I lost a few bets in a row in the last 2 hrs and am gun shy. Was gonna take LAL -5 2nd half for 1k to recoup; seemed simple and Mil is in SERIOUS foul trouble with key players in 1st half and lo and behold, more foul trouble and LAL up 25-12 in 1st 8 min of 3rd qtr.... And fouls are Mil 6 and LAL 4.... Fisher looks like he is playing with a Jazz shirt on and playing for Golden State. 7 for 10 and a chitload of those are 3s!!!! Blowout city!
Of course....
- Thread starter Theboundbook
- Start date
SKILES BET LAKETS SECOND HALF BENCHING THE STARTERS FOR THE WHOLE SECOND HALF CAN IT BE MORE OBVIOUS!:mj07: :mj07: :mj07:
Didn't bet the game or any NBA game today, but there has never been any more evidence of a fixed game that I can recall than for Milwaukee to get that game cover. Lakers betters got hosed, but its scripted anyway, so it doesn't matter......but Milwaukee was given that cover......it was really obvious, but most people don't see it.
gl
gl
I remember reading somewhere last year, that if the first half total was 'under' in the first half of a home game for the lakers, take the 'over' in the second half.
Low and behold, 75 points in the first half and 123 in the second
Low and behold, 75 points in the first half and 123 in the second
Glad I didnt..... LAL stop playing to NOT COVER again and why I didnt hit the over after that 1st half giggling under..... wow 123 pts 2nd half, to 74 pts 1st half...... (still went under overall, but what an easy over 2nd half....)
LAL has always been "so good or good enough" to insure a win when they want it, AND cover or not cover by shaving points at the end AND/OR making buckets to cover when they need it..... Yep, scripted..... I know everyone loves to say bs, blah blah blah..... NBA refs busted, (think they got jobs in the NFL this year), people shooting 14-14 FT's suddenly miss 5 of 6 to cover at then end? And no fix? Come on..... (the statements above are the opinion of a drunk boundbook and should be used accordingly)
I couldn't agree with you guys anymore. What a joke of a finish. I've always been suspicious of the timeout that gets called right around the two-minute mark of the 4th q (regardless of score). What's that all about??? Maybe a quick phone call, followed by a message to play hard or back it off. I'm convinced the Lakers laid down last night. Fix or not, somebody told them win by 14 or less, because it was very obvious.
