One Very Strong Final 4 Play

[Mully]

UNDER 133 Florida/Mason

The Gators haven't allowed a tourney competitor to score more than 62 points. G Mason has one hell of a defense as well giving up 65 points or less this tournament with the lone exception being Uconn in O.T. This number is about 8 points too high in my opinion and this will be my strongest play today.


Going to stay away from either side today. If I had to bet one, I would take UCLA m/l. I will however play the total...

Over 123 LSU/UCLA - small play , upgraded to a very strong play


This should be a great game right down to the wire. This line opened at 125 and even with close to 70 % on the over this line has been on a steady decrease. Some final minute fouls and made ft's should put this over the top.

ytd 75-59-3

Good Luck Gentlemen....

 

[Mully]

2nd half

2nd half

UNDER 70 Fla/Mason


Good Luck Gentlemen...

 

[skufft]

Thank you Mully and thank you offensive rebounding!

 

[gman2]

game should have never been anywhere near 130 points. good capping mully.

 

[Mully]

game should have never been anywhere near 130 points. good capping mully.

Thanks G man.

 

[gjn23]

close one

7 points in 2:50....thought it was sailing over.....a fla 2 min possesson sealed the deal when gm decided not to foul and couldnt grab a board

 

[gman2]

close one

7 points in 2:50....thought it was sailing over.....a fla 2 min possesson sealed the deal when gm decided not to foul and couldnt grab a board

the last 10:00 was bizarre. around the 12:00 media timeout, they needed to play at a 160-point pace to get it over the number. amazingly, they almost did. and for once, a coach actually showed good judgement in not hacking away with they were down DD with 2:00 left. though naturally skinn got his 3rd technical in the last month and that nearly blew the total. game was dead set to land in the high hundred-teens or low 120s and then a late scoring explosion almost derailed everything.

 

[gjn23]

i didnt understand that one

thought they called a tech on both players

why did gm shoot 2 techs but fla did not?

fla's 2 ft's were because gm was in the penalty

 

[gman2]

i didnt understand that one

thought they called a tech on both players

why did gm shoot 2 techs but fla did not?

fla's 2 ft's were because gm was in the penalty

thats what i thought too. if im not mistaken, its a weird rule that is open to interpretation by the refs. they can give double techs and award no free throws. or they can have both teams shoot 2 free throws. i know the same kind of situaton came up in the duke/bc acc final. both teams shot free throws and it made for 6 points without the clock moving. but in this case, im with you - i thought they called techs on both so i was expecting 2 gmu free throws, then 2 uf free throws, and then the 2 free throws for the foul itself (or 1/1, whatever they were in)

 

[gjn23]

that's what i thought

6 ft's

or

2 for fla being in the bonus (there was a personal called on skinn)

strange????

unless cbs had it wrong and there was no technical on greene

 

[Mully]

UCLA total upgraded to Very Strong

now 123

 

[vinnie]

that's why I never use the volume I refused to listen to those stupid fuks calling the games :mj07:

 

[Mully]

LSU/UCLA 2nd half

LSU/UCLA 2nd half

Over 67

:nono: not twice in one night.

Good Luck Gentlemen....