I go to the Doctor, my neighbors are too busy buying ammo and pallets of bottled water....me, I got the toilet paper and booze concession locked down solid...:00hour
Obama vs Putin, why the hatred?
- Thread starter Dead Money
- Start date
I go to the Doctor, my neighbors are too busy buying ammo and pallets of bottled water....me, I got the toilet paper and booze concession locked down solid...:00hour
Actually I have listened to Limbaugh a few times.
I stopped because listening to him gives me diarrhea.
My anus mimics his mouth.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-russia-cyber-vermont-idUSKBN14K01H
Dead Money, looks like our new best friends were up to something.
Dead Money, looks like our new best friends were up to something.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/515qFSXDJx0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
:mj07:
.............................................
Trump - vladimir you said you would not invade Ukraine and embarress me
Putin - Donnie , you said you would trust me to be smart
Trump - but not this way , I am looking like a fool unless I release a nukester on you
Putin - do what you have to do Donnie,,,,,, hahhahahhaahhahaaha
SHHH....don't tell nuts the Washington Post "mis-spoke...":142smilie
Obama's got ZERO proof, other than what the mainstream can concoct from near fantasy to support his last days of impotency....Putin skull-fucked Obama, pure and simple....:0008
You're using the #1 purveyor of fake news as the source!!!! BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! HEEE HAAAAWWWW!
:mj07::mj07::mj07:
So, educate us.......what are your must read sources for unbiased news of the day.?
There's definitely a difference between leaning one way or another, and trying to manipulate the content. When you do this for a living, I'm sure you develop opinions. You can usually tell which way a legitimate source leans when you read the Op-Ed section.
New York Times, Reuters, BBC, the Economist, and The Wall Street Journal are ones I would say are trustworthy. You have to know what your reading because a lot of these sources have sections dedicated to opinion pieces, but they are listed as such because the source doesn't want to get it's actual reporting confused with opinion.
You aren't supposed to like the news, you're supposed to read it and develop a position for yourself. When the "news" comes prepackaged with a position, it's a good sign it is complete shit. Just because reports are made that you wish weren't true doesn't make them untrue or the source untrustworthy. I don't think I watched one day of CBS This Morning where they didn't talk about Clinton's email server, the FBI investigation, or Podesta's emails.....but if you listen to Lowell, he'll tell you they pushed her hard and tried to make Trump look bad. It's fucking ridiculous.
Nothing I say will ever resonate with you, so please continue posting blogs and www.infowars.com articles as if they are valid. They'll keep telling you what you want to hear and convince you that actual news sources are biased and can't be trusted.
http://www.businessinsider.com/here-are-the-most-and-least-trusted-news-outlets-in-america-2014-10
http://www.poynter.org/2012/pew-tv-...tal-news-consumption-tops-print-radio/189819/
Guess you were not watching Charlie Rose broadcast on 9/13/16 when he edited Bill Clinton's comments the Hillary had "frequently" passed out before.
Haven't watched CBS since that liar Rather was on the air.
I hate to shit on your point, but here goes.....the segment ran in its entirety on CBS This Morning and on CBSN but was shortened up for an evening run. CBS said they shortened it up because of time constraints. Had they not already ran the full thing, maybe you would have a point, but they already ran it more than once.
You are free to look up stuff like this too. I am always interested in what you guys come up with but it always seems to be wrong or strongly manipulated, as with this example. This won't resonate with you one bit because you want to believe what the right wing spin machine is feeding you, that the "MSM" is pulling one over on you. You won't comment on being wrong because there's nothing in it for you.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...iew-was-done-for-time/?utm_term=.314085a88f31
Poor Gary, the MSM was getting their work APPROVED by the CLINTON MACHINE and he still thinks they're credible.
:142smilie
:142smilie
The truth is, you Republicans DID have some not-so-terrible candidates: Jeb, Kasich, Graham.
But you knee-jerk 80 IQ dolts chose Drumph. And yes, that is his real name.
So now we're fucked. You, me, and every other citizen, illegal immigrant and Native American in this country.
I hope you like taking it up the ass, because that's what all of us are going to get for the next four years.
Unless a sniper gets Drumph, and then it'll be Pence, who is, actually, even dumber than Drumph.
Washington Post retracts story about Russian hack at Vermont utility
By Aaron Short
Russian hacking code detected in Vermont electrical system
The Washington Post has retracted its story about Russian hackers penetrating the nation?s electricity grid with a virus found in a Burlington, Vt., electric company laptop.
?Authorities say there is no indication of that so far [that Russians had penetrated the US electric grid],? according to an editor?s note attached to a corrected version of the story on the paper?s Web site.
?The computer at Burlington Electric that was hacked was not attached to the grid,? the editor?s note read.
News of the supposed hack had set off a firestorm of recriminations, with Vermont leaders calling Russian President Vladimir Putin ?a thug? earlier Saturday, after one of the state?s electric utilities found a virus on a laptop computer.
A utility spokesman has also told the Burlington Free Press the laptop was not hooked into the grid.
By Aaron Short
Russian hacking code detected in Vermont electrical system
The Washington Post has retracted its story about Russian hackers penetrating the nation?s electricity grid with a virus found in a Burlington, Vt., electric company laptop.
?Authorities say there is no indication of that so far [that Russians had penetrated the US electric grid],? according to an editor?s note attached to a corrected version of the story on the paper?s Web site.
?The computer at Burlington Electric that was hacked was not attached to the grid,? the editor?s note read.
News of the supposed hack had set off a firestorm of recriminations, with Vermont leaders calling Russian President Vladimir Putin ?a thug? earlier Saturday, after one of the state?s electric utilities found a virus on a laptop computer.
A utility spokesman has also told the Burlington Free Press the laptop was not hooked into the grid.
Isn't it amazing how she approved those daily stories about her and her personal email server, Podesta's emails, her health concerns, etc.? She must have been crazy! LMAO, you're so gullible. Keep getting your news from Infowars.com :mj07::mj07::mj07:
Did they update the story to say that the computer was not attached to the power grid or did they take the story down? There's a big difference. I do like how the right wing machine is labeling this as Fake News to help muddy the waters.
By the way, I read the comments section on infowars. Lots of duped people, lol. They all say they they only get their news from places they trust, like Breitbart and Infowars, LMAO. No wonder Trump one. Lots of really dumb, gullible people.
Has infowars.com updated or taken down their stories about "Pizzagate"? :shrug:
An Electric Utility computer was hacked by the Russians. That computer was not attached to the grid.
Is that too complex for you to understand?
