New Mexico may have been the right team to play in this game, but I question the inside information Raymond claimed to have. How can the game mean much to NM, when they allow less than their best kicker to kick the extra point, especially knowing how much they have been struggling on offense.
New Mexico may have been the right play, but their offense is incapable of scoring against UCLA, and that had to be obvious.
But, of course, I bet more than I usually do and more than I should have, and, of course, that almost always leads to disaster.
Raymond, thanks for the advice. But I should know better than to treat it as anything other than it is: One man's opinion.