notice anything about this ad?
- Thread starter MadJack
- Start date
A Republican bill would block a regulation of President Obama?s that they see as executive overreach, but privacy advocates claim it could allow companies to sell your private Internet and search history. Who?s right?
[h=4]The context and what the bill does[/h]The Federal Trade Commission maintains jurisdiction over most aspects of the Internet. But after the 2016 election during the lame-duck session, another Washington agency called the Federal Communications Commission issued new regulations related specifically to Internet service providers, also known as ISPs. (You?ve probably heard of some of the country?s biggest ISPs, which include Comcast, Verizon, AT&T;, Time Warner, Cox, and CenturyLink.)
These new rules required all Internet browsing data, as well as data regarding app usage on mobile devices, be subject to the same privacy requirements as sensitive or private personal information. This overtook the previous rule by the FTC, the agency which previously had authority over regulating ISP?s and differentiated privacy requirements based upon the sensitivity of the information, with more stringent rules for such things as health information or Social Security numbers. The methods are also more invasive to the ISP companies, since the FCC also issues pre-emptive regulations while the FTC primarily conducted investigations.
Introduced by Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) ? chair of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law ? and Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN7), Senate Joint Resolution 34 and House Joint Resolution 86 are companion bills that would nullify the FCC?s rule. However, they would not return jurisdiction over regulating ISP?s back to the FTC, as they were previously.
[h=4]What supporters say[/h]Many Republicans saw these new rules as a power grab during the closing days of the Obama Administration. The rule was issued on December 2, 2016 and took effect on January 3, 2017, less than three weeks before President Trump took office. Supporters of the bill argue that the legislation would prevent the one-size-fits-all regulation.
?Under the FTC?s watch, our internet and data economy has been the envy of the world. The agency?s evidence-based approach calibrates privacy and data-security requirements to the sensitivity of information collected,? Senate lead sponsor Flake wrote in a Wall Street Journal op-ed.
?The FCC rules subject all web browsing and app usage data to the same restrictive requirements as sensitive personal information. That means that information generated from looking up the latest Cardinals score or checking the weather in Scottsdale is treated the same as personal health and financial data.?
ISP companies also contended that the FCC rules have placed them at a disadvantage with other non-ISP Internet companies that also collect user data, like Netflix or Facebook.
[h=4]What opponents say[/h]Privacy advocates warn that the legislation could produce dire consequences for consumer privacy, with Privacy News Online calling it ?a bill to let telecoms sell your private Internet history.?
?Its goal is to remove all the hard-earned net neutrality regulations gained to protect your internet history from advertisers and and worse,? they wrote. ?Specifically, the FCC had been able to prevent internet service providers (ISPs) from spying on your internet history, and selling what they gathered, without express permission. This legal protection on your internet history is currently under attack thanks to these 24 Senators and lots of ISP lobbying spend.?
That?s not false, as ISPs have been previously shown to sell user data to third parties, who in turn use it for marketing or other purposes.
[h=4]Odds of passage[/h]The odds of passage are decent ? if Trump?s new FCC Commission Ajit Pai doesn?t overturn the rule on his own first. Pai already placed a partial halt to some of the ISP rules in February.
The Senate legislation has attracted 23 cosponsors, all Republicans. It awaits a vote in the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee.
The House legislation has attracted 16 cosponsors, also all Republicans. It awaits a vote in the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Blackburn is the third-most conservative House member, based on a GovTrack analysis of voting records so far during this Congress.
[h=4]The context and what the bill does[/h]The Federal Trade Commission maintains jurisdiction over most aspects of the Internet. But after the 2016 election during the lame-duck session, another Washington agency called the Federal Communications Commission issued new regulations related specifically to Internet service providers, also known as ISPs. (You?ve probably heard of some of the country?s biggest ISPs, which include Comcast, Verizon, AT&T;, Time Warner, Cox, and CenturyLink.)
These new rules required all Internet browsing data, as well as data regarding app usage on mobile devices, be subject to the same privacy requirements as sensitive or private personal information. This overtook the previous rule by the FTC, the agency which previously had authority over regulating ISP?s and differentiated privacy requirements based upon the sensitivity of the information, with more stringent rules for such things as health information or Social Security numbers. The methods are also more invasive to the ISP companies, since the FCC also issues pre-emptive regulations while the FTC primarily conducted investigations.
Introduced by Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) ? chair of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law ? and Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN7), Senate Joint Resolution 34 and House Joint Resolution 86 are companion bills that would nullify the FCC?s rule. However, they would not return jurisdiction over regulating ISP?s back to the FTC, as they were previously.
[h=4]What supporters say[/h]Many Republicans saw these new rules as a power grab during the closing days of the Obama Administration. The rule was issued on December 2, 2016 and took effect on January 3, 2017, less than three weeks before President Trump took office. Supporters of the bill argue that the legislation would prevent the one-size-fits-all regulation.
?Under the FTC?s watch, our internet and data economy has been the envy of the world. The agency?s evidence-based approach calibrates privacy and data-security requirements to the sensitivity of information collected,? Senate lead sponsor Flake wrote in a Wall Street Journal op-ed.
?The FCC rules subject all web browsing and app usage data to the same restrictive requirements as sensitive personal information. That means that information generated from looking up the latest Cardinals score or checking the weather in Scottsdale is treated the same as personal health and financial data.?
ISP companies also contended that the FCC rules have placed them at a disadvantage with other non-ISP Internet companies that also collect user data, like Netflix or Facebook.
[h=4]What opponents say[/h]Privacy advocates warn that the legislation could produce dire consequences for consumer privacy, with Privacy News Online calling it ?a bill to let telecoms sell your private Internet history.?
?Its goal is to remove all the hard-earned net neutrality regulations gained to protect your internet history from advertisers and and worse,? they wrote. ?Specifically, the FCC had been able to prevent internet service providers (ISPs) from spying on your internet history, and selling what they gathered, without express permission. This legal protection on your internet history is currently under attack thanks to these 24 Senators and lots of ISP lobbying spend.?
That?s not false, as ISPs have been previously shown to sell user data to third parties, who in turn use it for marketing or other purposes.
[h=4]Odds of passage[/h]The odds of passage are decent ? if Trump?s new FCC Commission Ajit Pai doesn?t overturn the rule on his own first. Pai already placed a partial halt to some of the ISP rules in February.
The Senate legislation has attracted 23 cosponsors, all Republicans. It awaits a vote in the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee.
The House legislation has attracted 16 cosponsors, also all Republicans. It awaits a vote in the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Blackburn is the third-most conservative House member, based on a GovTrack analysis of voting records so far during this Congress.
http://www.madjacksports.com/forum/...p-s-FCC-Pick-is-an-opponent-of-net-neutrality
i brought up the net neutrality issue awhile back.
i brought up the net neutrality issue awhile back.
WTF are these people doing?
WTF are these people doing?
http://thehill.com/policy/technology/326145-house-votes-to-send-bill-undoing-obama-internet-privacy-rule-to-trumps-desk
The House on Tuesday voted in favor of blocking internet privacy rules passed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) last year, sending the bill to President Trump, who is expected to sign it into law.
The bill passed 215 to 205, with 15 Republicans joining 190 Democrats voting against it.
The FCC rules would have given consumers greater control over what their internet service provider can do with their data by requiring those companies to get permission from customers before using their information to create targeted advertisements.
WTF are these people doing?
http://thehill.com/policy/technology/326145-house-votes-to-send-bill-undoing-obama-internet-privacy-rule-to-trumps-desk
The House on Tuesday voted in favor of blocking internet privacy rules passed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) last year, sending the bill to President Trump, who is expected to sign it into law.
The bill passed 215 to 205, with 15 Republicans joining 190 Democrats voting against it.
The FCC rules would have given consumers greater control over what their internet service provider can do with their data by requiring those companies to get permission from customers before using their information to create targeted advertisements.
:lol:
http://thehill.com/policy/technolog...an-200000-to-buy-lawmakers-browsing-histories
Internet users are fighting back after Congress voted to block Obama-era internet privacy protections.
Two fundraising campaigns have so far raised more than $215,000 to purchase and reveal lawmakers' browsing histories.
Actor Misha Collins, the star of television show ?Supernatural,? has raised more than $63,000 on his GoFundMe page. More than 3,000 people have donated to the page, which has a goal of $500 million.
?Great news! The House just voted to pass SJR34. We will finally be able to buy the browser history of all the Congresspeople who voted to sell our data and privacy without our consent!? he wrote on the fundraising page.
Another activist from Tennessee has raised more than $152,000 from more than 9,800 people.
A bill on its way to President Trump?s desk would allow internet service providers (ISPs) to sell users? data and Web browsing history. It has not taken effect, which means there is no growing history data yet to purchase.
A Washington Post reporter also wrote it would be possible to buy the data ?in theory, but probably not in reality.?
A former enforcement bureau chief at the Federal Communications Commission told the newspaper that most internet service providers would cover up this information, under their privacy policies. If they did sell any individual's personal data in violation of those policies, a state attorney general could take the ISPs to court.
