Obama violates Constitution again; elicits UN involvement in Arizona!

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
Obama violates Constitution again; elicits UN involvement in Arizona!


J.T. Coyot?
Infowars.com
August 31, 2010

In an unprecedented act of unconstitutional abridgment and over-reaching presidential power, Barack Obama is poised to call the United Nations Human Rights Council vultures down on the state of Arizona.

He is apparently not satisfied with his last 11th Amendment faux pas; the commanding of Attorney General Eric Holder to unconstitutionally sue Arizona for enacting a state law to correct federal inaction on Arizona?s Constitutional request for assistance. Now, as if that wasn?t enough 11th Amendment stumbling, he is bringing the UN into it.

In his report to the United Nations Human Rights Council on human rights in the US, aside from calling for U.N. involvement in Arizona, he leaps right into America bashing. He points out what he considers flaws in the U.S. Constitution, then toots his own horn as the president who promoted and passed universal health care legislation, and ended ?torture? at Guantanamo. As if torture there was the American people?s idea. Sounding more like a constitutional destroyer than a constitutional scholar, he points out what he calls our human rights inadequacies ? discrimination and oppression of ethnic minorities, women, the handicapped and homosexuals. Making himself look like the American people?s deliverer, our messiah ? it reads like he?s stumping for election, perhaps as Secretary General of the UN.


In this report the federal government will turn over to the UN, control of all action regarding Arizona border policy. Arizona Governor Jan Brewer demanded that it?s new immigration law, SB-1070 be removed from the Human Rights report to the United Nations, which also contains the unconstitutional federal court challenge to the Arizona law, listing it as one of the federal methods used to protect human rights. Governor Brewer, in a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated that the inclusion of the Arizona law as a human rights violation was not only wrong, but was ?downright offensive.? She continues, ?The idea of our own American government submitting the duly enacted laws of a state of the United States to ?review? by the United Nations is internationalism run amok and unconstitutional.?

This unparalleled call for United Nations intervention to cover federal inaction on the border, and spin it as a civil-rights violation by Arizona, is incorrigible. Some would call it treasonous. Arizona has been fighting this illegal immigration problem now for over 30 years, while the federal government has been doing everything it can to avoid the problem. There are those who will say that the immigration situation is so vast that the only way the federal government can solve it, is by calling on the United Nations. This is poppycock, pure unadulterated internationalist tripe of the highest order. He?s merely escalating the Bush open-door immigration policy Americans don?t want, nor can we afford to have continue.



For the president to insinuate civil rights abuses as his reasons, is a slap in the face of the people of Arizona, and the United States. We have bent over backwards and been taxed to the hilt, to accommodate and pay for the 30 million from south of the border who have already entered the country illegally. The president?s language suggests the beginnings of sanctions, that could escalate into actions similar to those on Iraq after the First Gulf War. Sanctions that took a first world nation back to Third World poverty in less than two decades. This President?s actions betray his true loyalties, and begins the toppling of the first domino within the United States ? Arizona. To quote Abraham Lincoln, ?This nation can never be conquered from without. If it is ever to fall it will be from within.?
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
Obama has turned nothing over to the UN. And if you'll bother to read that bag-o-shit you put up, you can see that is the case.

He has not asked the UN to do anything at all, nor has he turned any law enforcement or any other legal action over to the UN.

There is no "call for United Nations intervention."

None. It's a lie. Jan Brewer's lie, J.T. Coyote's lie, and your lie.

And your author, "J.T. Coyote"?

He's a lying bag-o-shit. And he's not a real person either.

So, Lumi. why do you c&p an article written by a fictitious person and which is full of lies?

A.) You're actually that stupid - or -
B.) You intentionally spread lies.

Choose one or both.
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,007
245
63
Jefferson City, Missouri
Duff, are you saying this story is FALSE?

.Brewer condemns report to UN mentioning Ariz. law
Buzz up!190 votes Share
retweet
EmailPrint.. AP ? Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer speaks after winning the Republican gubernatorial nomination in the Arizona primary ? .By JONATHAN J. COOPER, Associated Press Writer Jonathan J. Cooper, Associated Press Writer ? Fri Aug 27, 10:57 pm ET
PHOENIX ? Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer demanded Friday that a reference to the state's controversial immigration law be removed from a State Department report to the United Nations' human rights commissioner.

The U.S. included its legal challenge to the law on a list of ways the federal government is protecting human rights.

In a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Brewer says it is "downright offensive" that a state law would be included in the report, which was drafted as part of a UN review of human rights in all member nations every four years.

"The idea of our own American government submitting the duly enacted laws of a state of the United States to 'review' by the United Nations is internationalism run amok and unconstitutional," Brewer wrote.

Arizona's law generally requires police officer enforcing other laws to investigate the immigration status of people they suspect are illegal immigrants.

Critics say it would lead officers to target Hispanics. Supporters, including Brewer, say the law prohibits racial profiling and other human rights abuses.

The U.S. Justice Department sued to block the measure, arguing federal law trumps the state's authority to enforce immigration laws.

A federal judge in July sided with the Justice Department and blocked enforcement of the law's most controversial provisions a day before it was scheduled to take effect.

In its report, the State Department does not specifically allege that Arizona's law would lead to racial profiling.

"A recent Arizona law, S.B. 1070, has generated significant attention and debate at home and around the world," the report says. "The issue is being addressed in a court action that argues that the federal government has the authority to set and enforce immigration law. That action is ongoing; parts of the law are currently enjoined."

A State Department spokesman had no immediate comment on Brewer's letter.

Brewer, a Republican, is running for election in November. Her popularity in Arizona and her national profile have soared since she signed the immigration measure in April.
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
Wake up, skulnuts, and read the original POS that Lumi put up.


:mfpost



I'm saying this is false. Pay attention-


In an unprecedented act of unconstitutional abridgment and over-reaching presidential power, Barack Obama is poised to call the United Nations Human Rights Council vultures down on the state of Arizona.

and this -

In this report the federal government will turn over to the UN, control of all action regarding Arizona border policy.

and this -

The president?s language suggests the beginnings of sanctions, that could escalate into actions similar to those on Iraq

Those are lies, skulnuts. Lies by Jan Brewer, Lies by the imaginary J.T. Coyote, lies by Lumi.

You got any proof that they are not lies? No? Then you should -

:stfu:
 
Last edited:

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
It's funny watching you get wound up.

All you can do is ride around on your broom and yell and cuss at people. This is when I know the truth has been told and your liberal icon tool has been exposed.
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
It's funny watching you get wound up.

All you can do is ride around on your broom and yell and cuss at people. This is when I know the truth has been told and your liberal icon tool has been exposed.

You post garbage and lies, get called out for doing it, and that's your best defense? Do you have a drinking problem? Just asking.
 

Trench

Turn it up
Forum Member
Mar 8, 2008
3,974
18
0
Mad City, WI
I just did a quick search on J.T. Coyote and found this article. It's off-topic but it's a pretty good article. Maybe J.T. is a real guy Duff? :shrug:

JT Coyote: Our shameful mosque debate
What happened to constitutional rationality?


By J.T. Coyote

If nine years ago, the construction of a Muslim Community Center in lower Manhattan a couple of blocks from the World Trade Center was announced, it may have received a quick voice-over video clip and honorable mention on the local news. Today, however, the news of just such a center proposed there, has garnered top story broadcast status and newspaper headlines across the nation and is reverberating around the world.

The pitch of anti-Muslim sentiment is much greater now than it was in the days, weeks, and even months after 9/11. In the aftermath of the tragedy, news stories flourished of Muslim communities across the nation, shocked and appalled at what a small group of extremist Muslims had done using the name of Islam. In the beginning, even President George Bush quieted any anti-Muslim feelings. Calling Islam the religion of peace, he assured the people that the vast majority of Muslims condemned and were reviled by the actions of this tiny sect of radical and militant Wahhabi extremists.

So, what happened to the constitutional rationality folks exhibited in the early days after 9/11? When did we relinquish our belief in the promise of America, our constitution, specifically the First Amendment, the protection of the minority, principles basic to the foundation of our republic? Has it been a gradual departure, or is it the new wedge issue being foisted, mostly by Republicans seeking ? or wishing to retain ? office this election season.

Former Bush administration official and prominent American-Arab political policy consultant Randa Fahmy Hudome spoke out concerning GOP pundit Newt Gingrich and his recent fear-mongering over possible implementation in America of radical Sharia Law, the law of the extremist Wahhabis. ?I don't know where this is coming from,? she said. ?Did someone actually say, ?I want to impose Sharia law on the United States?'? The answer is no. This is about as likely to happen as the radical interpretation of ancient Biblical law held by the KKK being implemented in America. Mainstream Muslims decry Sharia, in much the same way mainstream Protestants abhor the KKK's radical Biblical interpretations.

Ms. Hudome, and other highly placed Muslim Americans, plan on raising these concerns to the Republican National Committee. The fact that this alienation of the Muslim American voting bloc, which as in the past been primarily conservative in tone, could suffer long-term alienation as a result of the rhetoric coming from high GOP members. Because many highly placed Republicans are failing to see the distinction between Islam as a whole and its tiny extremist elements, the rank-and-file in the Muslim communities are jumping party to become Democrats and independents in droves.

This type of rhetoric, and the anti-Muslim view it engenders, is growing among Republicans and some Democrats as well. The media, to its detriment, are helping to feed this divisive debate, a shameful display of lack of restraint and misuse of its constitutionally protected trust. The media fails to ask itself one very important question ? when was it that the United States went to war with Islam? The answer is simple: We didn't. In light of this simple truth, shouldn't the media be diffusing this debate instead of inciting it on both sides?

The implications of this mosque debate has larger geopolitical ramifications of which people need to be aware. At the very least, to quote New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, ?What is great about America, and particularly New York, is we welcome everybody, and if we are so afraid of something like this, what does that say about us??

Summit County resident JT Coyote also writes for the free speech blog Infowars.com. He can be contacted at momsoldguns@qwest.net.

http://www.summitdaily.com/article/20100828/COLUMNS/100829822/1078&ParentProfile=1055
 

Lumi

LOKI
Forum Member
Aug 30, 2002
21,104
58
0
58
In the shadows
You post garbage and lies, get called out for doing it, and that's your best defense? Do you have a drinking problem? Just asking.

No drinking problem at all, but as per usual, you would belittle someone who does.

Again, you have nothing at all to stand on but name calling and insults.

Really Duff?

What is your major malfunction?

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ULX9W4b8xJs?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ULX9W4b8xJs?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

It's the Hard Heart that kills, and I have been to the Valley of Death and I have returned unscathed. It's also that very same heart that has turned a 180 and I will no longer fight or exchange blows with you and your childish banter.
You can copy and paste this and turn it around to meet your needs, I really don't care.

I copy and paste articles, SO WHAT !


<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mz-9XQL6Ubo?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mz-9XQL6Ubo?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

I notice that you never venture to the Handicapping Forums here ! A large portion of my posts are sports info and I was asked to stop.
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
I just did a quick search on J.T. Coyote and found this article. It's off-topic but it's a pretty good article. Maybe J.T. is a real guy Duff? :shrug:

Well sure, TJC is real in the sense that someone has to write that stuff, but whoever writes it is not named TJC, there is no TJC, In fact it may be that there are many who write as TJC.

It's a pseudonym to cover for one or more people who wish to hide their identity and agenda. In fact the tone and language differences between various TJC articles indicates a minimum of two different authors.

See whether you can find out who TJC really is.
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top