Pa. judges accused of jailing kids for cash

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
Pa. judges accused of jailing kids for cash
Judges allegedly took $2.6 million in payoffs to put juveniles in lockups

Matt Rourke / AP
Hillary Transue, who was sentenced to a wilderness camp for building a spoof MySpace page that lampooned her assistant principal in White Haven, Pa., on Friday. Transue says she did not have an attorney, nor was she informed of her right to one, when she was sentenced by Luzerne County Judge Mark Ciavarella.


updated 8:56 p.m. ET, Wed., Feb. 11, 2009
WILKES-BARRE, Pa. - For years, the juvenile court system in Wilkes-Barre operated like a conveyor belt: Youngsters were brought before judges without a lawyer, given hearings that lasted only a minute or two, and then sent off to juvenile prison for months for minor offenses.

The explanation, prosecutors say, was corruption on the bench.

In one of the most shocking cases of courtroom graft on record, two Pennsylvania judges have been charged with taking millions of dollars in kickbacks to send teenagers to two privately run youth detention centers.


?I?ve never encountered, and I don?t think that we will in our lifetimes, a case where literally thousands of kids? lives were just tossed aside in order for a couple of judges to make some money,? said Marsha Levick, an attorney with the Philadelphia-based Juvenile Law Center, which is representing hundreds of youths sentenced in Wilkes-Barre.

Prosecutors say Luzerne County Judges Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan took $2.6 million in payoffs to put juvenile offenders in lockups run by PA Child Care LLC and a sister company, Western PA Child Care LLC. The judges were charged on Jan. 26 and removed from the bench by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court shortly afterward.

No company officials have been charged, but the investigation is still going on.

The high court, meanwhile, is looking into whether hundreds or even thousands of sentences should be overturned and the juveniles? records expunged.

Among the offenders were teenagers who were locked up for months for stealing loose change from cars, writing a prank note and possessing drug paraphernalia. Many had never been in trouble before. Some were imprisoned even after probation officers recommended against it.

Many appeared without lawyers, despite the U.S. Supreme Court?s landmark 1967 ruling that children have a constitutional right to counsel.

'I have disgraced my judgeship'
The judges are scheduled to plead guilty to fraud Thursday in federal court. Their plea agreements call for sentences of more than seven years behind bars.

Ciavarella, 58, who presided over Luzerne County?s juvenile court for 12 years, acknowledged last week in a letter to his former colleagues, ?I have disgraced my judgeship. My actions have destroyed everything I worked to accomplish and I have only myself to blame.? Ciavarella, though, has denied he got kickbacks for sending youths to prison.

Conahan, 56, has remained silent about the case.

Many Pennsylvania counties contract with privately run juvenile detention centers, paying them either a fixed overall fee or a certain amount per youth, per day.


In Luzerne County, prosecutors say, Conahan shut down the county-run juvenile prison in 2002 and helped the two companies secure rich contracts worth tens of millions of dollars, at least some of that dependent on how many juveniles were locked up.

One of the contracts ? a 20-year agreement with PA Child Care worth an estimated $58 million ? was later canceled by the county as exorbitant.

The judges are accused of taking payoffs between 2003 and 2006.

Allegations of extortion
Robert J. Powell co-owned PA Child Care and Western PA Child Care until June. His attorney, Mark Sheppard, said his client was the victim of an extortion scheme.

?Bob Powell never solicited a nickel from these judges and really was a victim of their demands,? he said. ?These judges made it very plain to Mr. Powell that he was going to be required to pay certain monies.?

For years, youth advocacy groups complained that Ciavarella was ridiculously harsh and ran roughshod over youngsters? constitutional rights. Ciavarella sent a quarter of his juvenile defendants to detention centers from 2002 to 2006, compared with a statewide rate of one in 10.

The criminal charges confirmed the advocacy groups? worst suspicions and have called into question all the sentences he pronounced.

Hillary Transue did not have an attorney, nor was she told of her right to one, when she appeared in Ciavarella?s courtroom in 2007 for building a MySpace page that lampooned her assistant principal.

Her mother, Laurene Transue, worked for 16 years in the child services department of another county and said she was certain Hillary would get a slap on the wrist. Instead, Ciavarella sentenced her to three months; she got out after a month, with help from a lawyer.

?I felt so disgraced for a while, like, what do people think of me now?? said Hillary, now 17 and a high school senior who plans to become an English teacher

'I was completely destroyed'
Laurene Transue said Ciavarella ?was playing God. And not only was he doing that, he was getting money for it. He was betraying the trust put in him to do what is best for children.?

Kurt Kruger, now 22, had never been in trouble with the law until the day police accused him of acting as a lookout while his friend shoplifted less than $200 worth of DVDs from Wal-Mart. He said he didn?t know his friend was going to steal anything.

Kruger pleaded guilty before Ciavarella and spent three days in a company-run juvenile detention center, plus four months at a youth wilderness camp run by a different operator.

?Never in a million years did I think that I would actually get sent away. I was completely destroyed,? said Kruger, who later dropped out of school. He said he wants to get his record expunged, earn his high school equivalency diploma and go to college.

?I got a raw deal, and yeah, it?s not fair,? he said, ?but now it?s 100 times bigger than me.?

.............................................................

corruption at the highest levels .

We got to root this shit out .

damn crooked bastids all the time
 
Last edited:

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,497
260
83
Victory Lane
The Audacity of DopeCould legal marijuana save California?s economy?
By Jeff Segal
Posted Wednesday, February 11, 2009 - 10:36am

Olympic swimmer Michael Phelps has made marijuana a popular topic. He was photographed smoking from a bong, lost corporate sponsorships, and was suspended from the sport as a result. But celebrities aren't the only ones thinking about dope.

Some legislators in California have pot on their minds, too. That's because the government of the biggest economy in the United States is facing a massive budget deficit whose pain would be alleviated by decriminalizing marijuana.

California's current deficit stands at a whopping $15 billion and is expected to reach $42 billion next year. And the state run by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has virtually run out of cash. It recently delayed $3.5 billion of payments to taxpayers and counties.

While nearly all U.S. states currently face budget shortfalls, California's deficit is more than one-third of its general fund. That's largely due to its dependence on income taxes, which slide during a recession. And the state can't easily borrow due to the government bond-market freeze. Moody's even warned it may downgrade the state's rating.

There's no easy fix to the problem, as any solution likely requires cutting benefits and social services?tough political choices for Schwarzenegger. But the state does have an abundant natural resource it may be able to draw on for help.

Marijuana is California's largest cash crop. It's valued at $14 billion annually, or nearly twice the value of the state's grape and vegetable crops combined, according to government statistics. Indeed, a recent report pegged marijuana as two-thirds of the economy of Mendocino County, a ganja hotbed north of San Francisco. That's not surprising?it costs $400 to grow a pound of pot that can sell for $6,000 on the street.

But the state doesn't receive any revenue from its cash cow. Instead, it spends billions of dollars enforcing laws pegged at shutting down the industry and inhibiting marijuana's adherents. Of course, there's a reason for that. Marijuana's social costs may include addiction and rehabilitation treatment and lost productivity. Yet these are minute compared with the extensive social costs of alcohol or tobacco.

Of course, just legalizing pot wouldn't automatically harvest revenues for the state. An organized system of regulating sales and collecting taxes would need implementing. And it's possible that general drug use could rise, though the debate that pot is a gateway drug to harder substances is inconclusive.

There's also the question of whether or not taxing marijuana would simply create a black market that would again skimp the state on taxes. The best corollaries here are cigarettes and alcohol. Rises in "sin taxes" on them have decreased consumption?a positive?but don't seem to have destabilized the legal market. Decriminalization could lead to some job losses in law enforcement, though the countervailing argument would see these forces put to work stopping harder crime.

So what are the numbers? A national legalization effort would save nearly $13 billion annually in enforcement costs and bring in $7 billion in yearly tax revenues, according to a study by Harvard University economist Jeffrey Miron. Since California represents 13 percent of the U.S. economy, those numbers suggest the state could save $1.7 billion in enforcement costs and nab up to $1 billion in revenues. That doesn't include any indirect revenues as, for example, rural farming communities grow or marijuana tourism, which has been lucrative for the Netherlands, takes off.

Put it all together, and California could potentially wipe some $3 billion off its budget deficit by letting its people puff and pay. That still leaves it with a gaping $39 billion hole to fill, so the state's problems go far beyond what a new cash crop can fix. But anything to help soothe the state's chronic fiscal pain?even if unpalatable to some?is worth considering.

More Like This

Richard Beales imagined a plea to legalize pot as part of a larger appeal from hedge fund managers to investors. Chadwick Matlin looked at Arnold Schwarzenegger's and California's fiscal troubles in Bailout 2: Judgment Day. Mark Gimein hoped that Meg Whitman would decide against running for governor of California, because she'd be a bad choice.


Among the many virtues of industrial hemp as a farming commodity is its usage as a phytoremediation crop in cleaning contaminated soils. It continues to be used in the areas around Chernobyl to clean up nuclear contamination. Parts of the central valley in California are so contaminated with selinium that nothing will grow, and in the past birds around Kesterson Reservoir have given birth to deformed offspring. Hemp could be used to bring back ag land that is not producing anything now. Planting hemp as a crop rotation choice has proven to enhance wheat yields in Canada by up to 25%, and it absorbs 4 times the amount of CO2 that trees do. If you support legalizing industrial hemp, contact your legislators and voice your support for the following bills currently being considered. Your vocal support will help disprove that pot smokers are lazy, spaced out, and unmotivated. Activism is a gateway drug to better representation and an improved environment. HB 305 in Hawaii SB 131 in Kentucky SJ20 in Montana HB 399 in New Hampshire HF 0608 in Minnesota HB 403 & SB 377 in New Mexico HB 1549 & HCR 3026 in North Dakota

Legalize & Wakeup
People are inherently nuts. That's why we spend billions of dollars trying to stop mariuana sales, transport, and use. Murderers get out of prison in 4 years, and someone transporting 5 pounds of pot gets 20 years. If pot is a "gateway drug" then hard liquor is - without a doubt. It should be regulated, just like any other intoxicating substance - but when are we going to quit wasting time? Like the MSN article on Slate says - "mariuana is California's largest cash crop". But, like dummies - we don't want the revenue, we want to let all of the criminals have it. Criminals do bad things, and shouldn't have any money - they will just use it to buy guns that they shouldn't have. Come on - pot is worse than a bottle of Jack Daniels or Crown Royal? I don't think so. With a few drinks - people die. A few hits, people have fun and live. With all of this stuff - moderation and maturity is the key. Lets create more jobs throughout industry and take the revenue away from the criminals.

Submitted by io_RobbieRodgers on Sun, 02/15/2009 - 3:26pm.
Ignorance is the tool of Authority
I have to strongly disagree with the gentleman before me who stated he lost a generation of his life to pot, and the others who say the cost of rehabilitating a pot-smoker is too great. Sir, you lost 20 years of your life because you were a lazy cretin. It's ok, I myself was a lazy cretin for most of my life, even without pot. You using the arguement that it was the pot that made you lazy is weak, and also MALICIOUS because your arguement is adding to the propaganda that is keeping this relatively harmless substance banned. More americans die every year from stuffing their fat faces with cake than from incidents even indirectly influenced by marijuana (Excluding marijuana-crime related incidents, which only occur because it's illegal, which of course would mostly end when it is legalized, and I say when of course, because your ignorant generations of simpletons who are ruining the future of the future generations are going to be dead and buried sooner or later). In addition, I have never seen anyone truly addicted to pot. I have had many friends who have used marijuana every day from a very young age, and quit abruptly recently because of the economic downturn. They cannot afford to smoke anymore, so they have done the responsible thing and either quit or curb their use. They have not sold their TVs. They have not committed crimes to continue their habits. They don't beg their parents for money (though recently I have had to so that I could afford to eat a 99 cent taco from jack-in-the-box once a day to keep myself alive. Yes, I have a job by the way. It pays 7.50 an hour. I work a full 40 hours a week. I pay water, electricity, and rent, and I still go hungry some days. I get sick of hearing people complain about this economy when they still have working cell phones. Back on track. In summary, Marijuana addiction occurs about as often as the newfangled "Infant Addiction", where mothers keep having children because they always want a newborn to hold. These addictions likely operate on the same level: a psychological addiction, not a physical one. As we all know there are some people who cannot control themselves. I doubt however, there will come a day when someone with newborn-addiction will cause a law to be passed preventing people to have kids. Thank you internet for listening.

Submitted by MichaelbinCA on Sun, 02/15/2009 - 3:08pm.
What then?
Legalization would create other social issues. How would the authorities make their cut? Do you want poor police? It's getting so that........

Submitted by MichaelbinCA on Sun, 02/15/2009 - 2:51pm.
Anything can be legalized.
Man's laws can be created to suit man. What is needed is money. Money is regulated. Why? So, that the regulator has power. This is the only way that they can function. Without it, the administrative mind is far more dangerous that with it. So, there are 2 choices. Rid the planet of the administrative mind OR give them the money to control. Little bits and pieces of control are not the answer. It's an all or nothing issue.

Legalization of pot makes as much sense as allowing the stock market to be affected by such things as Oprah's weight.

Subjectivity has to go.

".....and you shall know them by their fruits...." Jesus Christ circa 25 AD.
Login or register to post comments
Submitted by bmestep on Sun, 02/15/2009 - 2:49pm.
Marijuana
Why is there such a paranoia of pot? It was not a gateway drug in my case. Tobacco and alcohol came before that for me and even before that it was food to escape this world and its problems.In fact marijuana changed my outlook on life and rid me of the desire to commit suicide,- the ultimate escape. Serving our country in its fiasco and first military defeat in war, Vietnam had some of the best marijuana known to hippie mankind. I became a hippie in uniform and lost my desire to hurt and kill. In fact marijuana opened my eyes to the amazing natural beauty of life and it enhanced every action of my life. When I was HIGH I was highter in my consciousness and my senses were sharpened to the point that I was able to be happy and see the positive aspects of every thing I encountered. I wanted to live like never before and also it taught me what was truly important in life. It taught me that love was the most important thing in life and that hatred and strife was something to be avoided and not embraced. Suddenly all human life was valuable- as well as all of creation. I became hip to the truth of life. Life was meant to be enjoyed and we were meant to live and let live in peace and to be satisfied with what I had been given. My inner eyes were open to the hidden beauty of life and that I needed nothing but my own few physical needs. I saw all men as brothers and that war,-any war- was stupid and foolish. Marijuana made me ask the question why we were at war. The people we were fighting to protect were really not interested in politics or government. They just wanted to live and let live. They wanted to grow their rice and crops and have families and prosper in peace but just like us the war was forced upon them. The common people were told they had to choose to be capitalistic or communism and either choice they made made them an enemy to the other. Talk about catch 22. I was not the only one whose eyes were opened. That is why there was such a protest against the war. Marijuana did not kill one person in Vietnam. I did go on to other drugs, but that tendency started with nicotine and alcohol and cough syrup as a teen for me. Since the time I started my escape, from the world I was forced to partake in, which I really thought I needed to escape from, I have done just about every drug there is to abuse.I never liked any on them more than marijuana. It was the least addictive of all and the least harmful to my personality. I never wanted to harm anyone or fight anyone ar steal to support my habit. In fact I grew my own as much as possible and did not support the drug cartels that way.
Alcohol always made me violent without using marijuana with it. All the other drugs either made me sick or paranoid or steal to support my habit. Marijuana does nothing but enhance whatever it is you are doing and makes it much more enjoyable. It can also help pain tolerance and depression.
In fact, marijuana makes one look for other reasons to live and other answers than the status quo. It makes the pursuit of wealth and power meaningless. It makes you more focused on the world without and the needs and cares of others. It makes music better, food taste better, and sex more enjoyable. It makes a person more personable and less likely to do harm to others.
So why is marijuana so feared? Because it opens the eyes of the user to the folly of greed and control. It opens peoples minds to the unseen reality of life and love and the brotherhood of mankind. In this world of economic pursuit, marijuana is a threat to the idea that prosperity at the cost of others poverty is the ultimate goal of evolutional theory of only the strong survive. Marijuana teaches the soul that all life is precious and that we should cooperate with each other and not compete with each other. Even nature teaches that cooperation is necessary for survival of the race. We are creatures that are herd dwellers like other mammals. Look at a hive of bees or a colony of aunts. Could they survive as a species if they all did whatever they wanted to do? They must surrender their desires to that of the good of the entire colony. So should we. Marijuana puts one into that mindset. Maijuana also has many other uses as well and could even help with the energy crisis. So the government has outlawed something that is less harmful in favor of legalizing something much more harmful.
Login or register to post comments
Submitted by one of us on Sun, 02/15/2009 - 2:41pm.
Legalize it
Only if the alcohol and tobacco companies allow it!
their lobbiest's are among some of the best, the government permits a product that is poison enhanced, addiction enhanced and kills people, cost the population billions of dollars in lost time and illness related issues. but yet we cannot get a product that has shown assistance in chemo related problems, has showen to have an effect against lung cancer, promotes eating, and reduces violence, when was the last time you heard of someone under the influance of pot shooting someone, or beating them to death or even strong arguments ...
It is about time we catch up to Europe and get a reality check, it is not government, it is BIG INDUSTRY, look at the dollars alcohol and tobacco take in each year, and then tell me why we cannot get it legalized, the big companies cannot controll it, little growers can supply their friends and neighbours and still pay taxes and make a profit.
Slam on the breaks against alchol lets see what happens.

Submitted by edenine on Sun, 02/15/2009 - 2:32pm.
marijauana saving california
Legalization is a good idea, but the problem is that the government already makes too much from keeping substances illegal. Think of the legal system; judges, clerks, attorneys all who depend on criminal enterprise for their livelihood. Also, the equation must include law enforcement: police officers, jailers, prison workers who depend on there being people who run afoul of our current laws. These people are a great portion of those who help to create laws, do you really think they will allow legislation to put them out of work?

Submitted by hoanagain on Sun, 02/15/2009 - 2:16pm.
California
California is going bankrupt because of the Democrat Legislature and Republican In Name Only Governor Schwarzenneger. Arnold is referred to as Blockhead locally. He was hired to keep the budget balanced but always has an excuse not to. Favorite excuse is the schools.

Money is not the problem with the schools in California or the nation. Attitude and refusal to live within their means is the school problem as is all government's.

Legalizing Obama's favorite weed would be a disaster not only for California but also the country.

Submitted by MNO on Sun, 02/15/2009 - 1:54pm.
Legalization of Marijuana
I hope this happens. I for one have been angry for a while that taxpayer money has been spent in law enforcement of marijuana and would like to see it legalized AND taxed. There is so much revenue to be made. Also legalization might bring an end to the ridiculous and dangerously high levels of THC additives, which are having a negative effect on the mental health of long term users, as it would hopefully subject the commodity to review by the Food and Drug Administration, which could then limit the levels of THC additive in the product.

Also with regard to Michael Phelps I feel sorry for him. I want to know where the same lynch mob was when the Mayor of Washington DC was caught with dope. If Michael Phelps could be sanctioned by a national sports authority how is it that Mayor Berry has suffered no sanctions and still holds his office? I really hate to say this but it's not because of his race is it? I hope not.
..............................................................

arnold could get stoned and solve his deficit problems .

seems simple enough
 

buddy

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 21, 2000
10,897
85
0
Pittsburgh, Pa.
Detention scheme was lucrative, harmful

Sunday, February 15, 2009
By Tracie Mauriello, Post-Gazette Staff Writer
Pamela Suchy/Times Tribune

judges5_500.jpg

Luzerne County judges Mark A. Ciavarella, center, and Michael T. Conahan, far left, leave the William J. Nealon Federal Building and United States Courthouse in Scranton on Thursday after pleading guilty to corruption charges.

Jesse Miers says he wanted to do the right thing when he tried to return a stolen gun after seeing a friend's 13-year-old brother wave it around.

Instead, the 17-year-old ended up in shackles on his way to a Butler County juvenile facility -- 270 miles away from his home in Luzerne County.

The judge who sentenced him last year pleaded guilty Thursday to fraud and tax charges in connection with a scheme to take $2.6 million in kickbacks from developers of two juvenile facilities, including Western Pennsylvania Child Care, where Mr. Miers was sent.

"I had maybe 45 seconds in front of [former Luzerne County President Judge Mark A. Ciavarella]," said Mr. Miers, now 19. "He just said 'Remand him,' and they put me in shackles. I was shackled for 13 hours while I waited for them to take me" in a van from the Luzerne County Court House to the juvenile detention center in Allegheny Township, Butler County.

Judge Ciavarella and a co-conspirator, former Luzerne County Senior Judge Michael T. Conahan, agreed in their plea deal to serve a little more than 7 years in prison and to be disbarred.

Federal investigators said they sentenced children to juvenile detention centers in which they had financial interests, and at times did so against probation officers' recommendations and without the children having legal representation.

Federal investigators say the arrangements with the judges were worth tens of millions of dollars to the two centers, which billed county governments for children sent there.

Western Pennsylvania Child Care and Pennsylvania Child Care in Pittston, Luzerne County, are owned by Greg Zappala, brother of Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. and son of former state Supreme Court Chief Justice Stephen A. Zappala Sr.

Dan Fee, a spokesman for Greg Zappala, said Mr. Zappala had no knowledge of the payments to the judges. Mr. Zappala has not been accused of any wrongdoing and is not a target of the investigation, according to a source close to the federal probe.

Attorneys for Mr. Zappala's former partner in the centers, Hazleton attorney Robert Powell, have said Mr. Powell made payments to the Luzerne judges. But they also called Mr. Powell a victim of extortion, and said he ultimately reported the shakedown to authorities.

Also, the federal complaint against the judges describes an unnamed contractor who built the centers as a second provider of alleged kickbacks. Other court records, including documents in two civil lawsuits filed Friday by families of some of the juveniles sentenced in Luzerne County, identify that contractor as Robert Mericle of Mericle Construction in Wilkes-Barre.

A call to Mericle Construction was not returned Friday. Mr. Mericle has not been charged in the case.

The Juvenile Law Center, a Philadelphia advocacy group working on behalf of another group of families, said as many as 2,000 children may have been harmed by the judges' scheme.

Mr. Miers is one of them. His story:

With his home life unstable, he was living on his own at age 16. At 17, he was evicted from his apartment because his paychecks from a tire shop weren't enough to pay the rent. He moved in with the family of a friend.

The friend's younger brother "started telling me about a gun he had and how he was threatening another kid with it. I told him he's going to get in a lot of trouble if he gets caught with it or if somebody gets hurt," Mr. Miers recalled in an interview last week.

After learning how the boy had obtained the gun, Mr. Miers said he tried to return it to the owner's home the next morning before he went to work. But no one answered the door, so he continued on to his job and called an older cousin to ask for advice.

"I didn't know nothing about guns and I was scared because a couple people I know got killed. My friend ... got shot in the face with a gun," he said. "I couldn't just throw it on the side of the road for somebody to find it."

Mr. Miers said his boss overheard the phone call and confronted him about the gun.

"I immediately pulled it out of my pocket and handed it to him. When I gave him that gun, I felt like the whole weight of the world was lifted from my shoulders," Mr. Miers said.

The boss turned over the handgun to police. Mr. Miers, who lost his job a short time later for coming in late too often, said he heard no more about it.

A year later, he said he was a passenger in a car that police pulled over for a motor vehicle violation.

"They ended up running my name, and they tell me there's a warrant out for my arrest," he said.

Charged with receiving stolen property, Mr. Miers was taken to the Pennsylvania Child Care center in nearby Pittston to await a hearing a week later before Judge Ciavarella.

Although he was 18 by then, Mr. Miers was tried as a juvenile because the gun incident occurred when he was 17.

He said he requested a public defender to represent him, but none showed up for his court date. Judge Ciavarella proceeded with the hearing, despite a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in 1967 that children have a constitutional right to legal representation.

"That's not news to anybody who works in the law, least of all judges," said Marsha Levick, deputy director and chief counsel for the Juvenile Law Center. "The fact that you could have a juvenile court judge routinely and consistently allowing children to appear before him without counsel is just stunning."

She said she believes the judges would have sentenced young defendants more fairly if attorneys had been present to advise the youths, raise objections and protect their interests.

Mr. Miers said he'd heard Judge Ciavarella had a reputation for disposing of cases quickly, often without letting defendants speak, so he asked court officials to let him write a letter.

"I wanted to state my case, but they only gave me five minutes to write it, and the judge didn't even read it anyway" before sending him away, he said.

Court officials told Mr. Miers the beds at Pennsylvania Child Care, where he had awaited trial, were allotted to other juveniles so he would be sent somewhere else.

That was Western Pennsylvania Child Care, the Zappala-owned center in Butler County -- a five-hour drive from his home. By the time a van arrived from Butler County to pick him up, he had been in shackles for almost 13 hours, he said.

"These judges were lining their pockets at the expense of children by making placement decisions, not in the child's best interest, but in the judges' best interest," Ms. Levick said.

Records show that in 2004 -- Pennsylvania Child Care's first full year of operation -- Luzerne County spent $2.9 million to incarcerate juveniles at various detention centers and boot camps throughout the state, including Mr. Zappala's centers.

That's more than double the amount the county spent in 2002, the year before Pennsylvania Child Care opened. A breakdown of the amount spent by Luzerne County at each center where its juveniles were incarcerated was not immediately available.

Statewide, spending on juvenile detention increased 15 percent during the same time period, according to the state Department of Public Welfare, which reimburses counties for half of their costs for juvenile incarceration.

In many cases, Luzerne County judges handed down harsh sentences to children with no prior records who had committed minor violations, Ms. Levick said.

A 17-year-old who stole a $4 bottle of nutmeg appeared without a lawyer before Judge Ciavarella. He ended up spending more than seven months at three different detention facilities, including Pennsylvania Child Care and Western Pennsylvania Child Care.

"These are situations that never, ever should have crossed the threshold of juvenile detention," Ms. Levick said.

"I have a 17-year-old daughter, and it's traumatizing to think about my child at age 14, 15 or 16 being whisked away to a detention center, being out of contact for days except for a five-minute phone call and her being surrounded by strangers. It's incredibly traumatic, and the travesty is that in Luzerne, it happened to so many kids."

Butler County judges in December stopped sending children to Western Pennsylvania Child Care, which they had been using since it opened in 2005. It was more expensive than other facilities that provided comparable services, said Deputy Court Administrator Tom Holman.

Because of the controversy over Luzerne County's juvenile placements, Allegheny County also has temporarily stopped referring children to the two Zappala facilities while it reviews placements there, county probation director James Rieland said.

Of more than 350 Allegheny County children in juvenile facilities, seven are at Western Pennsylvania Child Care and one is at Pennsylvania Child Care.

"What has happened with the judges' situation in Luzerne County does not seem to have impacted the quality of the programming delivered, but we do want to review the running of the program and make sure kids are safe," Mr. Rieland said.

Although his office prosecuted cases that resulted in children being sent to his brother's facilities, District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. did not participate in them, Mr. Rieland said.

The state Supreme Court is reviewing all juvenile cases heard in Luzerne County since 2003 to see if sentences should be overturned, if new hearings should be held or if records should be expunged.

That won't change the harm done to children who already have served detention sentences, according to the Juvenile Law Center.

"Any disruption in a kid's life is traumatic and psychologically harmful. Lives really get affected by having a juvenile record and having been incarcerated," said Bob Schwartz, the center's executive director. "The psychological effects of having been labeled an offender is something these kids will deal with over time."

Among them is Mr. Miers, who was released from Pennsylvania Child Care in September.

"I'm not going to say I'm traumatized, but in a way I really am just because of all I went through, being shackled all them hours and everything else," he said Friday. "The stuff I went through I'll never forget."

Tracie Mauriello can be reached at tmauriello@post-gazette.com or 1-717-787-2141.
First published on February 15, 2009 at 12:00 am
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top