Obama is on right now

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,499
263
83
Victory Lane
On a side note , John Stewart is going to be on
The Factor with O'reilly Wed and Thur night.

I smell a neocon whoop ass moment for Stewart

O' Reilly is a bully rat bastid white dog shit of the third kind
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,499
263
83
Victory Lane
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_j6IBdHW_rY&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_j6IBdHW_rY&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,499
263
83
Victory Lane
I'm about as big as RAYMOND. We'll be fine. ;)
..................................................................

OK then I am not.

but when you get him down, I can give him the boot to the head.

shawn - are you with us and how big are you ?

can you handle a baseball bat ?
 
Last edited:

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,499
263
83
Victory Lane
Stewart tells O'Reilly he's voice of sanity on Fox
ShareThisPrint E-mail By DAVID BAUDER

The Associated Press

NEW YORK ? Comic Jon Stewart told Bill O'Reilly that the "no spin zone" ringleader had become the voice of sanity on Fox News Channel, although "that's like being the thinnest kid at fat camp."

The host of "The Daily Show" and Fox's kingpin exchanged some good-natured shots Wednesday during Stewart's appearance on a network he relishes mocking. Stewart tossed off jokes but also criticized Fox for being a "cyclonic perpetual motion machine" opposing President Barack Obama.

"They have taken reasonable concerns about this president and this economy and turned it into a full-fledged panic attack about the next coming of Chairman Mao," Stewart said.

O'Reilly said the Obama attacks were primarily coming from Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck, who have two of the highest-rated programs on Fox. O'Reilly called Beck an "everyman."

"He just spouts," O'Reilly said. "He spouts for what he believes. If you think Beck spouts for the Republican Party, you're out of your mind."

Fox cut off the taped interview at that point, saying more would be shown Thursday.

Both men have appeared on each other's show before, but it was Stewart's first time back since 2004. O'Reilly annoyed Comedy Central by calling Stewart's audience primarily "stoned slackers"; on Wednesday, he amended it to "stoned slackers who love Obama."

There was even a dispute over who initiated the return visit. O'Reilly said on Fox earlier Wednesday that Stewart's representatives had asked for him to come on the show. Comedy Central spokesman Tony Fox said an O'Reilly producer requested the appearance.

Fox "is the most passionate and sells the clearest narrative of all the news networks, if ... you're still referring to it in that manner," Stewart said.

O'Reilly pointed out that Fox is like a newspaper with news and opinion pages, an idea Stewart poked fun at.

"Fox in and of itself doesn't say you're a news network all day," he said. "What is it, you're news from 9 to 11, then you're opinion, then you're news again from 1 to 2:30 except for the Jewish holidays? And then on alternate parking days you're news, but Christmas, you're not?"

Stewart was asked about a Washington Post column that suggested he was becoming disenchanted with Obama. "I don't take any of that seriously," he said.

But he did criticize Obama for not taking control of his agenda.

"It allows too much room for different narratives to take hold, for instance, a narrative that might emanate from a news organization of this ilk," he said
.............................................................

pretty funny actually
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,499
263
83
Victory Lane
RAY RAY

is there any place that you go every week no matter what ?

like maybe to Geno's to get a Philly cheese every Friday , say around 1100 AM ?

just curious


:SIB :SIB
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,499
263
83
Victory Lane
head-stuck-in-a-boot.jpg
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,496
172
63
Bowling Green Ky
Interesting - Obama has a face to face give and take with Republicans, and the first thing out of Skul is ridiculing him about a teleprompter. No credit, no middle of the road at all, just stupid base rip that has no basis in fact or anything real. Nicely done, Skul. Here's something tangible and real from the exchange - don't remember any of the Bushes or any other president, actually, that took a step like this to face the opposition - and unified, vengeful, obstructionist opposition like we've never seen before, I might add:

This, From Politifact.com:

The Truth-O-Meter Says:

Obama came into office "with a $1.3 trillion deficit before I had passed any law. ... We came in with $8 trillion worth of debt over the next decade."


Barack Obama on Friday, January 29th, 2010 in a Republican retreat in Baltimore

Obama inherited deficits from Bush administration

In a spirited and unscripted debate with the House GOP, President Barack Obama said Republicans were wrong to portray him as running up large deficits.

Speaking at a retreat for House Republicans in Baltimore on Jan. 29, 2010, Obama was particularly critical of a question from Rep. Jeb Hensarling of Texas. Hensarling asked Obama, "You are soon to submit a new budget, Mr. President. Will that new budget, like your old budget, triple the national debt and continue to take us down the path of increasing the cost of government to almost 25 percent of our economy?"

"The fact of the matter is," Obama replied, "is that when we came into office, the deficit was $1.3 trillion -- $1.3 trillion. So when you say that suddenly I've got a monthly deficit that's higher than the annual deficit left by Republicans, that's factually just not true, and you know it's not true. And what is true is that we came in already with a $1.3 trillion deficit before I had passed any law. What is true is, we came in with $8 trillion worth of debt over the next decade."

We checked Hensarling's claim in a separate item. Here, we'll look at Obama's claim that he came into office with a $1.3 trillion deficit and $8 trillion worth of debt over the next decade.

On Jan. 7, 2009, two weeks before Obama took office, the Congressional Budget Office reported that the deficit for fiscal year 2009 was projected to be $1.2 trillion. The 10-year projection was estimated to be about $3.1 trillion. So Obama's number was very close on the 2009 deficit -- he said $1.3 trillion -- but substantially different from the 10-year projection -- he said $8 trillion.

There are two reasons why he differs from the CBO. On the difference between the $1.2 trillion and the $1.3 trillion, the Obama administration credited a small portion of spending on its watch to policies of the previous administration. The reason for this is that the federal government runs on a fiscal year that starts Oct. 1, so Bush and Obama technically split responsibility for 2009 spending.

The large difference on the 10-year projection has to do with Bush administration tax cuts. The CBO creates its estimates based on current law, which means the CBO assumes that the Bush tax cuts will end in 2010 and everyone will start paying higher taxes in 2011 and going forward. The Obama administration, on the other hand, assumed in its baseline that those tax cuts would be renewed.

Economists we spoke with -- Josh Gordon, policy director for the Concord Coalition, and Brian Riedl, lead budget analyst of the conservative Heritage Foundation -- both said they believe the White House approach is more realistic because it assumes current policy will continue.

So the CBO's estimate is $5 trillion lower than the White House numbers, though economists don't quibble with the White House methodology. It does highlight, however, that when it comes to budget projections, people can have differences of opinion about what to include. In any budget projection there is room for interpretation, but it seems reasonable to assume for a baseline that the Bush tax cuts will continue. Obama's numbers are fairly solid, so we rate his statement Mostly True.

Some how the above don't jell with this--tell us where this chart is wrong--

Bush Deficit vs. Obama Deficit in Pictures



<IFRAME height=61 src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/button.js?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.heritage.org%2F2009%2F03%2F24%2Fbush-deficit-vs-obama-deficit-in-pictures%2F&source=Heritage&style=normal" frameBorder=0 width=50 scrolling=no></IFRAME>
wapoobamabudget1.jpg




only thing to add to above is we now have actual 2010 which is greater than whitehouse or cbo estimate--

Just out--
House faces tough vote on $1.9 trillion more debt


<CITE class=vcard>By ANDREW TAYLOR, Associated Press Writer Andrew Taylor, Associated Press Writer </CITE>? <ABBR class=recenttimedate title=2010-02-04T02:09:21-0800>1 hr 9 mins ago</ABBR>
<!-- end .byline -->WASHINGTON ? Facing a politically excruciating vote, House Democratic leaders are counting on new budget deficit curbs to help smooth the way for a bill allowing the government to go $1.9 trillion deeper into debt over the next year ? or about $6,000 more for every U.S. resident.
======================

I hate to be the the one to tell you Chad--Bush didn't write this budget-nor the last years budget deficit that tripled GW's



--so spare us the "whaaaaaa its GW'S fault

You can believe Gumby's "The era of Responsibily" grift

or realize "You been punked"<SCRIPT language=javascript> function UpdateTimeStamp(pdt) { var n = document.getElementById("udtD"); if(pdt != '' && n && window.DateTime) { var dt = new DateTime(); pdt = dt.T2D(pdt); if(dt.GetTZ(pdt)) {n.innerHTML = dt.D2S(pdt,((''.toLowerCase()=='false')?false:true));} } } UpdateTimeStamp('633913215851500000');</SCRIPT>
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,496
172
63
Bowling Green Ky
I see some posting of opinions on Oreily/Stewert interview--

Thought some might be interested in the facts and draw their own opinion.--

Heres video of interview part one.
http://video.foxnews.com/v/4001020/oreilly-vs-stewart


---and Scott --whats this white dog shit rant your on--

You might want to check out clinic Tigers in. You have a lot in common-
He don't like black women and you don't like white guys. :)
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,499
263
83
Victory Lane
I

---and Scott --whats this white dog shit rant your on--

You might want to check out clinic Tigers in. You have a lot in common-
He don't like black women and you don't like white guys. :)
.....................................................................

RAYMOND called me that one night when he was drunk.

I thought it fit perfectly with neocon racist types like yourself.

except you have this title

black gumby white dog shit redneck nazi communist rat bastid.
 

shawn555

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 11, 2000
7,190
130
63
berlin md
I see some posting of opinions on Oreily/Stewert interview--

Thought some might be interested in the facts and draw their own opinion.--

Heres video of interview part one.
http://video.foxnews.com/v/4001020/oreilly-vs-stewart


---and Scott --whats this white dog shit rant your on--

You might want to check out clinic Tigers in. You have a lot in common-
He don't like black women and you don't like white guys. :)

First this is the first comment I saw in here about Oreilly Stewart interview in this forum.

Second is fox gonna post the whole interview without all the edits?

Stewart does edit shit for his show as well but does put the full interviews up on the website.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top