage ranks worst of any NFL starting QB. Until Vick can show he can pass, the jury is still out. Add the fact the Falcons had the NFL's WORST defense last season, and I really like taking a 49ers team that has low expectations, playing at home, with a 7-3 SU record in last ten openers.
TEASER with NOR and SFO

SAN FRANCISCO +4
Comments: There's no way this unproven Falcons team deserves to be a road favorite of more than a field goal. San Francisco is expected to be an awful team, but the talent level is much closer than the numbers indicate. Assuming 3 points is given for home field, does anyone believe the Falcons are a touchdown better than anyone -- even the 49ers? I also like 49ers coaching edge -- even with mediocre Erikkson. Baby Mora is coaching his first game, on the road -- usually a tough task. SAN FRAN +4

NY JETS -4.5
Comments: I have a rule -- I bet AGAINST quarterbacks getting their first start in a road game. Cincy QB Palmer gets the nod here, and faces a hostile environment in the Meadowlands. Expect Bengals to run the ball heavily, which means Jets can stack the line and shut down RB Johnson. Jets were out of the race by Week 4 last year, which means their awful stats are largely misleading. With QB Pennington back helathy, this is an entirely different (much better) team. Meanwhile Bengals had the 25th ranked defense last season and the pass defense has looked terrible in the pre-season. Pennington-Moss-Martin and co. could have a field day. Laying -4.5 seems like a reasonable number, versus a young apiring team with a new QB. NY JETS -4.5

ARIZONA/ST LOUIS UNDER 45
Comments: I'm not as impressed with Rams offense as most of the "experts," as this team remains very inconsistent. Even if Rams build an early lead, they could get conservative las the game goes on and win an "ugly" game -- which often happens in games with double-digit lines. Meanwhile tne Cards are depleted at WR, as their top three receivers were all out at different times in preseason -- meaning the offensive unit never got the reps needed to create some confidence. Coach Greens says he'll test the Rams with a simpler, run-oriented attack, which bodes well for the UNDER. Rams OL has some questions, so if Cards can put any pressure on QB Bulger, that could create a lower scoring game than expected. Rams should win a 27-13 type of game, so I'll go UNDER 45

TAMPA BAY/WASHINGTON UNDER 39
Comments: New Coach Gibbs should get back to basics in this game, which means lots of running. Look for a 60-40 run to pass ratio from the Redskins, meaning a game filled with field goals and field position battles. Bucs offensive line has gone through a major shake up, as offensive starters have not demonstrated much consistnecy or cohesiveness. Bucs WRs are all new to the offense as Bown and Gallaway have not developed much rapport with QB Johnson, Bucs were never known for big offense anyway and with so much tunover, playing on the road in game one only addds to the challenge. This total should be much lower, perhaps around 36.5. I like the UNDER even with that number so picking up wins on 37 and 38 is a nice bonus. UNDER 39

DALLAS/MINNESOTA OVER 44
Comments: I tend to like most dome games to go OVER (exception this week in St Louis). This looks to be the perfect OVER opportunity, since neither team has a running game (Bennet OUT) and Dallas has shown no ability to run the ball (RB E. George is finished). QB's Culpepper and Testeverde should both throw 40+ times, which are probably helped by flag-happy new PI rules. I noted that Cowboys passed a lot the last two preseason games, indicating that Coach Parcells realizes his running game stinks. SInce Vikings are likely to play man-coverage, expect Dallas to put the ball in the air more than normal. If either team builds a lead, the game could turn into a shootout. In the dome, with Minnesota's #1 ranked offense and weak defense, I think this total sails over the total. OVER 44

CAROLINA -3
Comments: The Panthers are the better team, laying a soft number. They still get no respect from the public or oddsmakers. I got them at 10-1 to win the NFC! The defense remains one of the NFL's best; the running game is strong; and QB Delhomme has a confidence-building year under his belt. This is a young, brilliantly-coached team that has some questions along the OL (three new starters), but Coach Fox has proven he can win with yooung, marginal talent. With the added motivation of a big MNF home game, this should be a coming out party for the Panthers. It's hard to bet against Packers major weapons -- Favre and Green, but one must start to wonder how many more years the Packers can go 10-6 and win the division. I think this is a game ot two teams moving in opposite directions, and the Panthers have mnore to prove. Lay the -3. CAROLINA -3

--Nolan Dalla
 

MrChristo

The Zapper
Forum Member
Nov 11, 2001
4,414
5
0
Sexlexia...
ND...Enjoy reading your thoughts, but have a couple of points...

..Will the Balt offense really be so much better with Flynn and Ogden out? not so sure. Agree Boller looked ok in pre-season..but he faced Atl, a weakened Phil (and lost!), Det and NYG...All TERRIIBLE pass D's.
Browns were in the top 5 last year for pass D....As you said, the run killed them...Not sure it will be so effective for the Ravens this time around.

And Tenn losing a 'star' RB?? He hasn't gained over 4ypr for 3 seasons! (Which may actually help your over!)...but Tenn will be gain more yards on the ground this year than they did with George at RB.
Also not convinced that Mia can put up points.

But good luck!...Really like the Wash/TB under :cool:
 

Nolan Dalla

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2000
1,201
2
0
Washington, DC/Las Vegas, NV
***Mr. Christo made some interesting coments, and I'd like to respond:


ND...Enjoy reading your thoughts, but have a couple of points...

..Will the Balt offense really be so much better with Flynn and Ogden out? not so sure.

***Even if the Raven's defense is at 80 percent, that's still a nice edge over a Browns unit that's playing its first game together. I'm not sure I've ever seen stats on vet QBs joining new teams and systems and how they fare in their first game, but I suspect it is still transitional. Were the Browns facing a soft defense, I think that the weaknessess would not be as obvious. But the Browns looked very confused most of the preseason offensively, except for the Detroit game (a terrible defense), and the first unit pnly played a quarter in that game. I just haven't seen the spark from this unit that makes me think they can match Baltimore, even with some injries. I also tend to think Baltimore is the type of team that picks it up a notch when a starter goes down (see what happened with Anthony Wright at QB).

Agree Boller looked ok in pre-season..but he faced Atl, a weakened Phil (and lost!), Det and NYG...All TERRIIBLE pass D's.

***Good point. But Raven's running game should be the difference. As you say, they play against a terrible run defense. If Baltimore can't run the ball, we're dead on this bet. I say they can, since history has proven the Raven's enjoy some matchip advantages in the trenches. Billikc is not going to allow Boller to LOSE the game with risky passes. I expect a basic game plan, and an occasional deep pass to keep the defense off balaance.


Browns were in the top 5 last year for pass D....As you said, the run killed them...Not sure it will be so effective for the Ravens this time around.

***It probably won't be as effective -- after all, how can the Ravens' put up 300 yardds rushing in a single game again? So, it won't be as easy. But, since run defense was soft, the pass defense stats were somewhat inflated. After all, why pass when the defense gives up an average of 5 yards a carry?


And Tenn losing a 'star' RB?? He hasn't gained over 4ypr for 3 seasons! (Which may actually help your over!)...but Tenn will be gain more yards on the ground this year than they did with George at RB.

***Actually, you win this point. Without George (I have no idea why he still gets so much press with those dismal per carry averages), the Titans RUSH attack is likley to improve. I conceed this point to you. Then again, if the Titans can run for 4.3 per carry instead of 3.3 per carry with George, I think that could help the OVER, especially of the Titans get a breawaya run. George hasn't been a breakaway runner in five years (and was never really in that mold anyway).


Also not convinced that Mia can put up points.

***Agreed, it's a big question mark. But Tenn's pass defense has looked very shakey. This unit gives up plenty of yards. Without Kearse in the middle to pressure QBs, I think pass defense for Titans could be in trouble. I also think this could be a game with some turnovers and a defensive score, given the high risk nature of both passing attacks.


But good luck!...Really like the Wash/TB under

***Thanks -- the feedback is always hjelpful amd makes me re-think my plays. Always glad to discuss and come up with more information. -- NOLAN
 

MrChristo

The Zapper
Forum Member
Nov 11, 2001
4,414
5
0
Sexlexia...
Thanks Nolan.

I was on Miami/Tenn under before the game moved, and I think you've convinced me not to get back on. (Esp. @ 37).
McNair did look very impressive in his limited NFLX minutes.
Maybe Tenn as a side play might be the ticket ;)

Again, good luck with your plays.
 

Nolan Dalla

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2000
1,201
2
0
Washington, DC/Las Vegas, NV
Mr. Christo: Maybe Tenn as a side play might be the ticket

NOLAN REPLY:
That's an knee jerk reaction to a lot of press surrounding the decreased expectations of the Dolphins. I think the whole public is going to be on TENN this week, for the obvious reasons. This makes me shy away from the pick. Miami has become a tar baby that no one wants to touch. Wannstedt gets no respect (deservedly so), the QB situation is shakey, anf running gmae has a huge void, and the defense can no longer be counted on to hold opponents to 17 points or less per game. Everyone is OFF the Dolphins bandwagon.
But keep in mind this team has a phenomenal September record, especially at home. I dont; have the numbers in front of me, but the Dolphins have a clear hoe field advantage the first month of the seeason -- perhaps more so than any other team. For this reason, I'd be wary of betting agaisnt Dolphins allies -- like heat and humidity.
I also believe Miami probably has a bunker mentality -- which could create some unity and a decent performance. Veteran teams that are put in a metaphorical hole often rise up and "shock" the experts. Although it was just a pre-season game, the Dolphins did this as recently as last week. The hurricane had the public thinking the Dolphins would be distracted, and the line moved from MIA +3 to MIA +5. The Dolphins played well in New Orleans and were never in doubt of covering. I konw that's a pre-season game, but that was jut a week ago and shows me something about this team.

FINAL NOTE: I'm not syaing a play on Miami is justified, it's just that there are far too many intangibles for me to consider betting on TEEN and against MIA. I hate road favorites, anyways.

--Nolan Dalla
 

SourDoughJoe

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 15, 2003
411
2
0
72
The Last Frontier
Love your Jax +3 pick along with the Tenn over pick. After reading your info for so long I can say with confidence that you are not a self-contrarian, so that must be a typo at the bottom of your Tenn/Miami over 38 paragraph where you wrote UNDER 38.

GL,
SDJ
 

Nolan Dalla

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2000
1,201
2
0
Washington, DC/Las Vegas, NV
Note: UPDATED RECORD THROUGH SUNDAY NIGHT -- I also included the write up on halftime wagers. See below.


*********************************
2004 NFL SEASON TO DATE

WINS 13
LOSSES 8
PUSH 1
PCT. 61.9

SIDES: 7--4--1
TOTALS: 4--3
TEASERS: 0-1
HALFTIMES: 2--1
**********************************

RESULTS: 6-3 with one game still out / 2-1 on halftimes for a net result of 8 - 4

JACKSONVILLE +3 -- WON
BALTIMORE -3 -- LOST
TENNESSEE/MIAMI OVER 38 -- LOST
TEASE NOR +8.5 with SFO +10 -- LOST
SAN FRANCISCO +4 -- WON
NY JETS -4.5 -- WON
ARIZONA/ST LOUIS UNDER 45 -- WON
TAMPA BAY/WASHINGTON UNDER 39 -- WON
DALLAS/MINNESOTA OVER 44 -- WON

PENDING: CAROLINA -3
Comments: The Panthers are the better team, laying a soft number. They still get no respect from the public or oddsmakers. I got them at 10-1 to win the NFC! The defense remains one of the NFL's best; the running game is strong; and QB Delhomme has a confidence-building year under his belt. This is a young, brilliantly-coached team that has some questions along the OL (three new starters), but Coach Fox has proven he can win with yooung, marginal talent. With the added motivation of a big MNF home game, this should be a coming out party for the Panthers. It's hard to bet against Packers major weapons -- Favre and Green, but one must start to wonder how many more years the Packers can go 10-6 and win the division. I think this is a game ot two teams moving in opposite directions, and the Panthers have mnore to prove. Lay the -3. CAROLINA -3

HALFTIMES:

17 points in first half (U) -- SFO/ATL LOST
13 points in first half (U) -- WAS/TB WON
23 points in first half (O) -- DET/CHI WON
 

Nolan Dalla

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2000
1,201
2
0
Washington, DC/Las Vegas, NV
NOTE: I lifted this text from my Casino Player magazine column (Oct.) -- since it lists the angles and reasoning for each:


By Nolan Dalla

Ten NFL Halftime Angles:
Back to the Wishing Well for One Last Season

One of the major drawbacks of writing a monthly column on sports handicapping is giving away ?trade secrets.? These so-called secrets are discoveries that have been uncovered, often through painstaking investigation and research. Most public handicappers are reluctant to publicize their most-prized findings, because ? once they become widely known ? their value decreases as public awareness increases and oddsmakers start to make line adjustments. In essence, what this means is -- we can?t make as much money once the best angles are known publicly.
I discovered and developed the following ten halftime angles prior to the 2001 NFL regular season. I wrote about them in columns for Casino Player, and elsewhere. A year later, these same angles were posted all over the Internet (often without attribution or permission). By the 2003 regular season, oddsmakers had begun to adjust halftime lines based on some of these angles and (not surprisingly) the winning percentages decreased.
Nevertheless, the halftime (also called ?second-half?) angles continue to perform well and make a profit for those who are inclined to bet NFL halftimes. Frankly, I have no idea why more gamblers don?t make halftime bets. Think of it this way: Would you rather make a wager after seeing how both teams are performing that same day, or bet blindly without the benefit of this information? If you are really interested in making money betting on pro football, the answer should be obvious:


HALFTIME BETTING ANGLE #1
Bet the underdog when the favored team (for the game) is favored by more points in the second half than in the game itself.
Explanation: This makes perfect sense. Why would any team be favored by more points in the second half than the game itself? It commonly occurs when the underdog is blowing out the favorite, pulling off a "shocking" upset at halftime. Many bettors have a knee-jerk reaction and automatically go with the favorite in this spot to rebound big in the second half, which is a big mistake. Let?s look at the numbers:
2002 Results: 8-10-3 (44 percent wins)
2003 Results: 6-1-0 (86 percent wins)
20-Year Results: 56 percent wins
Comments: This continues to be one of the best moneymakers of any halftime angle over the past twenty seasons. However, note that there were far fewer plays in 2003 (just 7) than 2002 (21 plays). I attribute this decline in number of plays to oddsmakers catching on to this angle and adjusting the numbers. It will be interesting to see how many opportunities we have to bet this angle in 2004.


HALTIME BETTING ANGLE #2
When one team is ahead at halftime by 15 or more points, bet the UNDER in the second half.
Explanation: What happens is this -- the team with the lead gets more conservative offensively and rushes the ball more than it passes. This consumes lots of clock time. The leading team can also bring in multiple defensive backs, since it knows the opponent will be passing more often. In blowout games, field goals become far less likely, since the losing team needs touchdowns to get back in the game. Instead of kicking a short field goal the losing team will often go for it on fourth down. Odds are, the team usually will not convert or score. These factors all support a low-scoring second half.
2002 Results: 24-12-1 (66 percent wins)
2003 Results: 20-14-1 (59 percent wins)
20-Year Results: 60 percent wins
Comments: In 2003, this angle went through a bumpy ride in the later half of the season, as it became more widely-known. Despite this, 20 wins and 14 losses still represents a 59 percent win rate, slightly under the 20-year results of 60 percent wins. I give this angle at least one more year before it bites the dust.


HALFTIME BETTING ANGLE #3
When the road team is ahead at halftime by 15 or more points, bet the UNDER in the second half.
Explanation: This is closely related to the previous angle (#2). But, it's even stronger. It doesn't matter if the road team is favored or not. This happens for the reasons previously explained. But it's even stronger when the road team is winning by a wide margin. The home fans often become so upset they turn on the home team and the result is a dull, low-scoring second half.
2002 Results: 10-2-1 (83 percent wins)
2003 Results: 10-5 (66 percent wins)
20-Year Results: 63 percent wins
Comments: This is a subset of the previous angle and is a consistent moneymaker almost every year. Last year, this angle produced 66 percent wins. This continues to be one of the best halftime betting angles ever -- and now since it's been released I fear it will eventually decline as more bettors pound the under in games where this angle applies.


SECOND-HALF BETTING ANGLE #4
When 17 points (exactly) are scored in the first-half, bet UNDER in the second-half.
Explanation: Why are the games where 17 points (exactly) were scored in the first-half more likely to go UNDER the total in the second-half? First, oddsmakers tend to post totals slightly higher than ?17? for the second half in these games. This is a high total in a close low-scoring game, where play calling should be conservative. A ?one possession? game means one mistake can cost a team the victory. Under these circumstances, coaches are reluctant to take chances. They want long, sustained drives -- and ball control to keep the lead. These teams value field goals and will gear the offense towards picking up three-points -- which can be critical in a 10-7 type of game. Teams are not at all interested in airing out the offense and risking what is currently a very close contest.
2002 Results: 14-3-1 (82 percent wins)
2003 Results: 5-12 (29 percent wins)
Twenty-Year Results: 56 percent wins
Comments: 2003 was the worst season ever for this angle, which normally hits about 56 percent. I attribute the bad performance to a statistical anomaly. I'll keep this on the recommendation list for another year and see what happens.
 

Nolan Dalla

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2000
1,201
2
0
Washington, DC/Las Vegas, NV
SECOND-HALF BETTING ANGLE #5
When 13 points (exactly) are scored in the first-half, bet UNDER in the second-half.
Explanation: Just as in games where 17-points were scored in the first-half, ?13? points means the defenses are playing very well. First halves with 13 points scored almost always means one touchdown and two field goals ? not exactly a scoring frenzy. Again ? offenses tend to be more conservative in games like this and are more likely to play for first downs and field goals.
2002 Results: 13-11 (54 percent wins)
2003 Results: 4-13 (23 percent wins)
Twenty-Year Results: 55 percent wins
Comments: Another angle that performs well over a 20-ear period, which hit the rocks in 2003. Games that were either 10-3 or 7-6 a halftime (the most common scores for this angle to apply) are worth a look at least one more season.


HALFTIME BETTING ANGLE #6:
When 17 points (exactly) are scored in the first-half, and the game total is 38 or lower, the game is more likely to go UNDER in the second-half.
Explanation: Note that while the 17-point first-half angle goes UNDER 56 percent of the time in the second-half (see Angle #4), the percentages are even higher when we narrow this down to games with game totals at 38 or less. In fact, we get a 15 percent increase (based on 66 trials over the past twenty years. Consider this additional fact: In all games where the game total is 38 or lower, the second-half went UNDER 52.4 percent of the time while the OVER cashed only 47.6 percent. So, games expected to be low-scoring do tend to go UNDER in the second-half by their very nature.
2002 Results: 3-0 (100 percent wins)
2003 Results: 3-3 (50 percent wins)
Twenty-Year Results: 69 percent wins
Comments: This was a break-even angle in 2003. Considering how poorly Angle #4 performed last season, it?s remarkable that this related angle hit 50 percent.


HALFTIME BETTING ANGLE #7:
When 21 points (exactly) are scored in the first-half, and the game total is 42.5 or higher, the game is more likely to go OVER in the second-half. (Caveat: The game is not a blowout, defined at one team leading the other by 15 or more points)
Explanation: Note that games which are expected to be offensive shootouts -- based on game totals 42.5 and higher -- tend to go OVER in the second-half when exactly 21 points were scored in the first half. This happens for a good reason. First, 21 first-half points probably means a halftime score is 14-7. It also means touchdowns have been reasonably easy to come by. Furthermore, the losing team will be much more interested in scoring 7 points than kicking a field goal. It also means that if the team in the lead goes ahead by 14 points, the losing team will panic and go for the end zone on every drive. This helps the OVER in the second-half.
2002 Results: 5-0 (100 percent wins)
2003 Results: 3-2 (60 percent wins)
Twenty-Year Results: 64 percent wins
Comments: This angle went 3-2. Not many plays, but it always seems to produce a unit or two of profit each year.


HALFTIME BETTING ANGLE #8
When 23 points (exactly) are scored in the first-half, the game is more likely to go OVER in the second-half. (Caveat: The game is not a blowout, defined at one team leading the other by 15 or more points)
Explanation: An interesting part of my research was comparing results for games with 23 versus 24 first-half points. One would think the second-half results would be about the same. But when 24 points are scored, UNDERS prevail slightly. The kink in the number ?23? (and 30, also) are worth investigating. What I mean by "kink" is that if 23 points were scored in the first-half, it usually means two touchdowns and three field goals. That's five scores in 30 minutes. That's means a lot of yardage and ball movement for one half. By contrast, 24 means only 4 scoring possessions -- so while the actual points scored was HIGHER, the offenses may have racked up more yardage and are better primed for an OVER when 23 points were scored. If you combine this with the fact that the number 30 also produces significantly more OVERS than UNDERS (and 30 is a close cousin to 23 -- given the scoring multiples), I'll stand on this hypothesis.
2002 Results: 2-8-1 (20 percent wins)
Twenty-Year Results: 56 percent wins
Comments: After a dismal performance in 2002, I did not play this angle in 2003. However, it may be worth looking at for at least another year based on the overall winning percentages.


HALFTIME BETTING ANGLE #9
When 30 points (exactly) are scored in the first-half, the game is more likely to go OVER in the second-half. (Caveat: The game is not a blowout, defined at one team leading the other by more than 16 points)
Explanation: More on the first-half scoring numbers ?23? and ?30? -- what's interesting is that no other first-half totals from 9 through 32 produced a profit for second-half OVERS -- except 26 (a very rare occurrence). This is not surprising, since 26 is related to 23 as it probably means a game of many field goals.
2002 Results: 3-1 (75 percent wins)
Twenty-Year Results: 56 percent wins
Comments: This angle does not produce many plays, but has done well over the years. I did not track the angle last season/ I?m bringing it back for an encore in 2004.


HALFTIME BETTING ANGLE #10 (NFL PLAYOFFS ONLY)
When 16 points or less are scored in the first-half, the game is more likely to go UNDER in the second-half.
Explanation: In the past twenty years of playoff games, second-half scoring went OVER and UNDER about an equal number of times -- with a slight lean to the UNDER -- 52.5 percent of the time. However, when the first-half was very low scoring, the second-half score was likely to go UNDER as well. Playoff games are more intense than regular season games, and the best defenses often rise to the occasion. Hence there is more consistency with second-half UNDERS in low scoring games.
Twenty-Year Results: 68 percent wins
Comments: Let's break this down further:

(First-Half Points Scored -- Second-Half Result)

9 points scored or less -- 9 UNDERS / 3 OVERS
10 points scored -- 5 UNDERS / 5 OVERS
12 points scored -- 1 UNDER / 1 OVER
13 points scored -- 11 UNDERS / 1 OVER **
14 points scored -- 2 UNDER / 1 OVER
16 points scored -- 3 UNDERS / 2 OVERS

**Note the staggering 11-1 record for UNDERS in playoff games when the first-half produces (exactly 13 points). If this is not a monster angle to play, I don't know what is.

CONCLUSIONS: In 2002, these angles went a combined 70-36-7, or 66 percent wins. The next year in 2003, the win percentage declined to 56-47-1, or 55 percent wins. In all of my work in sports handicapping, I am most proud of these angles. Sad to say, these angles may eventually become a victim of their own success. I predict we probably have one more year of profits before they become obsolete.
 

fletcher

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 21, 2000
16,136
9
0
62
henderson,nv.
that is when you bet as a pro as I do and you do as well as the other stuff you do, i will post a play maybe a small write up but i never tell how i do things that is for me only even when i do the radio show out here in later part of ncaa fb and ncaa hoops on a well knowen show i give nothing away, hell bad enough people steal picks on the web and then reale them as my service plays which they are not, but they are stolen plays i post for free here at madjacks, but that is how some consencus report people do, steal and re-sale free plays they grab from ones site their free plays that most put up or they have spys who come to places like madjacks and steal plays and pawn them off a service plays and use the name of the person, there is one place that has 7 people from here on it I am under services which none are my service plays , you are on it as well as 5 more people from hee, it's a damn shame people have to steal plays then lie and try and sale them as the real service plays, well i know the one who has mine grouped in and yours also, have not been a service play ever of mine all free plays from my site or stolen from here, so i keep to myself, and give games , the more write ups the more they pawn them off for real plays from the service and happens to many places who run services or are a good capper from a place, they cut and paste the whole write ups, that is why i do very little write ups and just post games here, why help someone sale a lie witha write up, with out one someone can look and say what is the reason, and the one place that does this i am sure will see this replt that i wrote and next week your little tips will be in the news letter i will email you a copy of it. if your going to sale something either do your own work 1 or 2 if it is a consencue report don't use free plays and try to pawn them as service plays.

Even line makers check out the web and web sites just like this site, there was a story in the rj a few days ago and the guy from lvsc even said yes we go to sites where we know some very good players and some pros post and look and see what they have, he said the web has helped him when he was a sports book director the same way, he said never can have to much info. but this you just reposted will be ran next week all of my college stuff was and nfl froma certain consensus site unreal, even told jack about it and i fired off a very rude letter and my attorney is sending one to them on monday. people steal from sites all the time and resale it is has got really bad and most of the stuff is free not for pay info as they claim over 60% of reports are wrong and half right, but people will buy them. when i get your stuff next week from my spy who sends the stuff to me about the 3 places will email it to you. jack knows one of the people and can't stand them.

would watch the panther game gb is still a team with a qb who can take over a game, i think the line is a well made line for what a line is put out to do.l
 

jmizeus

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 15, 2000
7,264
2
0
western,ny
good job nolan. was at the jax/bills game on sunday and although jax got lucky at the end,a win is a win for u good job.
was impressed by the way buffalo played on sunday, i said all off-season to abunch of friends that if the offense just plays and makes no mistakes they will fine,mainly because we have a very good defense,but very surprised at the outcome of the game,i think they should have had put more pressure on leftwich on that final drive.but then he tosses up a 45 yard prayer and his receivers gets it,buffalo should have won it,but thats the breaks.gl next week
 

Bama6895

Roll Tide Roll
Forum Member
Jan 29, 2001
633
0
0
Birmingham, AL
Nolan,

Good week, congrats and hope you knock it out with Carolina tonight.

Can you email or post the halftime betting angles you posted a couple of years ago? The ones I am talking about are the ones where 1 team has X lead, bet the under, and stuff such as that.

Thanks in advance. You can get my email from Jack or you might still have mine from when we used to email.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top