NK sets off nuke
- Thread starter DOGS THAT BARK
- Start date
really thinkin' outside the box on this one, wease. We'd be sure to prove a point. Closer to total destruction, but we'd prove a point.
not so much,wubby...we have no leverage with n.korea...military action`s out as long as south korea`s in their crosshairs...
it really doesn't matter what any potus does as long as the chinese are there to cover the norks `back....they could get them to get rid of the nukes in 5 minutes, but they don`t want that.....CHINA is letting north korea do this....
so why not induce a small shiver down the commie`s spines and let the japanese start defending themselves........they have nuclear reactors out the ying yang(no pun intended)...i thought you guys liked the idea of us not being the world`s democracies` policeman?.
the chinese aren`t threatened in their hemisphere...if the japanese had a nuclear capability...or threatened a military build-up replete with a nuclear arsenal in response to the n. korean threat(you tend to get tired of a country lobbing missiles over your country),maybe the chinese get off their duffs and exert a little pressure on north korea...
the chinese need to have a little skin in the game...same with the russians...
talks don`t work...doesn`t take a rhodes scholar to finally get that message..
Last edited:
So your answer to Kim Jong-Il is ramp-up the proliferation of nukes??? Why make them build there own Weez? Let's just start handing them out to our allies. We've got more than enough to go around.
I retract my statement about you being a smart guy who just likes to antagonize liberals here. I gave you too much credit.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
---and why is it a racist question? Don't you want to know why--evidently you prefer to cry racist --LA LA LA LA
Question Should medical profession quick looking for links and cures below because by your analogy they are racial--
Yet we're closer to the beginning of the fight than to the end. Some numbers:
- Diabetes is 60% more common in black Americans than in white Americans. Blacks are up to 2.5 times more likely to suffer a limb amputation and up to 5.6 times more likely to suffer kidney disease than other people with diabetes.
- African-Americans are three times more likely to die of asthma than white Americans.
- Deaths from lung scarring -- sarcoidosis -- are 16 times more common among blacks than among whites. The disease recently killed former NFL star Reggie White at age 43.
- Despite lower tobacco exposure, black men are 50% more likely than white men to get lung cancer.
- Strokes kill 4 times more 35- to 54-year-old black Americans than white Americans. Blacks have nearly twice the first-time stroke risk of whites.
- Blacks develop high blood pressure earlier in life -- and with much higher blood pressure levels -- than whites. Nearly 42% of black men and more than 45% of black women aged 20 and older have high blood pressure.
- Cancer treatment is equally successful for all races. Yet black men have a 40% higher cancer death rate than white men. African-American women have a 20% higher cancer death rate than white women.
are you serious ??? :142smilie please link the above to your genius qustion of the day...:142smilie .....wtf does this have to do with anything ? I can't stop laughing... thanks !
I did some home work for you DTB
I did some home work for you DTB
from what I can put together.... about 2o,ooo Americans convert to muslim every year... I would think there are about 40 million Black Americans. So what are we talking about here ? < .5% of Black America converts to the Muslim Relgion ... That is why I thought your question was rasist.. When you ask : "why 95% of the converts , come from Black America"...... it is misleading to most that are going to read it... maybe this will help you......http://www.multnomah.edu/voice/0408/0408cover1.html we are talking about a group that is <.5 % of a group of the American Populus... can we ascertain anything profound from this ? Maybe this will help...http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=how+many+black+american+convert+to+muslim&aq=f&oq=&aqi=
I did some home work for you DTB
from what I can put together.... about 2o,ooo Americans convert to muslim every year... I would think there are about 40 million Black Americans. So what are we talking about here ? < .5% of Black America converts to the Muslim Relgion ... That is why I thought your question was rasist.. When you ask : "why 95% of the converts , come from Black America"...... it is misleading to most that are going to read it... maybe this will help you......http://www.multnomah.edu/voice/0408/0408cover1.html we are talking about a group that is <.5 % of a group of the American Populus... can we ascertain anything profound from this ? Maybe this will help...http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=how+many+black+american+convert+to+muslim&aq=f&oq=&aqi=
Last edited:
- Feb 26, 2001
- 13,593
- 164
- 63
I can't believe how some think gw has any kind of intelligence. He can't even form sentences.
You'll just have to take my word for it--TU
Maybe its because as I said I am a statistical profiler--and am statistically prejudice.
If 4 people get off a bus
A white male 35
A Skinhead
A Black person in dreadlocks
A muslim
--and I'm given the following info
--one is terrorist
-one serial killer
-one is quilty of hate crimes
--one is drug dealer
Would not be difficult to distinguish each and be correct 90% of time--it is the act I'm predudice against--not the race--but you can't discount the 90% stats in determining probabilty of those committing act--
--anyone would hate serial killers-arsons etc which will fall in the 90% of white males--does that make those that do racist- of course not- it the act.
You said that lots of my posts seem racist.
Go back over them or look at those in the future and I'll think you note most are biased against acts of irresponsibily with no mention of race--however the 90% comes into play and those on the profiling crusades did a little subconscious profiling of their own--as they did when on the people getting off the bus.
Basically only difference is-
common sense-vs PC illusions--whether one admits to it or not.
So, I guess the only solution presented here from the Obama rippers (Wayne and Wease, specifically) is Wease's spine-tingling idea to let several new countries to go Nuclear, including the country that attacked us in WW2, to somehow establish a more defensive world and protect themselves. All the while, ripping Obama and I guess how weak he is on whatever the Hell we are up against in every corner of the world. So far the only measure I can come up with in a reactively serious situation was when Obama gave the go ahead to shoot a few pirates in the head to save an American citizen. Seems like a pretty strong response to deviants.
I'll ask again, since it seems so easy to take pot shots at Obama, and then not come up with anything other than increased nuclear (I'm so happy we're back to the right word after 8 years of mis-speakage) proliferation in the world for other countries out of our control:
Wease and Wayne - you are suggesting that Obama is completely responsible and unaccomplished in dealing with North Korea because they set off a nuke. Simple question, was Bush completely responsible and unaccomplished when they set off nukes before Obama took over?
Did Iran give the U.S. a finger during the Bush administration? Repeatedly? But NOW, this is a big deal to you? And NOW it's Obama's fault that they are giving us the finger, but then it was not the administrations fault? Seems like when Bush was in office, these guys were moonbat lunatics, but now they seem to have much more impressive credentials and have more value to you in the world order.
:0corn
I'll ask again, since it seems so easy to take pot shots at Obama, and then not come up with anything other than increased nuclear (I'm so happy we're back to the right word after 8 years of mis-speakage) proliferation in the world for other countries out of our control:
Wease and Wayne - you are suggesting that Obama is completely responsible and unaccomplished in dealing with North Korea because they set off a nuke. Simple question, was Bush completely responsible and unaccomplished when they set off nukes before Obama took over?
Did Iran give the U.S. a finger during the Bush administration? Repeatedly? But NOW, this is a big deal to you? And NOW it's Obama's fault that they are giving us the finger, but then it was not the administrations fault? Seems like when Bush was in office, these guys were moonbat lunatics, but now they seem to have much more impressive credentials and have more value to you in the world order.
:0corn
