O on supreme court justices

[Eddie Haskell]

Phenom:

I think thats pur-ga-tory. Or limbo if your a baby. I often wondered what the cut-off age was for limbo when you had to go to purgatory? Anyone know?
Wayne means per-jury. Which is his now 10 year old attack on Bill Clinton. He will now act as if the last 8 years did not happen.
Only one word ya need to say to shut up a Kentucky fan - Laetner.

Eddie

 

[Master Capper]

Wayne, has had a deep infatuation with William Jefferson Clinton for over a decade now. In "Waynes World", Clinton is to blame for everything bad or evil that falls on our country, and anything good that happened during his reign was made possible by the GOP. All of W's incompetent acts were the direct result of William Clinton. The prosperous times for stocks and savers during the Clinton regime were a direct result of plans put in place by W's daddy, as well as the economic boom during Clinton reign had nothing to do with Clinton, as he was just in the right place at the right time. Although the departing Clinton team warned the incoming administratin about possible terrorist attacks, Clinton was still reponsible for 9/11 even though the W's choose to ignore warnings. Every under the table ploy used by W was kay in Waynes book, as he justified it by saying Clinton did worse.
I seriously, think Wayne is incapable of sitting down and looking at both sides of a coin and literally backing the person for the job, as in his world there is only one way of thinking and thats the only way which is classic of smalltown thinking. I could be wrong, but I am quite positive that Wayne has rarely if ever posted anything that would indicate he has the ability to think outside the box, but when the vast majority of someones news comes from Faux News and you cite people lite Bill O the clown, or a racist drug user like Rush, or even the bartender Hannity then what can one honestly expect. All three of the above earn their paychecks by preaching hate and they would be out of business if the country actually moved towards the center.

 

[Chadman]

Wayne, since you want to make this point, please post a link to Obama's complete commentary on his selection process for justices, or just drop this. I know you highlighted the part that could set up an argument for you, but I would bet there was more to it than you shared. You do hold others to this standard, I'm sure it shouldn't be a problem for you.

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

Wayne, since you want to make this point, please post a link to Obama's complete commentary on his selection process for justices, or just drop this. I know you highlighted the part that could set up an argument for you, but I would bet there was more to it than you shared. You do hold others to this standard, I'm sure it shouldn't be a problem for you.

Let me give you a link you'll have a hard time disputing
http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/alexmaccallum/CtN5

Don't know if you remember but a few years back made note of my fav wall hanging in office called Essence of Commpassion--goes like this
Resolve to be tender with the young, compassionate with the aged, sympathetic with the striving, and tolerant with the weak and the wrong. Sometime in your life you will have been all of these

So it's not that I'm not that I am against these but just don't think it is supreme courts responsibily--it should be done through charity.


Of course thats the diff between conservatives and liberals.

You had Bush and Cheney giving millions to charity collectively and Kerry and Gore stiffing charity for
"0" in some years--yet preaching 2 americas. Bottom line is their charitble with tax payers money but not their own.

--any comments?????

 

[Eddie Haskell]

Wayne, I have a comment. Can you list the charities that Bush and Cheney collectively gave millions too?

Thank you for your anticipated cooperation

Eddie

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

Wayne, I have a comment. Can you list the charities that Bush and Cheney collectively gave millions too?

Thank you for your anticipated cooperation

Eddie

how bout one small item to start with--

2005 Cheney donated $6,869,655 to charity including --
George Washington University's Cardiothoracic Institute and Capital Partners for Education (a charity for low-income high school students in the Washington, D.C. area) among other orgs to numerous to mention--

Was a tad more than Al and Tipper Gores-- $353

but of course he's an attorney and only talks the talk--I'm sure you understand

--any other questions your honor????

His 2005 tax return--if you need it
http://www.taxhistory.org/thp/presreturns.nsf/Returns/492E72305B82FD58852572BC007877E1/$file/R_Cheney_2005.pdf

 

[Chadman]

Let me give you a link you'll have a hard time disputing
http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/alexmaccallum/CtN5

Have a hard time disputing an individual's blog posting, which highlighted a part of his speech? I believe what I asked for was a link to his entire commentary or his entire position on criteria for nominating judges, and you post a link to the same excerpted comment that you made as something that's hard to dispute?

I'm still waiting - since you are making a point and say (I guess) that this is the main focus he'll have or is the only thing he'll base his decisions on. Once again, you would expect the same from others, but I guess you don't actually have that full commentary or his full stance on the issue. Very Drudgelike of you...

Noted at the bottom of the page is the following:
"Content on blogs in My.BarackObama represents the opinions of community members and in no way should be interpreted as endorsed or approved by the campaign."

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

which got me thinking what about O

what!! less than 1%($2,350) to charity--no wonder the Rev had his panties in a wad---hhhmmm also appears these dual ivy leauge scholars would slip under his $250,000 (combined income)guide line too--

http://www.taxhistory.org/thp/presreturns.nsf/Returns/B4099E76914E1A5985256E43007BCBE7/$file/B_Obama_2000.pdf

Do any of you feel like fools -YET

 

[Eddie Haskell]

Thank you Wayne for your cooperation. I knew with your internet prowess that you would be able to provide our readers with proof positive of the generous and loving giving of our number 2 man in charge, the one and only, Dick "the giving" Cheney.

I know you didn't mention "W"'s compassionate conservative donations but, thats okay, when #2 gives a whoping $6,869,655 in 2005, that outta cover both of them. You know, I must of been wrong about the big Dick these past 8 years, can you forgive me?

I mean a closer look at this magnanamous man and his warm, cuddly, wife's 2005 tax return show that they reported income of just under 9 million. Wow, and he gave almost 7 million of that to charity. What a guy!!!

But wait, how can he and darling Lynn be so generous. And now, the rest of the story. Read the following:

By exploiting a law that was meant for people to donate to Katrina relief, Cheney was able to net a $2,000,000 tax refund.

At least half, if not more if this refund was solely due to their exploiting of this law.

In order to do this, they had to write a personal check for over $2,000,000 at the end of 2005.

None of the donations were to any Katrina relief organizations.

The donations were from income related to Halliburton, which Cheney supposedly had no financial ties to.

In any other year, they still would have received a few hundred thousand in tax refunds from this "non-financial tie" to Halliburton, if they donated the proceeds to charity.

In each of the prior three years, their donations were never more than 4%-5% of their 2005 totals, the only year that this law applies to.

Once again, they flat out lie in their press release by obscuring the million or so that they personally benefited from this transaction.

The timing, while not illegal, is extremely self serving and shady, especially in light of the fact that they should not be benefiting financially from any ties to Halliburton.

In 2004, their donations were around $300,000, mainly from Lynne's book proceeds.

In 2003, their donations were around $320,000, also mainly from Lynne's book proceeds.

In 2002, their donations were around $120,000, you guessed it, mainly from Lynne's book proceeds.

Dick making money off of Haliburton and making it look like he's giving to charity while he's receiving tax deductions. What a guy.

In response to your "fool" question............ no.

Eddie

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

--after reading such a lenthy rebutal -that rebuts nothing I guess your satisfied with Cheny/GW chartible donations--and don't want to talk about O and gore and Kerry stiffing the poor--correct?

that's what I thought--kurby

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

Have a hard time disputing an individual's blog posting, which highlighted a part of his speech? I believe what I asked for was a link to his entire commentary or his entire position on criteria for nominating judges, and you post a link to the same excerpted comment that you made as something that's hard to dispute?

I'm still waiting - since you are making a point and say (I guess) that this is the main focus he'll have or is the only thing he'll base his decisions on. Once again, you would expect the same from others, but I guess you don't actually have that full commentary or his full stance on the issue. Very Drudgelike of you...

Noted at the bottom of the page is the following:
"Content on blogs in My.BarackObama represents the opinions of community members and in no way should be interpreted as endorsed or approved by the campaign."

from 'dreams of my father' page 100-101-

To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets. We smoked cigarettes and wore leather jackets. At night, in the dorms, we discussed neocolonialism, Franz Fanon, Eurocentrism, and patriarchy. When we ground out our cigarettes in the hallway carpet or set our setereos so loud that the walls began to shake, we were resisting bourgeois society's stifling constraints. We weren't indifferent or careless or insecure. We were alienated.

But this strategy alone couldn't provide the distance I wanted, from Joyce [a former girlfriend] or my past. After all, there were thousands of so-called campus radicals, most of them white and tenured and happily tolerated. No, it remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.

 

[Eddie Haskell]

Wayne:

Not satisfied. Not surprised. Not anything really.

You've been spinning lies, misrepresentations, and right wing garbage ever since I first came to this forum. I don't have the time nor inclination to look up Kerry's, Obama's or Gore's charitable contributions.

Your the one who brought up charitable contributions. I just exposed your bulllshitt.

Again.

Eddie

 

[Chadman]

I take it from your "response" to me that you don't have any full commentary from Obama on his selection criteria, just an excerpt which suits your commentary. You could just say no, for once, but I'll expect another off topic avoidance...
kurby kurby kurby

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

I take it from your "response" to me that you don't have any full commentary from Obama on his selection criteria, just an excerpt which suits your commentary. You could just say no, for once, but I'll expect another off topic avoidance...
kurby kurby kurby

I give you reference from his site--then give you page #'s in his book--:shrug:

I would buy it and bring it to you and read it to you--if I didn't think you do the ole
:00x7
as I was reading it.