I just looked at schedules -- compared wins and losses of OU to Duke, Kansas, Maryland, and Cincy and am more impressed with what OU did than any other team. Yes even Kansas. OU beat better teams, and had more respectable losses than did Kansas. Maybe the margin was not as big, but W's and L's are what counts -- and where those W's and L's occur. Same goes when comparing them to the other number one seeds. Take a look at their seasons and let me know what ya'll think.
Oklahoma should be #1 seed of tournament
- Thread starter dr. freeze
- Start date
- Feb 26, 2001
- 13,593
- 164
- 63
Personally I hate OU, but they did get fuked. No way they should be seeded below Cincinnati. I felt as long as they did not get blown out today they deserved that #1. However, not really sure it matters. If anyone should be upset its Gonzaga. Talk about no respect. I wish those Gonzaga boys would have given the selection committee the big :thefinger live on ESPN.
Personally I agree with Ok being a 2. You make a convincing argument and the seedings committee did reward them by putting them against the weakest 1 seed. That said I have Cincy coming out of the west.
