Notre Dame
- Thread starter DR STRANGELOVE
- Start date
come on...
come on...
it paid better because you could risk less to win more. Did I need to type that?
AA
Maybe next week I'll lay 1000.00 to win 10 cents on Mich.
Will that be the same?
A winner is a winner yes. But if you guys want to talk moneyline v. point spread, I guess I really dont know what to say.
AA
come on...
it paid better because you could risk less to win more. Did I need to type that?
AA
Maybe next week I'll lay 1000.00 to win 10 cents on Mich.
Will that be the same?
A winner is a winner yes. But if you guys want to talk moneyline v. point spread, I guess I really dont know what to say.
AA
IMHO smart players consider the amount put at risk as the benchmark, I know a few guys that play it differently, some players on here come to mind and they may disagree with my statement but I calculate at risk vs what I want to win.
It is a sure fact if I hand the man at the window 480 to win 200, that the 480 is gone if my team loses, of course the odds of winning the wager are much greater with the moneyline vs pointspread so it is a mute point.
That is why I play with percentages and always put the usual 2-3-4 % at risk. I want to be in control of the amount at risk instead of letting the bookmaker control it. Just my way of doing things.
It is a sure fact if I hand the man at the window 480 to win 200, that the 480 is gone if my team loses, of course the odds of winning the wager are much greater with the moneyline vs pointspread so it is a mute point.
That is why I play with percentages and always put the usual 2-3-4 % at risk. I want to be in control of the amount at risk instead of letting the bookmaker control it. Just my way of doing things.
