The point had nothing to do with the PAC 10 not showing up for bowl games.  The point was 
1) It is ludicrous to judge a conference by bowl games alone
2) USC beat 3 excellent teams not in PAC 10
3) What does the poor showing by PAC 10 teams have to do with USC - Michigan?
	
		
			
		
		
	
			
			1) It is ludicrous to judge a conference by bowl games alone
2) USC beat 3 excellent teams not in PAC 10
3) What does the poor showing by PAC 10 teams have to do with USC - Michigan?
				
		
 