I can tell you what the answer *isn't*, and that's needlessly provoking that nutcase right about the time you're about to obliterate one of his 'axis of evil' brothers.
Of course we can't invade(just that concept itself is absurd, as WE wouldn't be invading, it would be the ROK army), but the net result of 'surgical strikes' would be the same. The north would almost certainly invade SK if we do this. You speak of '10's of thousands of civilians killed?' Try 100's of thousands to a million civilians killed in SK alone in any sort of protracted war.
I agree with your overall theme (as best as I can understand it), that there is no good solution, and there never has been, and no military option, period. There was no military solution before they (apparently) have a nuke and there's none after. Not without sending Seoul back to the 1930's.
And stop throwing that crap in there about 'that's why we had to go get Saddam.' Nobody credible thought he had nukes, or was even close to having them and please don't cite Osirak in 1981 for the 50th time.
While we're rebuilding schools that we blew up in Iraq, the rest of the world must be laughing at us. Iran definitely is.
...........................
kosar.."I can tell you what the answer *isn't*"...
uhh...we already knew that...you`re a liberal...
and i agree..that by "political" standards the clinton/albright doctrine was a "SUCCESS".... "politically",that is...., which is the only metric the democrats use for anything....
eah, it was a success...just like iraq and saddam...
how was it a "SUCCESS"?..
president clinton "SUCCESSFULLY" kicked the problem on down the road for republicans to have to deal with....lol
i was trying to be nice,but truthfully,bush and clinton don`t share blame equally for north korea....it falls clearly in clinton/albright`s lap.....
unless somebody can find a link that states that bush/cheney provided lil` kim with $4 billion worth of light water reactors....but,hey,it`s bushitler`s fault they conducted a nuclear test...because he said,"the axis of evil".....
i admit..it is shocking that kim put one over on carter and clinton/not-so-bright.....:142smilie
ditch water dumb....
btw.....EVERYBODY believed that saddam had weapons..or was trying to procure them.....
haven`t you read clinton`s speeches?....kerry`s comments?...practically every democrat drawing breath?...saying how dangerous saddam was....the clinton bill that was passed by congress on regime change in iraq?.....
well over a decade of u.n. attempted inspections...resolutions?
you slept through all that?...
do you remember:
the internet ?
cell phones ?
wireless internet ?
red bull ?
just checking...
let`s count the successes of the clinton/gore/not-so-bright administration....their "security team".....
1) gave nuclear technology to north korea for peaceful purposes only, on their solemn pledge to not use that knowledge to develop wmd....
dohhhh!.
2) suppressed every effort to create a national missile defense.....
dohhhh!
3) cut the size and combat readiness of our armed forces.....
dohhh!
4)avoided any serious pursuit of al qaeda, viewing islamic terrorism as a policing matter rather than as a military threat....and for dessert...
5) bombed the bejesus out of waco....
dohhhh! dohhhh!....
and then there`s sandy burglar and the underwear document fiasco...which has never been explained to any rational conclusion....and now those few documents that were returned to the national archives,must be stored in an "odor-eater lined" vault.......
shameful....:nono:
look...the fact is that bush inherited the office of president of the united states having to deal with the after-effects of 8 years of disastrous policy planning....and that`s lamentable....
but,he volunteered for the position knowing the mess that was left him.....and it is now his responsiblity......
i agree on that...not with the revisionist history....
:SIB ...thank me very much...